The Frontstretch: NASCAR Sponsors Shunning Women? What The Price of Higher Education Gets You Nowadays by Jeff Meyer -- Thursday October 1, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

NASCAR Sponsors Shunning Women? What The Price of Higher Education Gets You Nowadays

Voices From the Heartland · Jeff Meyer · Thursday October 1, 2009

 

As I was perusing the web the other day, I ran across an interesting blog about sponsorship in NASCAR and how it should be geared more towards women.

The blogs from this particular site are the results of an actual college course being offered at Virginia Commonwealth University on the business of NASCAR. The course is taught by Drs. Jon Ackley and Michael Pitts, with posted blogs by students.

The blog that caught my eye was presumably authored by a woman. I presumed this because of a couple of reasons. The authors hide behind only initials, and if it turns out that those initials DO belong to a man, he has some serious issues and needs to be focusing more on abnormal psychology than NASCAR business, for reasons that will become clear as you read on.

The author’s main premise was based on what constitutes a “loyal” fan. She cited the statistics “that NASCAR fans are 75% more likely to purchase items that are endorsed by NASCAR or a favorite driver, and 40% of all fans are females with the majority of the purchasing power.” She went on to say that a “loyal” fan will not substitute a product over a comparable product based on price and availability. Given that definition, she did not consider herself a “loyal” fan as her shopping was not compelled by such restraints.

If there is an influx of feminine products in NASCAR, Mark Martin may be the only driver comfortable enough to put his name over the door of the Tampax Chevrolet.

Now before Brian France gets all upset about such revelations, let me assure you that her attitude is not set in stone! After all, it IS a woman’s prerogative…yada yada yada. Case in point; the author said that she could care less what energy drink or home improvement store was on a race car, as these are not sponsorships geared strictly towards women. Products such as Tide or Gain or Target did not count because everyone has laundry or shopping needs, not just women. However, she would become a “loyal” fan if there were race cars sponsored by such companies as Tampax, Maybelline, Herbal Essences or even Victoria Secret! It is at this point where I rolled my eyes and said “yeah, right!”

To be fair, I must divulge at this point that I have never taken a course on ‘the business of NASCAR’ from any accredited college or university—I have taken a course in over 22 years of marriage and the raising of two daughters. During that time, I have learned a few things.

First off, I will say that I believe the author’s definition of a “loyal” fan to be misguided. A “loyal” fan is loyal usually to either the driver or the product. A good friend of mine drinks Budweiser and for years was a fan of Dale Jr. He now is a fan of Kasey Kahne. I suspect, even if Kyle Busch were to land the Bud sponsorship in the future that his driver loyalties would change once again. My favorite driver happens to be Carl Edwards, and before that, Dale Jarrett. Both of them drive or drove Fords which I happen to find detestable. While Aflac is an outstanding product, I do not own a policy. When I was going to ship something, I went with the carrier that could get it there the safest and the cheapest. If, by some miracle of clean living, my product needs happen to coincide with my favorite driver, well that is just icing on the cake. My friend is a loyal fan of the beer while I am a loyal fan of the driver, no matter what product he endorses. I’m not going to run out to get a Whopper when I hate them just because Tony Stewart may be my favorite driver. Which brings me to women’s products…

When it comes to feminine hygiene products, are you going to tell me that a woman is willing to switch just because Tampax is sponsoring a race car? I’ve made many a trip to the store for such products and I can state as fact that if I didn’t write it down EXACTLY, or take the end off the empty box to the store with me, coming home with that particular type of product just because NASCAR endorsed it was a recipe for disaster.

“But honey, this one has wings just like the CoT and it sponsors a race car!…” Right!

The same is true with makeup. Makeup for a woman is a very personal thing. They have spent years (usually when you’re already running late) getting that shade ‘just right’ or whatever they do in there! If they already use Maybelline, and Maybelline goes on to sponsor a race car, well that is fine and dandy, but again, what woman that you know is gonna switch makeup products just because of that?

Under britches are the same as well. Women have cried and lamented because a certain bra was discontinued. In fact, some can even tell you the name, store from which they bought it, price and even the day it finally failed of their all time favorite undergarment! For women, once the ‘girls’ have finally found a comfortable ‘home’, your not likely to get them to move just because some racer is driving the Victoria Secret or Playtex No. 96 Chevy. It just ain’t gonna happen.

The author did acknowledge that barring a sudden influx of women into NASCAR, finding a male driver to drive such cars may be tough, but she did point out that Mark Martin drove the Viagra car for years with no shame. Yeah, that he did, however, must I point out that is a product geared toward women also? (In a perfect world, anyway)

Sponsorships aimed directly at women could have an interesting effect on the actual race cars though. Would a Tampax car be allowed a bigger wing? Would the underside of the Victoria Secrets car be all soft and satiny? Would the car blush if it flipped over? Would the other cars be doing a bit more ‘bump drafting’? Would the Herbal Essences car smell and look better than the others? Would the Maybelline car look stunning even though it was late getting to the track? Would it become a streaked mess if it started raining?

