The Frontstretch: Five Points to Ponder: On Self-Destruction, Old Faces and Favors by Bryan Davis Keith -- Tuesday June 5, 2012

Go to site navigation Go to article

Five Points to Ponder: On Self-Destruction, Old Faces and Favors

Bryan Davis Keith · Tuesday June 5, 2012


ONE: Kurt Busch Should Not Have Been Suspended

Yes, Kurt Busch acted like a complete ass when he went off on Bob Pockrass Saturday afternoon at Dover, essentially remarking that he’d beat up the veteran reporter if he hadn’t already been on probation. But really, a thinly veiled insult is now grounds for being suspended from competition? For crying out loud, the worst thing Busch did on the track the whole weekend was to make minimal contact with Justin Allgaier early in Saturday’s race. Sunday’s Cup event saw the usually volatile Busch docile on the radio, even as the No. 51 dropped through the field like a rock from the drop of the green.

The damage from the incident is already done. Phoenix Racing owner James Finch has made it clear that Busch may well not be returning to the car even immediately after serving his suspension at Pocono, if ever. Finch wasted no time listing potential replacement candidates in speaking to ESPN, stating “If he’s going to kill himself, I’m not going to be in the airplane with him.” The longtime NASCAR owner has no short history of removing/replacing drivers with next to no notice; just ask Jason Keller and Johnny Benson.

But the real question getting lost in all of Kurt’s idiocy and a career he’s attempted to self-destruct by every available means is this one… why the hell was this insult worth a suspension? Yes, Kurt acted like a jerk and took a well-respected reporter to task for asking a completely legitimate question. How does that justify being suspended from competition? Conduct like Busch’s is already costing him credibility within the media that cover this sport and is keeping what few prospective sponsors are left ten feet away behind a barbed wire fence from the No. 51 team. The damage is done.

NASCAR’s decision to suspend Busch was about the worst move they could have made. Busch has berated countless reporters in the garage prior to this weekend and never been suspended. For crying out loud, he raced the day after he went off on Pockrass! Now, instead of allowing fans and media alike to revel in a career unraveling before their very eyes, NASCAR has come in a day late with a heavy hand and made themselves the story. What’s their excuse going to be when a Tony Stewart or a Kevin Harvick snaps at a reporter later this year and they’re forced to park a Chase driver?

Sometimes an idiot is best left alone. Saturday was definitely one of those times.

TWO: That Being Said, Who Takes the No. 51?

Michael McDowell has spent years start-and-parking a number of cars in the Cup Series. James Finch may well want to consider an outside hire out of left field should replacing Kurt Busch prove necessary for his No. 51 car.

There’s no real getting around it, the No. 51 car is officially in play. Silly Season 2012 has begun, and the candidates for the ride are numerous. Owner Finch listed both Brian Vickers and David Reutimann as top available choices (Reutimann has a full slate already signed in 2012, but Vickers is available after performing admirably in a limited stint with Michael Waltrip Racing). There’s plenty of other options out there, from the veteran (Dave Blaney) to the young gun (Michael McDowell).

The right answer honestly depends on just what Finch and Phoenix Racing are looking for in a wheelman (besides someone that can stick their foot in their mouth after a controversial race). If it’s strictly a measure of talent and performance for the team (as it was with Kurt), it’s hard to argue against momentum. And right now, momentum is with Brian Vickers. Ever since doing his best impression of a wrecking ball last fall at Martinsville, Vickers has been the quintessential professional in his limited role with MWR’s No. 55, leading a ton of laps at Bristol and performing well on both of the short tracks he tackled in the spring.

But if the team is serious about finding a sponsor for the first time in years, the answer may well be in the polar opposite of Busch…one Michael McDowell. There isn’t a straighter arrow in the garage (McDowell’s not going to pose a behavioral problem off-track, that’s for sure), and there’s something to be said about giving a driver who’s dutifully played the start-and-park role for Phil Parsons the last three years a shot at racing. Between Brad Keselowski and Busch, Phoenix Racing has been playing with the big boys in terms of their wheelman the last few years. Going the other way might be worth a shot for a team that’s getting an unexpected new lease on life midway through 2012.

THREE: Why Was Stephen Leicht On Track So Long At Dover?

The massive crash that marred Lap 10 of Sunday’s Cup race took out contenders (Tony Stewart) and start-and-parkers alike. And of all the cars involved, there were none worse off than the No. 33 of Stephen Leicht, which was missing both ends of his machine after getting piled into during the crash. Yet, after 50-some laps, what was left of the No. 33 was back on the racetrack, noticeably limping around the high banks.

