The Frontstretch: Crime and Punishment Not Always Equal in NASCAR by Amy Henderson -- Friday May 2, 2008

Go to site navigation Go to article

Crime and Punishment Not Always Equal in NASCAR

Holding A Pretty Wheel · Amy Henderson · Friday May 2, 2008


When it comes to the rules, it’s long been lamented that NASCAR writes
with disappearing ink. More often than not, the complaints are about the rules not being applied fairly, which is often the case. However, it seems to me that the rules could use a little tweaking in the consequences department. The outcome does not always make the most sense in light of the infraction.

The punishment should fit the crime.

For example, if a car is found to be illegal after qualifying, the time is thrown away. However, under current NASCAR rules, if the team is in the Top 35 in owner points, they race anyway, while those outside go home. In essence, there are two separate punishments for the same crime. That’s just not right. The Top 35 rule should apply to those whose cars qualified within the rules, period.

Another time when the punishment was almost, but not quite right was last summer at Sonoma, when the cars of Jeff Gordon and Jimmie Johnson were caught with funky fenders that resulted in a myriad of penalties, some of which have never been seen since. I agree completely that if a car fails opening technical inspection, NASCAR should pull them from practice. But if that is the case, every car, every week that fails opening inspection should miss practice, no questions asked. Currently most are allowed to fix the issue and re-inspect.

NASCAR’s current penalty to teams that fail opening inspection gives an unfair advantage to cars locked into the Top 35.

I don’t agree that those cars should have been pulled from qualifying. They should have had to fix them and, having missed practice, gone out with the best setups they could think of with no practice time and hoped for the best. Otherwise, a locked in car has a competitive advantage over a team outside the magic Top 35, should they receive the penalty Gordon and Johnson got slapped with.

Then you get to the heart of the matter. Saturday’s Nationwide Series race at Talladega provided the case in point. Clint Bowyer got socked with an extra trip to pit road for coming off pit road and blending with traffic too soon, a move which could have caused a huge wreck. Cars coming off the flat apron onto the high banking are unstable and cars closing at a faster speed just beg for trouble. Bowyer got lucky and didn’t cause the Big One.

Enter Kevin Lepage.

Lepage made the same mistake that Bowyer had earlier, only he made it with the lead pack of cars bearing down on him running approximately 70 mph faster than he was. Some cars did get around Lepage, but it was inevitable that they wouldn’t all be so lucky. Lepage’s car was destroyed, so NASCAR couldn’t give him the same penalty as Bowyer. NASCAR chose not to penalize at all, probably figuring that enough damage had been done.

Not quite. A fitting punishment for Lepage’s dangerous lack of judgment is actually quite simple: the $24,608 (and yes, the size of that purse is a crime in itself) that Lepage won should have been instead distributed to the teams whose cars were wrecked by his carelessness. A punishment of this type would certainly not be well-received by the sponsors, which is, ultimately, the point. Threat of sponsor or money loss might make some drivers think about the moves they make on track. That would be a good thing.

I don’t think beating and banging and showing personality is bad. It is certainly not “detrimental to stock car racing” in any way. But sometimes it is detrimental to a competitor’s chances of a decent finish, and that’s when NASCAR needs to look long and hard at their rules. A fine and even a point penalty of the size that’s been given in the past isn’t a deterrent. Finishing one spot behind the car taken out by a driver’s recklessness might send a stronger message.

NASCAR should take a look at the rule book and revamp some rules so that the punishments fit, without exceeding, the infraction they are handed out for. It might make some drivers and teams think about their actions-without paying more than they should. There’s more than one place for parity in racing.

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

05/02/2008 08:10 AM

Great ideas that have been talked about forever….equal treatment in nascrap? How dare you suggest such a thing?

05/02/2008 08:29 AM

I like the disappearing ink comment.NAPCAR will never change as long as the current spin doctors are at the controls.

05/02/2008 02:16 PM

Motorsports are the only sports that I can think of where the carelessness of a competitor can completely remove another team from the event. You can also dominate an entire event but be beaten by every other team in the league because of such carelessness and all that is remembered is a big fat DNF to show the world what a failure you truly are. If your name isn’t Earnhard or Gordon, etc. nobody cares how well you almost finished.


Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Earnhardt Ganassi Racing Announces Partnership with Cessna, Textron
Fans To Decide Format of Sprint Unlimited at Daytona
UNOH and Kentucky Speedway Extend Sponsorship Agreement
Earnhardt Out For Charlotte and Kansas After Talldega Concussion
Piquet, Jr. Wins K&N East Opener

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.