The Frontstretch: NASCAR: The first step is admitting you have a Buschwhacking problem. by Amy Henderson -- Thursday March 23, 2006

Go to site navigation Go to article

NASCAR: The first step is admitting you have a Buschwhacking problem.

Second Fiddle: Around the Busch and Craftsman Truck Series · Amy Henderson · Thursday March 23, 2006


There has been a lot of controversy recently about so-called Buschwhackers "" full-time Nextel Cup Drivers running more than a handful of races in the NASCAR Busch Series-and the effect-largely negative-that they have on the overall and long-term health of that series. While it is true that these stars put bodies in the seats, they also attract sponsors away from full-time Busch-only teams, and they bring resources with them that the Busch-only teams can only dream of, because at least part of the problem is that most of them run for Cup owners with nearly unlimited resources and technology.

There is no solution in sight, because NASCAR has refused to address the issue. Some would argue that there is no single, viable solution. But I say otherwise. There are several possible-and easy to implement-solutions. Any one of these would drastically reduce the number and influence of Buschwhackers in NBS races; two or more would effectively return the Busch Series to the teams that put their heart and soul into it each week.

The first solution is to award zero owner’s or driver’s points to any team that has both and owner and driver running for a Nextel Cup title (meaning running the entire Cup schedule). The Cup drivers could still race, but points would be awarded only to the exclusively Busch teams. This would ensure that only a Busch Series team could win the Busch Series Championship. Alternately, NASCAR could simply not allow any driver/owner combo to run for points in both series. Theoretically, this would allow some Cup drivers to field their own teams or run for another owner, or for a Cup owner to have a young development driver run in the Busch Series. It would definitely reduce the concept of using the Busch race simply as extra Cup practice.

The second solution is to simply limit either the number of Busch races that a Cup driver can enter (allow, say, five or six, maybe up to ten for a Cup rookie) OR the number of Cup drivers that can enter a Busch Race any given week. This could be determined through either the order entries are received or through qualifying (the top drivers up to the number allowed make the race, the rest go home), would be relatively easy to enforce, and would still ensure that fans saw a handful of their favorite stars each week.

Third-and the Car of Tomorrow will be a temporary step in this direction-if the cars’ engines and/or body packages were far different in both series, it would take away the "extra Cup practice" contingent running the Busch races primarily to garner information for the next day’s Cup race. I’m no mechanic, and I won’t profess to know what changes to make-but it would be a viable solution when paired with one of the others. Or, run two different tire compounds for each series. Many other NASCAR divisions frequently race with Hoosier tires, which are significantly different from Goodyears-changing brands could be a long-term benefit for the series.

Another rule that could-and should-be instituted is eliminating "locked-in" status to Cup drivers, whether they’re in the top 30 in NBS points or not. Instead, give guaranteed starting spots to the top Busch-only teams, which would allow new Busch teams with young drivers the race experience that they desperately need, instead of being denied when a Cup driver takes a starting spot from them every week.

In addition, the distribution of prize money should be changed. First place prize money should be given to the top-finishing Busch team and so on. If there are 25 Busch teams and eighteen Cup teams in a race, the highest prize money one of those Cup teams should be eligible for is 26th, regardless of finish. The Busch teams are already struggling on less sponsorship money, and NBS purses are often meager compared to their Cup counterparts.

Finally, a viable solution that would improve competition across the board is to institute a spending cap in the Busch Series. Yes, it would be difficult to police, requiring a team of accountants to audit each team’s books-but it would allow and ensure equal footing for all comers in the series. If a team like Roush Racing or Hendrick Motorsports was allowed to have no more resources than a team like ppc Racing-or better yet, one like Curb-Agajanian or Keith Coleman Racing ""then they would no longer have an unfair advantage, and it would be easier for Busch teams to attract sponsors who simply can’t compete financially with Cup money. As a long-term solution, this would be the best way to ensure parity in the series without drastically changing its face.

So, next time you hear a NASCAR official or race team owner say that there isn’t an easy or viable solution, know that there is. The problem is, in order to institute a solution, NASCAR has to first admit that there is a problem, and then put the long-term success of the series ahead of the short-term gains from ticket sales.

