The Frontstretch: Rating The Races : Part I by Matt McLaughlin -- Monday November 26, 2007

Go to site navigation Go to article

Rating The Races : Part I

Thinkin' Out Loud · Matt McLaughlin · Monday November 26, 2007


Editor’s Note: With the 2007 Nextel Cup season complete, it’s now time to take a look back. This week, veteran writer Matt McLaughlin starts the process with his annual race review, analyzing each event of the Nextel Cup season and giving us his take on how good – or bad – they really were.

Today marks part one of the four-part series. Enjoy!

The Daytona 500

I've got to say two things up front. I don't like plate racing – it's contrived excitement, in my opinion – and I didn't care for the three o'clock starting time of this year's race. God and Bill France, Sr. intended the 500 to start at one in the afternoon – no later. As for the race itself, things were tepid for most of the afternoon. Tony Stewart had a dominant car all of Speedweeks, and he looked poised to win the 500 with ease. But a speeding penalty on pit road (or a penalty for stinking up the show, Stewart contended later) got him irate, and he self-destructed in the form of a devastating wreck. Kurt Busch, in another fast car, was a victim of Stewart's implosion.

With that turn of events, a race broke out; what can be said about that last few laps other than it would have made a fine opening scene for Days of Thunder 2007? As Kevin Harvick and Mark Martin drag raced towards the checkers side-by-side, mechanical mayhem was erupting behind them as Kyle Busch got out of shape and set off a field-decimating accident. Caught up in the wreck, Clint Bowyer got the worst of it; he wound up crossing the start finish line upside down and on fire. That chaos caused Martin to hesitate just a bit, expecting a caution that never came and opening the door for Harvick – he prevailed by inches over Martin to win. With NASCAR slow to throw the final yellow flag and rules uncertain as to when the racing actually ended and the caution began, I still feel Martin won this race. Rating: B-


Most fans don't tune into Fontana expecting much action. This year, they got all that and less at what is quickly becoming the most putrid track on the circuit. Jimmie Johnson, Jeff Gordon, and Matt Kenseth were the class of the field in a race that came down to the men on pit road. Kenseth's crew got their boy out of the pits first late, while Johnson's crew faltered and dropped their boy from contention. Kevin Harvick seemed poised to make a run at the No. 17 but had a tire equalize, handing the uncontested win to Kenseth. Rating: D

Las Vegas

Questions abounded as the circuit headed off to the newly reconfigured Las Vegas Motor Speedway. Among them: Why did the Cup circuit take a week off after just two events? Would the newly configured track at Vegas provide better racing? And – perhaps most important of all – would the new Goodyears stand up to the speed? Well, as for the track I think it's like a newlywed's stew; give it a little seasoning, and it ought to be much better.

The race turned out to be a Hendrick parade; Jimmie Johnson and Jeff Gordon combined to lead 200 laps on their way to a 1-2 finish. It was not to be their last such finish of the season. In retrospect, the Las Vegas race was a foreshadowing of this year's championship; Jeff Gordon led more laps than Johnson, but Johnson led the ones that counted. Rating: C


The Atlanta Spring race didn't live up to the normally stellar standards of the track, but at least things did get interesting at the end. Tony Stewart was leading, but Jimmie Johnson in second clearly had the faster car and was gaining fast. A battle ensued, as Johnson was of the mind to pass Stewart … but Stewart was not in the mind to be passed. It all came to a head with three laps to go. Johnson made a three-wide power move inside of the No. 20; Stewart drove into the corner for all he was worth to hold the No. 48 but slid up into the wall, forced to fall behind. Johnson went on to win the race, his second in a row. Little did we know that finish was destined to happen a few more times this year, as well. Rating: B-


The Bristol spring race featured the equally anticipated and feared debut of the Car of Tomorrow in a points-paying Cup event. Even jaded fans who had seen pictures were aghast at the site of the ugly little brutes lined up nose-to-nose in numbers prior to the start of the race.

Gibbs teammates Tony Stewart and Denny Hamlin dominated the early stages of the event, before mechanical issues felled them both. Stewart fell victim to a broken fuel pump drive cable, while Hamlin had an engine lay down late. That left Kyle Busch in the lead, but Jeff Burton was close behind. Everyone expected Burton to lay a bumper to Busch to make the pass – this is Bristol, baby! – but Burton ran Busch clean, allowing the kid to take home the trophy instead. As for the race winner's take on the Car of Tomorrow? "I'm still not a big fan of these things. I can't stand driving them. They suck." Succinctly put, sir. Rating: B


Some hoped that a race's worth of familiarity would make the CoT look more normal, or at least less ghastly. Nope – the cars were still so ugly you'd have had to tie a pork chop to the rear wing in order to get a starving dog to relieve itself on one.

Once again, the Gibbs cars looked strong early. So did Kevin Harvick's Chevy … but it turned out were some design flaws to the new rides. First, Harvick broke a fuel pump drive cable just as Stewart had at Martinsville. Then, the 29 car set itself ablaze when heat from the exhaust system set the mandated impact absorbing foam inside the car on fire. Whoops; so let me get this straight? NASCAR took five years to design and test a new car, yet they failed to find it had a propensity to set itself ablaze?

But in the end, despite the problems Martinsville provided the sort of dramatic finish this classic track often does. Teammates Jimmie Johnson and Jeff Gordon raced hammer and tongs against one another, making contact several times with smoke billowing off their tires – though fortunately, not out of their doors. It was to be the best finish of the season in this humble writer's opinion, and again, a foretaste of things to come. Rating: A- The minus is just because the cars were so painfully ugly.


