The Frontstretch: Matt McLaughlin Mouths Off: Corps or Whores? by Matt McLaughlin -- Tuesday June 9, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

Matt McLaughlin Mouths Off: Corps or Whores?

Matt McLaughlin · Tuesday June 9, 2009


I’m getting a little dizzy here. NASCAR normally moves forward with glacial process when it comes to rule changes that at times make evolution look hasty. They’ll hold study groups and meetings, generate a ton of internal memos, send up a few trial balloons in the garage while maintaining plausible deniability, and then finally issue an earth-shattering decision that, yes indeed, the lug studs on the Cup cars are going to be a few millimeters longer this year. If you look at the time that elapsed between Dale Earnhardt’s death at Daytona (which had been preceded the previous season by the deaths of Adam Petty, Kenny Irwin and Tony Roper) and the rules change that mandated the common sense rule to require head and neck restraints, you’ll get a good idea of how the system usually works. In fact, it was only the death of Blaise Alexander in that Charlotte ARCA race that finally forced NASCAR’s hand.

The speed with which the new side by side restart rules were adopted after fans expressed interest in the format after the All-Star race was stunning. The jungle drums are loud this week that NASCAR is going to implement new rules to reduce the horsepower in Cup cars sooner rather than later, trying to improve the quality of racing to woo back disenfranchised fans.

Then of course there’s this week’s stunning announcement that NASCAR is doing a dramatic about face and embracing Internet writers, or at least some portion of the Internet writers who report on the sport. NASCAR’s relationship, even with the mainstream media, outside the chosen ones, the NASCAR network partners, has always been a little prickly. You might recall Brian France sending Monte Dutton, one of the sport’s most popular, if controversial writers, a love note wishing him well in his new career though in fact Monte had expressed no interest in changing careers (other than this recent musical gig of his which came after the fact.) The implications of that note were pretty clear and meant as a warning shot to others in the sport.

My how the landscape has changed. In this economy several papers that were bastions of race reportage for decades suddenly released their beat writers who traveled race to race and replaced their columns with AP news releases. Some of those papers decided with the interest in Cup racing dwindling, they might as well run the scores from church league bowling tournaments in place of the former race coverage.

Most industries are struggling in this economy, but the newspaper industry has been driven to its knees by the twin blows of reduced advertising income and competition from the Internet. There’s an immediacy to the Internet that print papers can’t rival. If a major story breaks newspapers can’t report it until the next print edition, but the breaking story can appear on Internet in minutes. The best papers have adjusted to the new reality and built strong Internet sites of their own. The Detroit Free Press recently went mainly online in a struggle to survive. The face of the medium is changing and changing rapidly in a way it hasn’t since the dawn of television signaled the end of the radio soap operas and serials.

In the face of change NASCAR has announced they are forming the “NASCAR Citizen’s Journalist Media Corps.” Like I said Sunday, the name is so Orwellian that it send shivers up my spine. Those Internet scribes, the spiritual heirs of the lonely pamphleteers with their ink-stained hands, will be “embraced with open arms” and “given the very same access as the traditional media” according to NASCAR’s press release on the topic. NASCAR isn’t throwing open the gates to the Barbarians though. The decision on who is in and who is out is based on “professionalism, reporting, commentary and use of social networking tools.” (There was no mention if spelling and neatness also count.)

If I’m a cynic, it’s a cynicism based on experience and some battles lost. NASCAR initially reacted to Internet reporting on their sport with all the ardor of Fidel Castro embracing free enterprise. While NASCAR says the “Internet” is a “new” technology, it is in fact more than a decade old. I’ve been doing this gig for 13 years now in some form or another after convincing my boss at a small (and I mean miniscule) racing newspaper that we needed an Internet presence. His initial reaction can be summed up as “Hell, we aren’t making any money doing this anyway. Sure, let’s lose money in a new way.” Understand in that era the three “staff” members of the paper were sitting around in a two-room office next to a church where they handled snakes waiting to see if a check arrived in time to keep us in business.

