The Frontstretch: MPM2Nite: No More Mr. Nice Guy by Matt McLaughlin -- Thursday April 7, 2011

Go to site navigation Go to article

MPM2Nite: No More Mr. Nice Guy

Matt McLaughlin · Thursday April 7, 2011

 

No more Mr. Nice Guy,
No more Mr. Clean
No more Mr. Nice Guy,
They say, you’re sick, you’re obscene. – Alice Cooper

Is this stock car racing or Romper Room? What’s got into the Cup drivers lately? Nobody wants to be the bad guy. No one wants to be rude. No one wants to be booed.

The trend first caught my notice a few weeks ago. Kyle Busch, who reveled in the black hat persona for the last couple years, suddenly said he didn’t want to be the bad guy anymore. He added wistfully, “I can’t afford it.” Wait… is this the same guy who purposely parked his car on the frontstretch, exited and gave a bow to the occasionally incensed crowd, all but daring them to throw more beer cans directly at him? Is this the guy who used to cup a hand to his ear and seemingly invite an already angry crowd to boo louder, as if the efforts were substandard by the degree of his loathsomeness? I’m not a big fan of Kyle Busch, but I found his antics after a race as amusing as they were annoying. (Is Rea White going to have me fired for booing after a race?) To the victors go the spoils.

Curious about this change of heart, I wrote a few sources and was told that Busch had lost a couple major endorsement deals worth some big bucks because skittish sponsors were afraid his negative public perception would turn off, rather than attract customers. I think Kyle Busch knows his job on Sunday (and Saturday and Sunday and any other day of the week he chooses to race) is to win events and maybe one day a Cup title. I think that’s his job description at Joe Gibbs Racing as well. But Busch’s primary job, the one that keeps his team funded, is to sell candy and Camrys. And if his persona drives customers away, that can get to be an issue. NASCAR has said “boys, have at it” but the sponsors still seem stuck on the “boys, sell product” mode.

So now in 2011, we have the “new” Kyle Busch whom one of my friends is calling a “Pod Person.” He’s as gracious as Jeff Gordon Lite peppered with just a dash of David Letterman sarcasm.

As Gordon and even Johnson age, having perfected the Wonder-Bread image to a razor’s edge, another driver rising through the ranks has been Carl Edwards, a magna cum laude graduate of the Wonder Bread Institute. Edwards works as hard sculpting his “nice guy” image as Michelangelo did crafting his statue of David. In this case, the driver’s got it down to a science with the Opie Taylor haircut and his “aw shucks” interview technique that always includes thanking the media as if they’d just given him a Christmas pony. OK, there’s occasional lapses, like his getting in teammate Matt Kenseth’s face or putting Brad Keselowski on his roof at Atlanta, but even after that famous flip of Bad Brad, Edwards all but managed to summon tears telling the media he meant to knock Keselowski out of the way, not flip his car.

Has negative public perception forced drivers to be less aggressive? As Kyle Busch has found out, some sponsors aren’t fans of the “bad guy.”

Golly, gee, Pa, someone could have gotten hurt or something. Some fans eat it up with two spoons, and as a result even when the results weren’t there most of last year Edwards probably endorsed more products in TV commercials than anyone since Billy Mays. (Though Earnhardt Jr. has a dog in that fight even after a 99-race winless streak). Edwards even cultivates a bit of the bumbling but well-meaning Fred McMurray, the father in My Three Sons image when he does something like hurting himself playing Frisbee. Yet my guess is as he and his agent pursue a new contract with Roush Fenway Racing behind the scenes, he isn’t saying, “Golly-gee Jack, I don’t care what you pay me, I just gotta win a title in that No. 99 car. I just gotta… for my guys.”

Fast forward to last weekend and Kevin Harvick seemed, however briefly, almost apologetic for winning a race, noting the less than universal appreciation for his accomplishment in the grandstands. He doesn’t want to be unpopular, either. Harvick was thrust into an unfamiliar situation by the Earnhardt tragedy in 2001 while he was still a virtual unknown. He’d never even competed in the Cup Series, with just a handful of starts in the minors on his resume but a still grieving Richard Childress saw in the young Californian the same “Take no prisoners / losing isn’t an option” attitude that had embodied a fellow who won six titles with that team. Over the years (has it really been ten?), Harvick wasn’t shy about mixing it up with anyone who he felt wronged him, or even didn’t get out of his way fast enough.

