The Frontstretch: Consider The Evidence Before Hanging Kevin Grubb by Jeff Meyer -- Wednesday September 13, 2006

Go to site navigation Go to article

Consider The Evidence Before Hanging Kevin Grubb

Voices From the Heartland · Jeff Meyer · Wednesday September 13, 2006

 

Hidden behind the big story to come out of Richmond this past weekend, Tony Stewart missing the Chase for the Championship, was a second, more troubling piece of news concerning Busch Series driver Kevin Grubb. It was announced Tuesday that Grubb had been suspended indefinitely from NASCAR a second time for failure to follow the sport’s drug policy for reinstatement.

Grubb was first suspended in March of 2004 for testing positive for banned substances in violation of NASCAR's substance abuse policy. He was reinstated to drive in June of this year, with part of the conditions of that reinstatement being an agreement that he submit to periodic drug testing at anytime.

Last Friday, after a crash on lap 2 in the Busch race, Grubb was taken to the infield care center, where he was treated and released. Apparently, sometime while he was being “treated” and before he was released, Grubb refused to submit to a NASCAR drug test.

“He was on a program where he agreed to be tested at any time,” said Jim Hunter, NASCAR's Vice President of Corporate Communications. “He, for whatever reason, refused to be tested.” Hunter went on to say that several attempts were made by doctors and “medical liaisons” to get Grubb to submit to testing.

On the surface, one might think that this sounds like an open and shut case. However, as with most anything, there may be more to it than meets the eye.

“I don’t remember most of being at the track,” Grubb said when reached for comment. “I had people pulling me in 20 different directions. I ended up leaving, from what I understand.”

Kevin says that he woke up on Sunday, still feeling “terrible” and not really sure what day it was. Grubb further states that he then went to the hospital and was diagnosed with a concussion. “I’ve been clean the whole time,” Grubb said. “The next day, once I found out all the things that happened, I offered to take it. I’m ready to put the ball in action."

Now, as I see it, there are a couple of different trains of thought here that a person might choose to board. The first is that Kevin actually did have something in his system and wanted to give it time to clear. Some substances, such as cocaine, do pass through the system relatively fast, while others, such as marijuana, do not. If stalling to hide his drug use is the case here, Kevin knew what he was doing, and the suspension is justifiable.

However, what screams out at me through this whole thing is NASCAR's timing for the test in the first place. Is it the general practice of NASCAR to administer a drug test immediately after a crash? I don’t believe that’s the case. It should be mandatory for anyone that crashes and goes to the infield care center…but I doubt it’s part of the proper procedure administered for everyone once they get there.

Another question that must be examined is the treatment of Grubb at the infield care center. NASCAR states that he was treated and released. If Grubb went to the hospital on Sunday and is found to have a concussion, what does that say for the diagnosis and treatment he received at the track? If the concussion is in fact legitimate and the track doctors missed it, one could come to the conclusion that more emphasis was placed on trying to get Kevin to submit to drug testing than actually examining him.

Now, I am not jumping to conclusions one way or the other. I am just saying that there are a few questions that need to be looked at before the racing community looks to hang Kevin Grubb from the nearest flagstand.

“I worked very hard to get my life back to where it was,” said Grubb. “I don’t see it being thrown away in one night.”

Neither do I.

Stay off the wall, (and the drugs!)

Jeff

NEW YEAR? NEW NEWSLETTER. LOOKING FOR THE INFO YOU NEED ABOUT NASCAR IN 2013 – SENT RIGHT TO YOUR EMAIL INBOX?
Well, you’ve come to the right place. The Frontstretch Newsletter gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up and get all the information you need. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

 

©2000 - 2008 Jeff Meyer and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

M. B. Voelker
09/14/2006 05:55 AM
permalink

As the wife of an EMT I know that there is an unfortunate tendency in the medical community to assume that a patient with a drug history who is exhibiting altered mental status and bizarre behavior is high.

Most of the time that assumption is correct, but caregivers are warned about it because injured patients have died that way.

Somebody has definately screwed up in this case. Either Grubb for taking drugs and thinking he could fool the tests with a delay or the doctors in the infield care center for missing the injury.

Frank
09/14/2006 09:51 AM
permalink

I think they should re-exam him and offer a second chance for a drug test. I work as an EMT and safety supervisor in the Gulf of Mexico. To many times we want to pre-judge someone based on their past history. This is not fair to them nor is is fair to Kevin.

Mike
09/14/2006 10:29 AM
permalink

NASCAR should be very concerned about the fact that the infield doctors missed the concussion. From my limited understanding of concussions, going to sleep for a full night can result in the patient slipping into a coma. If that had happened in this case, we’d be reporting a much grimmer story.

Steve
09/14/2006 10:48 AM
permalink

I was in a car accident with a mtbi, mild traumatic brain injury, with memory loss of 24 hrs. In the medical notes it said I thought it was 1972 (it really was 1993). Maybe his behavior looked strange like drug induced and it was the concussion induced behavior that prompted the request for urine analysis. If his concussion is as bad as that he’ll still be groggy for a few days and it will be noticeable. Give him the test now.

James
09/14/2006 11:22 AM
permalink

I agree with all of the above responses, but it will never happen. NASCAR will never back down and/or admit it might have made a mistake. Grubbs will be banned for life unfortunately.

nascarbabe2U
09/14/2006 12:19 PM
permalink

If it looks like a fish and smells like a fish….it’s Mackerel….as in Holy Mackerel…..it looks like NASCAR screwed up! I think the guy could have been on the up-n-up and due to his medical state was confused….I say if they are so worried test him and if I was ole Kevin I’d request they take a hair sample…no foolin a hair sample.

Chris
09/15/2006 05:31 AM
permalink

I tend to agree,.. Nascar SHOULD have tested him AS SOON as he came up with his story about the concussion and memory loss.
Problem NOW is they have put it off,.. and it’s been four additional days.
Now as far as the hair sample,.. I think that may work… but the main issue is this:
Setting precedence.
If they do it for him (test him twice becuase of his excuse, legit or not)... then every driver they want to test from now ON will have to be tested twice, because all those drivers can always point back to THIS instance where Grub was treated differently… so thats the MAIN reason this is a done deal.

Rebecca
09/15/2006 09:03 AM
permalink

Can he contest the suspension because of the injury kind of like when someone is fined and they contest it with the ISC?

 

Contact Jeff Meyer

Recent articles from Jeff Meyer:

BSNews! Bruton’s Plans Extend Beyond Bristol’s Track
Top Ten Reasons Fans Failed To Show Up At Bristol Sunday
BSNews! NASCAR CEO Given "Special" Award Amidst Lavish Fanfare
Fan Coun-ci-What? Just What Is It That NASCAR Wants To Study?
Top Ten Reasons People With No Sense of Humor Write In And Complain About These Lists

Want to know more about Jeff Meyer or view his complete article archives? Then hop on over to his archive and bio page.