The “Born On” date of the NASCAR Internet is generally considered to be 1996 when Jayski’s Silly Season page was born. A hard working, tech-savvy guy from the Jersey shore started his small webpage trying to figure out what was going on with Lake Speed. Jay is a friend of mine so I know he’ll be embarrassed when I say that Jay is to Internet NASCAR coverage what another resident of the Jersey shore who started out small, Bruce Springsteen, is to rock and roll.

Eventually Jay, working out of the bedroom in his folks’ home started including links to other articles on the Internet related to the sport on his page, including mine. I recall my boss getting giddy and falling out of his chair when he saw the hits on our obscure website growing by the hundreds an hour after struggling to draw one hundred readers a week. And so a new cottage industry was born.

The new industry wasn’t met with open arms, either by NASCAR or by our in-print brethren with their degrees in journalism in many instances. The first assault on the frontier outpost was the now infamous “Circle R” note we all got back in the day. NASCAR was insisting that if we were to use the name NASCAR we follow it with the circled R trademark that indicated those six letters were a registered trademark. The problem is even the lawyer who sent the letter couldn’t figure out what set of keys one had to use on a keyboard to make that circled R appear after the word NASCAR. (I knew it at one time and used it once a column as a sarcastic response to the edict but have long since forgotten it.)

Despite threats of lawsuits most of us just ignored the stupidity of it all. However most sites did include the required disclaimer that that particular site was not the official site of NASCAR on the Internet and readers should click on a link to go to for the officially vetted propaganda of the day. I begged my boss at the time, Derek of Speedworld, not to include that burdensome verbiage. I wanted NASCAR to sue us. I had ACLU lawyers lined up to defend us pro bono. Eventually the battle ended with no causalities, though there was a lot of sniping from each side. Hell, I once ran the vanity plate “CRCLER” on my Thunderbird.

Then there was the whole Article Four boondoggle in which NASCAR said they owned rights to photos and reportage created at the track. That one was authored by Brian France himself back in the day. It too went over by a lead balloon with the NMPA (which only began admitting Internet writers this season) firing the fatal shots, but the Internet writers providing covering fire.

On a more personal note, I had that whole mess with R1 which I won’t recount here. It put me out of a job, but like a bad penny I keep coming back. I’ve made my peace with the fellow that pulled the trigger, but it still boggles my mind NASCAR’s sister company, the ISC, bought a website just to get me fired.

But let’s get back to the whole standards of admission to the NASCAR tree house more commonly known as the press box for Internet types; professionalism, reporting, commentary and use of social networking tools.

The difference between reporting and commentary should be pretty easy to understand. Reporting, as in recounts of the race, is reminding fans of what happened in the race they just watched. On this lap this happened and on that lap that happened and as a result Driver X won the race. Reporting also involves regurgitating in some semi-coherent fashion the press agents and car manufacturer’s press releases after the race as if you were sitting on Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s lap as he offered up his latest bon-bons on how to lose a race. At its most extreme, it involves staying awake through the race winner’s post-race interview in the press box, offering platitudes to his sponsors and carefully, if quickly, crafted quotes prepared by his PR guy or gal.

Commentary is a different animal all together. It involves seeing trends through a thicket of trees to see the forest as a whole, adding your analysis of those trends and putting it into some sort of semi-coherent fashion based on your understanding of the sport in such a fashion it informs, entertains, amuses or alarms your readers. Done well, reporting or commentating is an asset to race fans, though as a commentator, I prefer the latter to the former.

“Use of social networking tools” is a bit harder for me to understand. It seems to mean that that NASCAR wants writers who text message or tweet their readers during races. I still don’t own a cell phone and have never text messaged or tweeted a single individual. I don’t have a Facebook page and I don’t know MySpace from outer space. I’m still getting used to this email thing.

It’s the “professionalism” requirement that truly worries me. Based on my experiences with NASCAR officials, “professionalism” equates to parroting the corporate line, or at least masking your dissent in such a way that it makes your output so bland it can be ignored or easily digested by the simple-minded. Any departure from the party line is seen as unprofessional. That’s the same sort of mindset the governments of the USSR, China, Cuba and North Korea have adopted.

To effectively wield a big stick, one must also offer a carrot. In this case what is being offered to the Internet media as a carrot is full and free access to the garage area, which is denied to most fans. But the stick is there as well. If NASCAR doesn’t like what you have to say after your time in the garage, you get the stick and the carrots get taken away. That’s the sort of threat that could turn some members of the media corps into whores.

