The Frontstretch: UNqualified Failure: Racing Isn't About Speed Anymore by Amy Henderson -- Monday February 22, 2010

Go to site navigation Go to article

UNqualified Failure: Racing Isn't About Speed Anymore

Holding A Pretty Wheel · Amy Henderson · Monday February 22, 2010

 

While 43 race teams prepared their cars for Saturday’s last practice sessions and Sunday’s race at Auto Club Speedway, what was happening to three other teams told an entirely different story. As race preparations began, the No. 90 Keyed-Up Motorsports entry driven by Casey Mears, the No. 36 Tommy Baldwin Racing Chevrolet driven by Johnny Sauter, and the No. 46 Dodge of Whitney Motorsports and driver Terry Cook were packed up and pushed onto their haulers for the long trip home, having qualified 44th-46th for 43 spots. It happens every week, and it’s never fun to watch. But the slowest cars have to go home, right?

Wrong.

The slowest cars didn’t leave Fontana. Mears, the fastest of the three drivers cut out of the field, was faster than five drivers who raced on Sunday, and would have made a field based on speed and not politics. So would Sauter and Cook, whose runs clocked in at 42nd and 43rd fastest on the day. But politics have shaped qualifying in a sport once shaped by speed, and it only continues to get uglier as time marches on.

There have been numerous changes to qualifying over the last dozen or so years, all catering more to the complaints of a few than to the good of the sport. In the mid-90’s, qualifying was a bit of a complicated process. On Friday, all entries made an attempt to qualify. The fastest 25 were locked into those positions. Anybody from 26th on back had a decision to make: stand on Friday’s time, or make a second attempt on Saturday. Any team choosing to make a second run would take Saturday’s first practice in qualifying trim, preparing for that qualifying attempt. Everyone else practiced in race trim.

The cars making a second run would slot in on speed from 26th on back. If the fastest car beat the pole speed, it still started 26th. What usually happened though, was that the cars making a second run slotted in around those who had stood on time. A driver who, in his second run, was slower than one who stood on time but faster than the next one would start between them. Positions from 39th to 43rd were provisional positions based on points and the past champion’s provisional, which was awarded first to the most recent champion.

But teams complained that this system was unfair to those who chose, or were forced by their first run, to requalify, because it robbed those teams of practice time in race trim, given that the locked in teams ran Saturday morning practice in race trim. So NASCAR changed it.

The next incarnation for the qualifying procedure implemented circa 2001, was simple enough: One round for the top 36 spots, and then provisionals awarded in the same manner as before-by points and past champion’s provisional. That way, the lineup was determined all at once, and everyone had equal practice time in race trim. But under this system, teams complained about the use of unlimited provisional starting spots, thus allowing teams to gain more points and therefore, more provisional spots.

So NASCAR limited the number of provisionals to six, with the opportunity to earn a handful more by attempting races all season. The complaint here was that teams would wait until many teams had exhausted their allotment and then make races on provisionals when they were clearly not good enough to make the field otherwise. In a final attempt to appease the latest group of complainers NASCAR devised the current system, locking in the top 35 in owners’ points and making everyone else race for what has become only seven other positions, as teams use semi-retired champions to make the field in the 43rd spot, which remains the past champion’s provisional.

Now, nearly every week faster teams go home while slower teams race. It was especially pronounced at Talladega a few years back, where teams qualifying in the top 10 and top 20 were sent home while slower cars limped in based on past accomplishments. The system is still abused. Teams are allowed to use points that they buy at the end of the season-points the team or driver never earned-to make races over faster teams. This past week at Fontana, Mears outqualified three teams who bought the owner points they used to make the race over him. Sauter and Cook each outran two of those. Only Robby Gordon and Travis Kvapil’s teams actually earned the points they used to vault in over these three teams (while Kvapil did not drive the No. 34 in 2009, the team finished 35th with John Andretti behind the wheel). And that’s unacceptable.

In a sport based on speed, no team who relies on recycling somebody else’s points should be racing. Really, why should anyone be allowed to rest on their laurels and slide into the field based on something they did last week, or even last year? That’s not racing, that’s politics.

Compounding the problem was the cars who made the race and then promptly parked-that must have been a real comfort, particularly to Mears, whose team says that they will not start and park. It’s unfortunate that trying to accommodate a few teams’ complaints has turned into a joke. There are options, but does NASCAR want to hear them?

