The Frontstretch: Team Player or Manipulator: How Far Should Teamwork Go? by Amy Henderson -- Thursday September 15, 2011

Go to site navigation Go to article

Team Player or Manipulator: How Far Should Teamwork Go?

Holding A Pretty Wheel · Amy Henderson · Thursday September 15, 2011

 

It was, on one extreme, an unfortunate time to have tire problems: the closing laps of the race that would decide once and for all who was in the Chase and who was left to wait ‘til next year. On the other end of spectrum sits an uglier possibility: that a driver, his own chances all but gone, either chose or perhaps even was ordered to spin the car around, bringing out the caution and giving a teammate another chance at a win that was slipping away with each lap. The question being asked after the race was, which was it?

NASCAR decided this week that the question was worth answering, though the truth is they may never have the definitive answer they seek. Unless there was a radio transmission directly to Menard making the intention clear, the answer will be murky. While Jeff Gordon notes that there was a lot of talk about needing a caution on the No. 27 radio, then a switch to the team’s backup channel just before the spin, RCR driver (and the ultimate beneficiary of the spin) Kevin Harvick said that Menard’s tire was corded and that there were other incidents during the race that could have been questionable. But even if there wasn’t a blatant demand, that doesn’t mean without a doubt there was no team order-a code word, an understanding before the race ever began wouldn’t have been transmitted over the radio.

Conversely, it’s entirely possible-certainly every bit as likely as the other scenario-that it was nothing more than an ill-timed tire failure and resultant spin. So finally, NASCAR made the statement that should have been expected since Monday: “We haven’t seen or heard anything that would indicate the No. 27 did anything inappropriate in Richmond.”

And based on what they have to go on, it’s probably the right call. The sanctioning body did add that they will continue to monitor teams throughout the Chase, and that’s also the right call. Such an instance of over-the-top “teamwork,” while it gives fans something to talk about, should not have any role in deciding the eventual champion. That’s something that should be won on merit alone.

But how far is too far, in general, for teamwork? What does it mean to take one for the team, and what crosses a line?

One seemingly harmless spin by Paul Menard has sparked new worries about an old Chase fear…that team orders could influence the winner of stock car racing’s biggest crown.

If Menard’s spin was intentional, that definitely crosses a line. Not only does something like that give an unfair advantage, it’s a safety issue, and a serious one. Even if well-timed, a single car spin has the potential to cause a chain reaction as cars check up to avoid the car or can’t see through the tire smoke it produces. The risk of injury to a competitor makes this type of move a step too far beyond the spirit of teamwork.

The same goes, of course, for intentionally spinning a competitor to help a teammate in either a race or in the overall points battle. There was plenty of speculation when Kurt Busch wrecked Mike Wallace, then his and Greg Biffle’s best Truck Series points competition for the 2000 series title, at Dover in a blatantly intentional move that Busch had acted, possibly on orders from owner Jack Roush, to improve Biffle’s title chances. If that’s true, then that’s as far across that line as you can get. Knowingly putting a driver at risk by putting him in the wall is a dirty move. Doing it to help a teammate win a race or a championship is about as low as a driver can stoop.

On the other hand, what about blocking? Should a teammate hold up the competition for as long as possible in order to help the cause? Sure. I don’t see any issue here; that’s being a team player if the racing is clean. If one driver is about to go a lap down and can hold up the leader to give a teammate a chance to catch him for the win, that’s teamwork and nothing else. If I owned a team and a driver didn’t help a teammate in this type of situation, he’d be in the dog house on Monday. It’s perfectly legit, and part of the game. It’s what a teammate should be doing if he can’t win the race himself. That’s part of his job.

Ditto drafting. While some fans complain about the wheeling and dealing going on with the tandem drafting at Daytona and Talladega, the reality is, it’s not going away. If two teammates can work effectively together, swapping off in the draft, cool. If it ensures that one of the team cars will be ahead at the end, what’s wrong with that? Better your teammate than someone else, and perhaps he’ll repay the favor. When Dale Earnhardt, Jr. realized they had a better shot at victory if he pushed Jimmie Johnson at Talladega in April and made the call to push Johnson in the closing laps, Johnson knew how he’d gotten to victory lane thanks to his teammate, and he’s eager to repay the favor when he can. That’s good for a team. It’s good for morale and for future teamwork. Both drivers benefit in the long and short runs. All good. That said, if a driver’s only purpose is to push a teammate, as Joey Logano has hinted might be the case in his Nationwide ride, that’s not so Kosher.

Which brings us to team orders-when one teammate is instructed to give up position so that another can pick up championship points. This one depends on the situation. If it’s a pair out of a stable swapping the lead back and forth for an extra bonus point, I don’t a have a problem with that. On the other hand, if one teammate in question decides he likes the view from the front and doesn’t give the lead back as fast as he might have said he would, I don’t have a problem with that either.

But what about when one driver is asked (or ordered) at the end of a race to give up a finishing position so that a teammate could finish higher, especially in the Chase? Yeah, that’s a bigger ball of wax. In a way, it’s manipulating the outcome of the race and possibly the championship. Again, that’s something that needs to be won on merit, not team orders. It’s also not fair to the driver who’s asked to back off, to accept a finish lower than he could have otherwise earned. Teamwork goes out the window at the end of a race with the finish on the line, and that’s how it should be. Letting a teammate (and possibly others if there’s a car or two in between) pass just for a point isn’t being a team player, because in the end, that driver has his own team to answer to, not just his teammate’s. And shame on the owner who makes it happen.

