The Frontstretch: Matt McLaughlin Mouths Off : It's Not Easy Being Green ... So NASCAR Better Start by Matt McLaughlin -- Thursday August 7, 2008

Go to site navigation Go to article

A not so amusing thing happened to me one night last week while I was fueling up my black and gold ’76 Trans Am en route to a local car show. I’m used to the car eliciting a lot of reactions; usually a thumbs up, a smile, or an endless string of questions asking if it’s a real “Smokey and the Bandit” car. But as the young man fueling his Honda Civic Hybrid approached me, he didn’t seem to want to know about the car… or Burt Reynolds. Instead, I was stunned when he asked me who, exactly, I was trying to impress.

What I should have said right there was pretty young women of questionable morals; but as I quickly realized, that might have made things worse. I told him I wasn’t out to impress anyone; I was just buying gas. Quick to respond, he asked if I understood my 455 Pontiac turned 750 cubic feet of clean air into carbon monoxide a mile. I told him that sounded high to me, and that I didn’t drive the car much anyway. It was a toy car; my daily driver averages 30 MPG, and I also frequently ride a motorcycle that gets 50 MPG. But out of nowhere, I felt on the defensive, especially as his girlfriend — who was rather cute, though of unknown moral character — came toward me with a handful of pamphlets.

Now, I hate pamphlets… and I especially hate people who hand people they don’t know pamphlets they don’t want. All of a sudden, it seemed to take forever to fill the Trans Am and while I did so, I was berated for the size of my carbon hoofprint or something like that and called an environmental terrorist. I got annoyed. I was taller than the kid by a head and a decade ago, I would have punched him right in the yap — but I’m older and wiser now. I tried twice to explain I do about 2,500 miles a year in the car — No Sale. So, when I left the lot of the Sunoco, I did so in a cloud of tire smoke that would have made Jimmie Johnson proud — with my 800 CFM Quadrajet sucking huge amounts of fresh air through the shaker scoop, and a pair of Flowmaster Forties ripping the holy night. If I had stopped to consider things, the local police department was almost directly across the street; yeah, I may be older, but perhaps not that much wiser. Fortunately, I didn’t get ticketed for reckless driving — or even environmental terrorism.

It’s a sign of the times, I guess. The Green movement has gone from the liberal left to mainstream in this country. What was once the exclusive province of wild eyed fanatics like Al “The Sky is Falling!” Gore has reached Main Street and the way Americans live their lives. As a result, politicians on both sides of the aisle are suddenly eager to take the high ground on “renewable resources,” moving towards draconian higher fuel mileage standards and reduced emissions for passenger cars and trucks — even as the Big Three in Detroit struggle to stay afloat.

Matt McLaughlin’s classic ’76 Trans Am that got environmentalists all up in a frenzy last week.

That new public sentiment leaves NASCAR’s broad flanks open to attack. I’ve already had some people, obviously not fans of the sport, wonder why gasoline is “wasted” in automobile racing during this current energy crisis. They want to know what sort of fuel mileage Cup cars get (lousy) and what sort of smog reduction systems they run (none). As a high profile sport that celebrates the increasingly demonized fast, loud cars, it behooves NASCAR to start their own Green initiatives before someone running for or holding public office insists we do.

Step one would be simple. Just as Bill France, Jr. did back during the first gas crisis, we can cut the length of our races by 10-20% to burn less fuel and produce less greenhouse gases. Yes, it’s a symbolic gesture — the amount of gas consumed and greenhouse gases produced in an entire season of Cup racing are barely a blip on the big picture radar screen — but we’re doing our part. Some folks, like my strident buddy in the Civic Hybrid, aren’t going to be appeased. So in another symbolic gesture, I’d suggest that NASCAR take 1% of the race purse and 1% of ticket prices to buy and preserve virgin rain forest in South America, the forests that the Greenies call the “lungs of the planet.” Another 1% might be donated by track owners and promoters to initiatives local to their track intended to preserve green space, wetlands, and forests. Now, I admit that I’m a hidebound traditionalist. I’ve always loved the 500-mile races, because they are a test of the cars’ and drivers’ endurance… but I’m also a realist. In contemporary NASCAR, racing 500-mile events are only a test of the fans’ endurance, since the drivers don’t actually start competing until the final 20 laps of the race anyway. Sorry… I don’t know how to fix that.

The next step would be to approach the design of the cars themselves. With the help of Sunoco, NASCAR’s official fuel supplier, we should begin looking at having all the race fuel converted to E85 by the 2011 Cup season. In addition, the biomass fuel would not be derived from foodstuffs eaten by humans and livestock — the use of corn for ethanol has raised prices at the grocery store and contributed to famines worldwide. Instead, all of our race fuel will be generated from saw grass, grass clippings, and other renewable, if unpalatable, crops. That would be a great PR move for Sunoco in a time where oil companies, and their obscene profits, have replaced Congress as the most loathed institutions on Earth.