The best option for the sport would be to drop locked in positions completely. This is easily done-if NASCAR kept the past champion’s provisional and perhaps two “regular” provisionals based on points, the field would be set the way it should-by the fastest cars this week. Not last week or last year, but right now.

But wait-it’s not quite that simple, you say. What if a top driver wrecks in qualifying? Should he go home? Well, yes. And no. So, to fix that, the simplest thing is to go back to the second round of qualifying. That’s right, with a few minor issues, NASCAR had it right 15 years ago, and only got this screwed up by their subsequent changes. But it would be easy to correct those issues. So, if the top 25 in qualifying lock in, and the others are forced to either stand on time or requalify, what about the complaints regarding practice time?

Easy enough. Simply have one half-hour practice before second round only for those teams who have relinquished their times to make a second attempt, and hold either two practices after the morning qualifying runs or one extended happy hour practice later. The practice issue is solved, and that way, one mistake during Friday’s run isn’t fatal.

And as for the worries that a top driver might still go home-this is racing, not little league soccer where everyone gets to play. If you can’t get the car fast enough to make the race after two attempts, you don’t deserve to race, whether your name is Johnson or Earnhardt, Mears or Sauter or Cook.

Should Even Dale Earnhardt, Jr. be sent home if he can’t qualify on speed alone?

If NASCAR can’t see it clear to base the race on speed, they need to at least look at dropping the number of locked in teams drastically to ten or fifteen at the outside. From there on back, it should be go or go home. Also, the sanctioning body should not allow the transfer of points from one team to another-only the team that earns those points should benefit. If a team goes away, like the No. 44 at Richard Petty Motorsports or the No. 07 at Richard Childress Racing, those points should go away as well. The only possible exception to this should be if a team should choose to transfer those points to the driver’s new team, or, in an even bigger stretch, if the crew goes intact to a new team and wishes to negotiate for them. In other words, only the No. 90 should have even been considered to be eligible to buy the No. 07’s points-as Mears, not Regan Smith in the No. 78 who reaped the benefit, earned the points. But even that’s a gray area.

Racing is, and should be, a sport based on one thing-how fast a competitor can go on any given day. What he did last week, or last year, shouldn’t be a part of that equation. There shouldn’t be seven spots up for grabs, there should be at least 40, if not all 43. It’s about racing, and regardless of your name or the number of trophies on your shelf it should all come down to one thing. Go. Or go home.

And another thing…

I really can’t wait until the first Nationwide race Danica Patrick isn’t in. Better yet, is there a race on the schedule that will not feature Patrick OR Kyle Busch? That one might be worth watching, as the other drivers might actually get some airtime.

Fontana was almost a good race. It was same old, same old for much of the day, but Kevin Harvick tried to make for a good finish-but got into the wall, allowing Jimmie Johnson to coast home with an easy lead. It was better than most Fontana races, though, which isn’t really saying that much.

Speaking of Fontana, there were a LOT of empty seats there…and that’s different from Rockingham was how, exactly? Oh that’s right, Rockingham had good racing for those of us watching on TV.

Finally, I think I’m going to give a shoutout each week to a driver who didn’t win the race but had a great day. This week, that’s Scott Speed, one of the drivers competing for those seven spots each week-Speed finished 11th at Auto Club Speedway, vaulting himslef into 15th place in drivers’ points-for those looking this early in the season, that’s ahead of such notables as four-time champ Jeff Gordon, two-time title winner Tony Stewart, or Most Popular Driver Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

Contact Amy Henderson

NEW YEAR? NEW NEWSLETTER. LOOKING FOR THE INFO YOU NEED ABOUT NASCAR IN 2013 – SENT RIGHT TO YOUR EMAIL INBOX?
Well, you’ve come to the right place. The Frontstretch Newsletter gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up and get all the information you need. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

 

©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

janice
02/22/2010 07:57 AM
permalink

i have never seen so much coverage given to someone who is a lap down than is given to danica. i’m sure her sponsor loves it. thankfully open wheel season starts soon.

VaBlueGrass
02/22/2010 07:57 AM
permalink

Set a time based off of the leaders 1st practice speed that will be the cut-off for the race. Similar to the minimum speed for the race – but more stringent.