Johnson and Gordon were once again forces to be reckoned with, but they both fell off the pace this week because of crashes. In Johnson's case, the incident was unavoidable; in Gordon's case, the error was unforced.

That left other title contenders to battle up front. As badly as Matt Kenseth had been running early in the race, you'd have thought the only running he'd do late in the race would be after his crew chief with a hammer to beat him. Instead, Kenseth found himself in a heated battle with Jeff Burton. The two raced hard but clean, and in the end, Burton was able to hold off Kenseth to take the checkers.

In an odd twist, Kyle Busch ran over Dale Earnhardt's contending Chevy after a caution flew, and both cars were wrecked. Busch stormed away from the track as a result, even though the 5 team was able to repair the car. That left Junior, of all people, to hop aboard the No. 5 car to finish the race – again, that appears significant only in retrospect. Rating: B+


A pattern was being set at the Car of Tomorrow races. The Joe Gibbs Chevys started the races strong … and the Hendrick Chevys finished them stronger.

Denny Hamlin dominated this race early, only to have his campaign felled by a pit road speeding penalty. (Or another one of those, "Don't stink up the race!" penalities?) That left Tony Stewart with the lead … but Jeff Gordon wanted it. Eventually, Gordon put a bumper to the No. 20 car to make what was ultimately the winning pass on Joe Gibbs Racing … again. Mr. Stewart was miffed after the race and declined comment to the press; Mr. Hamlin looked dejected. But there was no denying the dominance; it was three for three as far as the Hendrick cars and CoT races. Other teams were left scratching their heads wondering how to catch up to the fleet foursome from HMS. By the end of the season some of them were probably considering rocket-propelled grenades. Rating: C-


Welcome to the ugly reality of restrictor plate racing; most drivers were content to fly in formation for most of the race to avoid wrecking their cars and potentially life-threatening injuries. Normal action did begin to heat up late, though. A green/white/checkered flag at a plate track is the equivalent of throwing a stick of dynamite into the cesspool and ducking for cover. Jeff Gordon still had the lead when David Ragan was kind enough to wreck to see to it the race ended under caution. Of course, when it came to wrecking, Ragan was one of the kindest guys on the circuit this season.

The win moved Gordon past the late, great Dale Earnhardt for total victories on what would have been the Intimidator's birthday. The race ended under caution to hand Gordon the win; but that didn't sit well with the highly partisan Talladega crowd, who pelted the No. 24 was with a fusillade of beer cans. Rating: D

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Matt McLaughlin and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

11/26/2007 07:46 AM

They was know A+ races cuz junior didn’t score a victory,….. no what I mean Vern?

Mike C
11/26/2007 08:29 PM

Well Matt , you didn’t even get past the Daytona race before you stopped making sense . Tony Stewart lost his temper and in so doing took Kurt Busch out of the 500 . How exactly did that happen ? Before you put pen to paper , or finger to keyboard , you might want to review your tapes of the races .

Margo L
11/26/2007 08:49 PM

You do seem very thin skinned for being a writer . You obviously have a grudge against Stewart . He didn’t answer an inane question you asked him ? Your constant snipes only serve to portray you as a hack . Try being a little bit objective , you’ll find your writing will improve .

gary k
11/27/2007 06:03 AM

You may want to try covering another sport. I am sorry I clicked over from Jayski’s. I saw all the races you mentioned and your opinion adds no value. You media folks get carried away with your own importance.

Labonte Fan
11/27/2007 12:27 PM

If you can’t take the honest straight-forward musings of an old-school racing fan/writer, why don’t you go read some politically correct Hendrick Motorsports press releases or something instead? Not everyone is as enamored with the way NASCAR is heading! (the sport that is, not the “product” as the remainder of the France Family refers to is these days) Hang in there Matt!

11/27/2007 01:26 PM

There did seem to be more than the usual snoozers this year.

Ditto what “Labonte Fan” said!

11/27/2007 06:37 PM

I agree with Labonte Fan, In reading Matt’s piece it appears that Matt wrote it like it was for each race, Stewart and all. I’m fairly certain that in Matt’s write-up of each race, if Tony’s name is mentioned its followed by what any of us already have known having seen the race. Using Phoenix for instance he states “Mr. Stewart was miffed after the race and declined comment to the press” which is exactly what happened. Tony himself stated he was unhappy and did not feel like talking with the press. (Which I gave Tony high marks for as he does things his way and doesn’t seem to follow the usual vanilla-type/talking-the-NASCAR-line driver approach). Also in the Daytona race write-up Matt states that Tony received a speeding on pit road penalty, “or a penalty for stinking up the show, Stewart contended later”. In the Phoenix race the same is said for Hamlin so a reader would have to see that Matt was indeed being objective in his writing. By the it too late for me to put in my order for more short tracks on the schedule for next year? ;-)

True Fan
11/27/2007 07:20 PM

Hey Chris2 thanks again for bringing some reasonability to the forum, as others only seem to be in attack mode ready to defend the honor of their guy(driver)in order to show loyalty ,ignoring racing and all that it intells!

11/27/2007 08:30 PM

Matt may be many things , but objective isn’t on the list .
After reading the comments on this column , i went back and read some of your past works . And i would have to agree that you certainly have a strong anti- Stewart bent in your writings . It’s your column , write what you want . But don’t play coy when you get called on being biased .

Racin Jason
11/28/2007 04:15 PM

I have been reading Matt’s articles for years now because his articles are largely based off one thing… opinion. If Matt thinks a race sucks, he will say it sucked. If you don’t like or agree with his opinion, don’t read his articles.

Matt, ya can’t please everybody, but your articles amuse me endlessly