The Frontstretch: NASCAR Letting Hendrick Win? And I'm an Underground Aviator by Amy Henderson -- Thursday April 12, 2007

Go to site navigation Go to article

NASCAR Letting Hendrick Win? And I'm an Underground Aviator

Holding A Pretty Wheel · Amy Henderson · Thursday April 12, 2007

 

If you listened to some prognosticators blabbering all over the web, NASCAR has decided who's going to win the Nextel Cup. That’s right; yep, they have it all mapped out. With a well-timed caution here, and a rain delay there, the sanctioning body has every race plotted out down to the last detail. They can make a car go bad with the weather and another mysteriously improve at the end of a race. It's all one big, huge conspiracy.

Oh, and by the way, I have a really nice bridge for sale, cheap. It's been speculated for years that NASCAR is somehow "fixing" races to get the outcome that they want. And at first glance, there have been some mighty interesting coincidences over the years, like Dale Earnhardt, Jr. winning at Daytona in the very first race back at the track after the race that claimed the life of his father, or Jimmie Johnson beating a dominant Mark Martin to the checkers at Atlanta, just one week after the tragic plane crash that took ten lives from the Hendrick Motorsports clan. But that is all they are: coincidences. Uplifting, gratifying coincidences, but coincidences nonetheless.

The conspiracy theory is ridiculous on so many levels. The last couple of years, it's been about Hendrick Motorsports. Before that, it was Roush Racing or Dale Earnhardt, Inc. When a team is successful, especially more than one car of a multi-car team at the same time, someone wants to point the finger at NASCAR for "making" it happen. There’s just one problem; for NASCAR to predetermine the outcome of a race, the planets would have to align in the shape of a perfect tri-oval.

First of all, someone would have to persuade all 43 teams to play along. It's silly to think that not one team would use an opportunity to make a pass for position to snatch a win if the opportunity arose. Second, even with a caution thrown in, there is no guarantee that any driver can make the big pass or hold off the next guy or not get caught up in someone's mistake. Even if NASCAR tossed a caution so that a team low on fuel would have enough to make it to the end, it's unlikely that only ONE team will benefit, enough to gain the decided end, and by closing up the field, it makes it more likely for that guy to get passed or crashed.

And if the caution was to benefit the driver in second so that he could catch up, there is still no way to guarantee that he can get by, short of paying off teams, and that's so far in left field it's on the Massachusetts Turnpike. In short, racing has too many variables to manufacture the outcome of a race. Does NASCAR manipulate the race to make the end artificially close or dramatic? Probably. But that's the extent of it.

Think about this from a marketing standpoint. If NASCAR was manipulating races and in effect, the season, to determine a champion that they somehow deem fitting, why would they not tip the scales toward Dale Earnhardt, Jr.? After all, he is the sport's most popular driver; the man who not only attracts a veritable sea of red in the stands but would be fulfilling a family legacy with a championship, and who has the richest sponsorship in the game? Why choose Jeff Gordon or Jimmie Johnson, who are criticized by fans at every turn for being everything from too good to masters at causing crashes or at bending the rules? Sure they're well-spoken, but is their practiced political correctness really what NASCAR wants as their poster child? And what about Tony Stewart, resident bad boy? Sure he's a great driver, but would NASCAR choose him for their top spot over, say, Kevin Harvick, who drives for one of the most storied teams in the modern era?

From that standpoint, it doesn't make sense to believe that NASCAR is favoring Hendrick Motorsports when it's likely that the merchandising dollars from an Earnhardt championship would all but drown the France family, the driver, and the Sponsor in dollars.

It isn't about who NASCAR wants to win. It's about who is the best at a given time. When Dale Junior won the 2001 Pepsi 400, he was driving for a team head and shoulders above any other on restrictor plate tracks, and he deserved to win that race. He drove it brilliantly and won. End of story. Ditto Jimmie Johnson at Atlanta in 2004, and Johnson and Gordon in 2007 so far. Right now, their teams have it figured out better than anyone, and they're having fantastic luck; not to mention, they’re both two of the best wheelmen in the game right now.

A few weeks or months from now, someone else will start dominating races, and the conspiracists will turn their attention that way. Once Toyota figures things out, they'll be a likely target. Or perhaps another team will win races from seemingly impossible odds; even stranger yet, maybe someone will find solace in victory after a tragedy, and be the latest to receive "special treatment" from NASCAR. In any case, the conspiracy is an illusion created by fans when things happen under certain circumstances, particularly in favor of someone they don't like. And just like an illusion-it isn't reality, only a manipulated version. NASCAR doesn't fix races and championships. They only feed the illusion.