Then qualifying lasts an hour – your best lap counts. If you don’t make the cut-off time in qualifying, you go home. If you do, you race.

Lay down a hot lap early – and you are rewarded with extra practice time. Oh – and cars are released on to the track in order of points standings. To the victor goes the spoils!!!!

VaBlueGrass
02/22/2010 07:59 AM
permalink

Set a time based off of the leaders 1st practice speed that will be the cut-off for the race. Similar to the minimum speed for the race – but more stringent.

Then qualifying lasts an hour – your best lap counts. If you don’t make the cut-off time in qualifying, you go home. If you do, you race. The target time will be set by NASCAR with the goal of 43 cars qualifying. If only 40 make it ok, if 50, ok. IN a perfect world only the top 35 places would pay points or purses anyway.

Lay down a hot lap early – and you are rewarded with extra practice time. Oh – and cars are released on to the track in order of points standings. To the victor goes the spoils!!!!

Carl D.
02/22/2010 08:55 AM
permalink

I know I’m in the extreme minority here, but I’m basically okay with the locked-in top 35 qualifying rule. It seems to me to be a reasonable comprise between the business interests of the teams and the opportunity to “crack the field” by those teams outside of the top 35. I know it’s tough on a small team to have to pack up and go home when they don’t make the field, but short of full-fledged franchising, there’s usually going to be some teams that miss the race.

What I’d really like is for the purses to be lowered for the last few finishing positions in order to get rid of the start-and-parkers. Those are the guys who are keeping the teams that actually want to run a full race out of the field.

Stephen HOOD
02/22/2010 09:00 AM
permalink

I think for the sake of racing purity you may be correct. But I wonder if there are other values besides “speed.” I think speed is important, but I wouldn’t discount the importance of “the show.” I think the purists would applaud a speed alone system, but I’m not so sure about the average fan.

Don Mei
02/22/2010 12:45 PM
permalink

OK, a simple compromise; lock in the previous year chase qualifiers and have everyone else duke it out for the remaining 31 spots.

Kevin in SoCal
02/22/2010 12:52 PM
permalink

I’d prefer to see the top 25 locked in across all three series. I would also be fine with the practice times being used as your qualifying time, as well. That way everyone is forced to use the qualifying practice time as actual qualifying practice. However, this system would punish anyone who might wreck in the first few laps on a “green” track.
I still don’t know how you writers keep seeing only 46,000 fans in the stands. I’m not even trying to be biased in favor and I saw more than 60,000, the same as we’ve had the last four years. The middle sections were packed and the outer edges in turns 1 and 4 were sparse.

Kevin in SoCal
02/22/2010 12:55 PM
permalink

Oh, forgot something. I completely agree that it is not right for teams to buy points from last year’s folded up teams to use this year. Especially for teams that did not even race last year.

Bill B
02/22/2010 01:31 PM
permalink

As long as NASCAR does not allow teams to put in qualifying setup then I am not for getting rid of the top 35. There is no point in allowing several teams to put in qualifying setups just to make the race then blow up or park early on while someone who was a contender sits out.
You mention Talledega a few years ago. That was the best example of cars setting themselves up for qualifying and then having to make major modifications (which are still inadequate to be competitive) on the first pit stop.
So I say, go back to 1999 qualifying rules. Lighter engines for qualifying, special shocks, setups, etc, and then everyone can change everything for the race package. That is the only fair way to make sure everyone is putting their best package on the track for both the race and qualifying.

Greg in Atlanta
02/22/2010 02:22 PM
permalink

I say go back to the REALLY old qualifying procedures … usually (at superspeedways and 40 car starting fields) three days of qualifying … fastest 15 on day one … fastest 15 on day two … fastest ten (plus “standing” on a previous time) on day three … … and two days of qualifying for 30 cars at short tracks (BTW … 30 cars is PLENTY in a short track event).

ClemK in Mi
02/22/2010 03:36 PM
permalink

Reducing the purse is a great idea, make up for that by paying a bonus per laps comleted. Make if worth running a complete race.

Big Henry
02/22/2010 03:46 PM
permalink

What this author fails to realize is that the whole 43-car field needs to be rethought and changed. This isn’t county fair racing anymore. 30 car fields would be fine. Run two heats of 25 cars and the top 15 in each transfer.

