The Frontstretch: Five Points to Ponder: NASCAR's Short-Track Silence and Stubbornness by Bryan Davis Keith -- Monday March 19, 2012

Go to site navigation Go to article

ONE: NASCAR’s Silence On Restarts Troubling

In one of those rare instances at Bristol where the FOX crew seemed fully on top of the race, instead of their on-air personalities or a select handful of drivers, a well-presented set of replays demonstrated that Matt Kenseth in fact beat leader Brad Keselowski to the restart line on at least one occasion while coming close to doing the same on another. The video made it crystal clear. Yet there was no penalty that ever came down from NASCAR, although it never affected the end result (Keselowski held off Kenseth and won the race).

What’s troubling is this fact: the video conclusively proved that the No. 17 car beat the leader to the line on a restart… and didn’t get penalized for it. The broadcasters did their best (and I do mean that) to explain it, and they couldn’t. Yet until a solid piece of work by Yahoo’s Nick Bromberg got NASCAR spokesperson Kerry Tharp on record stating that Kenseth was “off the hook” because Keselowski allegedly didn’t hit the gas in between the restart lines, race fans were left to scratch their heads. For me, what’s most troubling of all is that 24 hours of confusion, even more than the explanation itself. It’s especially hurtful for NASCAR after the sanctioning body got off to a strong start during Speedweeks by putting officials in front of the fans (Mike Helton was timely both in discussing the rain delay and the jet dryer episode on broadcasts).

This weekend, though, despite clear video evidence of an apparent rules violation, there was silence. One of two conclusions to be drawn here; either NASCAR was just being lazy and quiet, as Bristol isn’t their Floridian jewel facility or race (nor is it ISC property). Or, the sanctioning body took the hours that elapsed between the restart and post-race remarks to craft a rationalization for being asleep at the wheel, as they got caught red-handed for it. Neither of those scenarios are what could be called desirable.

With timing lines, high-speed cameras and computers, it seems NASCAR should be better able to enforce its own rules, on pit road and on restarts.

TWO: Enough Band-Aids On A Broken Leg

Despite a reconfigured implementation of timing lines on Bristol Motor Speedway’s unique pit road (it’s the only track where pitting under green or yellow alters the actual pit road the driver must come down), speeding penalties still proved to be an issue on Sunday afternoon, with the most notable infraction costing Dale Earnhardt, Jr. a certain top-10 finish.

Sure, adding timing lines as NASCAR did prior to this weekend significantly cut down the distance between them (reportedly from 11 stall lengths to six). But the imprecision of the system remained. There was still the opportunity for drivers to pull the same tactic (albeit not as effectively) and do what Brad Keselowski did a season ago, gunning the motor between lines and slowing suddenly to avoid speeding. It also left plenty of room for imprecise calls (Earnhardt didn’t seem to be surprised he was busted for speeding, he was merely surprised that NASCAR didn’t bust him where he was going fastest).

This officiating inconsistency has been a standing issue ever since Juan Pablo Montoya’s troubles with pit road speeding cost him a likely win at the Brickyard. Yet the problem remains. Let’s be clear, this confusion can and would be fixed with a strictly enforced pit road speed limit (no cushions) and a publicly visible speedometer to track it. But that’ll never happen. Why would a sanctioning body that’s proven time and time again willing to manipulate their events give up such a means of doing so? Or maybe keeping archaic systems alive is NASCAR’s misunderstood way of trying to stay connected with the past it spent the last decade trying to purge. Frankly, both are believable.

THREE: Complaints About Fan Involvement At Drivers’ Meeting Short-Sighted

Dale Earnhardt, Jr. and Matt Kenseth were not complimentary in comments made to the Bristol Herald-Courier regarding fan access to the drivers’ meetings, a trend that’s emerging at a number of tracks (Las Vegas Motor Speedway provided extensive fan access during their race weekend, while Rockingham Speedway is promoting the same for their upcoming Truck race). Both Junior and Kenseth have a valid point that these meetings are hardly for the drivers anymore; Daytona’s amounted to nothing more than a 30-minute introduction of celebrities and Fortune 500 CEOs that showed up.

