The Frontstretch: Veto The Bill To Change the Rules by Jeff Meyer -- Thursday August 6, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

Veto The Bill To Change the Rules

Voices From the Heartland · Jeff Meyer · Thursday August 6, 2009


Yesterday on this very frontpage, my esteemed colleague, Vito Pugliese (and I hope I spelled that right, ‘cuz I’m pretty sure he has some pretty heavy “family” ties) seemed to have a problem with three rules in particular that defined the outcome of recent races. They were (in order): NASCAR’s pit road speed limit, the Lucky Dog, and the penalty box.

It seems that Vito would like to have certain nuances of these rules changed. In his defense, however, I will say that although he would like to see them fixed immediately, he would also settle for his proposed changes to be implemented before the start of next season. But simply the possibility of changing the rules right now is what I would like to address first.

One thing that has always peeved me about NASCAR is not the fact that they occasionally employ “selective” enforcement, but the fact that they are able to, and do, change the rules as they see fit right in the middle of the season. To me, that is preposterous, even if it is a GOOD rule change.

As a “professional” sport, there should be a review at the end of each year that includes the sanctioning body, the owners, and other selected members of the teams that go over the rules and any concerns that may have arisen from them during the previous season. If there are changes to be made, they should be made then, and — here’s the clever bit — adhered to for the entire upcoming year! If they need tweaking some more, then change them at the NEXT meeting, not in the middle of the year. That way, everyone is on the same page and no one can bitch (well they can, but not with real conviction) about it later.

Take, for instance, the sudden change of the double-file restarts. First of all, we have always had double-file restarts; but now, due to a midseason fix to the rules, we only have guys on the lead lap up front. Now, those that know my work know that I have been advocating a fix for a long time, ever since they started the Lucky Dog rule (more about that later). But while I am happy that they did finally change it, changing it in the middle of the year was just wrong! No other sport fixes their rulebook in the middle of the year. The NFL, for example, didn’t suddenly move the goal posts to the rear of the endzone after week 7 because some new, super-legged kicker walked on to a team giving them a decided advantage. So as you can see, this is one area where NASCAR should be like other sports, sticking with rules that should be set at the beginning of the season and lived with for the entire year. ‘Nuff said.

Now, on the other things…

Pit Road Speed Limit:

This one is simple enough. The bottom line is that the only one to blame for Juablo not winning the Brickyard 400 is Juablo himself!

The speed limit is already set in stone. NASCAR, in what I find as an extraordinarily rare case of being reasonable, gives the competitors a 5 mph cushion above that limit just in case there are differences in the engines (as we all know there are). Your State Patrol does the same thing. If you are traveling down the Interstate doing 70 in a 65 mph zone, there is an extremely little chance that you will get pulled over and given a good talking to. It is when you are nudging upwards of 75 in that 65 mph zone that you are asking for trouble. On pit road, just as in real life — like within the city limits — those “cushions” become smaller. Having them is a must, though, because all the cars are different. Furthermore, having no cushion in place and citing it as a “safety factor” is ridiculous as well. Chances are, you’ll be just as dead if you are hit at 55.11 mph as you will be at 60.11 mph.

David Stremme and Robby Gordon were both penalized five laps each by NASCAR after an on-track altercation during Monday’s race at Pocono.

Well, at Indy Juablo was caught speeding in two separate “time zones.” He was doing “country” speed in “city limits” … and that just doesn’t wash. In truth, the ONLY thing that NASCAR should be ridiculed about when it comes to this subject is the simple fact that they used guys with stopwatches to police pit road until 2005! That, my friends, is just ludicrous.

Bottom line is, there is nothing that needs to be changed here. We don’t need speedometers in the cars, and we don’t need to have pit road speeds posted for all to see — least of all the driver. And if these guys didn’t have a proclivity to speed down pit road at any given time, why is it that over almost every radio, on every pit stop, you hear the CC reminding the driver to “watch your speed?!” These guys are the supposed best in the world; they should, and do (most of the time) know what they are doing.

The Lucky Dog:

If there was one phrase that certainly fit for Jimmie Johnson and Chad Knaus at Pocono, Lucky Dog was it (although I’m sure many fans and opposing teams alike used a slightly deviated female version of the phrase.) That being said, I, like Vito, am in favor of the Lucky Dog as a whole. However…

In today’s NASCAR, which ironically matches our society, the concept of parity and of course the “kit car” rules the roost. Long gone are the days when one guy, who happens to be two laps down, is going to motor around the entire field not once but twice because he is suddenly that strong! And even then, back when it was conceivable and when lap down cars did restart next to the leader, it’s not often that they just took off and burned the rest of the field that badly as many who recount these tales of yore would have you believe. In most cases, if a lapped car was able to get in front of the leaders, it was often another quick caution that allowed them to motor on around, OR, back in the days of “gentlemen drivers,” the caution would fly and the leader would slow down and let a lapped car pass him, specifically letting him have a lap back before getting to the line. That was not always the case… but it happened more often than not.

