The Frontstretch: Best of Holding A Pretty Wheel: Ten Things I Hate About You, NASCAR by Amy Henderson -- Friday June 6, 2008

Go to site navigation Go to article

Best of Holding A Pretty Wheel: Ten Things I Hate About You, NASCAR

Holding A Pretty Wheel · Amy Henderson · Friday June 6, 2008


There has been a lot of talk this season about NASCAR’s declining ratings, and, if fewer TV viewers is a valid indicator, declining popularity. Fans say they just don’t care as much as they used to, that the races aren’t exciting, that the television coverage is subpar. NASCAR blames anyone they can-except themselves. The really sad part is, NASCAR either had the opportunity to fix many of the things that fans have cited as reasons for leaving and refused, or whistled innocently and pointed the finger anywhere but at themselves. Thinking about what the real problems in the sport today are, and how easily they can/could have been fixed, makes me really wonder. Not that NASCAR has done anything to make us think they actually care about the fans, but sometimes it seems as though they only keep some things in place to save face and not look stupid.

What, exactly is wrong with NASCAR today? Well, that could take all night, but here are my top picks.

A constant complaint of media and fans alike is NASCAR inconsistency in enforcing the rules. This is most evident in penalties following infractions found during pre-race inspection.

1. Inconsistency in enforcing the rules. Contrary to reports of sightings at Roswell and the Enchanted Forest, the rulebook does, in fact, exist. There’s a copy on the coffee table, if you want to know the truth. The problem is, even when there are specific consequences written, the sanctioning body skirts them, and where they aren’t written, they vary from team to team, apparently on a whim. They crack down on some teams harder than others for the same offense and choose not to punish some offenders at all while nailing others to the proverbial cross. I don’t care who sells the most merchandise or diversifies the field-punishment should be uniform for the same crime.

2. Ridiculous race times. Remember when races started at noon or one o’clock and ended before dinnertime? Me too. I used to watch them in their entirety then. I get the push to accommodate West Coast fans, but come on. Accommodate them when the race is on the west coast. Oh, wait, they don’t actually GO to the race if it’s out there, yet they’re mysteriously going to watch it? Please. Go back to one o’clock and maybe fans won’t ditch the broadcast in favor of a family dinner.

3. The Chase. Excitement cannot be manufactured. We know it’s fake. If you’re 600+ points behind the point leader with ten to go, there’s probably a reason-like you haven’t performed as well as he has-and you do NOT deserve the championship. Period. Yet they have the points handed to them for their substandard performance and pretend they were contenders all along. Don’t try to sell me on that. Tenth or twelfth place is an impressive season-but not a championship run. Let the REAL championship caliber teams fight it out. We got a champion who flat didn’t deserve it one year, and got cheated out of the closest title margin in history (although at least the real winner got to take home the trophy) another. It worked out once in three years. Only in baseball should you be considered a success if you fail two out of three times.

4. The top-35 rule. Where in the real word are people rewarded for something they did last week-or even last year-if they don’t do their job this week? Imagine some guy winning Employee of the Week even though he lost three clients and bombed a presentation-because he did well six months ago. You’d be pissed. But here we are, being told by NASCAR that we love this rule because we’re guaranteed to see all the top drivers every week. That’s a deep load to be buried under. Qualifying should be the fastest drivers right now-not yesterday. Nobody who beats ten cars in time trials should go home because he wasn’t good enough before-he’s good enough now. Sure there should be a system in place for someone who crashes on his run, especially if it’s due to rain or someone else’s oil slick- but five or six cars should not be going home each week when five or six other cars ran slower. Don’t insult out intelligence-we know the definition of the word race, and “slow guy wins” isn’t it.

5. TV coverage. It doesn’t matter what network it’s on, ultimately NASCAR could have had more control over the contracts and still come out with a gajillion dollars in profit. They could have had in the contracts that the networks must show all restarts live, must come back from break if there is a caution, must limit the number of times they explain “tight” and “loose.” But it might have meant a few grand less in their pockets, so we’re stuck with more “entertainment” and less racing.

6. Ignoring their storied history. Want a quick and easy move that would be a great PR move and would cost nothing? Return Darlington to the schedule at Labor Day instead of Mother’s Day. NASCAR’s not going to give the storied track a second date, but they could give them the right date-and create a lot of goodwill in the process. After all, if, as NASCAR preaches, the best dates are doled out to the tracks who sell the tickets, Darlington deserves that date even more-after all, they sell out their one race each spring. California can’t even fill the stands once, let alone twice, so it doesn’t matter what two times they run. But restore the Southern 500, and it just might appease some old-time fans. At least a little.