There’s nothing new or surprising about watching teams piece together wrecked machines to make a few more laps and score a few more points. What was different about this case was the No. 33 team had start-and-parked three consecutive events, came into Dover without sponsorship on the hood, and was clearly set to start-and-park again… they had only one set of scuffed tires in their pits prior to the start of the race. That begs the question: why was it so important to make laps in a severely damaged machine?

The eventual 35th-place finish the team did score moved them up to 36th in owner points, past the No. 21 team (which was not on-track this weekend) but still well over 50 markers behind 35th and a “locked-in” spot in the Cup field. Even if Tommy Baldwin Racing’s No. 36 team has to keep start-and-parking races themselves, with sponsorship lacking, there’s no way the No. 33 can catch them start-and-parking as well.

Pure speculation here, but does the No. 33 know something those outside the garage haven’t picked up on yet? Is there a team (or two, even) in the top 35 that’s nearing fiscal trouble? Either way, the No. 33 team was not acting like a start-and-park operation after the crash on Sunday… and that was a deviation from the plan.

FOUR: Carter-2 Motorsports Back with More Name Power

The same small-time ARCA operation that has attempted to make a splash, first by draping their race cars in Ron Paul for President decals dating back to Toledo last fall and then by publicly stating they’d consider putting former ARCA Rookie of the Year Jeremy Mayfield in one of their cars has done it again with their entry for Pocono this weekend. One Bobby Hamilton, Jr., former Nationwide Series regular and a driver that was part of the thrilling 2003 battle for the then-Busch Series crown, is slated to drive the team’s No. 40 car according to ARCA’s posted entry list, making what will be his first ARCA start since Michigan back in the spring of 1999.

As was the case when Mayfield’s name came up, it’s important to note that even with a name driver in the car, the No. 40 team has not shown the speed needed to bring a old face back to Victory Lane. But that being said, unlike Mayfield, Hamilton Jr. is not a driver that brings baggage; instead, he comes with some old-school character that racing has been lacking of late. This hire is one that Carter-2 Motorsports should be proud of making, turning Saturday’s ARCA event into a “must see.”

FIVE:…on the FAS Lane Racing No. 32?

Yes, has everything from Audis to Suzukis for sale on it, but there’s no getting around the incongruity of having the namesake used car site of Hendrick Motorsports sign on to sponsor a lower-tier Ford operation; the site will sponsor Boris Said in the Cup Series’ two road course races this summer. Even more noteworthy, the press release announcing the deal said nothing about the FAS Lane team switching to Chevrolets, even for those two events.

Look closer, though, and the connections that helped made this deal happen really stick out. Boris Said is a partner in a BMW dealership under the Hendrick Automotive umbrella, and has past history in Hendrick-affiliated equipment (he ran a number of races with the MB2 Motorsports team when it still existed, nearly winning the Watkins Glen Cup race in 2005.) The deal with HendrickCars also specified a limited number of associate sponsorships in events where Ken Schrader will be behind the wheel… another Hendrick Motorsports alumnus.

On the one side, it’s good to see FAS Lane get any type of sponsorship they can… the team has been stretching a dollar for well over a year now to race competitively at the Cup level, and is a tribute to Frank Stoddard’s leadership atop the box. On the other, though, isn’t it just a little troubling that even the independent little guy not driving Chevrolets is getting help from Rick Hendrick? It’s getting easier to list the teams that don’t have Hendrick support instead of the ones that do.

Contact Bryan Davis Keith

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Bryan Davis Keith and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Bill B
06/05/2012 10:23 AM

No matter how you slice it, a person’s cumulative record is maintained in all aspects of life. When you are a kid at school, at your job, and with the legal system. When you have a “bad record” and multiple occurences that is taken into account. You can argue whether or not that is fair but that is reality. If this had been a rare occurence – let’s say it was Matt Kenseth (has he ever even been on probation?) instead of Kurt Busch- nothing would have or should have happened. But Kurt keeps doing the same boneheaded things over and over. NASCAR wants and needs the media to provide their precious PR machine, they can’t have their drivers continually acting like jackasses toward the media.

People say, the media should teach Kurt a lesson by ignoring him but what if every driver acted that way? What if the media ignored all the drivers? Would that be good for NASCAR and their goals? No.
So that is why they are punishing a repeat offender who just doesn’t seem to be able to control his temper any better than a 5 year old.

06/05/2012 10:26 AM

Definitely should not have been suspended.

It’s one thing to be fired by your team because you act like crap towards them… But for the sanctioning body to care? Come on.

