The Frontstretch: Call it the Kyle Busch Rule by Kurt Smith -- Saturday February 16, 2008

Go to site navigation Go to article

Call it the Kyle Busch Rule

The Official Columnist of NASCAR · Kurt Smith · Saturday February 16, 2008

 

Kurt Smith is currently celebrating on his honeymoon in South Florida with his beautiful new wife Suzanne, but since he always has a backlog of opinions (remember, they're like sphincters!), he gave us his take on the possibility of NASCAR raising the minimum age limit. Enjoy!

Kyle Busch humorously apologized indirectly to Joey Logano and Marc Davis for possibly being responsible for making NASCAR believe that Cup drivers need to be at least 21.

In an article at That’s Racin’ some time ago, Kyle was quoted as saying that "…I think a lot of this might have to do with just the off-track stuff, the way – I don’t know if I brought it on, which is going to be the Kyle Busch rule again for others again, I’m sorry."

Most of us know what he means. Certainly his name enters the minds of many fans when NASCAR talks about ensuring that drivers reach a certain level of maturity before racing at the Cup level. Not because Kyle is immature necessarily, but that is the public perception of him.

If Kyle Busch is green in the ways of the world, it doesn't show on the racetrack. In just his ninth Cup race—while still sporting peach fuzz—Kyle finished second at Las Vegas. Shortly after turning 20, he scored his first win at Fontana. Before he turned 21, the minimum age that NASCAR is considering, Kyle had 2 wins, 11 Top 5s and 17 Top 10s.

NASCAR is considering raising the minimum age limit to 21 and Kyle Busch says he is to blame.

Certainly, Kyle's skill behind the wheel should not raise a concern about whether a driver under 21 can handle the Cup series. If anything, Kyle's success on the track makes an argument against raising the minimum age. So what's the problem?

The easy answer for those critical of NASCAR is that Kyle is being blamed for breaking the First Commandment of the France Family: Thou Shalt Not Criticize NASCAR.

Mike Helton has said that NASCAR is looking at "the new drivers that are coming along and we’re also looking at how they mature and how they can handle the pressures of racing in our top division." Read that statement carefully, especially the part about "how they mature". The general consensus about Kyle Busch among race fans is that he sometimes opens his mouth when he shouldn't, but not many dispute his ability to handle a racecar.

Kyle gave signs of being outspoken while in victory lane at California, when he took Roush Racing to task for suspending his brother Kurt. That was an emotional outburst that wasn't well thought out and could certainly be attributed to youth. But it was hardly the first time anyone said anything spiteful in victory lane. It wasn't any more reactionary than "This is for all the Johnson haters."

Then, after Kyle won the historic first race with the Car of Tomorrow in Bristol, he had those memorable words of praise for the new design…

We all remember what he said. But even if his victory lane tirade came from someone lacking in maturity and self-control, which is fair to suggest, is that a reason to raise the minimum age of Cup drivers? If you remember what Matt Kenseth, Jeff Gordon, and quite a few others had been saying, Busch was simply echoing the sentiment of most of the drivers at the time.

It's unclear exactly what NASCAR's motivation is here, but one certainly hopes it isn't bruised egos in R&D. It would be one thing if Kyle Busch were wrecking his own and others' cars every week. But he wasn't…in fact, he was winning.

So it appears that NASCAR may just have a problem with Busch's occasionally brash mouth. If you ask most NASCAR fans, the sport has bigger things to worry about.

I don't want to be on record necessarily opposing a minimum age of 21 to race in Cup. There are some good reasons for it, but there are other steps NASCAR could and should be taking to mature drivers properly, especially in the name of safety. NASCAR can't make the argument that they want drivers to gain more experience in the minor leagues before moving on to Cup, even though that's a valid and justifiable argument. Stay with me, I'll explain.

With all of the current Nationwidewhacking going on, there isn't much opportunity for young drivers to even get seat time, and that isn't likely to change. The hard reality is that the sponsors rule. A driver would have to be a superstar on the level of Joey Logano…i.e. already have some name recognition…before he would even have a chance at a full-time Nationwide ride with a willing corporation footing the bills.