So, what happened with the No. 48 team at Pocono was just pure luck and rarely occurs. Yes, the particular track that NASCAR happens to be racing at that week does come into play here, as the bigger the track the more time you have to work on your car should you choose to pit. However, to say that Johnson somehow manipulated the rules or took advantage of them is nuts. It was just dumb luck that no one else was one lap down. Or two laps down! Not only that, but Johnson had to get incredibly lucky not once, not twice, but three times! It was just their day!

Couple being some of the luckiest SOBs alive and the fact that they never gave up and have been in similar (well, not usually three laps down, but down early in a race) situations before and have kept fighting — even won — I, for one, thought they did one hell of a job! And most of you know that I’m not a big Jimmie Johnson fan! I did not feel that the rules had been bent out of their original intent one bit. Do you not realize just how many things had to “come together” for them to pull off what they did? Dumb luck and hard work was all that happened there.

The bottom line here is, it has happened before, it did happen on Monday, and at some point it will probably happen again in the future with this rule. But it’s like shooting a hole-in-one or picking up a 7-10 split… when it does happen, you say, “you lucky SOB!” and then let it go.

The Penalty Box:

Actually, as I watched the action between Robby Gordon and David Stremme, I was laughing. Hey, we all know Robby Gordon. He wasn’t going to let anything “go.” Was anyone really that surprised that the two kept after each other? If you were, please proceed immediately to Aegis Labs for testing under the auspices of NASCAR’s new Drug/Alcohol Free Fan Policy (also, like the rulebook, unpublished!).

No, what I was surprised about was that NASCAR parked them both for five laps. My first thought was “Good! They both got what they deserved!” Usually, NASCAR will show some sort of favoritism toward one or the other, leaving the rest of us to really wonder that age old question. “Why?”

Well, these guys were like two siblings fighting in the back seat of a long trip. NASCAR, having other, more pressing things to do, like running a race, finally stopped the car, came back there and gave them both a good spanking — regardless of who started it or who hit whom first.

Neither one of these jokers were a factor in anything, and both were acting like Saturday night locals going after each other on the dirt. I, for one (and please don’t lapse into shock when you read this) thought NASCAR did exactly the right thing. Punishing one more than the other would have been wrong and opened up an even bigger can of worms or closet full of conspiracy theorists.

So again, NASCAR surprisingly, actually did the right thing here. Wow, I said it twice!

Must be a full moon!

Stay off the wall (and off the radio as you plot your revenge!)

Jeff Meyer

Contact Jeff Meyer

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Racing to the Point: NASCAR Has Its Own Heartbreak Kid
Beyond the Cockpit: Brittany Force, the Fastest Force
Voices from the Cheap Seats: Advertising for Dummies
Who’s Hot / Who’s Not in Sprint Cup: Off Week-Richmond Edition
Couch Potato Tuesday: Picking The Best IndyCar On-Air Personalities


©2000 - 2008 Jeff Meyer and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

08/06/2009 06:42 AM

So, if Robby G and stremme were penalized 5 laps each for basically wrecking each other, shouldn’t Denny Hamlin have had a similar penalty for wrecking two innocent bystanders? Nascar keeps telling us they can’t ‘legislate’ intent, but it seems to me ‘a lot of emotion’ isn’t an excuse for willingly taking out other competitors.

MJR in Springfield VA
08/06/2009 07:04 AM


NA$CAR has ceased to be a “Sport.” They are now a “Show.” Just listen to the drivers, the owners, the NA$CAR head-haunchoes… And I quote: ”We just want to give the fans a good show today.” Thus, the great idea of yours to have an annual rules review committee (which makes a helluva lot of sense to me too) doesn’t fit into the “Show”


“Neither one of these jokers were a factor in anything…” Well, actually they were. Their antics were a factor to 41 other cars on the track at the time. It would have been hellish if while they were squabbling between themselves they pulled one or more cars into their shoving match.

Mike in Floyd Va
08/06/2009 07:50 AM

It’s gone from being a sport to sports entertainment like the WWE. Drivers talk about being body slammed, a wrestling term. Rules are selectivelky enforced like the WWE. The rules are inconsistently enforced like the WWE. The only thing missing is Vince McMahon and a wrestling ring. At least with Vince McMahon in charge we’d know we would be entertained for our hard earned bucks. Can’t say the same for Bozo the Clown from Daytona.