And with his career goes one of maybe two drivers left in the whole Cup garage with any sort of personality. Thanks, headhunting media.

06/05/2012 11:15 AM

It’s time to bring into nas$car a new soft drink. What else could it be, but vanilla cream soda. It would be perfect because it describes the personalities of 99% of the drivers of nas$car. The “intimidator” has been replaced by the passive/aggressive. This sport is run by big name sponsors’ who want nothing more than sell their products (drivers included) with as little controversy as possible. “Soft sell” is their selling point. Actual racing is discouraged in the “sport” today. And the media, seemingly with nas$car’s blessing, know they can shove a microphone into a pissed off drivers’ face right after he gets out of his car and get cussed out. They then become the victim. I’m not condoning Busch’s behavior, which is immature at best. But at least he shows some fire. Which is gone from the sport today. Obviously nas$car could care less about us long time fans that built their sport. I no longer set aside the time on week-ends to watch a race. This one time fanatic has become a casual observer. And the downward spiral continues. Kind of long winded, but I needed to vent.

06/05/2012 11:19 AM

Maybe the 33 was back on the track due to Leicht running for ROTY. His only competitor, Josh Wise, is also a S&P driver, so if Stephen wants to win, he has to have a few races where he finishes higher. The chance came for him to grab 3 spots, EASY. They took it. Josh’s best finish so far is 37th so now Stephen has 2 races that he has bested Wise’s best finish.

Just think of that massive bonus for the team fielding the winning ROTY driver. Those funds could go a LONG way for such a cash stripped organization!

06/05/2012 11:47 AM

Just maybe it was Kurt’s record of disdain and disrespect and the fact that he was on probation that caused the suspension?

Why shouldn’t Finch step away from a situation that pulls him and his team down? When Kurt acts out that also reflects on Finch and the team. Finch gave him a chance, an opportunity, and it was on Kurt to make of it what he would. Well we saw how much he respected the opportunity.

06/05/2012 12:20 PM

That 51 would be last every week without Kurt behind the wheel. He elevated a terrible car to near top 20 status.
I’m sorry, Reuti is a nice guy, but not much of a driver. #FREE KURT BUSCH!

Kevin in SoCal
06/05/2012 12:24 PM

No matter how you feel about Kurt Busch, I thought his comments towards the stupid question were not strong enough to be suspended for. Fined, yes, but suspension is way too harsh, even if he was on probation already. Bob Pockrass came at Busch with a loaded question intending on getting a bad response out of him, and it worked. Now, if Busch had touched Pockrass or his personal effects, then yes that would be worth a suspension in my opinion.

06/05/2012 12:58 PM

lot’s of good point being made on the kb saga and in reading the article and someof the comments i ask myself, “if he’s so bad, just who exactly who has he hurt…besides himself i mean?”

I agree and take up the cry!


06/05/2012 01:03 PM

The real question on the #51 is will it actually continue to race w/o Kurt Busch. Somehow this article treats the #51 like a full time ride, which it certainly was not until Busch became the driver.

The suspension is silly since there is no way Nascar would suspend a driver with a big team/sponser for being rude in an interview. See numberous Tony Stewart interviews.

06/05/2012 01:12 PM

Of course he should be suspended. What kind of logic says “he did it before and didn’t get suspended so he shouldn’t now”???? What? OK, say he got away with it before so that some how makes it OK now? That is plain NUTS.

old farmer
06/05/2012 02:14 PM

I’m with the “free Kurt Busch” crowd.

The suspension was asinine.

Down with publicity-seeking media and their stupid questions!

06/05/2012 03:51 PM

Time to back off, let Bush think through this, IT WILL HELP and one race makes no difference they need the time get some cars going.

06/05/2012 04:19 PM

Hendrick/Chevy and nascar are joined at the hip. They can do no wrong.

That’s why the ratings and attendance is up so much. And I have land on Mars to sell you.

06/05/2012 04:28 PM

As much as Kurt Busch is really good behind the wheel of a race car, he has certainly put several of them into the wall for James Finch this year. For a team with no sponsor, it has to be getting expensive to keep building/rebuilding cars for a guy who seems to drive the cars beyond their capability to run. He may not find as ‘flashy’ a driver as Kurt, but he may save a lot more money by having cars in one piece after the checkered flag.

06/06/2012 11:22 AM

I agree with Bill B. – He should have been suspended because of his history of anger management issues. Is NASCAR just supposed to ignore this incident because it “wasn’t that bad”? What happens the next time and the time after that? If Kurt can’t learn to keep his mouth shut, than he deserves anything he gets.