Matt McLaughlin explains things aren’t often as they seem when you finally get a glimpse at the inner workings of a professional sport.

I remember the first weekend I was headed to the track with full media credentials. I was practically giddy with excitement. I was finally going to get my peak behind the curtain. I was going to be in the press box. I was going to be handed a sheaf of press releases to let me know what the drivers thought after the race. And I was finally going to interview Dale Earnhardt (Senior not Junior) on why he was in an apparent slump. As I’d learn, no, Little Grasshopper, you’re not going to get ten minutes one on one with the Intimidator despite your press pass. He only talks to the big dogs and you are still a pup. If you’re lucky the nice Chevy PR lady will hand you an official press release of how he felt after the race and if you report it verbatim, perhaps one day you’ll get to ask Dale a question in a post race press conference.

Hell, even Robby Gordon, who was running so bad that nobody else wanted to talk to him, dissed me when I asked him a legitimate question while he was standing around doing nothing other than preparing to pack up and go home after failing to qualify at Dover. He wanted to know who I wrote for before giving me thirty seconds of his time. I told him I wrote for an Internet site and he told me that he had no time for Internet types. And it’s been game on ever since. Don’t pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel or who has unlimited bandwidth at his disposal.

On that ride to the first race (ironically I think it was at Rockingham), my boss Mike Calinoff tried to temper my enthusiasm. He told me something that was going to stick with me for life. He told me that the more access I got to the garage area, the more I learned about the people who ran the sport and the people who made up the sport, the less I was going to like it. You look behind the curtain and you risk learning that the wizards are only mortal men. I was naïve then, I never thought it could happen. It did.

So the chosen ones, the new member of the NASCAR’s Citizen Journalist Corps, I offer this advice, because though I’ve gotten a glimpse of the Promised Land, I won’t be crossing with you. Like Calinoff told me, once you have insider access you will like the sport less, not more. A merry-go-round laden with happy children is a beautiful thing to behold until you get into the inner-workings of the machine and see that it’s all ready to fall apart. You’re mileage may vary. Perhaps you’ll be able to dwell on the positive side, the drivers who take time out of their busy schedule to interact with Make-A-Wish kids over and above the call of duty, and stuff like that. There are a lot of genuinely good folks in the garage area. But when you see the warts, call a strike a strike and be honest in your opinions. The ultimate litmus test isn’t the NASCAR officials who dangle the carrot, but your hard won readers who expect honesty and can sniff out deceit like bloodhounds on the trail of a fugitive. Once you lose your credulity, the most precious gift you have as a writer, it’s like losing your virginity. You can never get it back.

There’s a joke I head a long time ago in the garage area. A rich man arrives at a local tavern and lays the keys to his Ferrari on the bar. He spies a beautiful woman at the bar and asks if she’ll sleep with him for a million dollars. “For a million bucks…well, yeah, I guess I will.” He asks her if she’ll sleep with him for a quarter and she’s offended. “What sort of girl do you think I am?” she huffs indignantly. “Ma’am,” he responds coolly, “We’ve already decided what sort of woman you are. Now we’re just negotiating over the price.”

Contact Matt McLaughlin

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Did You Notice? … Breaking Down A Sprint Cup Season Eight Races In
Beyond the Cockpit: Ricky Stenhouse, Jr. on Growing Up Racing and Owner Loyalties
The Frontstretch Five: Flaws Exposed In the New Chase So Far
NASCAR Writer Power Rankings: Top 15 After Darlington
NASCAR Mailbox: Past Winners Aren’t Winning …. Yet
Open Wheel Wednesday: How Can IndyCar Stand Out?


©2000 - 2008 Matt McLaughlin and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

06/09/2009 02:33 AM

Big Balls Matt, remember I have been saying its a show, and how many have to start on the couch, you nailed this one

Michael T.
06/09/2009 04:05 AM

Matt, I’ve asked several times about your beef with Robby Gordon and never got a response. Thank you for finally laying it out there. I, too, can empathize with the bitterness toward another when they make you feel unimportant. I’ve always read and heard stories of how Robby wasn’t like that. He made everyone feel special. I would probably hold a grudge too. I hope your interaction with him is in the minority.

