The Frontstretch: Reader's Comment Inadvertently Reveals The Problem With Jimmie Johnson by Jeff Meyer -- Thursday October 23, 2008

Go to site navigation Go to article

Reader's Comment Inadvertently Reveals The Problem With Jimmie Johnson

Voices From the Heartland · Jeff Meyer · Thursday October 23, 2008

 

If you come to this website looking for a bunch of happy, fluffy, feel good articles about NASCAR and some of its more colorful characters, my writings are probably not your first stop. Even if I do write about some happy, fluffy, feel good subject (albeit rare), it is still done in my usual, opinionated manner.

There are a few reasons for this, not the least of which is that this column was basically born in a very opinionated, if not occasionally unruly, Midwestern racing tavern several years ago. With that type of beginning, you can see why fluffy is just not my style.

Most of the time, while I do get my share of hate mail and hateful comments, it seems that the general, average Joe or Jane race fan tends to appreciate and agree with my point of view. However, a recent comment to yesterday’s Top Ten list, in which I basically compared Jimmie Johnson to Cale Yarborough, made me stop and think for a moment. The comment was from a reader named Linda, and she had these kind words for me:

“Jeff, you really don’t like Jimmie, do you? If it weren’t for him, I wonder how you would come up with your negative articles.”

Hmm. Well, to Linda I say, no, it’s not that I really dislike Jimmie Johnson — it’s just that well, it’s Jimmie Johnson!

Jimmie Johnson and Chad Knaus have gotten Chase racing down to a science — creating lots of apathetic fans.

Let me explain. While I admit J.J. is not my favorite person by a longshot, of all the drivers in the Cup Series, he’s the one that brings out the biggest dose of pure apathy. Now, if Linda had been talking about me not liking Kyle Busch, she’d have been spot on. But not Jimmie Johnson. When it comes to Johnson, I, and probably 90 percent of NASCAR’s fan base, just don’t care. He inspires no excitement for us. Johnson and crew chief Chad Knaus have gotten this whole CoT thing down to such a science that it has become mundane.

Just think about it. All year long it has been Kyle Busch this, Kyle Busch that, with the occasional hope thrown in that Carl Edwards could beat him. Did you hear anything about Johnson? Not much. While Kyle and Carl were racing, Jimmie was just sort of cruising around, lurking and waiting for the Chase to come.

And therein lies the problem most people have with Jimmie Johnson.

Now, here we are, with barely a month left to race, and Johnson is on the verge of a “threepeat,” the likes of which hasn’t been done in 30 years — and only once before in NASCAR history by the legend Cale Yarborough.

Certainly, winning three championships in a row is an outstanding achievement. As we already established, Chad and Jimmie have gotten this type of racing down pat — there is no denying that. However, this feat today simply cannot be compared to what it took to do it 30 years ago. Even Yarborough himself, while being politically correct and gracious about possibly sharing the record, is not convinced there shouldn’t be some sort of “Barry B*nds” asterisk attached to it.

“It’s going to happen. That don’t mean I’m pulling for him,” Cale said in a recent news conference. “But, if he does it, I’ll be in good company. I hope he feels the same way.”

And the competition factor?

“I think it may have been harder to win (championships) back then than it is today because you had to compete against everybody,” Yarborough said, referring to the revamped Chase system of points. “I never was one to do much calculating. I went all out every lap I ever raced in my whole career. I’d still be doing it today. The only thing I can say is Jimmie better be glad I’m not racing with him today.”

And so it goes. I’d be willing to bet, and maybe the editors will help me out here by throwing in a totally unscientific poll (guess what? They did!) that next to Kyle Busch, the average Joe / Jane fan would have listed Jimmie Johnson as a second choice for the person they would have least liked to have won the championship this year.

Like I said, it’s not that I or everyone else dislikes Jimmie so much; it’s just that he’s, well, Jimmie Johnson! He inspires nothing, and sadly — for today’s race fan — a Chase Cup does not equal a Winston Cup.

Thank Brian France for that.

Stay off the wall,

Jeff Meyer

Contact Jeff Meyer

NEW YEAR? NEW NEWSLETTER. LOOKING FOR THE INFO YOU NEED ABOUT NASCAR IN 2013 – SENT RIGHT TO YOUR EMAIL INBOX?
Well, you’ve come to the right place. The Frontstretch Newsletter gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up and get all the information you need. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

 

©2000 - 2008 Jeff Meyer and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Jeff Meyer
10/23/2008 02:19 AM
permalink

Thank you Editors!

Shayne Flaherty
10/23/2008 08:15 AM
permalink

I agree with your comments concerning Jimmy Johnson. Big Yawn. The other Chase contenders were in a position at the beginning of the Chase to run for a championship. Basically, they blew it. Jimmy and Chad didn’t cause that. They were there to take full advantage of the other teams failure to get the job done. I’d much rather watch 5-6 drivers battle this thing out all the way to Homestead. Unless Jimmy and Chad get kidnapped, it ain’t gonna happen.