That being said, it’s not a product of fans having access to the meetings, that’s a product of NASCAR catering way too much to the big names they’re hosting. In their current configuration, one can’t blame Kenseth or any driver for stating that no driver is going to ask a meaningful question about the race or officiating in that environment, because that’s not what the meeting is about.

So it turns out their criticism has value; it’s just misplaced. Fan access is honestly just the ticket needed to return relevance to the drivers’ meeting. It’s just that if NASCAR’s trying to provide access and make things cool, the worst thing they could do is list a bunch of suits from the exclusive underwater woven basket of their sport. Call it a hunch, but fans would probably be more interested in hearing about the track, the officiating and the race, not listening to Mike Helton congratulate a CEO of a company they’ve never heard of. And that goes for drivers, too.

So to me, the key to fixing the meeting is simple: trim the fat, leave the substance. In this day of smartphones, Twitter and instant media, what better place to pose tough questions to the sanctioning body than in a pre-race meeting, on the field of competition, in front of race fans that had to show enough interest in the first place to get in? It gets harder to ignore or sweep issues under the rug when more people are watching and listening.

FOUR: The Dark Cloud over Brad Keselowski’s Victory

Brad Keselowski certainly gave a strong account of himself with his fifth career Cup win this weekend at Bristol. It didn’t take pit road tricks, strategy or a bump-and-run to bring the trophy home; Keselowski had a former Cup champion all over him for over 100 laps, and flat out beat him.

As great a year as it’s been for Brad Keselowski, it’s been every bit as rough for teammate A.J. Allmendinger: four races, zero top-15 finishes as driver of the No. 22 Penske Dodge.

What, then, is the only problem for Penske Racing on a Sunday that saw the No. 2 look every bit the master of Bristol it has always been? Let’s just say Keselowski’s teammate in the No. 22 didn’t look like a master of anything. Despite starting on the front row and leading laps early, by race’s end Allmendinger was again an also ran, finishing 17th after spending the better part of the afternoon wrestling with a mishandling car.

Actually, there are two problems here. One: 17th was the best result of the season for Penske’s second car. Two: the entire afternoon went backwards. There was no late charge, no sign of improvement, there was fall back, fall back, and hover midpack.

Right now life is good for Keselowski and the No. 2, who are looking fully able to pick up where they left off after making the Chase a season ago. And for Allmendinger, there’s no better time than early in the season to struggle.

But for Keselowski and team, there’s got to be concern as to how much the No. 22 car seems to have regressed since losing driver Kurt Busch. Because the second the No. 2 sees the teams around them catch up, or has a bad weekend coming off the truck, they’ve got the No. 22, and only the No. 22, from which to collect notes. A car that can’t do better than 17th isn’t exactly what they’re going to be looking for when that situation inevitably pops up.

FIVE: It’s A Shame About Bristol’s Attendance

SMI’s Bruton Smith blamed the weather (early morning rains doused the Bristol Motor Speedway, but fortunately cleared out to allow the race to start on time) for the lack of fans in the stands. Others have speculated dating back to last year that in tough economic times, one of the most expensive race trips on the circuit has fallen victim to such a reputation. Plus, there’s still the 800 lb gorilla of fan discontent that Brian calls the “Chase.” Whatever the reason, the estimated crowd of 102,000 that was documented on the results sheet still seemed a bit generous, as the grandstands were sparsely filled everywhere around the .533-mile oval.

Sadly, for all those theories, most are pointing to the reconfigured Bristol track, with its multiple grooves and room to race, as being responsible for the loss of fan interest. It has changed the racing, it has reduced the carnage. And frankly, on Sunday it was all for the best. The closing 100 laps, mostly a hard-fought duel between Keselowski and Kenseth, were compelling to watch. An early “Big One” removed some of the big guns from contention and opened the front of the field up. Then, there was that teammate squabble between Jeff Gordon and Dale Earnhardt, Jr. In my view, despite the lack of cautions there was no shortage of action to enjoy Sunday, even if that didn’t translate into copious amounts of twisted metal.