06/09/2009 06:06 AM

Thanks for your insight Matt. After ten races of DW and Larry Mac shilling for Toyota, it’s a refreshing change to get “the real story”.

06/09/2009 07:58 AM


And as far as “Nascar’s Citizens Journalistic Media Corps”?


As you say, the ONLY ones selected will be the exisitng PRO-NA$CRAP writers who write in FEAR of NA$CRAP!

Example, an article by Godwin Kelly from Daytona (now being from Daytona should tell you something about how PRO-NA$CRAP this writer is), anyway the article “Mayfield Out Of His League In Courtroom Battle by Godwin Kelly” I took as a not so veiled threat to Jeremy to give up on his lawsuit as he is not going to win it anyway!

My interpretation of the article is that King Brian got hold of Godwin, and asked him to write an article to try and persuade Jeremy to just go away!

I responded as I generally do, taking NA$CRAP to task for their handling of not only the Mayfield situation, but also the Carl Long fiasco, and how NA$CRAP is cutting their own throats (gee, one can hope right?), ANYWAY, my response was CENSORED by Godwin Kelly and simply not published!

So I am quite sure if NA$CRAP selects writers to be on this “MEDIA CORE”, that NA$CRAP Schill Godwin Kelly will be at the top of the list!

Laidback Racing
06/09/2009 09:44 AM

“NASCAR Citizen’s Journalist Media Corps.”…yeah right…Kool-Aide drinkers only need apply. Bet my website writers won’t be accepted. Wait, in fact we haven’t!!! Just got turned down today for a media pass to Infineon. Reason given: too many people in the infield already…at Infineon?

Gene Haddock
06/09/2009 10:28 AM

I just started writing on different sites last year, and am glad I ran across this piece.

Thanks for the short version of the internet history regarding NASCAR. You really opened my eyes.

Carl D.
06/09/2009 11:04 AM

As someone who has followed your career from its humble beginnings, I knew when I first heard about this new “citizen’s media corps” that you wouldn’t be applying for credentials. I knew you had way too much integrity to be one of Brian’s media whores. And you’re so right about readers being able to “sniff out deceit like bloodhounds”. No matter how much perfume you put on a turd, it’s still a turd.

06/09/2009 11:05 AM

A peek behind the curtain may not be as life changing as some potential writers think . They’ll find the same jealousy , pettiness , vanity , greed , and stupidity that everyone on the supposed inside sees on a daily basis . These new writers will then either get very tired of the above and move on to write about something else , or they will see the sport for what it really is and write from that perspective . Or they’ll become enamoured of the Nascar force fed fairy tale and end up in the marketing department at ISC .

06/09/2009 12:26 PM

Gee, Matt,
Do you think that maybe, just maybe, Brian Farce is taking hints from our “friends” in Washington, District of Criminals, and the way they handle the Downstream Media?

Bill B
06/09/2009 12:44 PM

More lip service from NASCAR. We all know that “freedom of speech” will only be tollerated as long as it toes the party line. Good article Matt but anyone that’s been paying attention already knew that (although you had examples to back it up). That is why NASCAR and ISC are looked upon by so many as “The Evil Empire”.

@Laidback Racing… come on Mad Mike you will never get a pass. Your blatant call a spade a spade articles make Matt’s articles look like propaganda supporting NASCAR.

Steve Cloyd
06/09/2009 12:50 PM


Hold down the “Alt” key and type 0174 on your keypad. :D

As for the “slowness” of NASCAR, I doubt they’d even have the safer barrier either had Indianapolis not just installed them without NASCAR approval. Say what you will about Tony George, but he forced their hand there, in a good way.

I stopped going to ages ago because it was clearly nothing more than yet another marketing tool, nothing more. It’s like watching Sadam’s press agent give me an update on the situation; complete B.S.

06/09/2009 01:55 PM

Another good one Matt.

