The Frontstretch: Voices From the Heartland: NASCAR and Automakers Still Beating a Dead Horse by Jeff Meyer -- Thursday October 28, 2010

Go to site navigation Go to article

Let me set this straight right off the bat. It is OKAY to beat a dead horse. Pointless, yes, but not socially unacceptable. Beating a LIVE horse is when people, not to mention the horse, get a little pissy.

Now that we’ve cleared that up…

The horse in question for the purposes of this article is, once again, the old adage of “Win on Sunday, Sell on Monday.” This carcass rears (if a carcass could “rear”) its ugly head once again due to NASCAR’s recent announcement that they are looking to revamp the Cup cars… again.

“The point we’re at right now is trying to get feedback from all four manufacturers,” said John Darby, Cup Series director. “The fact is that, No. 1, 2013 is the right year to do this as it aligns with new models, and secondly, there’s interest from all four makes.”

So, just exactly what are the changes that are on the table, you ask?

“We had really positive feedback when we released the new Nationwide cars this year, Darby said. “The fact that undeniably, the Dodge Challenger and the Ford Mustang are really good-looking race cars. We’re not talking about a new race car. We’re talking about body modifications and making model changes that will help the identity and the look of the cars. It’s all from an appearance format, not to change the race car itself.”

Let’s take a logical look at that last statement and review a few things from the past. First of all, “back in the day” when “stock cars” were mostly stock cars modified for racing, you had no problem telling the Chevys from the Dodges from the Fords, etc. Back then, the adage actually held water. You could easily tell a Challenger from a Camaro from a Mustang from an Impala, so on and so forth.

NASCAR plans to alter the look of its Cup Series cars in 2013 much like they did with the Nationwide CoT… giving each manufacturer its own identity.

In the ‘80s and ‘90s, when the automakers homogenized their cars or even dropped certain models altogether, everything looked the same. Customers have been bitching about this problem for years, but due to supposedly superior business acumen (that means “smarts” for some of my local readers), the bitching fell on deaf ears. Well, we’ve seen what happens when you don’t listen to the customer and just how “smart” the automakers really were.

So to get things back on track, do you remember – besides asking the government for money – what the automakers did? Yes, that’s right; they started making cars that the customer really wanted. A few cases in point are the Challenger, Mustang, and Camaro.

Why do you think the new Nationwide cars look so good? Why do think they get good, positive feedback? Because they almost LOOK like the old muscle cars so many of us grew up with! Holy cow! You mean to tell me, if we pack a car with all the new technology of today and make it look like the car of yesteryear, it will sell?! Well, duh!!! I’ve been saying that for years.

Unfortunately, while NASCAR and the automaker’s hearts are in the right place, (or is it a move of desperation?) I still say that society has changed to the point the horse is still dead and cannot be revived no matter how hard you club the darn thing. Nowadays, I assert that only the shallowest of people will run out and buy a brand new Impala just because they saw Jimmie Johnson win with one on Sunday.

Nothing says sexy muscle car like the words Ford Fusion … NOT!

Yes, the new Nationwide cars do look pretty nice, I’ll give you that. The sad fact remains that for the practical customer, new Challengers, Camaros (yes I know Camaros aren’t even racing yet, but they have gone retro, too) and Mustangs are priced way out of the new “casual fans” range. And remember, casual fans are about all NASCAR has left. So except for the new “old” muscle cars that the automakers are now producing, let’s face it; if you see a new design or cool looking ride on the street nowadays, you still have to get close enough to the nose or tail to see the emblem and have a clue as to who makes it.

Another factor to be considered in today’s NASCAR is safety. Yes, the new CoT is safer, and since they have gotten rid of the wing and worked out a few bugs, they actually have produced some pretty good competition, depending on the track (one of the biggest factors!) I am all for more safety, but again, as I’ve said many, many times, they could have improved the “safety” aspects on any of the cars all along without having to go to the “pre-fab” racing body we’ve got now. Darby’s continued statements proves my point:

“The cycle that we’ve been in — which started actually back in the ’90s — of focusing on aerodynamic parity, we’ve now been able to take to the next level of what matters and what doesn’t,” he explained recently. “The fact is, there’s a lot of design features and sculpturing and things that you can put into cars that aren’t aerodynamically sensitive enough to worry about. That’s where we’re headed now, is really allowing the manufacturers to focus on those spots to bring out all the identity they can because that’s the value to the manufacturers.

“As we were going through all our aerodynamic challenges, the manufacturers fell into that stagnant period where all the cars looked the same in the showroom, too. There’s been a trend now to where manufacturers are working really hard on new models that don’t look like everyone else’s. I think that’s evident in what’s starting to enter the showroom today and will be evident over the next few years. We’ll do everything we can to help them with the process.”

So what is NASCAR saying? All those little body lines and curves which they so meticulously got rid of over the years suddenly don’t make a difference? Oh, so we are going back to “stock” cars? That would be all good and well if NASCAR would allow it… but they won’t. You know it and I know it, so why blow smoke up our skirt!

