The Frontstretch: Changing the Chase by Mike Neff -- Thursday June 29, 2006

Go to site navigation Go to article

Changing the Chase

Full Throttle · Mike Neff · Thursday June 29, 2006

 

Brian France held a press conference in Daytona today. Part of what he discussed was tweaks to the Chase to the Championship format for the Nextel Cup Series. He believes that after three years, the time has come to evaluate suggestions that have been proposed over the last two and a half years to somehow make the Chase better. There have certainly been quite a few suggestions over the life of the Chase, but it is hard to believe that any tweaks will please everyone.

Let's look at what NASCAR might be considering:

1)*Get rid of it*. There's an idea; go back to the good old days where the purpose of racing for a whole season was to determine the champion. It wasn't to come up with some contrived race to the finish over the last few races that gave a driver who was mathematically eliminated from contention under the “old” point system the opportunity to win a championship away from someone who dominated a series for an entire year. This change won't happen, though. There has been too much time and money invested to allow the experiment to be scrapped, not to mention it would also mean that NASCAR would admit that the Chase was a bad idea, and we all know that isn't going to happen.

2)*Reward winning with more points than are currently awarded*. This is an idea that has quite a bit of merit. There should be a premium placed on winning in the series, and the current point system simply doesn't promote winning. The difference between first and second can be as little as five points under the current system. There was an idea floated last year to give anyone who wins a race a 500 point bonus. You would only receive it for winning your first race of the year. The bonus would separate winners from people who consistently finish in the Top 10. It would be a significant incentive to drivers trying to make the Chase and would certainly add some excitement to the end of most races, especially those that are close to the Chase cut off.

3)*Allow drivers to throw away their two worst finishes of the year.* This is a suggestion that would encourage drivers who are injured to not push themselves to get back in the car immediately after their injury. Points could still be awarded as they are today to the person who starts the race, so that drivers could start and then have a sub. However, if the substitute driver didn't perform well, the race could conceivably be one of the races discarded for a driver. This would also allow someone who crashes a car the luxury of not coming back out and running laps in a damaged car simply to gather whatever points they possibly can.

4)*Standardize points for people finishing lower than 30th.* This suggestion is a good piggyback to the previous idea; award the same points to the drivers who finish 30th through 43rd. This is a fantastic idea to eliminate the rolling wrecks that are a primary cause for so many debris cautions throughout the year. If a car is involved in a wreck that will require significant time to fix, the team will not feel pressured to get the car back on the track to attempt to garner points. When finishing 40th results in the same points as finishing 32nd, there won't be any reason for damaged cars to be put back in the track. That will hopefully reduce debris cautions and all but eliminate the need for a competitive speed rule to be enforced.

5)*Afford Chase drivers their own point system during the final 10 races*. The purpose of the Chase was to have a race to the finish among the eligible drivers that would offer them a nearly equal chance of winning the championship. The experience in the two previous Chases has shown that a driver can only have one bad race and realistically expect to have a shot at the championship. If the drivers have more than one finish of 30th or worse, their hopes for a title are dashed. If the Chase drivers had their own point system, though, a bad race would merely mean that they would receive the fewest points of the Chase competitors. Two or three bad races would not eliminate a competitor from Chase contention. With that type of system in place, there would be a distinct possibility that six or seven drivers could easily be mathematically eligible for the championship heading into the final race of the year.

Like it or not, the Chase is a necessary evil that NASCAR is going to have in place for the foreseeable future. The first year was a resounding success, but last year was a bit of a runaway, and there is certainly some room for adjustment going forward. It will be interesting to see what changes are going to be proposed by NASCAR for the Chase in 2007. Hopefully there will be changes made that will make the race to that championship more exciting, and afford more drivers the opportunity to win the title in the final race at Homestead.

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Did You Notice? … Breaking Down A Sprint Cup Season Eight Races In
Beyond the Cockpit: Ricky Stenhouse, Jr. on Growing Up Racing and Owner Loyalties
The Frontstretch Five: Flaws Exposed In the New Chase So Far
NASCAR Writer Power Rankings: Top 15 After Darlington
NASCAR Mailbox: Past Winners Aren’t Winning …. Yet
Open Wheel Wednesday: How Can IndyCar Stand Out?
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Mike Neff and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

M. B. Voelker
06/30/2006 08:15 AM
permalink

IMO, scoring the Chase drivers separately is a bad idea. I just can’t see giving someone win points for an 8th place finish or 10th place points for coming in dead last.

But dropping the ONE worst finish in the “regular season”, awarding more points for wins (and possibly top 3 and top 5 as well), and/or allowing a “wild card” for any driver who has competed in all the races, has multiple wins, but is not otherwise eligable would be acceptable to me.

sal
06/30/2006 10:21 AM
permalink

Isn’t it pathetic when ‘excitement’ is created by manipulating points, rather than good hard racing on the track? I still feel that locking any teams in or out of the top 10, while encouraging all 43 teams to continue to race to the end of the season, is pathetic. Either make the crapshoot a REAL playoff by running ONLY those teams ‘eligible’, or go back to a season long title. With TV ratings sagging consistantly, I’m not sure you can call the crapshoot format an unqualified success.

CH
06/30/2006 11:53 AM
permalink

How exactly would “throwing away” two worst finishes per year work? Would every driver have to throw away 2? If Driver A has two finishes in the 40s and Driver B has worst finishes of low 30s, wouldn’t that punish Driver B? If Driver B does not have to throw away 2 races, then Driver A would be hurt even more by throwing away 2 races wouldn’t he?

Jeff
06/30/2006 01:08 PM
permalink

Hmm….I wasn’t a fan of the chase idea when it was 1st floated. I’d still prefer the old format because I think it’s the fairest with more points going towards winning though. I am still going to watch the last 3 or 4 races of the year even if the championship has been decided. To me; it’s all about the racing. However the chase was more interesting than I expected. Makes for some interesting drama close to race 26 for those fighting for the top 10. Also in 2004; that final race was intense with it coming down to the final laps. Last year wasn’t as good, but do we need to “contrive” a format that makes it ultra-exciting every year? No. I will always watch because of my love for the RACING, but the old way was the fairest to me. Worked pretty well from 1975-2003 I think. Some close finishes for the title. I am sure that even some people whined when NASCAR changed the format going into that 75 season, but the sport was nowhere nearly in the public eye back in 1975 as to what it is today. If they tinker with the format so much; they might as well just say, the winner of the race at Homestead is the champ. Woohoo—-that means even Joe Nemechek(by the way—I like Joe) could be champion at his home track. :/

Missy
06/30/2006 05:47 PM
permalink

I figured something would happen once a couple big names (Jr and Gordon) missed the show. Baby France can’t afford his big guns on the sidelines and needs some loophole to make sure they can crawl in there.

 

Contact Mike Neff

Recent articles from Mike Neff:

Special Winter Sprint Car Series set for January debut at Cocopah Speedway
Beyond the Cockpit with Ben Rhodes
Kroger 250 postponed until Sunday afternoon
Denny Hamlin out of the car for the race at Auto Club Speedway
Nationwide Breakdown – Drive to Stop Diabetes 300

Want to find out more about Mike Neff? Maybe see all the articles he's written here at the Frontstetch? Check out his article archive and bio page then!