Mark
10/23/2008 08:19 AM
permalink

“— a Chase Cup does not equal a Winston Cup.” And it never will. And, NO, I won’t thank him, if anything I’d like to kick his butt. He has pretty much screwed up everything he has laid hands to, including the Winston Cup.

Last man out turn off the lights and bring the flag.

Carrie
10/23/2008 08:30 AM
permalink

What a crock. Jimmie inspires nothing? Really? He inspired your article, didn’t he? You just wasted a bunch of words and time on someone you supposedly feel nothing for. The simple fact is, Jimmie has been quietly kicking the crap out of his competitors since 2002 and the good ol boy yahoos don’t like it.

Would he have have won 2 Cups under the old rules? No. But the simple fact is his win percentage is the eighth highest ever and that includes beating guys like Earnhardt (all three of them), Gordon (all two of them) and, hey look at that, Cale Yarborough.

Put an asterisk on that.

Derrick
10/23/2008 09:08 AM
permalink

Hey I couldn’t agree more. While I don’t dislike Jimmie…. It is just boring. Give Jimmie and Chad credit, they do know how to work the system, but after that it is just plain boring to watch them. For every Jimmie Fan out there…. It is easy to root for a winner!!! For all the rest…. Lets hope Jimmie gets caught up in one of Robby Gordon’s “oops” before the end of the year! Then maybe this “chase” could be a little more intersting.

Graceann
10/23/2008 09:45 AM
permalink

You said it, or should I say ” Yarborough said, I went all out every lap I ever raced in my whole career.” Unlike Johnson who has cruised around most of the season using it as a “test session” while the others actually put their heart into it. Yeah, Johnson has the heart of a “Champion” to bad its just for glitz and glory not for the love of the sport.

midasmicah
10/23/2008 10:25 AM
permalink

Man, it’s good to see an article that offers up the root of the matter so brutally honest. No fluff indeed. I’ve stated the same thing time and again. Johnson may be a good driver and a good man, but he’s got the personality of a fencepost. With the current points system, the first 26 races mean nothing. Just a test session for the chase. If things don’t change and fast, like the titanic, na$car will soon sink fast.

Señor Obvious
10/23/2008 10:34 AM
permalink

You guys really need to do some research. Yes, Johnson would have won the two championships under the old system. Not that it matters though because,

wait for it….

WE HAVEN’T USED THAT SYSTEM IN YEARS!!!

It doesn’t apply.

Now, as far as Jimmie Johnson’s charisma level, I think you’ve sold him short. He’s right up there with Jeff Gordon, Matt Kenseth, cotton, that real cheap white bread you buy at convinience stores, the Toyota Echo, college ruled loose leaf paper (100 pack), those worn out panties my girlfriend wears once a month that, make no mistake about it, say “no entrada señor” in no uncertain terms, Tab diet soda and well, the list could go on.

Carrie
10/23/2008 10:49 AM
permalink

Make up your minds, people. Jimmie’s got the “personality of a fence post” just because he chooses, most of the time, not to be a smart-ass or have the attitude of Tony Stewart. However, when he loses his stuff and says something the least bit on un-PC (like when he dedicated his Daytona 500 win to the haters), he’s an a$$.

Apparently the only way Jimmie would ever be able to win with you people is if he was born an Earnhardt.

Linda
10/23/2008 10:53 AM
permalink

Gee, I have arrived. My own special written because of me article. I have to guess you don’t attend many races, because you might find out Jimmie has more fans than you think he does. There are even lots of JR fans cheering for him when JR is not in the mix.

Ginger
10/23/2008 11:06 AM
permalink

Carrie, you got it wrong. Even if his name was Earnhardt, he would be boring.

Jeff, you got it right, we just don’t care.

midasmicah
10/23/2008 11:13 AM
permalink

My gosh!!! I love it when people agree to disagree. My point with Johnson is simple. He’s boring and hard to really get up for. At least with Kyle Busch and Tony Stewart you get some emotion. And racing HAS to have some emotion. It’s not just Jimmie Johnson. Racing as a whole has gotten hard to watch. Thanks for listening.

dawg
10/23/2008 11:22 AM
permalink

While I think you are spot on about this contrived Chase. If Jr. were to have missed it this year. Next year it would have been expanded to 15. I cannot, however agree with you about JJ. With 40 something regular drivers at the top level. there is room for different personalities.
I once heard Karl Kinser, described “as a guy so bland, he doesn’t ever have a nick name.”
There has to be room for guys like JJ, Matt, & Ryan. Can you visualise a race with 43 Tony Stewarts, AJ Foyt’s, Robby Gordons & Kevin Harvicks? Do you think they’d ever get a complete race in? It would turn into a weekly destruction derby, & while it would be entertaining for a while. It would soon get old.
One can hear the same things in the stick, & ball sports. That the current players weren’t fit to carry the jock strap, of the former greats. That,s BS. You have to judge players, or drivers against the people they actually competed against.
In that context, no one does it better than JJ, & Chad. They could easily be going for #5. Next year they could be trying to stand alone. With 4 in a row.Don’t bet against it. I’m not a JJ fan either, but to be even trying to put the guy down. Seems highly subjective!