Despite this reality, Bruton is now talking reconfiguration again, a move that would remove progressive banking and return Bristol to the one-groove wreckfest that it used to be. That’s not to be taken lightly; SMI isn’t going to stand by and watch its Coliseum play to half-crowds.

One can only hope that the reason for fan discontentment en masse at BMS isn’t a product of the multi-groove racing. That the alternative – a return to an ugly crashfest with hundreds of caution laps would bring fans back – is nothing to applaud. Is that why fans wanted to come here, for the wrecks? It’s a bit disheartening.

So in the midst of all this criticism, let’s not forget something else… the Chase castrated the Bristol night race long before the reconfiguration. Could drivers’ conservatism be at play here more than any other issue that’s been brought up?

Bottom line, I have no problem with fan criticism; they can and should speak with their wallets. I just hope they’re doing it at Bristol for the right reasons.

Contact Bryan Davis Keith

NEW YEAR? NEW NEWSLETTER. LOOKING FOR THE INFO YOU NEED ABOUT NASCAR IN 2013 – SENT RIGHT TO YOUR EMAIL INBOX?
Well, you’ve come to the right place. The Frontstretch Newsletter gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up and get all the information you need. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

 

©2000 - 2008 Bryan Davis Keith and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Bad Wolf
03/20/2012 12:44 AM
permalink

It’s the reconfigured track, Stupid.

Yes, the racing is “Better” than it used to be, but Bristol was the one bone thrown to the Old School crowd who wanted to see good old fashioned beating and banging Saturday Night style in the Big Leauges. Say what you will, and put as much lipstick on this pig as you want, but the fans have voted with their wallets and have stayed home.

phil h
03/20/2012 01:36 AM
permalink

Silence on restarts??
Wait till its a race at a roadcourse and someone like Robby Gordon or Boris Said could be challenging for a win!!
If either driver were lined up side by side with say..Earnhardt or Johnson,NASCAR would black flag them so fast you couldn’t crack open your Bud or Miller fast enough to see it coming!!!

RickP
03/20/2012 07:39 AM
permalink

The racing at Bristol is much better than it used to be because it’s actually racing. The old Bristol bush-league style wasn’t racing, it was merely crashing your opponent out of the way. In that case, rubbing wasn’t racing.

Weren’t we lead to believe that on restarts, if the leader doesn’t start between the marks on the wall, that the flagman restarts the race? If so, then the supposed leader may not be the first to cross the start/finish line if he reacts too slowly.

john
03/20/2012 10:06 AM
permalink

NOW IS THE TIME FOR PIT ROAD SPEED LIMITERS.

They could’ve used them on the old carbureted engines with an MSD box, but now it’s even EASIER with a soft cut on the ECU instead.

WHY WON’T NASCAR IMPLEMENT IT?

Probably because pit road speeding penalties introduce fake drama into the race, ruining a driver’s great performance on the day, and shakes things up. Pit road limits are supposed to be for SAFETY, and nothing ELSE. Put limiters on the damn things!

Daddy-R
03/20/2012 10:37 AM
permalink

Cautions; why not put the cars back on the track in the order they crossed the finish line on the last green flag lap. Give every car 15 seconds in their pit stall; more than that and they lose positions.

babydufus
03/20/2012 11:00 AM
permalink

i was aghast when the tv revealed that there were maybe 70000 or so people in the stands. although the side by side action (i’ll not call it a battle as it was no such thing) was fun to watch, i still like the old bristol way better. this track’s reputation and hell, the entire nascar business was built on rough and tumble on the excitement of gladiator type races where the first looser is 2nd place and drivers who did not hesitate to move someone when their patience or finesse ran out. god, i miss that. that style of side by side racing is the kind of racing that we should be seeing on the cookie cutter super speedways not the short tracks (yes, rubbing and moving a slower car out of way is a valid racing style too.) Bristol had always been on my list of tracks to see a race at and now it’s fallen off of the list. why? because now i’m thinking that the modern day nascar neutered side by side bristol racing is about the same as the precision sport of pairs ice dancing complete with its beauty queens, crooked judges and limited contact and i wouldn’t be caught dead attending one of those.

