The Frontstretch: I'm Just Sayin'... Greg Biffle Won, Period by Becca Gladden -- Wednesday October 3, 2007

Go to site navigation Go to article

I'm Just Sayin'... Greg Biffle Won, Period

Becca Gladden · Wednesday October 3, 2007

 

Editor’s Note : Are you STILL not getting the Frontstretch newsletter? Shame on you for not jumping on the bandwagon for something that gets delivered FREE, right to your inbox. Well, we figured we’d throw a little bone your way and let you in on what you’re missing. What follows is a special edition of “I’m Just Sayin…,” by Becca Gladden a weekly column that appears in the newsletter each Thursday. If you like what you read, don’t hesitate to click here to sign up for the newsletter, because it’s the only way you’ll be able to find this new Frontstretch feature each and every week!

Watching the end of Sunday’s weird, wacky Kansas Cup race, I was as stunned as anyone to hear Jimmie Johnson say in his immediate post-race interview that he didn’t think Greg Biffle won the race. “He was clearly out of gas,” said Johnson. “I feel terrible for Greg. He’s been working so hard to win a race and he was up there in position to win it. But if you don’t maintain pace car speed, you don’t hold your position. And it was clear to everyone that he couldn’t do it. If he could have, he would have stayed on the bumper of the pace car to the finish line. So in my opinion, where he coasted across the finish line relative to the other cars that could maintain pit road speed is where he should finish.”

The issue Johnson raised turned into a full-blown controversy when his Hendrick Motorsports teammate Jeff Gordon echoed these same concerns. “They don’t freeze the field. You have to maintain a reasonable pace,” he added. “And that is in NASCAR’s judgment if that was a reasonable pace. Everybody was slowing down trying to figure out what (Biffle) was doing. We were almost at a stop to run his pace, and the pace car was driving away…so we all just started going by him. In my opinion, he didn’t win that race. Clint Bowyer won the race.”

Bowyer had questions, too, forming a bit of a mini-alliance of sorts: “Jimmie and myself and Jeff Gordon and everybody – I don’t know exactly what the rule is, but I thought you had to at least be able to maintain a caution pace, and (Biffle) failed to do that.”

But, according to NASCAR Vice President Jim Hunter, “When the caution comes out like that, the leader of the race has to maintain a reasonable speed to the start-finish line. And in our opinion, in NASCAR's opinion, Greg Biffle did that. And that’s really the end of the story.”

And of course, he’s right, because this is a case of NASCAR’s ball being in NASCAR’s court – frankly, it’s NASCAR everything.

In response to Mr. Hunter’s comment, Speed TV’s Bob Dillner, who was interviewing Hunter after the race, emphasized that the ruling was, as Hunter said, “NASCAR’s opinion.”

But in this situation, as in every one that requires a ruling, NASCAR’s “opinion” is ultimately the only one that matters.

Now, I don’t think Jeff Gordon, Jimmie Johnson, or Clint Bowyer really expected NASCAR to pull Greg Biffle out of Victory Lane and declare someone else the race winner. But by bringing up the issue, what the drivers were really requesting was a better explanation of the “finishing under caution” rule. And apparently a clarification is sorely needed, because everyone on the track and in the garage seems to have a different interpretation of the existing rule.

That is certainly a reasonable request, and a better understanding of how NASCAR makes this and other judgment calls would go a long way toward dispelling the ugly but persistent allegations about their overall legitimacy as a racing series.

But right now, that’s not going to happen. The bottom line is that there are judgment calls in every sport, whether it’s an umpire’s ball or strike ruling, a football referee’s line call, or a basketball ref’s decision on what constitutes a flagrant foul. The controversies that such calls elicit often make those sports maddening, but are a large part of what keeps us watching.

NASCAR is no different.

In baseball, the umpire is always right, and no amount of arguing is going to change that.

In NASCAR, the officials are always right, and with the exact same caveat as above; because ultimately, they’re the only one that can pick up their ball and go home.

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
NASCAR Easter Eggs: A Few Off-Week Nuggets to Chew On
Five Points To Ponder: NASCAR’s Take-A-Breath Moment
Truckin’ Thursdays: Top Five All-Time Truck Series Drivers
Going By the Numbers: A Week Without Racing Can Bring Relief But Kill Momentum
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Becca Gladden and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Barbara
10/04/2007 10:32 AM
permalink

The way I heard it on Sunday was when the caution came out with 3 to go, the field WAS frozen. And Greg was leading at the time the yellow flag was thrown. Plain and simple.

hoboraceguy
10/04/2007 12:36 PM
permalink

I disagree. It was and always has been reasonable pace speed. What if Under yellow biffle runs out of gas, stops, everyone else stops behind him, someone can’t stop in time, rear ends a car and runs over 4 track workers clearing the track. Biffle needed to maintain pace speed for saftey reasons alone. But judging from them opening pit road for TS while watrip 5 track workers and a towtruck are all on the middle of a wet pit road that saftey doesn’t matter that much to nascar as long as they can pick the winners.

 

Becca Gladden is no longer a contributor to the Frontstretch, but you can see all her past articles on herbiography and archive page.