The Frontstretch: Could "Stick and Ball" Owners Save NASCAR's Integrity? by Jeff Meyer -- Wednesday September 5, 2007

Go to site navigation Go to article

Could "Stick and Ball" Owners Save NASCAR's Integrity?

Voices From the Heartland · Jeff Meyer · Wednesday September 5, 2007

 

Ever since Brian France took over at the helm of NASCAR, it is well documented that it has been his dream for it to become as popular as your traditional “stick and ball” sports, most notably, professional football. In the first few years of his reign, his unabashed comparisons and ramblings about racing's ratings vs. the NFL's became so extreme, sometimes it made me wonder whether he was trying to make up for a bad football bench warming episode during his formative years. But let's face it; before Brian Z. took over, the NFL was what it was and NASCAR was, well, NASCAR. Traditionally, the predominantly ‘good ole boys' of the southern racing community liked a good football game now and then, and your NFL fan was your basic guy who usually also likes fast cars. Comparisons between the two weren't usually made; however, now it's a different story.

We now have “The Chase,” a racing playoff system that was strictly made up to mimic the football playoffs. They now call the Daytona 500 the “Super Bowl” of NASCAR, a move which I can't positively blame on Brian. It seems to me someone might have called it that before he took over…but it is a moniker that he has embraced nonetheless. In his quest to capture what France dubbed “the casual fan,” we now suffer through two immensely unpopular races a year in the Los Angeles area, simply because it is the second largest ‘market' in the country; never mind the fact that even the NFL can't seem to make a go of it in that town. Racing tradition be damned — Brian France is gonna do it! Remember last Labor Day in Fontana? I believe the official reason the stands were not full is because the shopping was so great on the midway. This year, I'm sure the official reason will be the “unseasonably warm” weather. Whatever the changes, they have all been gimmicks.

But no amount of mischief can stop a growing tide of disinterest, After an initial rise and an obscene price that NASCAR commanded for its TV partners to broadcast the races, ratings have dropped faster than a ring-neck pheasant at the end of my 12-gauge pump on a November weekend. (Ok, I admit, once in awhile I miss and the bird continues to rise, just as an occasional race's rating beats the previous years.) Changes have already been made to the ‘playoffs' so more stars might get in (to create better ratings, no less.) Meanwhile, the grotesquely obese price that NASCAR initially wanted for title sponsorship of the (now) Busch Series has been ignored, and is rumored to be cut in half. But, if you have been a regular reader of this column, you shouldn't be surprised at NASCAR's sudden downturns as, at one time or another over the last 4 years, I have predicted a lot of it. There has been one changing aspect of NASCAR as we know it that I did not see coming.

However, and now that the downhill slope is here and seems to be a growing trend, I can't help but think it might ultimately be beneficial to the sport. Huh? I see you scratching your head…I'm talking about the growing power of the car owner.

In the past, NASCAR has had, for the most part, the same old cast of characters when it came to team owners, and the France family has pretty much had their way with them over the years. It has always been “their way or the highway, baby,” and if you didn't like it…well, tough. However, with recent team ownership changes, just think how things might be different. While France has miserably failed to bring the “stick and ball” fan to NASCAR, the owners are successfully bringing the “stick and ball” MONEY to their businesses.

Consider what has happened just this year:

  • Jack Roush sold half of his team to Fenway Sports Group, led by John Henry, owner of the Boston Red Sox, creating Roush Fenway Racing.
  • Ray Evernham partners with George Gillett, who happens to own the NHL's Montreal Canadiens, forming Gillett-Evernham Motorsports. Gillett is also a co-owner of the Liverpool Football Club of the English Premier League, which isn't really a football team at all, but rather, a soccer team. Perhaps, if no one tells Brian, he won't know the difference and – in some small way – feel vindicated.
  • Roger Staubach and Troy Aikman, owners of Hall of Fame Racing (I listed Roger first because he was winning Lombardis long before Troy…) recently announced that they have sold controlling interest of HFR to two men named Jeff Moorad and Tom Garfinkel. Moorad and Garfinkel just happen to be the CEO and COO of the Arizona Diamondbacks, respectively.

Just this last weekend, a fellow by the name of Tom Hicks (and family members) were the royal guests of Richard Childress at California Speedway. Mr. Hicks just happens to own the Texas Rangers of Major League Baseball and the NHL's Dallas Stars. Oh, and did I mention he is also co-chairman (with Gillette) of the afore mentioned Liverpool Football Club? (Which as we have already established, is a clever way the English disguise a soccer team.) Mr. Hicks had "no comment" when asked if a possible merger between himself and RCR was imminent, and we all know what "no comment" usually means.