There are times when being a team player is sportsmanlike and right. If a driver can hold up the competition just enough to help a teammate get past, or push him across the line for a restrictor place win, that’s part of the reason for being part of a multi-part stable. However, using the guise of “teamwork” to manipulate the outcome of a race or championship? Not cool. That goes quadruple if it involves putting other drivers in danger by causing (or being) a wreck. That’s not sportsmanlike; that’s dirty. To help a teammate win is cool. Helping a teammate’s competition to lose? Not cool.

After the last caution at Richmond raised questions about Paul Menard’s motive, NASCAR is right to monitor team radios through the Chase. While a little teamwork is part of the game, only one man can win a championship. And whoever that may be should win it the right way-on his own.

Contact Amy Henderson

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Swan Racing Announces Restructuring, No. 26 & No. 30 ‘Sold’ Off
Tech Talk with Tony Gibson: Taking Stock Of Danica Patrick In Year Two
Vexing Vito: Three Drivers In Need of a Role Reversal
Going By the Numbers: Top-10 NASCAR Variety Hard To Come By In…
Truckin’ Thursdays: Lessons Learned Just Two Races In
Fantasy Insider: Team Revelations For NASCAR’s Short Tracks

FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Lugnut
09/16/2011 12:00 AM
permalink

Paul Menard has responded to this, the talk of “not needing a caution” was because he wanted to retaliate and wreck kenseth who wrecked paul earlier, and with kevin leading “they didn’t need a caution”. What happened with the spin was he said his car was busted to hell, drove good for 10 laps then “went to sh*t”. The spin was not intentional.

wcfan
09/16/2011 12:58 AM
permalink

Its a good thing Jr did not get any help from the cautions on Sat. night.(sarcasm)

Thats right he got 3 LUCKY DOGS and if it would have helped Jr there would have been a caution when Cassel spun on the front stretch.

phil h
09/16/2011 01:19 AM
permalink

no surprise. teams,drivers and owners do what it takes to get any advantage possible.you play offense or defense,deliver a cheap shot,take one for the team.
When you have a championship system thats setup like stick and ball sports,thats what you do.

Sharon J
09/16/2011 07:03 AM
permalink

I am with Tony on the blocking. If a team mate blocks for another driver to win points, move him out of the way. I saw enough of this blocking in the final race of last year.

Bill B
09/16/2011 07:20 AM
permalink

This is very hard for NASCAR to police. In this case only a handful of people at RCR know for sure. Yes, NASCAR can monitor the radios but all that will lead to are code words and more preparation before the race discussing scenarios at team meetings.

Carl D.
09/16/2011 09:07 AM
permalink

I agree that blocking iss okay as far as the rules are concerned, but I also have no problem with a driver “punting” a blocking car out of the way. You live by the block, you die by the block, figuratively speaking of course.

Rufus
09/16/2011 12:38 PM
permalink

I wonder if any of these people who are adamantly opposed to blocking were ever around when the King of the blockers, who also went by the nick-name, “The Imtimidator”, was racing. He would have thought nothing of blocking you, or even running you into the wall to protect his position and prevent you from passing him. But, in his defence, he also would have shoved you into the wall if you blocked him. Fair was fair! Then again, I guess it only matters who is the blocker and who is the blockee. Example, Talladega when Big-Bad-Brad nearly put Edwards into the stands for blocking him. Everyone cheered Brad for what he did, and everyone also condemned Edwards for what he did. I bet, had the roles been reversed, people’s opinions would have been reversed! Just saying!

Sue Rarick
09/16/2011 01:31 PM
permalink

It’s all well and good to argue the fine points of if Menard did or didn’t block but that ignores the more important question which is how it affects the sponsor and sport. When it blatantly started to happen in F1 I stopped watching F1 and haven’t watched a F1 race for 7 or 8 years. And I used to be one of the people that would set their alarm to watch the 2-3am races.

I have a saying, never let fact get in the way of perception. If people begin to see nascar as currupt they stop watching. They stop watching and sponsors leave. I wouldn’t be suprised to see Menard leave RCR (blaming them) if Paul’s actions affect people’s perception of the Store. And forget any lawsuits….in a pi$$ing contest Menard trumps RCR.

Keith
09/16/2011 05:10 PM
permalink

There should be no team work allowed at the racetrack. No help or pit crew swaps or no repairing teammates cars in the garage no sharing of setups no radio communication between drivers while on the track because it is an unfair advantage over single car teams.

Carl D.
09/16/2011 06:33 PM
permalink

Rufus…

This has been explained a gazillion times and the video is out there on youtube for all to see, but here goes… Talladega 2009… Brad is on Carl’s bumper coming out of turn four to the line. Brad starts to go high, Carls drifts up to block the pass… Brad then goes low and Carl comes down, again to block the pass, but Brad has a fender there and doesn’t lift. Carl gets turned sideways and crashes. You can’t blame Brad for trying to pass, and you can’t blame him for refusing to lift just because Carl came up the track. Like I said, it’s on youtube if you need a refresher. I’ll repeat… you live by the block, you die by the block.

 

Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Earnhardt Ganassi Racing Announces Partnership with Cessna, Textron
Fans To Decide Format of Sprint Unlimited at Daytona
UNOH and Kentucky Speedway Extend Sponsorship Agreement
Earnhardt Out For Charlotte and Kansas After Talldega Concussion
Piquet, Jr. Wins K&N East Opener

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.