Beyond that, if NASCAR believed the more-experience-before-Cup argument, then it might be a requirement for Jacques Villeneuve, Patrick Carpentier, Sam Hornish, and Dario Franchitti to spend a year or two in the Nationwide Series. Those four, the top rookies in Cup this season, have started in a grand total of exactly 18 Nationwide races between them. Only Hornish has started in more than four.

Most of us remember when Jacques Villeneuve was approved for his first Cup start at no less dangerous a place than Talladega. And we remember the amply voiced concern of many of the participants in the race. It turned out ok, but that sort of thing should worry drivers more than a hotshot 19-year-old who has won in the Nationwide Series.

The truth is that drivers probably should have at least a year of minor league experience before moving to the Cup level. That was probably Gibbs' plan for Joey Logano. But if a mandatory year in Nationwide before moving to Cup isn't even remotely close to being enforced, then why an age limit? There are drivers in their 30s and 40s that cause more problems on the track on Sunday than Kyle Busch ever did.

In response to Joe Gibbs' concern regarding the sponsorship trouble that they would have should Logano's climb to Cup be delayed, NASCAR has stated that any rule change would be phased in. But what about the superstar that is coming down the road? At a time when NASCAR's attendance and ratings aren't what they should be, they shouldn't be hindering the progress of someone who can bring in new fans, so long as he (or she) proves himself in a year of driving with fenders.

Besides, it might make watching the Nationwide Series worthwhile again.

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Did You Notice? … Breaking Down A Sprint Cup Season Eight Races In
Beyond the Cockpit: Ricky Stenhouse, Jr. on Growing Up Racing and Owner Loyalties
The Frontstretch Five: Flaws Exposed In the New Chase So Far
NASCAR Writer Power Rankings: Top 15 After Darlington
NASCAR Mailbox: Past Winners Aren’t Winning …. Yet
Open Wheel Wednesday: How Can IndyCar Stand Out?
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Kurt Smith and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

M. B. Voelker
02/15/2008 10:08 AM
permalink

That’s a nice, balanced look at the idea and at Kyle. There’s been a lot of articles on both that range from the one-sided to the outright hysterical so its good to see someone tackle the age-rule idea in a thoughtful way.

Personally, I think its unnecessary because they have an approval process available in the granting of Nascar licenses already so they could handle the case of a driver who isn’t ready on an individual basis.

But I wouldn’t be too terribly bent out of shape if they implemented it because there are more important things in the world to get intense about. ;) :D LOL

Marc
02/15/2008 06:39 PM
permalink

The Busch boys, who are really Bodines in drag, have definietly given a new level of immaturity to the sport. Its not that they can’t drive, its their personality. They are like wet behind the ears pups and probably will be when they are in their 50’s. Bird-dog and Ears, as I call them, can get a car to victory lane, if they can keep it off Tony Stewart or some other unlucky soul, for 500 miles, but then they say the dumbest things during the interview, they resist arrest, or get black eyes, or just plain act childish. Its kind of like Forrest Gump winning the Shrimp Boat races.

S.D. Grady
02/16/2008 10:07 AM
permalink

The Kyle Busch rule or the Joey Logano rule…an age limit is not needed regarding on-track ability. Maybe NASCAR should institute a “Life in the Spotlight” school where drivers will learn the proper response to sticky media questions. That’s what this is really about. But then wouldn’t that defeat the “let the boys be boys” decree? Basically, I have no idea what the point of this is.

alan
02/16/2008 10:27 PM
permalink

marc whats ur problem with the busch boys huh.So they speak there mind thats nascar roots and they get punished for it hmm lil biased there

Marc
02/17/2008 10:05 AM
permalink

Alan, you wouldn’t have a little Bodine in you, would you? Only kidding, I just don’t like them. They come off like jerks, thats what the Bodine reference is. They can both drive a car, I give them that, they just act dumb.

Kurt Smith
02/18/2008 01:02 PM
permalink

M.B., thanks for the compliment. I know you’re a tough customer (I mean that in a good way of course) so it means a lot. :-)

And thanks all for your comments. I’d talk more, but I’m still recovering from a bumpy flight!

Contact Kurt Smith