08/06/2009 07:59 AM

I understand the lucky dog rule..and now with the double file restarts it makes it harder to race to get your lap back. But didn’t NASCAR implement a wave around rule with the new restarts? I understand the wave around requires a driver to pit after the race he is at a disadvantage..but he does have the chance to get his lap back..especially at larger tracks. At smaller tracks getting a lap back is harder..usually more cars down a lap or more. The chances of getting a lucky dog being more then one lap down at most tracks is minimal..anyhow..I think you should only get a lap back if you are one lap down..not more..and to obtain that you should have to use the wave around. In other words a driver more then one lap down should have to use the wave around to position himself one lap down to get the lucky..and then only then should he be given the lucky dog. It is not right to be able to get the lucky dog being so many laps should have to work for it as much as the guys who stayed on the lead lap had to .. not just get “lucky” over and over and over and over…

Bill B
08/06/2009 08:16 AM

I agree that the rules should be set in stone at the beginning of the season and any propsed changes should be addressed during the off season with one excpetion. If the rule change is in the name of safety then it should be implemented ASAP.

08/06/2009 08:36 AM

How FUNNY! How VERY FUNNY! Your “As a “professional” sport, there should be a review at the end of each year that includes the sanctioning body, the owners, and other selected members of the teams that go over the rules and any concerns that may have arisen from them during the previous season.”

You mean that King Brian and his STOOGES would “invite” the actual participants to a “meaningfull” meeting to “discuss” the rules?


Oh yes, I am sure in front of King Brian & group, that some driver or crew member would “candidly” & “openly” feel free to discuss rules issues!

Maybe you need to go to the AEGIS labs for some blood work!

And, in support of the Gordon/Stremme incident, Robby got robbed he DID NOT spin Stremme, only bumped him, happens every race, and as others have stated:


08/06/2009 10:25 AM

This whole racing thing is a combination of luck and skill. There probably aren’t 3 to 4 teams (probably none)that have the skill to be able to take advantage of the “luck” JJ’s team had. It’s too late to change the rule to disadvantage the 48 team, they probably won’t need it again. It’s really funny like Jimmie proofing the chase. They’ll just find another way. Yes, Jeff, I have been in shock that you weren’t anti 48. But what a wonderful representation of how important the whole team is!

08/06/2009 12:07 PM

I agree with Sal. Guess that means if you want to win it is okay to bump/wreck others to get there since you won the race and didn’t annouce that you were going to wreck them. Amazing

Bruce Simmons
08/06/2009 01:40 PM

Hey guys!

Yes, Denny is living in a lucky bubble for sure. This was like that blind eye turned towards his Coke 400 pass below the yellow line. All of NASCAR looked the other way. What gives? Well, enjoy your freebies while you can Denny!

As far as Jimmy Johnson getting all those laps back: Destined. That’s all I have to say. When things are going to work out for a certain result, they just seem to go that way, no matter what anyone does. That and some old fashion elbow grease at all the right times.

It’s just amazing. Go Jimmie, go!

08/06/2009 03:41 PM

Sounds like Douglas needs to live in “the world according to Douglas.”

Maybe he ought to go fishing, or some such, on race days. Then he could constantly complain about something else, hopefully in some other outlet.

08/06/2009 05:32 PM

Hey jaymatt, thanks for your support!

BUT! Let me ask you a simple question?

“do you think NA$CRAP would actually and truly listen to team members, from owners, to drivers, to crew members, on a neutral stage, and take appropriate action as required”?

And a second question?? (if I may?)

“do you really think, that with all the previous actions and threats to these very same drivers and crews, THAT ANYBODY would have the courage to actually stand up and properly discuss the state of NASCAR”? (knowing that they may be the next one to “fail” a drug test). Courtesy NA$CRAP!

Keeping in mind that not that long ago NA$CRAP had a special drivers meeting at MIS and simply told the drivers “SHUT UP ALREADY”!


I am wrong? Really?

08/06/2009 06:51 PM

Nobody seems to care that Juan Pablo received the lucky dog pass 5 times to win his only race, and that 5 laps was a NASCAR imposed penalty. IF you dont remember look it up.

Kevin in SoCal
08/09/2009 04:45 PM

Robby Gordon and David Stremme were not penalized the first time they made contact with each other. They were only penalized after repeated contact and Gordon’s malicious words over his radio.
Denny Hamlin’s contact with Reutiman and Ambrose was a total accident, not a malicious hit and not in retaliation for previous incidents on the track. THAT is the difference, people.


Contact Jeff Meyer

Recent articles from Jeff Meyer:

Voices From The Cheap Seats: The Tale Of Two Tires
BSNews! Bruton’s Plans Extend Beyond Bristol’s Track
Top Ten Reasons Fans Failed To Show Up At Bristol Sunday
BSNews! NASCAR CEO Given "Special" Award Amidst Lavish Fanfare
Fan Coun-ci-What? Just What Is It That NASCAR Wants To Study?

Want to know more about Jeff Meyer or view his complete article archives? Then hop on over to his archive and bio page.