Personally, I am all for going back to the days of using each manufacturer’s stock body with the innards modified for racing, but it is never going to happen. Here’s what NASCAR ought to do; keep the cars (without the “splitter”) the way they are. Maybe a few minor tweaks here and there, but nothing major. Meanwhile, get the automakers to quit worrying about looks on the race track and go by the “powered by” angle! After all, a Chevy man will always be a Chevy man, a Ford man a Ford man and of course, your Dodge men! (A Toyota man is just too weird to type!) People just don’t run out and buy a certain model just because it won a race anymore.

Another adage comes into play here as well: “You can’t judge a book by its cover.” ‘Tis the same in today’s NASCAR: you have to raise the hood. After all, it is what’s underneath that makes your car really go … the “horsepower” that makes the difference between 1st and 43rd.

But I’m not gonna dig any big horse-size graves just yet. There’s too many “smart” people out there that enjoy the act of beating!

Let us know your thoughts, but meanwhile…

Stay off the wall!

Jeff Meyer

Contact Jeff Meyer

Thursday on the Frontstretch:
MPM2Nite: The Answer Man Rides to the Rescue… How To Fix NASCAR, Part I
Fanning the Flames: Is There Any ‘Right’ Strategy for the Big Three at Talladega?
Dialing It In: What Losing The Catch Can Man Will Mean For Teams, NASCAR
Fantasy Insider: Talladega, The Track Too Tough To Predict

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
NASCAR Easter Eggs: A Few Off-Week Nuggets to Chew On
Five Points To Ponder: NASCAR’s Take-A-Breath Moment
Truckin’ Thursdays: Top Five All-Time Truck Series Drivers
Going By the Numbers: A Week Without Racing Can Bring Relief But Kill Momentum


©2000 - 2008 Jeff Meyer and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

10/28/2010 08:19 AM

I agree with your opinions here, Jeff, but I do have a serious question for you.
Do you advocate changing the engines to 6 cylinders? I mean watching that big ol’ (small block) V8 win on Sunday doesn’t make me want to go out and buy a car that doesn’t even offer it as an option.
The “powered by” approach is a good one, and could work, but without a tangible relationship to the “stock” model, you still don’t generate a “need” for the consumer. At least that is my opinion.

10/28/2010 09:13 AM

I went to my first NASCAR race 50 years ago as a child. I love racing and I only watch racing when my favorite brand is racing in the mix. When NASCAR took the front engine four door chevy and made it into a stock car and then penilized the T Bird for being exactly what is was a great rear drive two door race car, NASCAR lost some of my fan support, I still had my 9 seats in the clubhouse section at homestead, then NASCAR took over the track and kicked me out of my seats and motorhome site on the infield. I was a founding member of the track, NASCAR dumped all over me as if I did not count.Its a long story about my fight with them and they won. But did they? I have not purchased any thing connected to NASCAR since, most of all a ticket (I spent about $8,000. a year at homestead) They did this to a lot of the old NASCAR fans, they lost their base support and it is showing now that all of the newby fans are moving on.

10/28/2010 01:13 PM

Two points. #1 While the average fan cannot afford the challenger, mustang or camaro, people will still dream, and the dreams of being able to own one of those cars will lead to brand loyalty. Sure you may be buying a malibu or a used impala, but it still contributes. #2 You are very young when you become a chevy man, a ford man or a dodge man. Imagine the young boy watching NASCAR with Dad on a sunday afternoon and thinking: ‘that challenger sure does look cool’ and there you have a future dodge man. While having these cars on the track may not necessarily produce a win on sunday sell on monday mentality, they will create brand loyalty with the young fans which will lead to a lifetime of sales to the little boy watching Nascar on sunday with dad.

Kevin M
10/28/2010 04:35 PM

BRuce Ford was the one that replaced the thunderbird with the 4 door taurus first. not chevy, granted the lumina was front wheel drive

Steve S
10/30/2010 01:15 AM

You can say what you want about selling the powered by deal, but barak ofrance dictates that too. He tells the manufacturers what heads they can use after he takes their engines back behind closed doors to see what they are putting up for numbers. Then tells them what thay can or can not do while not releasing the numbers (at least to the public). So the teams that are winning (mostly bow ties) and have been winning for more years than, yes, that’s right, more years than jimmie johnson has been winning cups, believe it or not! And while I’m at it, the chase 1st and then the cot were supposed to even the field but yet we have a team going for their 5th consecutive cup when in the history of the top level of nascar only one time did a driver manage to even win 3 in a row, and that includes the likes of the King, David Pearson, Dale the elder, Bobby Allison, Darrel Dipstick and many other HOF’s, heck even Jeff Golden couldn’t do 3 in a row never mind 4 and possibly 5. So yes, barak ofrance, you sure fixed it, and no, it wasn’t broken but ask Hendricks, it’s FIXED now.


Contact Jeff Meyer

Recent articles from Jeff Meyer:

Voices From The Cheap Seats: The Tale Of Two Tires
BSNews! Bruton’s Plans Extend Beyond Bristol’s Track
Top Ten Reasons Fans Failed To Show Up At Bristol Sunday
BSNews! NASCAR CEO Given "Special" Award Amidst Lavish Fanfare
Fan Coun-ci-What? Just What Is It That NASCAR Wants To Study?

Want to know more about Jeff Meyer or view his complete article archives? Then hop on over to his archive and bio page.