Secondly, we’re going to finally reduce the engine sizes for the Cup, Nationwide, and Craftsman Truck Series entries from 5.7 liters to 4.6 starting in 2010. Given the same design parameters, a smaller displacement engine will burn less gas than a larger one. Reduced power would also actually benefit racing… not hurt it. It’s been shown time and time again that lower speeds on oval tracks actually make for better racing, with more side by side action and overall passing. So, in one full swoop we’ll make a symbolic gesture towards being green while actually taking a stride towards improving the dismal quality of racing as of late. Who knows? With reduced horsepower in the Cup cars, Goodyear might even be able to design a tire that lasts more than 10 laps at Indy!

Finally, we’re going to step into the 20th century at last and have the Cup cars run fuel injection rather than carbs. Again, I’m a hidebound traditionalist; and I love carbs. I love taking them apart and tinkering with them; in fact, I’ve bought three of the things in the last three months. But the fact remains that the last passenger car to use a carb was the lowly Chevette Scooter sometime back in the ’80s. For better or worse, within my lifetime, I figure the last place we’ll be able to see a mechanical secondary double pump four barrel Holley carb is in the Smithsonian Institute.

In its place, fuel injection has become a wonderful thing. Look at the horsepower the late model performance cars make with fuel injection. I hate to admit it, but a lot of these modern muscle cars can stomp the Hell out of the legends of the ’60s and ’70s, all while getting decent fuel mileage and meeting emission standards along the way. Given proper regulated design parameters, fuel injection can greatly improve the fuel mileage of stock cars (that’s important, since E85 really hurts fuel mileage) and lower the amount of carbon monoxide at the track — fumes which have been sickening drivers, crew members, and fans for decades. Again, it’s a move that’s good for the environment and good for the fans.

While we’re at it, track owners and promoters can contribute to our effort as well. Let’s face it; a lot of empty aluminum cans are generated at a stock car race. Heck, just look at all of ‘em that hit the track when Kyle Busch wins! There need to be large and convenient recycling bins at every track to see to it all empty pop and beer cans are recycled instead of ending up in a landfill. To encourage their use, promoters could put up standup cardboard cutouts of Kyle Busch atop the recycling dumpsters to allow fans to toss their cans at Kyle without causing catastrophe. Tickets and programs could be printed on 100% post-consumer recycled paper. Carpooling by the fans could be encouraged by premium parking for high occupancy vehicles (and motorcycles of American manufacturer) with easy access routes out of the track after the event. Track facilities themselves could be designed and redesigned with more green friendly technology, like wind mills and solar panels, with the excess energy generated during the 50 weeks the typical track isn’t hosting a Cup event going to the local power grid to lower the cost of energy for local consumers. Trees could be planted on track property to offset the race’s environmental footprint… etc., etc. In truth, there’s thousands of small gestures race tracks could make that I’m overlooking here to prove to the Greenies, “OK, we get it. We’re working hard to be part of the solution, not the problem.”

Teams could also become part of the initiative. Let’s face it; those bulking mastodons of team transporters burn a lot of fuel and roll a lot of miles. Again, with Sunoco’s help and strategic planning, those rigs could all be converted over to biodiesel. And team owners should consider transporting personnel to tracks within a reasonable distance by car or truck rather than private aircraft. A Ford Expedition might be a horror to the environmentalists — but a private jet makes it look like a Prius. Even the race car drivers might try making a statement by driving to races (after all, they are supposed to be pretty good at that stuff). Taking a trek to Darlington, Richmond, or even Atlanta and Dover in the car rather than firing up their personal helicopters and jets — twin symbols of conspicuous consumption in harsh economic times — would really send a message that NASCAR’s taking initiative. Hell, maybe they could use Segways rather than two stroke golf carts to get around the track grounds.

I hate to say it, but I don’t think this Green frenzy is going away anytime soon, even if gas prices were to somehow drop down to more manageable levels (as reduced demand indicates it should). So, it’s time for NASCAR to police itself and prove that they are good environmental citizens of the Earth (God, I feel vomit trying to exit my nostrils even writing that!) before the politicians, meddlers, and Greenies step in and make their own policy law. When the Barbarians arrive at the gates of NASCAR, we need to be able to say we have managed to reduce our oil consumption and greenhouse gas output by 33% of 2008 levels, and plans are in place to reduce it by 50%. Clearly, that would generate vast amounts of good will… but no matter what, just don’t let those Greenie Weenies enter the track property to hand out pamphlets. Did I mention I hate pamphlets and pamphleteers? Bastards, dirty rotten bastards, why I ought to…

Anyways, if we don’t act now, the alternative is to have some unholy overlord like the EPA insist that stock car racing take place with four cylinder hybrid cars with full catalytic converters and mufflers (and the roar of an unmuffled V8 is the last good and true thing unsullied in stock car racing) against our will. It can happen. The majority of the American auto industry’s problems stem from well-meaning, but boneheaded politicians without a clue about automotive design and consumer preferences making their shortsighted demands about automotive safety, fuel consumption, and emissions standards.

