The Frontstretch: Need A Date? Sorry, Kentucky, NHMS Isn't Your Type! by Amy Henderson -- Friday June 26, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

Need A Date? Sorry, Kentucky, NHMS Isn't Your Type!

Holding A Pretty Wheel · Amy Henderson · Friday June 26, 2009

 

The NASCAR Sprint Cup circuit swings north this week for the first of two visits to New Hampshire Motor Speedway. The quirky little one-mile oval, dubbed the “Magic Mile” years back, is a bit of a shock to those driving up Route 106 and caught unaware. Coming from the north, as I do, you pass a small lake and a lot of pine trees. On a regular day, when there is no activity at the track, it looms up suddenly and silently out of those pines, though over the years more inroads and parking areas have invaded the giant trees.

Race fans have a sometimes contentious relationship with the Magic Mile—the contention owing to a track that fans just don’t seem to know what to make of, less than stellar racing in the track’s past, and television networks’ seeming inability to show any racing that isn’t among the top five and occasionally Dale Junior. With Speedway Motorsports, Incorporated’s latest purchase of Kentucky Speedway, there are those fans who would like to see NHMS lose one of their two dates in favor of the 1.5-mile oval in Sparta.

To this notion I say, “Wait just one minute!”

Now, it is true that I am a bit partial to the track. It is really my “home track.” I grew up in Campton, NH, just 45 minutes north of Loudon, and I saw my first auto race of any kind at the Magic Mile.

Maybe that’s a part of the reason, but it isn’t all. I’ve seen some great races at NHMS: my first ever race, when Dale Earnhardt picked off drivers one by one, like a panther tracking its prey, until time ran out and he was second to a young driver who would go on to make the track his personal playground. I saw Ryan Newman, Robby Gordon, and Joe Nemechek take home their first Cup victories and Tony Stewart come oh-so-close to his first win only to lose it on fuel mileage. I saw Stewart win on a rainswept, dreary Sunday to honor his competitor and friend Kenny Irwin, who had died on that same track just two days before.

But I’ve seen some bad races as well. The year that Irwin was killed, his was not the first death in Turn 3 at Loudon. Adam Petty lost his life in that same corner just two months earlier, due ultimately to a rash of hung throttles on GM engines (a problem that was known to NASCAR prior to Petty’s death and had a fairly simple fix) and the then-Busch Series race that weekend (it was a stand-alone then, and probably the most fun race weekend the track hosted) was held on a cold, rainy day that saw Tim Fedewa take the checkers and dedicate the hollow victory to Petty, as Stewart would do for Irwin within a matter of weeks. That same rash of stuck throttles led to a restrictor plate race at the Magic Mile in September of 2000 which was a thorough disaster-Jeff Burton led every lap and the plates didn’t slow the cars down enough to save anyone should a throttle have stuck wide open. Luckily, even NASCAR saw the hopelessness of their solution and let the cars run unrestricted the following year.

New Hampshire Motor Speedway is technical and demanding, and its unique design should be reason enough to keep two dates on the Cup schedule.

But every track has both good and bad races, so that’s not the only reason, perhaps not even the best reason, for the track to keep both of it’s race dates.
.
The most compelling reason, to me, is that NHMS is unique. There are no other flat, asphalt one-mile ovals shaped like a paperclip on the Cup circuit. In fact there are few one-mile tracks at all anymore. The track is technical and demanding. Teams have to chase the setup all weekend long, and drivers have to time each corner precisely in order to pass and, ultimately, win. The racing is only boring to the untrained eye, because there is really a lot of it. It may not be for the lead, but there is racing a-plenty—a fact fully supported by loop data. The track is different and has become racier than many of the plethora of 1.5 or two-mile ovals that litter the schedule these days. There are many of that type of track on the circuit—the sport is saturated with them, and should never allow another to take the place of a unique track, especially one that has sold out every Cup race it has ever hosted (a mark that may fall by the wayside this weekend as every track struggles to fill the stands, but still worthy of mention as NHMS is one of a very small handful of tracks to sell out two races a year.). None of the 1.5 or two-mile ovals sell out one race a year (with the exception of Las Vegas), let alone two.