I wasn’t going to respond, but only after a few paragraphs in and I was thinking about Jayski’s Born on Date before you got to mention it. I jumped on the I-net a few months prior to his BoD and still remember finding his site along with SpeedWorld’s. Two great sites at that cromagnus time of the web. However, at that same time NASCARs site was ok, then through the years it sucked, it went back to being ok, now it blows badly. I hardly ever visit the “mother” site.

I used to think AP writers were held at a higher standard than the local rag penheads. My wake up call was Jr’s first win. I happened to catch an AP article on his first win and it stated …“Dale Earnhardt Jr scared Joe Nemechek out of the way…blah blah…for his first win at Texas”. After tuning in the see that race myself I can tell ya there wasn’t any “scaring” going on. Now I must assume AP writers can’t tell the difference between a stockcar race and a hotdog eating contest. Corps or whores? Gotta be whores. Only because they write whore-able garbage!!!

Being that the sanctioning body does not understand something, particularly something new (ie, technology, culture), they’ve been giving knee-jerk decisions and dumping on it immediately, only to soften up much later. IMO over the last few decades.

Laidback Racing
06/09/2009 02:32 PM

to Bill B who wrote
“Laidback Racing… come on Mad Mike you will never get a pass. Your blatant call a spade a spade articles make Matt’s articles look like propaganda supporting NASCAR.”

This is Jo Ann and I Hear ya brother…Everyday I look for a “cease and desist” order from NASCAR concerning some of Mikie’s stuff…and that’s why we like him!

Bill B
06/09/2009 02:46 PM

Hi Jo Ann, your articles are usually much more positive so I just assumed it was Mike. LOL That’s why I never miss his articles either (or yours).

An even easier way to use special characters (at least for microsoft).
Click on the Start button (lower left hand corner)
Click on “Programs”
Place cursor on “Accessories” to expand menu and then click on “Character Map”.

A window with hundreds of characters will appear.
Click on whatever character you want and then click on “Select”. You can string characters together to form words. Once you have the characters you want click the copy button and then paste into whatever document you are using.

06/09/2009 03:53 PM

I’m not making fun of people telling Matt how to do the trademark symbol, I’m just laughing at the thought that Matt may use the knowledge to get back into NASCAR’s good graces.

No offense intended. Just thought it was funny.

06/09/2009 04:23 PM

® ® ® that was amusing, Matt

Thank you, Mr. Cloyd

Kryle the crybaby
06/09/2009 04:42 PM

These double file restarts are just another crappy attempt by a crappy management to generate artificial excitement. It won’t work. Everyone is strung out in a single file parade in a couple of laps again anyway. Fix the real problem, the actual on track product. Get rid of the chase so each race is really important again and get rid of the COT p.o.s. so these drivers can actually race side by side and not just battle their own race car all day long. And also get rid of Brian France before it’s too late. Mayfield should demand he take a drug test. He looks more like someone who abuses drugs more than Mayfield does. Sick, arrogant, brainle$$ prick

06/09/2009 07:12 PM

now now matt…i’ve met robby gordon on numerous occassions and he was great with fans. remember, i sent you his fan club membership info and a personally autographed photo about 6 yrs ago! i knew you’d love it.

ok…..have you received you golden invitation from NA$CAR to be the leading contributor to the NA$CAR Citizen Corp? i know you want to join!

hey, let the idiots bring back “pit bull” and maybe i’ll be interested. i loved that show, eventhough it wasn’t politically correct. i’m sure they’d have plenty of fuel with the sport today.

06/09/2009 09:57 PM

I recall the R1 fiasco…went looking for your latest article, and not only was it not there, there was no record of you even ever writing an article on that site. Anyways, the day I will believe this “NASCAR® Citizen’s Journalist Media Corps” is actually a valid, and reliable group, is the day Matt joins it. NASCAR® has tried to silence Mr. McLaughlin before, the day they invite him to join them is the day I really, really start planning for the end of the world.

Steve Cloyd
06/10/2009 10:21 AM

“I recall the R1 fiasco…went looking for your latest article, and not only was it not there, there was no record of you even ever writing an article on that site. “

That’s the last time I went there too. That site became as worthless as when they sold their soul like that.

06/11/2009 11:53 AM

Bet Pete Pissed on is a memebr.

For you folks who don’t know, Billy France said Matt was the most dangerous idiot on the internet many years ago.