In 2002, he sat out a Cup race for his admittedly dastardly actions in a Truck race the previous day, ironically enough at Martinsville. The kicker came after that ugly wreck, when he was called on the carpet by NASCAR and black-flagged. At that point, he drove his car through the garage area like he intended to score maximum points, running over pedestrians and demanded NASCAR officials speak to him on his time schedule, not theirs. (Truth be told, Harvick probably sat out that race more for his affront to NASCAR officialdom than his on-track antics). I guess it’s easier to be apologetic after you win a race than when you finish second.

But the pot really hit the boiling point to a Fukushima degree when TV reporters interviewed Dale Earnhardt, Jr. after the race. Lord, that was painful to watch. The poor guy couldn’t even make eye contact with reporters and stared at the ground as if the tips of his shoes were suddenly the most fascinating thing on earth. It appeared the guy was ready to cry. Hell, there ain’t no crying in car racing! Earnhardt admitted he probably could have spun Harvick for the win but he didn’t want to be a bad guy or come off as obnoxious. My guess is that there was a deafeningly loud orbital sound from inside a black sarcophagus outside of Kannapolis at that point. If I were his PR person, I’d have had Junior committed on suicide watch after that interview. In fact, I haven’t heard a Q & A that painful since Denny Hamlin basically conceded last year’s title after his pit miscue at Phoenix while still leading the points. After that, we all got to see what a thoroughly dispirited driver does in the season finale.

Well here’s a message for the dude(s): this is Martinsville. This is full contact racing, old school style. Short of drawing a hand gun and shooting the fellow trying to pass you for the win with three laps to go, there are no rules. Spin that fellow out, cut down his tire or put him in the wall. They’ve inducted guys who did that into the Hall of Fame numerous times and fans treat them with reverence. Had Junior gone ahead and hooked Harvick to get the win, then offered a sideways grin with an excuse that he hadn’t meant to spin the No. 29, he only wanted to “rattle his cage” my guess is that the majority of fans would have still been on their feet in the stands cheering long after the lights went out and the last transporters rolled off the Martinsville property. Oh, some fans and maybe even some media types would have been enraged and said Earnhardt was the dirtiest son-of-a-gun ever born… but they’d have gotten over it. In the meantime, as Junior’s famous father once said, “If they ain’t cheering, they better be booing.”

Earnhardt Sr. won a lot of races and titles and it wasn’t always pretty. But nowadays, we remember who won, not how nicely he played with others.

Sure, sure, I’ve heard the arguments. Junior wants to be his own man and forge his own legacy, not parrot his father’s path to success. Well, he sure isn’t doing the latter, is he? Hey, bully for him. Along the road, he’s ruffled some feathers, most notably in a Busch race with Matt Kenseth at Dover and another with Carl Edwards at Michigan. People got over it.

I know some of you reading this column are so new to the sport, you’ve never seen anyone but Jimmie Johnson win a title, but NASCAR did in fact exist before Johnson. Dale Earnhardt the Original earned his nickname “The Intimidator” honestly; it started in his late model days and continued right through his Cup career. Off the track, he was often one of the nicest people you can imagine, a true philanthropist whose generosity helped countless thousands of the less fortunate.

Though he had lines.

Countless people contacted Dale’s people wishing that Earnhardt would drive a loved one to the cemetery in a hearse with a big number 3 on the side. Earnhardt’s response was, “I’ll wind up in one of them things soon enough anyway. I ain’t climbing in one under my own power.” I’m not advocating ill behavior as a lifestyle. I don’t advocate people tripping elderly nuns on their way to church or stealing from the blind newsboy’s tin cup.

But when the engines fire and the helmets go on, it’s a whole ‘nuther deal. In the final ten laps at a short track, it’s OK to make Attila the Hun gasp from beneath his coverlet of maggots in Hell. If some folks protest and wring their hands, well, that’s the sort that ought to be watching the Lawn Croquet Channel instead.

Contact Matt McLaughlin

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Matt McLaughlin and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Keeping it REAL
04/07/2011 02:53 AM
permalink

I swear I am going to throw up if I read one more article on this subject this week. Matt thinks the world of Mark Martin for being a clean, hard racer yet bashes Jr for not spinning a guy out to win. Anybody can do that – spin a guy out for the win. Where is the talent in that? You think they wouldn’t do that to you in return?

You comment “spin that fellow out, cut down his tire, or put him in the wall” makes me sick. Is this what people really want? A bunch of hooligans wrecking each other all the time? Think NASCAR has image problems now, imagine that scenario. Good call Matt .. not.

