The Frontstretch: Fanning the Flames : ESPN Overload, Merger Madness, And Political Correctness by Matt Taliaferro -- Wednesday August 1, 2007

Go to site navigation Go to article

Fanning the Flames : ESPN Overload, Merger Madness, And Political Correctness

NASCAR Fan Q & A · Matt Taliaferro · Wednesday August 1, 2007


Just a couple of thoughts on Indy before I get to the questions this week… humor me.

Anyone hear the old story about how Brad Parrott was actually the guy who started the tradition of kissing the bricks after winning the Brickyard 400? Of course you have, because ESPN repeated it 472 times last weekend. Every time Dale Jarrett was in front of a camera, that softball was lobbed his way. Talk about overkill…

Think Kevin Harvick wasn't more than a little PO'd with Stewart after the contact that sent him parachuting back to seventh? Everyone made like all was swell afterward, but I believe Harvick's post-race shot was a little more than a playful congratulatory pop. Not that I expect the two to break up or anything…apparently, the two are so close Stewart has his own room in Harvick’s house.

Blue air, yellow air…whatever. Congratulations on figuring out how to put colored graphics on the screen, ESPN, but I still don't feel like Dale Earnhardt.

Guys, when are you going to learn you can't drive three-wide into a turn at Indy? I heard Kyle Petty mention that there looks to be a lot of real estate when they make laps in the pace trucks at 35 MPH. Race cars at 200 heading into a 90-degree turn tend to be a little less stable.

Alright, time to turn from fleeting thoughts to a long line of questions from you, the fans! As always, the address is if you want to write in and ask away; your comments, insight, and opinions are always welcome. Heck, they're even encouraged; where else are you going to hear that?

Q: DEI and Ginn merge. Then, Robert Yates and Newman / Haas. Not to be outdone, JR Motorsports merges his Busch shop with Hendrick and Kevin Harvick aligns with Richard Childress. At what point does it end, what does it mean for the future (only seven owners?) and who's next? — Matt H.

A: The future, whether we like it or not, is heading towards franchising. No one likes the “F” word, but you said it yourself: There conceivably could be only 10 or 11 owners in the field in a few years. If we get to that point, it most likely would be advantageous to all parties involved (read: NASCAR and the owners) to go the franchise route.

Who's next? I think that sound you hear is Haas CNC Racing going to Def Con One.

Q: NASCAR's PC police have once again outdone themselves. I just do not understand how NASCAR can take points away from a driver after he has earned them for something he did or said off the track. I know a precedent was set when Dale Jr. cursed in Victory Lane. Tony should not have said what he did, but this was cable TV, not network television!

What happens when a penalty for a curse word actually changes the outcome of the point standings? What if a driver does not make the Chase because of a 25-point penalty? What then, NASCAR? — Terry G.

A: I knew this one was coming, so here's my take: One of our contributing writers, Tony Lumbis, summed it up best in Mirror Driving yesterday when he stated, "I think we're dealing with two different arguments here. Is it a stupid to issue a (points) fine because someone is not PC…absolutely. But is it necessary in today's environment? Unfortunately, it absolutely is."

Bingo. Of course, it is absurd to take something as valuable as Nextel Cup points for something as harmless as a little curse word. But the fact of the matter is, Terry, NASCAR has no choice. After Janet Jackson's show of professionalism at the Super Bowl a couple of years ago (thanks Janet, we were all just dying to see that) the FCC told the broadcasters to clean it up. And a network — and yes, I know ESPN is cable, but they are a network nonetheless — that is continually made to pay fines for its on-air content will eventually drop the product that is causing the problem. I know it's no fun, but that's the reality of it.

Q: I have noticed the No. 13 is still technically 35th in owner points. This may be a stretch, but what if a startup team who has never competed in Nextel Cup before decides to run and use the No. 13? They do not get the owner's points, right? — Tony H.

A: No. NASCAR owns the numbers — incidentally, I've always wondered how one can "own" a number — and they grant permission for teams to use said numbers. Although the No. 13 still shows in 35th-place in the owner's standings and is an "open" number now that Ginn Racing dropped it after the merger, NASCAR would never open the can of worms you have inquired about.

