The Frontstretch: Racing to the Point: "Game 7 Moments" Don't Feel Like Game 7 At All by Brett Poirier -- Tuesday February 18, 2014

Go to site navigation Go to article

Racing to the Point: "Game 7 Moments" Don't Feel Like Game 7 At All

Racing to the Point · Brett Poirier · Tuesday February 18, 2014

 

Most playoff series don’t reach Game 7. Some go four games, some five, some six, but few go seven. There’s a reason for it: Game 7 is reserved for the playoff series that just couldn’t be decided any other way. They’re destined to have one last winner-take-all moment.

As fans, we treasure Game 7s because we know they don’t come along very often, and we value how special they are. Game 7 isn’t just important because it decides a winner, it’s important because of all the small moments that led up to it. In baseball, it is the 13th-inning walk-off home run in Game 5 keeping a team alive that was on the brink of elimination. It’s the player who stole second in the seventh inning of Game 3, moments before his teammate doubled to drive him in as the go-ahead run. Those moments — along with 100 more — are the reason there is a last one. Without any of those plays, maybe the series goes five games, or six, but not seven.

That concept has been lost on Brian France. NASCAR’s chairman and CEO has been trying to figure out how to add “Game 7 moments” to NASCAR for years — and unfortunately, he’s finally done it. Forget about the first 35 races of the Sprint Cup season because the championship will come down to one race, set with four contenders fighting for the title.

Brian France wants more “Game 7 moments” in NASCAR, but some fans aren’t so sure.

Game 7 is coming in November. In other sports, fans find out two days before that there will be a Game 7, but NASCAR fans have nine months to brace themselves. Even American Idol doesn’t manufacture this much drama. And that’s exactly what it is: manufactured. If Jimmie Johnson and Matt Kenseth are banging fenders at Homestead-Miami Speedway, side-by-side in the final laps while fighting for the title, will that moment supplant the 1992 battle at Atlanta as NASCAR’s greatest championship moment?

It won’t for me. The difference between the 1992 battle and whatever scenario plays out at Homestead-Miami this year is the ’92 one wasn’t concocted in a third-grade science lab — better known as the NASCAR offices. The 1992 battle was special for all of the reasons my fictional baseball series was. After 28 races, barely anything separated six contenders for the title. It was the closest thing NASCAR will ever have to a Game 7. No gimmicks need to be added; it was authentic. That’s the reason it’s still talked about today.

When France announced the new championship format last month, many writers referred to his incessant desire for Game 7 in their stories, while others referred to his move as a Hail Mary. Neither term belongs in NASCAR, but they suited the stories well because neither does a winner-take-all final race. Auto racing has variables that stick-and-ball sports don’t. If teams were battling 1-on-1, like the Denver Broncos and Seattle Seahawks did a couple of weeks back in the Super Bowl, a winner-take-all finale would make sense.

Sprint Cup pins 43 teams against one another each week, though. And then there’s the other huge variable: the playing surface. The New Orleans Saints may be at a disadvantage when they travel north to play outdoor playoff games (the Saints play their home games in a dome), but imagine if the size and shape of the field was changed, too. In NASCAR, nearly every week it would get changed into a shape and surface the Saints hadn’t seen all year, much like Cup drivers won’t see Homestead-Miami until the finale.

MLB, NFL, NHL and NBA teams all travel and compete in different places across the country, but the playing surfaces are all pretty much the same. Try looking at Martinsville and then at Talladega — then tell me they are pretty much the same. I will tell you to get a CT Scan. Auto racing is a different animal. The points might be tallied differently, but the top auto racing series in the world all hold season-long championships (without playoffs) for a reason. It’s what has worked best since Morgan Shepherd competed in the first Indy 500 in 1911.

“I don’t think we can take everything the NFL or NBA is doing and say, ‘We need to do it like this because they’re doing it like that and it’s working,’” Ryan Newman said last month. “This is still stock car racing. This is NASCAR. A certain percent of change is good, but we do not need to copy their (playoff systems).”

Yet NASCAR has. Eleven years ago, there was a 36-race championship. Ten years ago, it was shortened to ten races. And now, it’s down to one.