You think people in the stands would have been cheering had Jr wrecked Harvick? Did you have the volume off when Sr spun the 5 at Bristol night race in 99? I am a devoted #3 fan and even I was thinking that was BS. He stole that one in a bad way, kinda made me sick at the time wondering if maybe he didn’t really have the talent to win anymore but was just going to drive through people to do it now.

BTW, that is precisely the sentiment that would have prevailed – Jr didn’t have enough talent to win so he wrecked a guy. If it were me, I’d rather have my dignity and integrity and have fought a hard second place and known that next time I’m in the position I will have another shot at it rather than knowing somebody is going to take me out since that’s what I did to win.

Funny, Matt talks about contrived debris cautions, inconsistent officiating, etc. damaging the rep of NASCAR but he wants a crash derby rather than a real race. Wow. You go crazy old man .. as you’d say about Mark Martin, who again we know would not have spun out Harvick and yet you seem to adore him. Interesting.

Lawn croquet channel? Really, I prefer to watch people put their cars on the ragged edge and race side by side daring each other to drive it harder, drive it deeper into the corner, dare to be great. What I don’t care for is a every driver on the track proving it takes no talent to drive through each other. Guess we’re just looking for different things, eh Matt?

Bad Wolf
04/07/2011 06:15 AM
permalink

I guess “Keeping it REAL” aka Nascar Crusader, Dans Mom, Randy Goldstein etc. does not understand the roots of stock car racing nor what used to put the fans in the stands.

Good read once again Matt, and the empty stands show what the fans think of “Keeping it Reals’” new and improved Nascar filled with it’s Billion Dollar Baby drivers.

Stephen HOOD
04/07/2011 07:27 AM
permalink

The problem with “Boys have at it” coupled with a spartan points system is that a spin and and win @ Martinsville may put you in the fence at Texas or Talladega. The drivers points and prestige for winning by spinning will be erased and then some when the spinner catches the winner at the next event. If you don’t care about points and championships, then go ahead and knock people into the safer barrier, but as JJohnson has shown, championships are won by finishing races, even if that means coming in third a few times when you might have won with a bit more aggression.

Do I think Dale Jr. left Harvick intact because he doesn’t have a major pair like his dad? Come on. He pulls in front of the field at Daytona and Talladega for the sheer enjoyment of it. I think Harvick won because he had a better car, Dale knew he was driving over his head, and he has the long view. If he wants to make the chase, he has to finish the race. Their gonna play nice when the pay day is twenty races away.

babydufus
04/07/2011 08:47 AM
permalink

i agree matt. Jr should be apologizing for NOT spinning harvick.. watching to post race interview made me sick to my stomach. Not only for Jr but for the “product” as a whole.

mark it down 4/3/2011 the day NASCAR died R.I.P.

Spridel
04/07/2011 10:47 AM
permalink

Like almost any other sport – NASCAR has been cleansed of much of its former character by the amount of money that is involved now.

In the old days, a driver only needed to think about money in terms of the purse at a race. On track effort and behavior could be raw and emotional. Rivalries often involved true dislike and even hatred. This carried over from event to event where fans knew who these drivers were and which ones they pulled for. There was always the promise of some action on the track – for better or worse.

Now, drivers need to consider how their actions will effect their ‘revenue streams’ and ‘marketability’. If you are seeking any kind of career driving, how can that pressure not cause you to become more conservative? Too much is riding on your decisions…

As a result, the competition tends to be more complacent until the end of an event, when drivers start jockeying for a possible shot at a win. Sometimes there are incidents, sometimes not. In cases where the situation crosses “the line”, the offending driver may offer a politically correct apology to the aggrieved driver after the fact. There isn’t much “street justice” anymore – too many cameras and microphones recording everything…

This is the true “action detrimental to stock car racing”…

Gordon83Wins
04/07/2011 10:54 AM
permalink

Matt, I love your columns and it really pains me to say it, but I agree with the first poster on this one. It takes no talent whatsoever to wreck a guy for a win. It’s one thing to move him out of the way and do a bump and run, but putting him in the wall deliberately is being an immature goon. I lost a lot of respect for Carl Edwards after his incidents with Keselowski. You know what they say, it’s all fun and games until someone loses an eye.

People praise Dale Earnhardt Sr. endlessly for his drive and desire, and always cite Bristol and his moving of the 5 car to win the race. But the truth is that Earnhardt was a superb craftsman behind the wheel, and didn’t outright wreck people on his way to 76 wins and seven championships. If he won that way that often, you can bet he’d have been put in the wall just as often, unless the Elliotts and Wallaces weren’t as brave as longtime fans like to think.

