The Frontstretch: Really?! by Amy Henderson -- Friday September 11, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

Really?!

Holding A Pretty Wheel · Amy Henderson · Friday September 11, 2009

 

Strange things are afoot at the Circle K.

Or at least it seems that way lately. Maybe it’s just me, but several tidbits lately have me doing a double take. I know it’s called silly season for a reason, but this year has gone beyond silly and right on into downright ridiculous.

The latest piece of news is that Yates Racing and Richard Petty Motorsports will merge in 2010. That one came straight out of left field. The first thing that comes to mind is yet another person trying to get by on the Petty name. The second is that I feel kind of sorry for Reed Sorenson, even if he’s not the world’s greatest driver, because he’s at least as good as Paul Menard, who will get the No. 43 (I’m guessing on the number; one of them will keep it for sure) ride for no reason other than his family’s money. I also feel for Jamie McMurray, whose No. 26 team would likely have moved on over to Yates Racing when his Roush-Fenway Team is forced to close to meet the 2010 four-team limit. Unless Roush-Fenway continues with Hall Of Fame Racing, who is also dropped like a hot potato in this deal, and could perhaps foist McMurray’s team on them-not that they’re ready for a second team, but they would likely take any deal RFR offered just to stay afloat.

But wait! There’s more. Richard Petty Motorsports will field Fords next season for Menard, Elliott Sadler, A.J. Allmendinger, and Kasey Kahne. Yeah, that Kasey Kahne-the same one Ford sued for breach of contract when Kahne accepted his Sprint Cup ride with what was then Evernham Motorsports, because the driver had a development deal with the manufacturer, and Evernham ran Dodges. Even more ironic is that Ford had Kahne paired with then-Robert Yates Racing. But I guess it’s all good now? Strange bedfellows…

Kasey Kahne, who was sued by Ford for breach of contract when he accepted a Sprint Cup ride with Evernham, could find himself behind the wheel of a Fusion next season.

As if all that wasn’t crazy enough, there’s still the looming Chase, whose dozen participants will be determined by Sunday morning. Only four drivers are assured a spot, and fifth place is just 105 points ahead of 13th. Both Brian Vickers and Kyle Busch are just waiting to capitalize on anybody’s misfortune—and at Richmond, anyone can run into a problem. Matt Kenseth is currently 12th, just 17 points ahead of Brian Vickers, and should he miss out, it will be the first time that he isn’t in Cup contention since the Chase began—and it will also leave Jimmie Johnson as the only driver to make the Chase every year since its inception.

Speaking of crazy and the Chase, how about the fact that unless Tony Stewart or Johnson wins Saturday night, Mark Martin, who is currently in just 10th place, will show up in Loudon as the point leader? I know winning is important, but on what planet is Martin having a better season than Stewart? Handing a driver who barely squeaks into the playoffs at all the lead is just silly.

Almost as silly as having a playoff system in which you don’t have to win a single race to get in. Ironically it was Matt Kenseth’s 2003 season, in which he won the championship with just one win, that brought the Chase about. NASCAR’s reasoning for the whole Chase abomination was that it would put more emphasis on winning versus simply being consistently in the top 5 or 10 each week. But this year, four drivers without a single win to date will likely make it in, while three drivers sitting just outside all have at least one points win.

So, NASCAR, is winning the point, or isn’t it? If it’s not, then stop trying to be the NFL and lose the Chase, which is possibly the second worst idea ever, behind the top 35 rule. If it is, then make the Chase about the top 12 full-time drivers who have won races, not just stroked the points to get in. This year, that would mean just 11 drivers in, unless one of the oh-fers wins in Richmond. I do not and never will like the Chase system, but if it’s supposed to be about winning, put the winners in.

On the bright side, NASCAR hit a home run last weekend by moving the Labor Day weekend show to Atlanta. I hate that the sanctioning body panders to “markets” instead of setting the schedule based on racing, but at least this time they seem to have pandered to a market that really cares. Atlanta was packed, and you have to wonder if many of those fans are the same ones who went faithfully to Darlington to ring out the summer every year. It’s still not right, but at least there wasn’t the gaping hole that there has been since the race moved to California. The race should be at Darlington, but at least NASCAR got the market right—and the attendance proves it.

It’s silly season in NASCAR, and this year’s is a doozy. But don’t stop the ride just yet—I’m not ready to get off.

DON’T LET THE FINAL WEEKEND OF SILLY SEASON PASS YOU BY!

