The Frontstretch: A Quick Rundown of NASCAR's New Qualifying and Testing Changes by Kevin Rutherford -- Wednesday October 17, 2012

Go to site navigation Go to article

A Quick Rundown of NASCAR's New Qualifying and Testing Changes

Kevin Rutherford · Wednesday October 17, 2012

 

On Tuesday, NASCAR revealed multiple changes to the sport that will affect both the Sprint Cup and Nationwide series when they take effect come 2013. Most prominently, the sanctioning body announced the abolition of the top-35 rule for qualifying and new testing procedures.

Let’s waste no time and take a closer look at all three changes, one by one.

Most notable is the Sprint Cup Series’ new qualifying format. Well… new-ish. Actually, come to think of it, it’s not very new at all. Recycled is the better term.

NASCAR VP of Competition Robin Pemberton outlined multiple changes for the 2013 season on Tuesday. Photo courtesy Tom Pennington, Getty Images.

Beginning in 2013, Sprint Cup fields will assume a 36-6-1 format. For the uninitiated, that means the field will be set by the 36 fastest drivers in time trials, plus six provisionals set by owners points standings and one spot for a past champion, which becomes another provisional if not used as such.

If that sounds familiar, it’s because the format recalls NASCAR before the top-35 rule, which locked the top 35 teams in the owners standings into the race.

Prior to that rule, which was put into place when teams with sponsors expressed concern that said sponsors might leave their team if they weren’t guaranteed a spot and did not qualify (this, mind you, was back when 50-plus teams were showing up to the track), the fastest made it in, with a few provisionals around for drivers who either messed up or simply couldn’t find the speed.

The fastest qualify? It’s about damn time.

The top-35 rule was a regulation that benefited no one but the top- and mid-tier teams in the sport. It gave them essentially a free pass when it came to qualifying, rendering it positively useless unless one was either really interested in grabbing the pole position or needed to race his or her way in on time.

Just as NASCAR made winning a race more important in the past few years, it has now made qualifying more important to all drivers.

Think of it this way: yes, there’s six, maybe seven spots available if a funded organization cannot qualify for a given race. But — and I realize this is a fairly unlikely scenario — say the top 8 in owners points are the slowest and would be sent home if not for provisionals? Looks like eighth place in points isn’t going to be having too great a weekend.

But more realistically, the rule could spell disaster for some of the mid-tier teams that aren’t as high in points. This change isn’t going to worry many of the sport’s elite, but it will give some drivers more to think about come time trials.

Plus, this ensures that start-up teams that just so happen to have a fairly quick — at least in the top 36 — car at a given track have a chance to race rather than having to worry about competing with the other go-or-go-home organizations.

I still don’t think it’s perfect; I’d rather see the top 43 in time trials making the race and that’s final, though that doesn’t account for Mr. Championship Driver walling it on his qualifying lap. Ideally, something like two provisionals (and maybe a third for a past champion) would be more suitable. But what NASCAR’s implementing is better than its predecessor, so it’s a step up indeed.

According to NASCAR’s Vice President of Competition, Robin Pemberton, the top-25 and top-30 rules will remain in the Camping World Truck and Nationwide Series, respectively. So if you’re a fan of the top-whatever in owners points getting a guaranteed spot, you still have those series on which to fall back.

Speaking of qualifying, NASCAR has decreed that time trials order will be set by a random draw. So no more will the slowest in practice begin qualifying and the fastest end it. It’s not a huge move, and quite frankly, I don’t care what the order is for qualifying anyway.

The other big announcement Tuesday concerned testing. Beginning in 2013, Sprint Cup Series teams will be allowed four tests per organization at tracks at which the series competes. Additionally, teams fielding a car for a Rookie of the Year contender will be allowed one more test for that driver. In the Nationwide and Truck series, teams will be allowed two tests per organization at these tracks, with the additional one for a declared rookie.

I can’t complain here — I don’t think anyone is, really. It was originally rumored that NASCAR would allow teams five to seven tests, but four (and five with rookies) is still a decent numeral. Doing so allows organizations to get a better handle on the new Sprint Cup cars, which will be introduced next year.

The ban was originally in place to cut team costs. It kind of put everyone on a more even playing field, though sheer budget and ability to test at non-NASCAR tracks have still kept the gap wide. That’s probably not going to change anytime soon, so I see no real problem with bringing back testing at these racetracks.