I grant that a driver wrecking another makes for a memorable event, but it also reflects failure on that driver’s part to control his emotions and/or his car. I may remember it, but I would never pull for a driver who wins simply by taking his competitors out and putting them at risk. Petty isn’t The King because he wrecked everyone in his way.

Keeping it REAL
04/07/2011 11:21 AM
permalink

Bad Wolf – I am not any of those other posters. Feel free to write to Frontstretch and I’d happily give them permission to check my IP address against any other posters. I find it comical that every time you disagree with somebody on this site you assume it is the same person with a different name.

Regarding your comment about the billion dollar baby drivers. I completely agree with you that the sport isn’t necessarily filled with the most talent and drivers who want it most. I am not happy about that at all, and agree that a good part of the drivers today are there for three reasons and in this order: 1) they can attract sponsors, 2) they knew the right people, and 3) they have talent. Nowhere in that equation is desire, and sad that talent is 3rd. But this 1-3 list is not my own. It was given to me by a current NASCAR driver who will remain anonymous. I think that is one of the big reason the ratings are down. Drivers are vanilla and their desire is a bit questionable sometimes. However, I strongly disagree that you have to plow through somebody to be exciting. Death in our sport doesn’t make for positive publicity and enough of is obviously very bad for the sport. Intentionally wrecking your competition is bad news. You cannot put SAFERs everywhere, and eventually a car is going into the grandstands. It almost happened with Carl/Kes. Let’s not condone that behavior. You belong in a cave if you do.

AnnieMack
04/07/2011 11:23 AM
permalink

Matt’s column rings true on so many levels. The readers who disagree and the sponsors who think their money buys them an opinion are what is killing the sport. The sponsor’s money used to buy them air time, marketing exposure.

Unless the driver committed a crime, the sponsors were tickled pink when controversy surrounded them to the point their on-air exposure was increased. The fans wanted their driver to win at all costs. Nobody wanted to see anyone injured and if new fans think that is what we crave, they’re wrong. We crave competition, ingenuity, talent, excitement.

I can’t stand Kyle Busch but damn he can throw a fit for the ages. I like having drivers I dislike so I can cheer against them. If the new fans want emotionless drivers, then this is the sport for you. I prefer drivers who want to win so bad they can taste it. Jr should have had that taste in his mouth and done whatever he had to to stand in victory lane. Shame on him for rolling over. I have to think his post-race interview was indicative of his embarassment at his own performance.

midasmicah
04/07/2011 11:32 AM
permalink

today’s nas$car =sterile and sanitized drivers. No characters welcome. Mind you, I was watching nas$car when a lot of the “fans” were still in diapers. Judging from the idiotic comments by “neo” fans, I think some of them are still in diapers. Anyway I used to be a nas$car fanatic”. Now it’s hard to watch a full race. Bland racing, non-stop commercials,inane commentary, and stepford drivers do not add up to excitement. I’m still a racing fan, but I’m hoping the powers that be will come to their senses and start listening to their real fans before the ship sails into the sunset.

Keeping it REAL
04/07/2011 11:47 AM
permalink

Annie and Midas – where the hell in my comments do I say I want a driver with no personality who doesn’t have the killer desire to win? Somehow in my mind I can separate that from driving through somebody to win. Apparently you cannot?

I completely agree about Kyle – I don’t like the guy at all. Take great pleasure in rooting against him. Makes it exciting and interesting. However, it is his attitude (bowing, saying crap about other drivers, etc.) that did that. How many people has he driven through? Honestly, very few. See, you do not have to drive through people and put their lives in jeopardy (you belong in a cave if you think that is the way this should be) to be interesting and cause a stir. Remember Craven vs. Kurt at Darlington? Did they wreck each other? Not even close actually. They leaned all over each other but were never close to spinning each other out. Now that is damn good racing and hard racing and what we want to see. Those two guys WANTED it on that day. That is what this sport needs.

What this sport does not need is a bunch of thugs trying to plow each other into the wall. The sponsors will leave in droves because the media will attack it as knuckledragging caveman sport, and some of our favorite drivers are going to end up critically injured or killed and at some point some cars are going into the stands to kill the very people who pay the bills to put on these events. Still think it’s a good idea to condone driving through each other? If so, very short sighted and not asking much talent out of our stars, just thug behavior. Enjoy that NASCAR.