The Frontstretch Newsletter’s got you covered all weekend long as Managing Editor Tom Bowles gives you all the latest news from Homestead. And if you don’t get the Newsletter… now’s your chance to sign up. It’s action-packed with the latest in breaking news, commentary, and driver features from your favorite writers … and it gets sent FREE right into your email inbox! Click here to jump on board with content you won’t see anywhere else on the site.

 

©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

 

chris
09/11/2009 11:22 AM
permalink

seemed kinda left-field to me as well, Amy.

The rumor (or general consensus from a couple of different folks) runs along the line of:
9 – Kahne
98 – Menard
28 – Sadler
43 – Dinger.

All of which makes sense to me (given the presence of the previous information).

Bob8828
09/11/2009 11:30 AM
permalink

Maybe someone is not trying to “get by on the Petty name”, Maybe Gilette is out of cash! Maybe it is team 5,6,7,& 8 for RFR. But I wouldn’t think Jack would hire Sadler, must be an iron clad contract.

Bill B
09/11/2009 11:51 AM
permalink

Talk about watered-down ownership…
Evernham sells part of company to Gillette…
Gillete merges with Petty…
Gillette-Petty merges with Yates
Somewhere there is a lawyer getting rich writing up what must be a very complex ownership structure.

Very surprised Sadler is being kept given the fact he was out the door before the season started and his past history with Yates.

glenn
09/11/2009 12:24 PM
permalink

Sorenson is definitely better than Menard, but I don’t feel for Jamie, he has performed poorly in a team of well prepared equipment. Over-rated. No doubt Dinger will get the 43, I hope he does well. At least they didn’t go Toyota!

Mike-NH
09/11/2009 01:11 PM
permalink

The problem with the 12 racers with wins get in the Chase idea is that someone could win on an oddball course – a road, Indy-style, or superspeedway course – but still be in the Chase, even if they stunk up elsewhere. What if Marcos Ambrose won a road course race? Or Scott Pruett? Does he deserve to get in the Chase? Not likely. Right now Brad Keselowski would be in, and he’s only a part-timer.

I actually think if they’re going to have the Chase, they should simply award 10 spots to the top 8 points leaders, then have two “wild card” spots available for the two non-Chase winners that won the most races. That way you reward consistently good finishers, and wins. If you did that, then this year we’d be seeing (if the Chase started today) Biffle, Newman and Kenseth out and Kyle Busch and Mark Martin in, which makes more sense (even if you’re leaving a two race winner in Kenseth out). It’s still not perfect – you still see zero race winners in – but anyone who runs so consistently well as to be in the Top 8 deserves a shot.

Kevin in SoCal
09/11/2009 01:57 PM
permalink

Mike, you missed the part where she said only full-time drivers would make the Chase, so Brad K. would not be in it.

I also agree with your Chase modification, but I’d say to have it the top 10 plus 11 and 12 be the wild cards for the full-time winners who arent in the top ten. Also, the 11 and 12 wild cards would start 11th and 12th as they would get no bonus points for their wins. Only the top ten in points after Richmond would get the bonus points for their wins. This way there might be a little more emphasis on winning.

wcfan
09/12/2009 12:43 AM
permalink

I like the old system where you race for all 36 races and the most points wins. This year Martin will go from 500 points behind Smoke to the lead with a stroke of nascars pen. Martin would have no real shot at the title in the old system, but with the chase he is the man to beat. Just watch nascar do everything the can to help him.

Richard in N.C.
09/12/2009 07:10 PM
permalink

I happen to still think The Chase is a good concept, but still needs some tweaking – like increasing the amount of points given for winning and for finishing in the top 5.

Sure sounds to me like Yates is much better at building engines than at building a race team. RPM, Yates, and even Roush might all come out ahead with Doug Yates being able to focus on engine building and the Gillette group focusing on team management and sponsorship.

Matt
09/13/2009 07:44 PM
permalink

Sorenson has never really proven to be any better than Menard. Both are good Nationwide drivers, but Sorenson’s best success is all found at one track: Gateway. In Cup, both have been pretty average so far. It’s true that Menard is being kept because of the money, but that’s merely a tie-breaker. Neither deserves it any more than the other on merit alone.

 

Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Where, Oh Where Has the Underdog Gone?
The Racin', the Dumb, and the Just Flat Ugly: Where Do On-Track Incidents Rate?
Danica Needs NASCAR - But Is It a Two-Way Street?
Beyond the Cockpit: Michael Annett on Goals, Achievements, and the Stanley Cup
Spread Too Thin: Do Other Interests Slow Drivers' Cup Efforts?

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.