One other compelling reason to keep NHMS on the schedule twice a year for the foreseeable future is that the track has never sat on its sold-out laurels and management has always gone above and beyond to assure that the track improves for the racers and fans. Former owner Bob Bahre worked tirelessly to improve the track—trying different sealers and widening the racing surface in order to improve the racing—and it worked, as the Little Track that Could has gone from a single groove to a multi-grooved surface. Bahre also made sure the fans were taken care of. Camping at the track for years cost nothing. Eventually Bahre decided to charge a modest fee for the week, in exchange for larger spaces and enforced family camping areas. The money was poured into more improvements, a task which new owner SMI has continued, under Bahre’s direction as a consultant. (I went to the track office on Wednesday of this week and Bahre was the first person I saw when I walked in the door—his presence is still felt keenly.) Simply put, few other racetracks have undergone the transformations that NHMS has, at great expense, all to make things better for race teams and fans.

So, Bruton Smith-when you consider where to cull a race date from in order to add Kentucky Speedway to the schedule, please consider Atlanta—take a 1.5-mile track in place of another, not at the expense of a fan-friendly, unique, quirky racetrack that has evolved slowly into a premier venue. NASCAR, please don’t consider anything less than cookie-cutter for cookie-cutter as you consider a scheduling request. NHMS has too much going for it to see a race fall away.

NASCAR needs something unique in a cookie-cutter world. It has just that in the Magic Mile, the racetrack that rises gracefully from New Hampshire’s rocky hills and pine forests to loom over Route 106. It’s a track that makes racers race but they know that the trophy is well and truly earned. It is truly the fans’ track. It would be a shame to lose all of that.

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
NASCAR Easter Eggs: A Few Off-Week Nuggets to Chew On
Five Points To Ponder: NASCAR’s Take-A-Breath Moment
Truckin’ Thursdays: Top Five All-Time Truck Series Drivers
Going By the Numbers: A Week Without Racing Can Bring Relief But Kill Momentum
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Ken
06/26/2009 07:43 AM
permalink

Suggestion! Take a date away from California and give it to Kentucky! Oh wait, that won’t happen! After all, NASCAR’s ISC must protect their own interests first, even if it is to protect the lousiest track on the tour! I know I’ll get kicked in the head for this one, but I like Kentucky a whole lot better that the disaster known as Fontana, even if Roush drivers always seem to be able to win there in February.

Gordon82Wins
06/26/2009 07:46 AM
permalink

Nothing against Kentucky, but we have enough 1.5 mile speedways.

Reva Lynn Beagle
06/26/2009 08:43 AM
permalink

I live in Kentucky, and happen to like our track. I’d like to see California lose one of it’s races and bring it here. Trust me, it would be a sell out crowd!

chris
06/26/2009 10:32 AM
permalink

I like diversity in the series. I’d like to see Kentucky get 1 race, but I agree that it should come at the expense of a similarly configured track (or something there might be too much of). I think that Atlanta and Fontana are likely candidates. No way Charlotte is losing a date, not even if they sold zero tickets. I’m selfish and wouldn’t want Texas to lose a date. That, and attendance there is nuts (no it doesn’t sell out, but it’s just got too much seating more than it has a ticket selling problem). I find Michigan to be a little…dry, but I don’t have any idea what attendance is like there.

Of course, it won’t matter till the former owners drop their lawsuit.

I think that “2nd races” at all the tracks should be rotated, or bid on, or something, or perhaps a weighted lottery based on % of attendance/total attendance.

Michael
06/26/2009 11:00 AM
permalink

I live in So Cal, but I wouldn’t have any problem with Fontana giving up a race if it went somewhere with good racing. I am more than a little bored with the cookie cutter track designs these days, especially in the 1.5 to 2 mile size.

I like the idea that second races should be rotated, at least for the cookie cutter tracks. Leave the short tracks alone, same with the plate tracks. Do that weighted lettery that Chris talks about.

Prof pi (Jeff Thompson)
06/26/2009 11:39 AM
permalink

There’s a good reason why NHIS is interesting, and several of them are included in my blog: flat, small radius turns, historical location, real racing that requires driver, set-up, and engineering.

mkrcr
06/26/2009 04:13 PM
permalink

I don’t think it much matters if Kentucky gets a date or which track loses a date. As long as the Crap of Today car is there and the Crap of Today network is broadcasting it, the racing still sucks.
Cookie Cutter tracks, Cookie Cutter cars, and Cookie Cutter networks. Nap time!

Rex
06/26/2009 07:02 PM
permalink

Obviously, this track has a lot going for it, but I would like to see more side by side racing. Bruton probably could bank the turns more to create this? It is not a very exciting race.

 

Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Earnhardt Ganassi Racing Announces Partnership with Cessna, Textron
Fans To Decide Format of Sprint Unlimited at Daytona
UNOH and Kentucky Speedway Extend Sponsorship Agreement
Earnhardt Out For Charlotte and Kansas After Talldega Concussion
Piquet, Jr. Wins K&N East Opener

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.