yankeegranny
10/23/2008 12:40 PM
permalink

i wonder if JJ would be so bland if he had started out racing for someone else besides Hendrick? Gordon is bland, Mears is bland,and they sure seem to be trying to turn JR into a country-style politically-correct driver. Hendricks got rid of Kyle and I wonder if he would have gotten rid of Mears if he had married his girlfriend instead of being an unwed dad?

don mei
10/23/2008 02:30 PM
permalink

The fundamental problem with Nascar today, (other than the COT, AKA the POS) is simply that the entire focus is now on winning an abbreviated championship rather than on winning races. The current format, and to some extent the old format, given the Nascar points structure, encourages drivers to drive conservatively just to finish…witness Johnson at Talledega. You can be damn sure that if first place was worth 50 or 100 points more than it is now, life would get a LOT more interesting.

Lunar Tunes
10/23/2008 03:31 PM
permalink

Carrie said: “What a crock. Jimmie inspires nothing? Really? He inspired your article, didn’t he? You just wasted a bunch of words and time on someone you supposedly feel nothing for.”

Carrie, you (and people like you) are the reason there is a warning on my new hair dryer that says; “Do not use while sleeping.”

What JJ inspires is intense apathy when it comes to exciting racing. That is what the author is writing about.

(Do not read this post with your eyes closed or if you are illiterate.)

Carrie
10/23/2008 04:11 PM
permalink

Lunar Tunes: Bravo. Attack the person when you really can’t attack the point.

Writing about your apathy toward someone proves you’re not apathetic at all. Pathetic, yes. Apathetic, no.

Jeff has written two pieces about Jimmie in two days that directly contradicts his claimed apathy toward the guy.

Jamie
10/23/2008 04:49 PM
permalink

Sure seems to be a lot of people reading and writing about a guy who inspires so much “apathy.” If I was truly apathetic to an individual I wouldn’t spend anytime reading about them – let alone writing about them.

As far as a Sprint Cup equalling a Winston Cup – where Jimmie’s concerned it sure does. He’s likely to win this one under either system – same way he did in ’06.

Not that it matters. Change the system anyway you want – Jimmie and Chad will still find a way to be on top. They’re just doing what any good champion does – going to their destiny.

Personally, I find that anything but boring.

midasmicah
10/23/2008 05:46 PM
permalink

Hey folks, while we can agree to disagree, let’s not be jerks about it (lunar tunes). We all have opinions and calling each other names is not going to change them. While I may not care for JJ’s personality, I’m going to respect someone else’s perspective on this subject. Thanks for listening.

Lunar Tunes
10/23/2008 10:38 PM
permalink

What? I never called anyone a name.
I merely was pointing out that the article is talking about JJ’s style of racing and what most fans think about it.

Its not about if he inspires Jeff or anyone else to sing praises and write love poems about him.

And…to use someone elses way of thinking…you say not to be calling each other names but yet you can call me a jerk? How does that work?

And let’s compare the following quotes…

“What a crock. Jimmie inspires nothing? Really? He inspired your article, didn’t he? You just wasted a bunch of words and time on someone you supposedly feel nothing for.”

“Bravo. Attack the person when you really can’t attack the point.

Writing about your apathy toward someone proves you’re not apathetic at all. Pathetic, yes. Apathetic, no.”

Gee, if that aint the pot calling the kettle black.

Mike In NH
10/24/2008 09:59 AM
permalink

As I said elsewhere – his cardboard cutout in the store has as much personality as he does. Contrast this with Cale Yarborough, since we’re comparing his record to Cale’s as well. Look at the difference.

He’s so boring that they have to keep sticking his crew chief together with him like they’re some sort of joined species, just to add a little personality to the picture.

Tony’s by himself in his commercials. So is Mikey Waltrip, Kevin Harvick, Carl Edwards, and a bunch of others. Yet Lowes needs to add Chad to their commercials to give them some punch. That’s all you need to know, right there.

Shayne Flaherty
10/24/2008 11:51 AM
permalink

Mike In NH, your comments made me realize that Big Jim Johnson did the fashion spread in Maxim magazine this month. Good thing I prefer reading in the bathroom. Otherwise, I might have crapped in my shorts.

Phil
10/24/2008 01:18 PM
permalink

Just put JJ in a woods car and then you will see how great a driver he is.

 

Contact Jeff Meyer

Recent articles from Jeff Meyer:

BSNews! Bruton’s Plans Extend Beyond Bristol’s Track
Top Ten Reasons Fans Failed To Show Up At Bristol Sunday
BSNews! NASCAR CEO Given "Special" Award Amidst Lavish Fanfare
Fan Coun-ci-What? Just What Is It That NASCAR Wants To Study?
Top Ten Reasons People With No Sense of Humor Write In And Complain About These Lists

Want to know more about Jeff Meyer or view his complete article archives? Then hop on over to his archive and bio page.