Finally — and I didn’t see this coming, did you? — the sport revealed the shortening of Nationwide Series fields starting in 2013. Instead of 43 cars, 40 entrants will start each Nationwide race (providing, of course, that 40 show up).

Shortening the Nationwide field could very well cut down on the amount of start-and-parking that has gone on in the series over the last few years — especially these days, with teams like The Motorsports Group and Rick Ware Racing often fielding multiple start-and-park entries.

If the 40-car field is meant to curb teams parking, I don’t think it’s going to do a great job of it. The current start-and-park organizations can still spout off a fast lap to get in, and if more teams begin showing up in the next few years, that’s potentially even more legitimate cars going home.

The move is in place to create a sense of urgency for teams to make races. But if some teams keep fielding cars on qualifying lap steroids for the sake of parking them three laps in, it’s going to force smaller teams by doing the same. Ideally, I’d love to see a scenario in which only a certain percentage of the field (maybe top 30) even get points or funds for showing up, but that would hurt a lot of teams as well. And a lot of them are scrambling for funds as is.

In other words, it’s going to take more than a shortened field to save the Nationwide Series. A lot more.

But all things considered, the moves NASCAR made Tuesday are, collectively, a step in the right direction, particularly when it comes to its new qualifying rules. It’s not going to make NASCAR a better sport altogether. But it’s good to see them trying.

Connect with Kevin!

Contact Kevin Rutherford

NEW YEAR? NEW NEWSLETTER. LOOKING FOR THE INFO YOU NEED ABOUT NASCAR IN 2013 – SENT RIGHT TO YOUR EMAIL INBOX?
Well, you’ve come to the right place. The Frontstretch Newsletter gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up and get all the information you need. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

 

©2000 - 2008 Kevin Rutherford and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Bertus
10/17/2012 04:36 AM
permalink

The reasoning for the shortening of the Nationwide field is to save (some) money. It is effectively a 3.5% to 4%cut in overall purse money.

And as long as there is sufficient incentive, I do not see the S&P teams reducing their entries because there are less available spots. Curtis Key will probably field 4 cars and park 3 as long as it is profitable

Doug in Washington (State)
10/17/2012 01:52 PM
permalink

I did a little “What If” checking to see how the new qualifying rules would have affected this year’s fields.

Other than the Daytona 500, which has totally different procedures, NO teams “qualified” 36th or better yet got sent home. The highest qualifying run to go home was at the Dover race, where Josh Wise ran 39th and went home (Travis Kvapil, who “qualified” 45th, was in on points). That held true even for 2011, where the highest qualifier to go home was 39th (twice, Blaney at Watkins Glen and Kvapil at Chicago). 2010, it was 2 teams qualifying 38th and went home. You have to go back to 2009 where this would have made a big difference- Nemechek went home at Homestead after qualifying 30th.

The teams that this will continue to hurt is the part-time teams who post 37th to 42nd place qualifying runs, but don’t have owner’s points to fall back on. They’ll still be faster than cars than “qualify” and make the race, and the positions will just end up going to whichever fulltime Start-and-Park teams have ran the most races (and hence have more points).

The same teams that benefit from the T35 rule will continue to benefit from the recycled Provisional system. Since there’s no limit on provisionals, there’s no real incentive for teams like the #32 (which has qualified 44th or worse 11 times yet gotten on on points) to just putter around to a 42nd starting spot. They’ll only ever have to worry if a bunch of part-timers qualify 36th or better. That hasn’t happened since 2008, and even then only at impound, restrictor plate tracks where the S&P teams ran qualifying setups (and couldn’t run more than a handful of laps) and everyone who wanted to race qualified on race setups.

This is a wash. It’s not really any better than the T35 rule. The best way to do it would be to have 2 rounds of qualifying. Top 25 set in round 1, round 2 fills the rest. If you can’t beat the start-and-park scrubs in 2 attempts, you don’t need to be in the race.

Kim
10/17/2012 06:05 PM
permalink

Anybody remember when nascar said “that’s enough changes for a while”?

The test ban only helped the rich teams (Hendrick).

Teams really only need to test on the mile and a halfs that are in the chase.