So now, it's off to Pocono, with a long, long, long afternoon of long, long, long straightaways ahead. I guess I should look on the bright side; We've got a road course and a two-mile gas mileage parade coming up after that. Man, August 25th can't get here soon enough.

Did you hear about NASCAR’s qualifying procedure about to change? If you don’t know what we’re talking about, it’s because you’re not getting the Frontstretch newsletter – and believe me, THAT’s something which needs to change. How could you not want more of your favorite news, commentary, and opinion from your favorite Frontstretch writers – especially when it’s all FREE! Click here to sign up today.

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Racing to the Point: NASCAR Has Its Own Heartbreak Kid
Beyond the Cockpit: Brittany Force, the Fastest Force
Voices from the Cheap Seats: Advertising for Dummies
Who’s Hot / Who’s Not in Sprint Cup: Off Week-Richmond Edition
Couch Potato Tuesday: Picking The Best IndyCar On-Air Personalities


©2000 - 2008 Matt Taliaferro and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

08/02/2007 06:15 AM

It’s live tv. It’s unfortunate that all of the drivers have potty mouths. However, they should be adult enough to watch their mouths when not under pressure, such as in victory lane. How can we expect them to act like adults, when they are encouraged to have childish little fights almost every week? They get exposure for their sponsors and air time for themselves, and for NASCAR, it sells tickets.

08/02/2007 12:36 PM

Who cares if they’re network or cable or live or whatever. Why can’t ESPN just implement the 7-second delay? I think NASCAR is being too heavy-handed on the guys who are making them an awful lot of money. The same guys that are sweating it out in their cars, high on adrenaline for hours at a time. It just doesn’t go away that fast, especially when they win. And if NASCAR is concerned that the fans at the track might hear some “inappropriate” language, it’s a stock-car race for crying out loud, not a tea party!

08/02/2007 07:43 PM

Be careful what you say, what you do. Big Brother is watching, Big Brother will get you. Is it 1984 yet?

08/02/2007 10:52 PM

No matter what Matt Taliaferro stated, ESPN is a CABLE network unfettered by normal FCC regs. I just finished watching a flick on the Fox Movie Channel and the prudes among you should’ve heard the POTTY language! Better yet, how many of us haven’t used the S word, the F bomb or any of the other 7 words of George Carlin in public? If anyone says never, you’re being hypocritical. Kudos to Tony for not giving a d**n about a few points and telling it like it is.

Jan, it’s NASCAR setting a bar of civility that they want the drivers to adhere to. Just because you can swear on TV doesn’t mean that you have to. It’s not showing that Tony is being genuine or “telling it like it is” by swearing, rather, it’s showing that Tony either doesn’t think before he opens his mouth (Tony Stewart? Nahhh) or just can’t self-censure when he knows that his words are going to be heard by any viewer out there.

Jan, would you have had an eight year old sitting next to you while you watched the movie? Probably not, because you knew that there would be strong language and adult situations being shown. It’s not something a lot of people that are trying to set a reasonable level of discipline for their children want their kids exposed to when it’s possible to avoid it.

Viewers aren’t expecting that kind of language on an interview in a NASCAR race, and NASCAR wants to keep it that way. That’s why they fine ignorance like that. Not because they’re prudes, but because they have set their own higher standards regardless of the minimum standard required for the venue.


Have a question for Matt's Fanning the Flames?>Just click here! and Matt may answer YOUR question right here on the Frontstretch.

Like what you see from Matt? Well you're going to love what you hear from Host Patrick Snow, Matt and Frontstretch's own Tom Bowles every week on the Athlon Inside Racing Powered by Pepsi podcast!

Contact Matt Taliaferro

Recent articles from Matt Taliaferro:

Fanning the Flames: Of Daytona, Danica, Dale, and Duels
2009 Season Review: Tony Stewart
2009 Season Review: Ryan Newman
Fanning the Flames: Closing the Inbox on the 2009 Season
Fanning the Flames: The Crew Chief Carousel and Other Assorted Oddities