Hey race fans, are you looking for more exclusive Frontstretch content emailed right to your inbox every day? Then don’t miss the premiere of the brand new Frontstretch newsletter, coming to a google account near you starting Monday, April 16th! For more information on how to sign up, click on “newsletter” at the top of our home page or check out this link. Jump on board with FS today!

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Amy Henderson and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

xracinman
04/13/2007 07:59 AM
permalink

While I agree with you that things are not fixed by NASCAR, I think you are using the wrong examples to prove your point. Why should NASCAR fix things so Junior wins a race, let alone a title? He already has the biggest fan base around. They don’t need to do anything to improve his popularity, and as long as he is popular, so is NASCAR. And if they were fixing the races so Johnson or Gordon won, then they are just following the tried and true method of invigorating the fan base. Not that I am comparing the two, but wrestling did pretty well by having the “bad guys” win more often than not. If they were controlling who won, then having the Hendrick team win a lot of races just makes the occasional non-Hendrick win all the more wonderful.

As for the Stewart-Harvick comparison, which one is really the “bad boy”? I would postulate that Harvick is, even if he races the former 3 car. His methods on the track (which of the two was parked by NASCAR for on track activities?) are far more egregious than Stewart. And neither is exactly politically correct off the track either (although I will admit that Tony is a bit worse in this regard).

I think that NASCAR might have their favorites, just like any fan does, but that they do their best to keep the playing field as level as possible. Do they set up things so the end of a race is more exciting? I think they do. Do they “fix” races to draw more attention to the sport? I highly doubt it. As you said, it would take so many people to do it that it is almost impossible. And imagine what the negative reaction would be if it was discovered. The NASCAR hierarchy may not be the brightest in the world, but they are far from being stupid too.

Brian France Sucks
04/13/2007 10:49 AM
permalink

I agree on all points. If NA$CAR could have it they’re way, only the most popular drivers would win, because that’s where the $$$ comes from. Dale Jr. winning 10 races a year; they’d love it. The artificial drama that they create by mysterious debris cautions is reprehensible, though. I can think of several instances where this has cost teams races and other, more popular drivers have won (See Casy Mears: Homestead). That’s the way Vince McMahon (oops Brian France) operates though.

Pam R
04/13/2007 11:19 AM
permalink

Conspiracy theorists: Those who can’t handle the truth. Their driver didn’t win. They need to suck it up and stop complaining.

Anyone who believes that NASCAR scripts the outcome of races and championships needs to find another sport to watch. Why would you watch if it’s all predetermined?

Great article, Amy!

Dave
04/13/2007 06:18 PM
permalink

You’re missing the biggest of them all! They faked Dale Earnhardt’s death. Think about it.. the crash didn’t look that bad. They made it a law to seal the autopsy photos (that don’t exist). There was no funeral or grave marking. All of a sudden NASCAR is thrust into the limelight and has a viable excuse to make a new Car Of Tomorrow. They just made up this huge dog and pony show about what happened and a huge detailed crash report. All the while Dale sits back and collects a fat check every week. Brilliant job NASCAR.

J. Meyer
04/14/2007 05:56 AM
permalink

“All the while Dale sits back and collects a fat check every week…sipping beers with Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa.”

Chanda
04/18/2007 07:44 PM
permalink

If Nascar is letting Hendrick win, then they need to let Casey win a few! Is the 25 car just a hunk of junk or is Hendrick giving Kyle, Jeff and Jimmie all the good cars?

Brusimm
04/18/2007 11:37 PM
permalink

IF NASCAR were going to decide who wins, Jr would be. Plain and simple, and yet, why would teams compete if they were told to not win? Give me a break. You’re on the mark with that one Amy. Besides, there’s plenty more issues for folks to focus on for them to get a little spun up about.

 

Contact Amy Henderson

Recent articles from Amy Henderson:

Earnhardt Ganassi Racing Announces Partnership with Cessna, Textron
Fans To Decide Format of Sprint Unlimited at Daytona
UNOH and Kentucky Speedway Extend Sponsorship Agreement
Earnhardt Out For Charlotte and Kansas After Talldega Concussion
Piquet, Jr. Wins K&N East Opener

Want to know more about Amy or see an archive of all of her articles? Check out her bio page for more information.