Who knows, maybe more of those answers will be forthcoming as they get studied in our institutions of higher learning?

Stay off the wall (your makeup will smear if you hit it!)

Jeff Meyer

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Did You Notice? … A Return To Richmond, Post-Spingate And Quick Hits
NASCAR Mailbox: A ‘Normal’ Saturday And A Valuable Lesson
Beyond the Cockpit: Tony ‘The Sarge’ Schumacher
Open Wheel Wednesday: Controversial Moves, Long Beach Crowds, and Being a Fuddy Duddy
The Frontstretch Five: Pleasant Surprises of 2014 So Far
IndyCar Driver Profile: Takuma Sato
Beyond the Cockpit: Tommy Baldwin on Owning His Team, Hall of Fame and the Number Seven
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Jeff Meyer and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

ginger
10/01/2009 07:16 AM
permalink

I think the blogger is correct on the percentages but dead wrong on women not caring what product was on the race car. I am a Dale Jr fan, and I’m going to buy whatever products his sponsor sells. I am not alone, because when AMP became his sponsor, we bought and bought and bought. Amp’s sales went up over 60%. I go out of my way to avoid Lowes and Home Depot, and well you get the picture. I don’t think you will ever see him endorsing a feminine product or a male hormonal fixer-upper. But of course if he did, I would support the heck out of it.

Bill B
10/01/2009 07:34 AM
permalink

I think the NASCAR fan being loyal to a particular sponsor is as antiquated as the “win on Sunday buy on Monday” concept. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen but I think the percentages of fans that follow that model is greatly exagerated. In the past maybe but not anymore. Drivers, teams and sponsors change much more frequently now for one thing. As for the example given in the article regarding the Bud fan that changes drivers based on sponsorship – that is a really bad example for this article. That person has brand loyalty that has nothing to do with NASCAR. If Bud stopped sponsoring a car tomorrow he would continue to drink it. The model is supposed to work the other way – “I like this driver therefore I will buy this brand just because they support the driver I like.”

Bill B
10/01/2009 07:40 AM
permalink

Ooops. Sorry Jeff, after rereading I realized I misunderstood the point you were making about the Bud fan. We are actually in agreement on that point.

The Turnip
10/01/2009 08:57 AM
permalink

Hey Ginger, maybe Jr. DOES need to take a “male hormonal fixer-upper”!

Seriously, this sponsor thing goes both ways!

I AVOID, at all costs, GOODYEAR TIRES, SPRINT PHONE SERVICE, and to this very day, DO NOT BUY TIDE DETERGENT, ever since they dumped DW!

I also, due to my great disappointment in NA$CRAP in general, try my very best to AVOID any product that advertises NA$CRAP!

(admittedly, an almost impossible task, but I do the best I can)!

AND! Maybe NA$CRAP is not working for these products, lets see now, rumor has it, well, more than rumor, actual published reports, have GOODYEAR near bankruptcy, SPRINT, near bankruptcy, and of course lest we all forget, (which us americans seem to conveniently do with great frequency) GENERAL MOTORS, & CHRYSLER ACTUALLY HAVE GONE BANKRUPT!

And the HOME DEPOT was in critical shape not that long ago! (not sure where they stand right now after the management changes).

AND! Can you imagine the profit in each can of say RED BULL? They spend BILLIONS of $$$$ worldwide sponsoring racing and such! BILLIONS!

Now why would I pay some $2.00/can, where I know $1.99 is PURE PROFIT?

And finally, nice column
Jeff! Very nice!

Oldsmo-Bill
10/01/2009 10:16 AM
permalink

As I read the post from “the Turnip”, I realized that I did, in fact, stop buying Coors Light when they dumped Sterling Marlin in favor of David Stremme. And I’ve been thinking “I told you so” ever since. (serves them right!)

Andrew
10/01/2009 10:22 AM
permalink

This was a good article.

Good thing I like JPM coz Target is where I like to shop. I used to hate going there when they sponsored Reed Sorenson.

Kevin in SoCal
10/01/2009 01:03 PM
permalink

I wonder if Dale Jr. started sponsoring rat poison, if his fans would start using it, on themselves…

Lunar Tunes
10/01/2009 01:13 PM
permalink

Wow! Kevin aint out to make any new friends today, is he?! LOL

Kevin in SoCal
10/01/2009 05:16 PM
permalink

Its a great talent I have. I can speak and piss you off at the same time. :) :) :)

 

Contact Jeff Meyer

Recent articles from Jeff Meyer:

Voices From The Cheap Seats: The Tale Of Two Tires
BSNews! Bruton’s Plans Extend Beyond Bristol’s Track
Top Ten Reasons Fans Failed To Show Up At Bristol Sunday
BSNews! NASCAR CEO Given "Special" Award Amidst Lavish Fanfare
Fan Coun-ci-What? Just What Is It That NASCAR Wants To Study?

Want to know more about Jeff Meyer or view his complete article archives? Then hop on over to his archive and bio page.