As I see it, these ownership mergers, among others that have happened this year, equate to nothing less than more power to the teams themselves. No longer is Brian France just dealing with one guy that they (NASCAR) can tell to "shut up and sit down" when an objection is raised. Could this sort of power be evidenced by Jack Roush's recent assertion that NASCAR plays favorites according to how much ad money is spent by various sponsors? I find it hard to believe anyone of that stature would have made such an accusation a year or two ago.

What I would like to see happen, and maybe this is just my own "Pelican Brief" way of thinking, is that ultimately, these new groups of owners, who own teams in sports that are played with a finite set of rules and independent officials, eventually demand that NASCAR, too, turn over its officiating to independent sources.

When you stop to think about it, the arbitrary enforcement of the rules in NASCAR is one of the biggest things that rob the sport of its true integrity. Brian France needs to decide if he truly wants to be in the ‘“stick and ball” league or not. Perhaps the new “stick and ball” owners, and the power they wield, may someday lead him down the right path.

Hey, it COULD happen; and if it does, remember, you heard the theory here first!

Stay off the wall,

Jeff Meyer

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
NASCAR Easter Eggs: A Few Off-Week Nuggets to Chew On
Five Points To Ponder: NASCAR’s Take-A-Breath Moment
Truckin’ Thursdays: Top Five All-Time Truck Series Drivers
Going By the Numbers: A Week Without Racing Can Bring Relief But Kill Momentum
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Jeff Meyer and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Michael
09/06/2007 11:35 AM
permalink

Brian certainly does seem to be on a quest to destroy every single piece of his fathers’ and grandfathers’ hard work. I suspect he is mostly interested in building a legacy for himself than truly building the sport of stock car racing.I worry about the influx of outsiders as team owners. They always seem to come in waving their checkbooks and telling everyone that they plan to be in it for the long hall. Several months or a year later, they have sold their teams or become minority owners. It keeps the sport in constant turmoil and frankly makes NASCAR look like the hick organization that stick and ball enthusiasts think it is.

hoboraceguy
09/06/2007 12:26 PM
permalink

I think the stick and ball boys may really help. I agree the main issue with NASCAR the past 10 years is nascars hand in the races. From calling cautions when Jr’s in trouble to calling cautions when kurt busch gets more then a 10 second lead. Then we have crashes with no caution because it would put their golden boys a lap down.(Nemechek crash during green flag stops comes to mind.)Stick and ball boys have the lawyers to stop nascar. Also Nascar doesn’t have the power over the stick and ball boys. He can’t just tell them “we don’t need you”. Could be good.

Mark Rubley
09/06/2007 12:27 PM
permalink

Let’s face it. NA$CAR is a business. a BIG BUSINESS. For the long term fan – 20 plus years – we have seen some massive changes in the sport we so love. But there is reason for that. Money… and lots of it. Think of it this way; if you ran a business and had the choice of making 1 million a year or 10 million, which would you stirve for. Same with NA$CAR. Their great failing in this – that is jammed down the throats of the long term fan. They told him they wan’t to distance themselves from that fan base. They didn’t like the “southern way of doing things.” They hurt the feelings of a lot of good solid folks. And for what? Simple, they wanted the 10 million a year. I’ve loved this sport for 30 odd years, attended over 100 races, but I have to tell you, I liked it a whole lot better when they were just trying to make the 1 million, put on a great race, and treat the fans with some respect. If NA$CAR happens to read all the things that are written about them as of late, one would think they would see the writing on the wall. But they don’t…. Now All they Seriouly Care About is Revenue….. huh….that stands for NA$CAR now dosen’t it……remember that one… you heard it here first.

Bobby Marshall
09/06/2007 03:39 PM
permalink

I also am a 30 veteran of NASCAR watching, and I have also felt the shift away from us. I understand that the owners would like some compensation for their investment when they exit the sport, and therefore, are jumping at the chance to get it now rather than wait until they sell (or try to). Your theory of the new partners causing NASCAR to rethink or maybe even separate themselves from the officiating of the sport is very interesting. I also wonder if the antitrust suits by Texas and Kentucky are helping them to realize that the world they are creating for themselves is more diverse than they expected. The more people you involve, the more complicated the management becomes. With the “stick and ball” guys now involved, they may indeed change the way NASCAR has to approach things. It is a very interesting theory indeed!

 

Contact Jeff Meyer

Recent articles from Jeff Meyer:

Voices From The Cheap Seats: The Tale Of Two Tires
BSNews! Bruton’s Plans Extend Beyond Bristol’s Track
Top Ten Reasons Fans Failed To Show Up At Bristol Sunday
BSNews! NASCAR CEO Given "Special" Award Amidst Lavish Fanfare
Fan Coun-ci-What? Just What Is It That NASCAR Wants To Study?

Want to know more about Jeff Meyer or view his complete article archives? Then hop on over to his archive and bio page.