The Chairman and CEO of the most successful American racing series just had to have “Game 7 moments” in a sport that’s never held a game.

The new playoff structure is bound to produce some exciting and intense moments. It’s also going to leave a lot of people asking themselves if NASCAR’s newest champion is really a champion at all. The NFL, MLB, NHL and NBA don’t have to worry about that; but then again, they didn’t schedule Game 7 before the season began.

Contact Brett Poirier

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
ATHLON SPORTSBOWLES: Is Kevin Harvick A Hall Of Famer?
Racing to the Point: I’ve Got the Green-White-Checkered Blues
Beyond The Cockpit: Ron Capps Could Have NASCAR Stars Trying… Drag Racing?
IndyCar Driver Profile: Sebastien Bourdais
Who’s Hot / Who’s Not in Sprint Cup: Darlington – Off Week Edition
Couch Potato Tuesday: Moving NASCAR Coverage Onto the Web
Voices From The Cheap Seats: NOTeworthy News
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Brett Poirier and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

kyboy88
02/18/2014 07:27 AM
permalink

Couldnt agree more. Making the whole season irrelevant is not how you draw in fans. NA$CARs front office is full of clowns!

Michael in SoCal
02/18/2014 11:05 AM
permalink

“It’s what has worked best since Morgan Shepherd competed in the first Indy 500 in 1911.” – that’s the best racing-related sentence I’ve read all week.

That said, I’m going to give the new raceoff system a chance, and I’ll consider whoever wins the championship a true champion because they raced according to the rules that everyone else did. If they can beat 42 other drivers, according to the rules in place, then to me they are the champion.

Dennis
02/18/2014 11:10 AM
permalink

A 36 race Champion versus a 10 race Champion versus a 1 race Champion. No matter how good the racing at Homestead ends up, it won’t have the same meaning to it that a 10 race or 36 race Championship would. The team with the best season MAY win it, but with the new one race takes all, the odds are against it.

babydufus
02/18/2014 11:28 AM
permalink

morgan shepherd line… priceless.

and i strongly agree with the author and the above posters.

in terms of generating drama or interest, I can see how casual fans will see the bulk of the season as something to be dismissed. seems like regular season long season sports like baseball and hockey games play to a much smaller audience during the regular season unless there is game between strong rivals. looks like someone forgot about the “Wake me up when the play-offs are on” factor. i also strongly agree that racing doesn’t compare well with stick and ball sports in any way shape or form. i just can’t see how the new system is good for the long term health of the “sport,” but i suppose that’s not what the head office is really looking at eh?

GinaV24
02/18/2014 11:59 AM
permalink

Well said, Brett! I didn’t like the chase and I like the crapshoot/demolition derby, 1 race decides it all format even less. I used to watch every race – NASCAR continues to take away reasons for the fans to watch or buy tickets for a race.

Scheduling game 7! I hadn’t thought of it like that, but that is the perfect explanation of it.

Upstate24fan
02/18/2014 12:51 PM
permalink

I agree, this whole system is NASCAR trying to fit the round peg in the square hole. Though, now that I’ve had time to digest this, I’ll give it a chance. I do like that now one bad race won’t equal a Chase death nail. Blow a motor at Chicago, go win NH or Dover and you move on.

bud sudz
02/18/2014 09:53 PM
permalink

Well put. The new “Playoffs” could be better than the old “Chase”, if it wasn’t one race at Homestead. One race is an anomaly, not a Championship.
Best article I’ve seen on the new format.

Big Dan
02/18/2014 10:50 PM
permalink

“The Chairman and CEO of the most successful American racing series just had to have “Game 7 moments” in a sport that’s never held a game.”

That says it all.

Guest
02/19/2014 05:08 PM
permalink

If anything the new format increases the chance of a winless champion. Be 4th in points after Phoenix, then just stay ahead of the other “Championship Contenders” at Homestead. If that means cruise at second instead of taking risks to win then so be it.

Just think a Start and Park can blow and engine on lap 1 wrecking 3 of the 4 contenders knocking them out of the race. The all the last guy has to do is finish no matter the position, or just DNF ahead of the others. There’s a Game 7 moment!