7. Marketing to the wrong audience. The fans NASCAR has attracted in the recent huge growth are all well and good. Some will no doubt become diehard fans. But many-most, I fear-are simply latching onto a trend, and will move on once the Next Big Thing rolls around. By catering to this new breed of fan and ignoring the fans who have always been there, NASCAR is creating a precarious situation. Someday they might turn around and find there’s nobody left.

8. Trying to be something they’re not. Racing is not a stick and ball sport. Its beginnings are in the Southern Appalachians where the toughness and bravery of many of the moonshiners would put the most hardened NFL linebacker to shame. Don’t try to be something you’re not, when what you have is something unique and special.

9. Ignoring the fans. NASCAR would do well to select a panel of fans at each track and sit in a room with them. They would find that often what fans want is simple. If they actually listened, and weren’t afraid to admit they were wrong when something, like the Chase or the qualifying rules doesn’t work for the fans, and made changes accordingly, it just might restore the ratings.

10. Sacrificing good racing for demographics. The argument for taking first one date, then two, from Rockingham was that the track wasn’t selling out. So California got two dates instead-and they don’t sell out either-but at least the racing at The Rock was good! I’d be willing to bet that a race at Rockingham would be consistent in the television ratings with most of the others, maybe a bit better, like Bristol tends to be, because the racing is exciting. If the product isn’t good, consumers won’t buy it for long-and nobody likes cookie-cutter product, unless, of course, it’s a cookie.

So, there, in a nutshell, is my take on what’s wrong in NASCAR today. It’s painful to look at. But it’s fixable. It would all be fixable if only NASCAR knew it was broken.

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Mike In NH
06/06/2008 08:56 AM

Amy, can you clarify #8? I get the impression that you think the sport should only be in the Southeast, but I’m not sure that’s what you mean. Is it?

06/06/2008 10:42 AM

Mike, that is not what I mean by that at all. I sometimes get the impression that NASCAR is embarrassed by its beginnings in ‘shine running and the South in general. A couple of years back, NASCAR denied a team a one race sponsorship because the name of the sponsor had the word “redneck” in it-it was a collectibles website or something similar. I think. NASCAR denied a team that money simply because they didn’t like the connotation. I’m not saying that fans, Southern or otherwise,are “rednecks” but it seems that NASCAR was afraid of the term beyond the fear of offending anyone.

I don’t think that all of NASCAR’s races should be in the Southeast (although I DO strongly believe that racing, and not “market” should determine the venues NASCAR uses!) but their roots are unique, and NASCAR shouldn’t pretend the sport was not born in the place, time, and circumstances that it was.

06/06/2008 12:42 PM

Good ones.

Off the top of my head – three things (race related only) I hate about you, Nascar.
1. Competition red flags.
2. No going below the yellow line.
3. Commitment cone.

M.B. Voelker
06/06/2008 01:47 PM

Seems to me that #4 and #6 are at cross-purposes.

If what they did last week isn’t good enough to carry over and help you make the race on a driver/team level why should what happened 5, 10, or 20 years ago have anything to do with keeping a track on the schedule?

IMO, sports are about performance. Individual drivers/teams should have to perform to be in the race and individual tracks should have to perform to stay on the schedule.

06/06/2008 04:15 PM

Sorry, M.B., but I don’t see much of a decline in the quality of racing at Darlington, and, if this year’s ARCA race is any indication, Rockingham-other than what can be directly attributed to the tires and evolution of the cars themselves. Far, far, far more fans tune in on TV each week than sit in the stands, even at the biggest race track, so NASCAR should be giving the majority of the fans the best race they can put on, not in the new, popular, bandwagon market, but in the racing nation in general. They screwed Rockingham themselves-a better date would have put a much higher number of bottoms in the seats. The ARCA race at The Rock was ten times better than any NASCAR race this year other than maybe Bristol and Martinsville-it was about a hundred times better then California, the track that replaced it on the schedule, and Darlington was better than Phoenix, the track that replaced one of ITS dates. In the end, it is the television profits that pad the pockets of the higher-ups more than ticket sales.

Performance SHOULD be judged on the track, you are right about that-and as far as the schedule is concerned, it is not.

06/08/2008 10:28 PM

Please add Darrell Waltrips mouth as #11. It was very enjoyable watching the race today on TNT, without Darrell centering on Mikey, or how he did it when he was racing. Kyle Petty was quite the antithesis, concentrating on the racing, similar to Neil Bonnett or Benny Parsons. I did not miss Hollyweird Hammons either, who is actually just Barney to Waltrip’s Andy imitation.


Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Earnhardt Ganassi Racing Announces Partnership with Cessna, Textron
Fans To Decide Format of Sprint Unlimited at Daytona
UNOH and Kentucky Speedway Extend Sponsorship Agreement
Earnhardt Out For Charlotte and Kansas After Talldega Concussion
Piquet, Jr. Wins K&N East Opener

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.