Meanwhile, I guess I’ll don a ball cap and dark sun glasses and take the Trans Am for a five mile blast down dark country roads, reveling in the joy of 455 cubic inches, 360 (dyno tested) horsepower, and 490 foot pounds of torque surging through a Borg Warner ST10 four speed to a 3.42 posi rear — staring across that big gold screaming chicken on the black hood as telephone poles began looking like a picket fence. That’s before the Greenies can pry the keys from my cold, dead hand to stop such foolishness … but they’re going to have to catch me first.

Contact Matt McLaughlin

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Did You Notice? … Breaking Down A Sprint Cup Season Eight Races In
Beyond the Cockpit: Ricky Stenhouse, Jr. on Growing Up Racing and Owner Loyalties
The Frontstretch Five: Flaws Exposed In the New Chase So Far
NASCAR Writer Power Rankings: Top 15 After Darlington
NASCAR Mailbox: Past Winners Aren’t Winning …. Yet
Open Wheel Wednesday: How Can IndyCar Stand Out?
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Matt McLaughlin and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Gordon81Wins
08/07/2008 05:59 AM
permalink

Matt, you could drive your Trans Am 24 hours a day for ten years and still leave a fraction of the carbon footprint that Al Gore leaves flying his private jet to speeches where he tells people not to drive SUVs.

It’s time people stopped buying garbage from these hypocrites.

David Lee
08/07/2008 06:16 AM
permalink

Matt, why doesn’t NASCAR join the Flat Earth Society, too? That’s just as real as man-made “climate change”. You don’t defeat a hoax by joining the hoaxters. Just because the “sheeple” of this country want to be herded by the likes of Algore and all his greenie buddies, let’s stand up for what’s real in this world, and it ain’t “global warming.”

Steve Cloyd
08/07/2008 07:40 AM
permalink

Environmental bullies. Now I’ve heard it all.

Send them to China if they want to see REAL pollution on an unimaginable scale. Their heads would explode.

Anyway, I liked Robin Miller’s idea for the 500. Give each team a certain amount of fuel, far less than they use now, get rid of all the rules, and let them do whatever they want to go 500 miles as fast as they can on the limited fuel.

Johnboy60
08/07/2008 07:57 AM
permalink

Al Gore “invented” air pollution just as he said he “invented” the internet! Just more liberal hogwash! You should have popped those people in the mouth! Shame on you!!

Tom
08/07/2008 09:05 AM
permalink

In contemporary NASCAR, racing 500-mile events are only a test of the fans’ endurance, since the drivers don’t actually start competing until the final 20 laps of the race anyway. Sorry… I don’t know how to fix that.

I know how to fix that. Score points every lap of the race based on your current position. Then just riding around letting people pass will cost you points and possibly the chase.

FunkyD
08/07/2008 09:39 AM
permalink

An Algore press junket burns more fuel than the entire field does in a 500-miler. The day NA$CAR goes green is the day they lose even more green (in the form of fans’ cash).

You should have told the little twerp to mind his own freekin’ business. Kudos on the tire-smokin’ exhibition! I would’ve done the same with my 400-pony GTO.

Of course, SATB fans know that Bandit was a 77 T/A, not a 76. However, you ride is sweeeeeet!

Margo
08/07/2008 09:46 AM
permalink

You make some great points . Wasting gasoline is wasting gasoline . PERIOD . Why not shorten the race distances ? 300 miles maximum , some even less .
As more and more sponsor money became available in NASCAR , the teams invented new ways to spend it . Jets , giant transporters , private planes for the crews . NASCAR can easily turn that around . Any team that shows up to the races with an enclosed trailer towed by a pickup truck gets a 50 pound weight break . Show up with an open flat bed trailer towed by a small box truck or pickup and you get a 100 pound weight break . There would be no more giant transporters !
NASCAR has always been terrified of fuel injection because it requires computers , thereby giving the teams another way to circumvent the rules . When NASCAR feels it can control what the teams do with the engine management systems required for fuel injection , they will begin to use it .
YOU FILLED YOUR PRECIOUS TRANS AM AT A SNOKO STATION ???? Go to the nearest auto parts store and buy a can of water remover , you’ll need it ! Your car deserves better than that .

