The Frontstretch: The Best Of The Frontstretch : Ain't That A Shame - But Who's To Blame For Bristol? by Matt McLaughlin -- Tuesday January 22, 2008

Go to site navigation Go to article

The Best Of The Frontstretch : Ain't That A Shame - But Who's To Blame For Bristol?

Full Throttle - Special Edition · Matt McLaughlin · Tuesday January 22, 2008


Editor’s Note : With Speedweeks just around the corner, there’s an opportunity to take one last look at 2007 before moving forward. And that means we have a chance to honor the fantastic men and women that make this site tick – our talented staff of 19 writers who work hard each day to give the latest and greatest NASCAR news, information, and commentary. Our staff’s passion for this sport is unwavering, and their dedication unmatched – it’s because of them viewership for the site has more than doubled over the past year, even in the face of increasing concerns about declining TV Ratings and fan support. People may not like the direction the sport may be headed – but based on the numbers, it’s through the hard work of our Frontstretch staff that more people are coming here for a daily stock car fix.

So, in their honor, we present to you a special “Best Of” week, chronicling the best articles our staff presented to you in 2007. They’ll make you laugh, they’ll make you cry, and most of all, they’ll make you think – and hopefully, they’ll make your day just a little bit better. Enjoy, and look forward to bigger and better things to come as we head towards 2008!

This article was originally published August 27th, 2007.

It seems I am in the minority about the “new” BMS – I actually enjoyed Saturday night's Cup race, a drowning voice in the face of mounting criticism against the track. What I saw throughout was a lot of two and even three wide racing, along with passing throughout the pack. Yes, two cars – the No. 9 and the No. 99 – dominated the race, but keep in mind that Matt Kenseth led 415 laps en route to his win in the 2005 Bristol night race. So, such domination is not without precedent even at the old Bristol.

Still, many fans and even some members of the media proclaimed Saturday night's race at Bristol "boring" (or worse). In fact, many feel the night race has been ruined. So what, if anything, went wrong? If we set the 1999 Bristol Night race and Dale Earnhardt's now legendary "Rattle his Cage" pass of Terry Labonte as the highwater mark, what has changed since then? Well, the cars themselves are now rid of the hideous new CoT design, the track surface was changed to parabolic banking, Goodyear bought a brand new tire to Saturday night's race, and the focus on where drivers are in the point standings has changed to the Chase, which likely loomed large with the "playoffs" only two weeks away at the beginning of the event.

Let's look at all four elements. Many drivers commented that the new Goodyears were not soft enough to allow for hard racing. I'm sure there's some truth there, because the tire test at the new track was canceled by weather. As such, Goodyear bought a very conservative tire to the track to make sure there was not a rash of tire failures, just like the debacle of the Charlotte race after the track was levigated.

Along those same lines, Goodyear has suffered some very embarrassing incidents, with tires prone to frequent blowouts that cost them a lot of face. Because of that, they now tend to be conservative. If the race is boring, that's OK…just so long as their product isn't failing left and right on nationwide TV, giving potential customers a less than rosy picture of the company's technology. Now, with a race under their belt they can probably bring a more aggressive tire to Bristol next time; that might allow for better racing. But it's hard to pin too much of the blame on the tires, because the same tires were used in Friday night's Busch race and that race was an instant classic.

I'm not ready to point a finger at the new track design. In fact, I love how it turned out. I am a big fan of side-by-side racing, and there hasn't been much of that at Bristol for a decade. It was the new track design that allowed that "fans on their feet hooting and hollering" finish on Friday night. No, we're not even going to blame the track for this one.

So, the biggest difference between Friday night's Busch race and the Saturday night Cup event were the cars. The Busch rides were old school, while Saturday's race featured those decidedly awkward, to the point of being homely, Cars of Tomorrow (by the way, Rusty, that's the correct use of the plural) with their comically oversized rear wings. Once again, the old school cars provided much better racing than the new cars. “But, Matt, the Busch cars are less powerful too,” you say. I agree. The level of horsepower has reached insane levels in the Cup series. It's time to dial that back a bit. So in my eyes, the new cars were the main culprit in why Saturday night's race paled in comparison to Friday night's, and that doesn't speak well towards what's going to happen next year when the new cars become the series’ full-time mounts.

I also have to assign a lot of the blame to the new Chase points systems. Some drivers, Gordon, Stewart, Kenseth and Hamlin are already locked into the Chase, so they could run the ragged edge with no worries. But for other drivers who could still at least mathematically be eliminated, they had to drive much more conservatively. Bristol is a dangerous place, and a small misstep can leave a driver climbing from the smoking wreckage of an irreparable car and leave him with a finish in the 40s. Among the group that couldn't get too wild Saturday night was Kurt Busch, a master of Bristol. He might have been able to get up there to challenge Kahne and Edwards if he had free reign. So, in my mind, the new points system concocted to make racing more interesting actually conspired to make Saturday's race less exciting. The Chase from its inception has been fatally flawed and that's been borne out every season it has been in place. The much hoped-for TV ratings bonanza didn't occur – in fact, ratings are actually declining. It's a time to admit this dog won't hunt and replace it.

Given a little weathering and a somewhat softer tire – the first occurring naturally and the second gradually – I think we're due for more classic races at Bristol. And if NASCAR finally drops these failed CoT monstrosities, along with the Chase, things could get even better faster. Meanwhile, if you really can't live without a constant series of wrecks, there's always the local demolition derby.

Want a chance to win a FREE Frontstretch T-Shirt! How about a shot at a FREE membership to our Ultimate Fantasy Player Program? Well, Frontstretch has a new 2008 survey out just for YOU! We’re attempting to see what you like about us the most, and what areas you’d like to see improved. Click here to take the survey and do your part to help make one of your favorite websites a better place to be!

Want to join Matt on our Frontstretch Staff? Now’s your chance to join one of the fastest-growing racing websites on the internet, matching wits with some of the most respected writers in the business today. is actively seeking 3-5 new staff members for the 2008 season, and you can audition now by clicking here to find out exactly what you need to do. When finished, send your completed audition to – we hope to hear from you soon!

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Matt McLaughlin and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!