That said, if you come to me for sponsorship money there is no way in **** that unless I’m guaranteed to have that car in the final race, you’re going to get my money. Sponsors are just funny that way.

SkoalBandit33
02/22/2010 05:44 PM
permalink

It should be noted that while the #34 team did earn their locked in status for 2010 by finishing in the top 35 in 2009, they started 2009 locked into the top 35 precisely because of one of these points swaps.

No offense to Jenkins, but the #34 team only made 5 races in 2008. However, when EGR shuttered some of it’s teams in 2009, Front Row formed a “technical alliance” with EGR and the owner’s points from the #15 Menard Team earned in 2008 (Menard left for Yates) were transferred to the #34 for 2009.

It doesn’t stop there though, because Paul Menard was outside of the 35 halfway through 2007. DEI then “merged” with Ginn Racing (ie DEI bought Ginn basically for the points) and the top 35 owner’s points from the #14 Ginn entry driving by Sterling Marlin were then transferred to the #15 Menard DEI-Ginn entry.

So, let’s review.

Sterling Marlin, driving an underfunded Ginn car with NO locked in status at the start of 2007, was the only driver outside of the top 35 who qualified on TIME for the first 5 races of 2007 and kept it in the top 35 until Ginn sold his team.

These points then went to Menard, who prior to this was outside of the 35 and missing races here and there, who now suddenly found himself in the top 35 through NO achievement on his own. As a result of this bailout, he managed to squeak the car home at the end of 2007 29th in owner’s points while finishing 34th in the driver standings.

These points allowed him to then start 2008 locked into the top 35 for the first five races, and carry on in lackluster fashion throughout 2008 in bubble land for most of it.

These points were then transferred to #34 for 2009 where Andretti picked up the lackluster torch and eeked out a top 35’s owner points finish for 2009, which brings us up to 2010.

..and for the record, I LIKE Andretti, his plate win for Cale Yarborough is one of my favorite races of all time, but still, when you do the research you see how the points from just ONE swap continue on 3-years later as a kind of top 35 welfare.

TitanTerry
02/23/2010 08:33 AM
permalink

In my opinion, the begining of the end for us and NA$CAR was the Top 35 rule; it sure was for me. Only check in on the sport these days; if you can still call it that. I was at the Daytona 500 qualifing. Did anyone notice the stands were empty during it? I sure did, as have they all been since this rule came into effect. When at the race, and I have atteneded many, I always watched the qualifing as did lots of other fans. But today, why bother, they are not racing, they are going roundy-round for their sponsors and don’t have to race to get in a race; the laps mean nothing so why be in the stands to watch. All they have to do is smile and laugh all the way to the bank, and at those faster teams going home in the premier ‘racing’ sport of america. Racing means compete! It is beyond a joke! It sickens me to have a sport that once was all about who brought the best car and team to the track and finished first. Period. Race or go home was the letter of the hay-day. That has evolved into this excuse of what they call racing. RACING it is not!

Steve
02/23/2010 09:12 AM
permalink

I agree with this article. 2 rounds of qualifying, the fastest 43 start the race. If your not fast enough through all that, you go home, even if your name is Stewart, Gordon, Johnson (I’m a Stewart fan).

Golf has a cut line for every tournament and no they don’t make an exception for Tiger Woods just because he’s Tiger Woods. He missed a cut last year at a major and golf hasn’t died so I don’t think nascar would be just fine if Jr missed a race.

To make things more interesting, give points for qualifying to the fastest 5 or 10 cars. It would make for an interesting show on Friday and Saturday which would give people a reason to watch qualifying.

Steve
02/23/2010 09:15 AM
permalink

Correction to above post: I think nascar would be just fine if Jr missed a race.

4EVER3
02/23/2010 10:54 AM
permalink

Lock in the past years Champion,All others Qual.on speed.

 

Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Earnhardt Ganassi Racing Announces Partnership with Cessna, Textron
Fans To Decide Format of Sprint Unlimited at Daytona
UNOH and Kentucky Speedway Extend Sponsorship Agreement
Earnhardt Out For Charlotte and Kansas After Talldega Concussion
Piquet, Jr. Wins K&N East Opener

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.