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Swan Racing Announces Restructuring, No. 26 & No. 30 ‘Sold’ Off
Tech Talk with Tony Gibson: Taking Stock Of Danica Patrick In Year Two
Vexing Vito: Three Drivers In Need of a Role Reversal
Going By the Numbers: Top-10 NASCAR Variety Hard To Come By In…
Truckin’ Thursdays: Lessons Learned Just Two Races In
Fantasy Insider: Team Revelations For NASCAR’s Short Tracks



©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

03/24/2006 04:41 AM

Here’s another idea. Nascar wants to limit Cup owners to 4 teams. Why not make that 4 teams in any combination over all 3 of the top series? If Roush wants 4 Cup teams, he cant field his own Busch or Truck teams. If he wants to get seat time for his rookies he would have to find a full time Busch or Truck team to put him in their seat. That might work.

Charlie D.
03/24/2006 04:47 AM

First off NASCAR car will never do it… the money is the most important thing to them.

They don’t care that they are screwing people (Busch teams) in the process.

Let tomorrow take of it’s self, but if it don’t work out, we can always change the rules… again.

Just wait… the Car of Tomorrow will screw up the Cup Series and then NASCAR can boast that they have two mongrel series.

03/24/2006 05:37 AM

It’s the start of Nascar’s version of football’s AFC / NFC.

03/24/2006 07:10 AM

Drivers with full time Cup rides who won a Cup race in the previous year should not be allowed to participate in the Busch series or in the Truck series.

M. B. Voelker
03/24/2006 10:37 AM

You can’t make different rules for different people.

The way to solve the problem is to address the actual cause—restricted Cup practice last year and restricted Cup testing this year combined with two close a converence of the equipment.

Change the Busch equipment so that its no longer possible to learn enough to make “testing in the Busch series” worthwhile and there will be no motivation for the Cup teams. It will be back to only those few drivers who just can’t stand to hear cars racing without being out there with them.

The oldest tradition in racing is that anyone with a legal car and a lisenced driver can attempt to qualify for the field. That shouldn’t be messed with lightly. And anyone who has ever complained about Nascar having no respect for tradition should be ashamed to even consider breaking that one.

03/24/2006 10:43 AM

watching some cup drivers i like is usually what draws me to watch busch races ,but i do agree it’s unfair to full time busch, i agree put there pay scale behind busch drivers,let the up an comers get there glory an rewards.

03/24/2006 09:29 PM

How about limiting the on-track time per driver for the weekend? You get x time for practice. One hour in the Busch car is one less hour in the Cup car. NASCAR makes a rule in the interest of “cutting the busy schedule” that happens to have a side-effect.

jim cunningham
03/24/2006 10:20 PM

cup drivers should not ruin busch because they can. limits can be found if the dictatorship want’s to

03/24/2006 11:10 PM

I don’t mind the Cup boys running in the Bush if they are running for the championship, like Carl Edwards for example. But I disagree with them running for “fun” or “practice”. It ruins it for the true Bush guys who work hard only to be beat out by those who have the more money, equipment, and experience.

03/26/2006 10:29 PM

I would tune in to the Busch Series races even if there were no “Buschwhackers”, because those guys are the stars of tomorrow! It’s interesting to see the up-and-comers race. That said, I don’t mind seeing my driver in the mix every once in a while. It bothers me, though, that the Cup drivers are able to race for the Busch Championship, though, and I have a solution for that one – simply plan Busch Series races at locations far from the Cup race that weekend. Nextel Cup racing in California? Okay! Busch guys race in Nashville! If the Cup drivers miss a few races in the Busch Series, there’s no way they’ll be able to race for the title. I’m sure they’ll win most of the year’s Busch races anyway, but at least an actual Busch-only driver can come out victorious in the end.


Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Earnhardt Ganassi Racing Announces Partnership with Cessna, Textron
Fans To Decide Format of Sprint Unlimited at Daytona
UNOH and Kentucky Speedway Extend Sponsorship Agreement
Earnhardt Out For Charlotte and Kansas After Talldega Concussion
Piquet, Jr. Wins K&N East Opener

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.