Funny, I don’t recall Petty or Pearson driving through people to become great. And yes I watched them both, very late in their careers admittedly but I did also buy some of the highlighted coverage of their golden years since sadly the sport was only shown in occasional Wide World of Sports highlights and such back then. Funny we recall Daytona ’76 and ’79. That’s two instances in a decade where the top guys took each other out on a big stage. They really didn’t do that that often, yet you people somehow today think that’s all that happened back then. To all those calling me out on being a recent vanilla fan you are sadly mistaken. I just happen to remember when it was the extreme combination of talent and desire that made it interesting, not the rock-em-sock-em robots that you can see on any short track in the country on any given weekend for $8. I’d hope for the price of admission you’d expect a bit more out of some of the best talent in the sport but maybe not??

Carl D.
04/07/2011 01:03 PM
permalink

I’m going defend Matt on this one. He never said “If you’re on a short track running second, you should always wreck the guy in front if that’s what it takes to get the win”. He simply said (and I’m paraphrasing) that short track racing is physical and sometimes ugly, and that often times a driver has to get a little physical as well. You don’t have to wreck ‘em, but you can’t be afraid to rattle their cage a bit. However, I suspect Junior was reminded over the radio of the bigger picture, and had to take that into consideration. If that’s the case, no wonder he was so bummed out afterwards. Sometimes points racing sucks for the driver as well as for the spectators.

Buzz
04/07/2011 01:09 PM
permalink

I think people forget what a low-down, dirty, SOB Dale Sr. was. Hindsight can be 20/20, but it can also be blind.

Tim S.
04/07/2011 01:09 PM
permalink

So local racing is all low-buck demo derbies? Yeah, that’s keeping it real, all right.

wcfan
04/07/2011 01:19 PM
permalink

I agree with most of the posters here today. Carl D. really got it right. Short track racings does have alot of beating and banging, but that does not mean they have to intentionally wreck each other.

Keeping it REAL talks about the Daytone races in 76 & 79 and the big wrecks we all remember and still see on tv today. But i believe Keeping it Real would agree that those 4 drivers were racing hard and not giving each other an inch TRYING TO WIN THE RACE and that was their intent. Not wrecking each other.

There is a big difference between good hard racing and intentionally dumping somebody.

Keeping it REAL
04/07/2011 01:20 PM
permalink

Tim – so you don’t see significantly more vendettas, crashes, fights in the pits, etc. at local short tracks? Where are you from? The talent level and professionalism is a while different level at Cup. If you thrive on the drama and roughness, how the heck can you argue that you should be getting your fix at your local short track? Is your track operated like Cup? Me thinks not.

Countray
04/07/2011 01:25 PM
permalink

I feel like I’ve gotta put in my 2 cents here. I’m NOT a Dale Jr. fan, but I am a Kevin Harvick fan. Keep in mind that Jr hasn’t won in 99 races. Harvick won last week. If I’m Jr in that situation, I may not drive right through him, but I’ll tell you one thing… When Kevin drives under me to take the lead with three laps to go… I’m squeezing him down unto that curb, and if does clear me, I’m divebombing the next corner, even if it means using Harvicks door to slow me down. I’m not wrecking him (not intentionally anyway), but I’m leaning on him in every way imaginable to keep him from passing me and winning that race. And I don’t think anybody would have any problem with that. Except maybe someone who followed Harvick with the reverence that the Nation gives Jr.

Keeping it REAL
04/07/2011 01:28 PM
permalink

Carl – huh, seems I read this quote above “Short of drawing a hand gun and shooting the fellow trying to pass you for the win with three laps to go, there are no rules. Spin that fellow out, cut down his tire or put him in the wall.” Guessing you missed that part? I realize that’s not literal, but the tone of the article puts his intention a lot more literal to that than I like, hence my arguments that thugs drive through guys whereas talented drivers find a more honest way around them. That’s all. Seems pretty simple to me.

AncientRacer
04/07/2011 01:29 PM
permalink

Lord God almighty, Matthew why do you tug my heartstrings so? I am old. Decrepit. Then you write, and worse you publish, something like this. Something wise and wonderful. Why???… Ahhh …I know, you are from the Caliphate Central Command and you believe if I were to croak dead away from a simple emotional reaction there would be more Gold and survival seeds for you… I see! I am wise to you now! ;)

Carl D.
04/07/2011 02:09 PM
permalink

Keeping it REAL… You are right. “there are no rules” pretty much says do whatever it takes to win. I don’t 100% agree with that sentiment but I recognize that sometimes you have to play rough to win. Would fans have cheered if Junior had put Harvick into the wall to get the win? I guess plenty of them would. Plenty would not. There’s hard, physical racing, and then there’s dirty racing, regardless of the track. Still, Dale Senior did win seven championships.

