Check in with Matt and Jay on their site at CareyandCoffey.com.
|Subscribe to The Frontstretch Newsletter|
Voices From The Heartland · Jeff Meyer · Thursday September 28, 2006
Using the cleverest and most versatile invention ever to be thought of by mankind, statistics, I have come up with a new way to evaluate those that are "lucky" enough to be in the Chase. I say "lucky" enough because the particular statistic that I am using in this evaluation is what is affectionately known as the "Lucky Dog".
The Lucky Dog, in my opinion, is purely the byproduct of the "young gun" invasion that took place in the late Nineties and continued on into the new millennium. Back when racing was real racing, and not the entertainment show we know today, there was a thing known as a "gentleman's agreement".
That agreement was basically this; if, when a caution came out, a lapped driver was close enough to the leaders, the leader would usually, keyword usually, slow down and let that lapped car pass him before he crossed the start/finish line to gain his lap back.
That "gentleman's agreement" seemed to work pretty well for the first fifty and some odd years in NASCAR until things started to get nasty. More and more young drivers, who were instantly dumped into primo equipment instead of "paying their dues", so to speak, were becoming quite selfish. Not wanting anyone to get a lap back, they were racing hell bent for leather back to the flag. The situation got to the point where NASCAR finally said enough is enough and instituted the "Lucky Dog" rule, which states that the first car a lap down gets a free pass, no matter how close to the leader he is. Some people like the rule, some do not. It's here and we have to live with it.
Now, using the "Lucky Dog" as a yardstick, a person could make the argument that if you are using a lot of "Lucky Dogs" to get back on the lead lap, something must be fundamentally wrong in the first place if you are always in the position of being a lap down. Simply stay on the lead lap and you don't need charity. Using that bit of logic, however convoluted some may find it to be, I found some interesting peculiarities when applied to the current drivers in the Chase.
After 28 races, the man at the top, Jeff Burton, has been awarded zero, that's right, zero "Lucky Dogs". At the other end of the spectrum, the luckiest boy to be in the Chase, Kyle Busch, has been awarded a series leading 9 "Lucky Dogs". Now that Kyle is essentially out of contention for the title, you could say that his luck finally ran out! More mean spirited folks will say that he shouldn't have been in it in the first place, considering another very popular driver, Tony Stewart, was awarded the exact same number of "Lucky Dogs" as Burton, zero. The rest of the top ten shakes out as follows; Jeff Gordon 5, Matt Kenseth 3, Denny Hamlin 7, Kevin Harvick 4, Mark Martin 2, Lil E 3, Jimmie Johnson 4, and Kasey Kahne with 4 also.
Now I realize that this evaluation is not in the least a scientifically thorough one, but if you look down the list of "Lucky Dog" recipients, (conveniently located at www.jayski.com) to me, it dispels the old adage of "I'd rather be lucky than good". While luck is nice, it tends to come and go and not always at the right time. "Goodness", on the other hand, you either have it or you don't! The trick is to be good and lucky!
Stay off the wall,
©2000 - 2008 Jeff Meyer and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!
Jeff, what an interesting take on the Lucky Dog/Chase. I think that you may have something here.
Recent articles from Jeff Meyer:
Voices From The Cheap Seats: The Tale Of Two Tires
BSNews! Bruton’s Plans Extend Beyond Bristol’s Track
Top Ten Reasons Fans Failed To Show Up At Bristol Sunday
BSNews! NASCAR CEO Given "Special" Award Amidst Lavish Fanfare
Fan Coun-ci-What? Just What Is It That NASCAR Wants To Study?
Want to know more about Jeff Meyer or view his complete article archives? Then hop on over to his archive and bio page.