Andy
03/20/2012 11:27 AM
permalink

Saturday-night style beatin’ & bangin’ is for guys that don’t have the skill to get to the front and stay there without taking out their competition. This is the big leagues and they’ve left that behind.

Leave the track alone, lower ticket and hotel prices and dump “The Chase” so that every race counts.

pepper
03/20/2012 01:57 PM
permalink

This is one of the best Frontstretch articles I’ve ever read. You hit each issue I had, and I agree with your point of view on each of them. Too bad we don’t have someone like you in the booth. Instead we are treated to two bozos named Waltrip who are each on his own ego trip.

Never stop bringing us the audacity of stupidity that Nascar is. There is too much “we’ll make the rules as the race goes on”.

And leave the track alone, Bruton. For those who like wrecking better than racing, go to see your local demolition derby each Friday night. The rest of us like to see cars going for getting the pass.

Steve
03/20/2012 02:08 PM
permalink

So what happens when they put it back to the way it used to be and nobody shows up.

Its not the track, its what they put on the track that is the problem. You can’t pass with this car at any of these tracks, so why should Bristol be any different. And the Chase has absolutley ruined the racing across the board with everyone playing nice every week. The tires are rock hard so there is no grip. All this induces borefests every week and all these issues are common for every track, Bristol included.

If you want beating and banging go to a demolition derby. Rubbing is not racing son. Its what you do when you can’t pass someone cleanly. Which usually means you don’t have enough talent or a good enough car. Take your Days of Thunder video and go to a demolition derby if you want a wreckfest.

Earner
03/20/2012 03:15 PM
permalink

Just a Quickie: At this point I would have to say the fix is in NASCAR style Because Kenseth was ahead at the start (X 2) & nascar did nothing (twice)…Maybe they don’t watch either?

SB
03/20/2012 04:27 PM
permalink

For those racing ‘puritsts’ (or snobs, as the case may be), if you want multiple groove, wide open tracks, it seem to me that you can pick any other track on the circuit with the exception of Martinsville and the road courses, and get all the aero dependent, polite racing you can stand. Turning Bristol into yet another of those tracks hasn’t seemed to work. As far as being a ‘true’ race fan…this is what made Nascar so popular, not the Fontana’s of the world. It seems to me that harking back to the way things used to be is at least a nice nod to tradition and history. But then, we all know just how important those things seem to be to the boys in Daytona these days, don’t we?

bud sudz
03/20/2012 04:57 PM
permalink

One of the biggest issues with any of the racing today is the lack of tire wear. These hard tires that never lose speed leads to the monotonous racing that we see today.
You used to have real pit strategy, changes in lap times late in the runs and the ebb and flow of the jackrabbits running strong for 20 laps then fading and those who preserved their tires moved to the front.
Also, today’s NASCAR is a final run roulette for your finish position with the lucky dog and 20+ cars always on the lead lap. In the past, the entire race mattered. Attrition, bad sets of tires, bad adjustments and slow pit stops whittled down the contenders throughout the race. At the end, there may have been 5 or 10 cars who perservered and had a shot at the win. Now, you can gain the lucky dog multiple times, catch a few breaks at the end and score a good finish. The middle of the race is largely irrelevant.

old farmer
03/21/2012 01:54 AM
permalink

“bud sudz” must have loved the Indy 500 a few years ago.

Gordon85Wins
03/21/2012 09:22 AM
permalink

“the Chase castrated the Bristol night race long before the reconfiguration.”

Absolutely true. The Chase has been such a colossal disaster for NASCAR on so many levels that’s it’s amazing that it’s still in place. Not even a loss of millions of fans has convinced NASCAR that the Chase sucks and always will. Even more amazing is how it would be the cheapest and easiest of NASCAR’s problems to fix.