Overra88ted
04/07/2011 02:30 PM
permalink

I fully expected Dale Jr. to start crying like a girl in his post race interview, after he embarassingly CHOKED away his best chance in the last 5 years for a win. Dale Jr. could not look into the camera because he knew himself he CHOKED. But that won’t stop Na$crap’s Most Popular Loser from Shamelessly using the PITY PASS fan vote to get into the Sprint All-Star race, a race for Winners. Because his average at best talent, in the best equipment in Na$crap will not be enough for Jr. to earn a transfer spot from the Sprint Open race.

CincyLady
04/07/2011 03:07 PM
permalink

I was tired of it all when Jr took the lead and the booth and everyone else was about to “wet” themselves with joy over the fact that the winless streak was about to end and that the Anointed One had moved big bad Shrub out of the way to do it. Then up sneaks Happy and even I did not think he could get around Jr with that short amount of laps left. But he did and I was happy as we actually had a very good race to end a race that had been good virtually the whole time and one that Nascar didn’t seem inclined to overly mess with, sans the Jimmie Johnson speeding ticket, so very timely and overdue.

Predictably, all the talk after the race was how Jr came so close to winning and Harvick had snatched a certain victory from Jr, who was to at long last, end the winless streak. I am glad Dale Jr. is running better, but I do not believe the health of Nascar lives in the ability of the 88 car to be the center of attention each and every week. Jr. is a medium tier driver who perhaps knew he could not seal the deal against Harvick, a better car, or whatever…
I tend to agree with Keeping it Real that the best drivers do not make dumping a driver the way they win. I’m not a fan of Jimmie Johnson, just irritates me to say his name, but the guy is a good driver who always lets the race play out and keeps his car in position to win. That he has the a freakishly devoted CC in Knaus, helps but is not the whole equation.
I want to see honest emotion in drivers but I do not believe “boys have at it” is about dumping someone to get a win, and the Darlington race with Craven and Busch is probably my favorite race as it was exciting racing with two excellent drivers.
Matt, you have become the only writer I make sure I read every week, but on this I think whatever Dale Jr did or didn’t do, everyone needs to remember he is not the end all and be all for many of us, and I for one, am tired of Texas already, the next track he will end the winless streak at….

janice
04/07/2011 03:34 PM
permalink

i said monday that jr was pathetic in his post-race interview. can’t stand someone who will not/cannot look people in the eye when they’re speaking to them. this is an interview jr….look at the camera, take off the shades and let us see you eyes.

yeah this weekend we’ll get 99 races since last win, texas place of his first win…can he break the steak. i can hear chris meyers commentary in my head already, along with mouth waltrip.

you know what is going to happen….if jr doesn’t win this weekend, the race after that is……

talladega

so it will start all over.

i thought sure jr would have managed to “make his car wide enough” that harvick would not have been able to pass him, but alas, he didn’t. i’m surprised kevin hasn’t apologized for winning, for racing and catching jr with 3 laps to go in a black chevy owned by rcr with a 3 decal on the car.

i still say jr needs to spend some serious couch time with a sports psychologist. his head isn’t there, hasn’t been for a very long while. and regardless who hendrick partners with him, it’s still the same, passive jr.

besides, jr is making money hand over fist by his endorsements and hauler sales. hendrick knows a cash cow when he sees one.

Scott
04/07/2011 04:34 PM
permalink

I continue to believe that if Dale Jr’s last name was, for example, Smith instead of Earnhardt, he would be nothing but a journeyman driver who is going from ride to ride. He would not be NASCAR’s most popular driver.

Sharon Jones
04/07/2011 06:34 PM
permalink

To wreck Harvick he would need a faster car than the one he was driving. He planned on doing a cross over but that did not work out. Could he have wrecked Harvick? Don’t think so. He was close but close only counts in horseshoes they told me.

Mr Bill
04/07/2011 06:58 PM
permalink

Everyone knows Dale Earnhardt senior won seven championships. Does any one remember the times he pushed people are made one big move on another driver that won the race? Maybe you can mention a few times he did something that he would only do if it meant the difference between winning the race and not winning the race. Does any one seriously think two years from now any one will say Jr did the right thing by not putting pressure on Harvick? Two years from now people will remember that Harvick won. You can not win championships driving like Mark Martin does and like Jr did at Martinsville. Winning will resolve about any problem you have with a sponsor. Just ask Mr. Goodwrench.