JimBaker
08/07/2008 10:44 AM
permalink

Environism is a religion for people who think they are too enlightened to believe in God. They worship Nature instead. I wish even one of them could tell me what year it was, when all of Nature was in perfect harmony. Then I would know the goal they are working feverishly to achieve. Environism has been the perfect union of government and religion that our founding fathers feared. They are more brazen now because the government has been teaching this religion in our public schools for nearly two generations. The problem will get a lot worse before it gets better. Soon they will be telling you how many square feet you are allowed to have your home. Eventually, this kind of crap will have to be delt with. Stick to NASCAR, Matt. I hear too much from these people already.

NCfan81
08/07/2008 11:05 AM
permalink

I agree that there should be bins for recycling soda/beer cans. How hard is it to throw your trash away? Regardless of global warming this or that, the rules of cleanliness and respect for whats around you is seriously lacking at the track. I was in the garage area a few weeks ago and noticed how the team members left their trash all over the place, its so disrespectful.

Mike
08/07/2008 11:55 AM
permalink

There’s something to be said for acting responsibly; but, the militant view of some is over the top. George Carlin must have met your friend:

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/content/view/130/218/

chris
08/07/2008 11:57 AM
permalink

In your position, I might have tried a different tack. You could have explained that they were thinking short term, while you were being environmentally conscious with a much more effective long-term outlook. You’re using up the available petroleum-based fuel at a higher rate, while they are just prolonging the issue.

Simple microeconomics. You’re driving up the price of gas by using more in your T/A. Driving up the price (as we’ve seen) will drive the car companies to find alternative fuels. You’re also decreasing the supply on a finite resource, which also helps to accelerate the process of moving the world to alternative fuels.

So, I say: good job. I need to go get a less fuel efficient vehicle so I can help to accelerate the change to renewable fuel sources.

:)

dawg
08/07/2008 12:42 PM
permalink

Some have seemed to confused the current situation. Some of the Dumb asses that we have elected, want to go back to a 55MPH speed limit. IN ’74 when the Oil embargo was in effect. 95% of gas stations were closed on Sundays. I was towing my Midget 180 miles one way, to race on Sunday nights. One station was open Sunday. I’d fill up, plus fill a 5 gal can. Strap it on the trailer. Dump it in before starting home. This would get me back to the station. Now no shortage, just high prices. I kind of understand the balance of trade, we send all of our money to the Arabs, & Chinese, & get oil, & cheap crap in return. I do faithfully recycle, & try to do my part to save the planet. But I also know that the tree huggers would never understand the rush when you bury your foot in a big block. As long as you can afford to put gas in the Blackbird, go for it!

dawg

Dennis
08/07/2008 02:51 PM
permalink

Green my ass. They should serve BBQ Spotted Owl on a stick at the track. Cover the grandstands in Panda fur to make them more comfortable, and apply Right Whale oil to the sides of the tires to make them shiny and nice looking.

Two dopes violate your personal space with their stupidity and now you want to cave in to their demands.

Give that T/A to a man Nancy Boy and get a Vespa.

Sand
08/07/2008 03:15 PM
permalink

DAMN HIPPIES!

Sand
08/07/2008 03:25 PM
permalink

We are on this earth only for a short time. We were put here to do three things.
1. Burn gas
2. Eat meat
3. Kick ass
Did that come off as a little Hickish? Who cares! All hail the american V8.
Can I get a hoo haw two times tuesday?

Keith
08/07/2008 05:26 PM
permalink

Why use ethanol or gasoline or any other type of fossil fuel go straight to Hydroxy or HHO which is water broken down into hydrogen and oxygen also it is 3x more powerful than gasoline and leaves water as its byproduct. You should of told those 2 freaks to get back in their car because if they don’t they won’t have to worry about the pollution problem anymore.

Brent
08/07/2008 08:01 PM
permalink

What happens to all the Goodyears they burn up??

Marc
08/07/2008 09:47 PM
permalink

Responsible stewardship is one thing. We are admonished to be responsible stewards. But I cannot and will not buy the hogwash of all the Al Gores of the world, who burn up millions of gallons in jet fuel, trying to get us to conserve a little. If it is beneficial do it, but don’t buy into all the garbage you read and hear
about us ruining the planet and all the ice at the North Pole melting. It is all a bunch of lies by liberal dope smoking hippies who are not welcome at my table for Sunday dinner.

Earl Hickey
08/08/2008 12:54 AM
permalink

That Trans Am is sweeet. Have you ever seen my El Frickin Camino? Just make sure your tires are properly inflated and you are golden Matt.

You should have punched that tool.

PontiacGuy
08/08/2008 11:08 AM
permalink

From one Pontiac guy to you Matt. Don’t ever let them catch you. The freedom of all gearheads is at stake here.