The Frontstretch: Fanning the Flames: Talkin' Safety, Driver Shuffles, And Engine Troubles by Matt Taliaferro -- Wednesday October 24, 2007

Go to site navigation Go to article

Fanning the Flames: Talkin' Safety, Driver Shuffles, And Engine Troubles

NASCAR Fan Q & A · Matt Taliaferro · Wednesday October 24, 2007


Six down, four to go and I'm still not sold on this being but a two-man race to the title. Although Clint Bowyer continues to put up a valiant effort — seemingly running in quicksand at times, it seems — this week's Atlanta race will determine his fate. If trouble finds Jeff Gordon and Jimmie Johnson and Bowyer can notch a solid finish, he's alive and well. Another strong run by the Hendrick duo, however, and the No. 07 is deep-sevened. Just not enough time to make up ground once we leave Georgia.

Onto the questions. Shoot me your feedback, opinions, gripes, shout-outs and questions to and I'll get you in next week.

Q: Hi Matt. I seem to remember that some drivers were hesitant to the idea of NASCAR mandating that they wear a HANS device in the wake of Dale Earnhardt's death. Since then, the drivers seem to have become more accepting of it, as I can't remember the last time I heard a complaint (via the media of course). Has the HANS device simply become an accepted part of the safety innovations of the last few years to the point that the drivers view it as just "part of the uniform?" And can you tell me exactly how it works? Thanks. — Patty Bouvier

A: First off, few were adamantly opposed to the device after the loss of Dale Earnhardt. Yes, some complained, but quickly got over it once NASCAR dropped the hammer and said, "Wear it or else." And you won't hear anyone complaining after watching Jeff Gordon walk away from a nasty spill in Turn 1 at Pocono last season, or Brad Keselowski's Busch Series crash at California this September. In fact, the HANS device has become a standard piece of safety equipment in most forms of motorsports throughout the world.

A little more info on exactly what it does: The Head And Neck Support Device works to keep the head from whiplashing forward in the event of an accident. Harnesses or tethers attached to the helmet run to the carbon fiber neck collar that has two arms that extend from the back of the driver's neck over the pectoral muscles; the arms are then secured under the six-point safety harness (seat belts to us layfolk), ensuring that when a rapid decelaration (or sudden stop) due to a crash occurs, the driver's head is limited in how far it can travel in relation to the torso.

Q: Junior blows another engine this weekend. How many does that make? Seven? It's obvious that he is getting the R&D stuff at this point. My prediction: He wins Daytona with the Hendrick goods next year. —Cody Aldridge

A: Technically, the engine didn't blow at Martinsville, but he fell from fourth to 23rd with under 10 laps to go, so I guess we can say another one failed.

Yes Cody, it is safe to say that Junior is getting some frisky setups, but that only makes good business sense. Truex had to be the company's primary focus heading into the Chase, so they most likely dialed the DEI / RCR combos back a bit for him, knowing that a reliable powerplant is better than a radical one that could kill every mosquito in a five-mile radius just past halfway. I do agree that Dale Earnhardt, Jr. in Hendrick equipment will make an awfully attractive fantasy pick for Daytona next year, though.

Q: I'm no Haas CNC Racing fan, but how do you give the boot to two drivers who took second tier equipment and put it in the Top 35 of the owner standings? Do they really think Jeremy Mayfield and Scott Riggs are going to outperform Jeff Green and Johnny Sauter? — TDawg

A: It's a "what have you done for me lately?" sport we love these days, Dawg. Jeff Green delivered five Top 10 finishes to Haas CNC Racing in nearly two seasons; Sauter had one Top 5 and two Top 10s in 32 races. Can Mayfield and Riggs better that? My opinion is that they can. Haas and Custer's got a seven-post shaker rig, a wind tunnel, and ace Director of Competition Matt Borland at their disposal. Most importantly, they’re locked into the field each week; these are both signs and assurances that this company is intent on being competitive.

Of course, arguing over who is the better driver is an exercise in futility, but Mayfield's two Chase appearances speak volumes; they tell me that when in competitive equipment, he can succeed. Make no mistake: this isn't Gillett-Evernham Motorsports, and any team that is a satellite operation of a bigger entity (Hendrick Motorsports) will never battle for a championship. Still, I look for the two newbies to duplicate the outgoing drivers' points position, and they could very well sneak in a handful of Top-10 runs.

And finally, I figured this one was coming and sure enough, here it is:

Q: Matt, is there any truth to the rumor that won't go away about Brian France being replaced by Jim France as the CEO of NASCAR? It continues to pop up, but no one wants to take this bull by the horns and report on how much truth there is to it. What's your scoop? — LW Head

A: Hmmm…commenting on rumors, especially ones of this magnitude, can be dangerous because I don't want to feed the fire. Since you asked, though, I'll be happy to tell you what I know!

My first thought when I heard the France rumor was to consider the source; I'll leave it at that. However, I have been told since that there could be something to a switch at the top of the NASCAR hierarchy. Honestly, that's about all I can say at the moment, and for that I apologize. Hang tight, man; this will be a story worth following, and we'll have plenty of coverage here on the Frontstretch once the truth does come out.

Enjoy the best racing we'll see on a mile-and-a-halfer all season long at Atlanta this week, and I’ll see you right here next Thursday…

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Matt Taliaferro and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

10/25/2007 04:46 AM

Jim France should have taken control of NASCAR several years ago . But he’d better hurry and do it now if he’s going to , because there may not be anything to take over at the rate Brian is going . And it appears that NASCAR is moving out of Florida completley and relocating to the Charlotte area . There seem to be a number of changes in the works .

10/25/2007 08:49 AM

A change at the top of NASCAR is really and seriously needed!

NASCAR as it is run today is a complete JOKE!

Along with Brian, should also go (at least) Mike Helton!!

Kevin in SoCal
10/25/2007 10:42 AM

The New Chase: the top 10 drivers, but only the last 5 races. Now that would be more exciting.

10/25/2007 03:08 PM

Actually Dale Jr.‘s engine did blow up. Just not as spectacularly as usual though.

Per the Budweiser Post Race report – “The engine finally wheezed its final breath under the last of a track-record 21 caution periods. The engine failure dropped Dale Jr. from fourth place to a finish of 23rd place.


10/25/2007 03:45 PM

I for one, eagerly await Jim France’s return to the sport as the CEO. I really hope he takes the time to read some of these fan forums to understand how we feel about the direction of this sport. Unfortunately for him the damage has already been done by the soon to be former CEO Brian France. What did Brian France think with the implementation of the COT? Do teams have unlimited resources to keep bringing in multiple programs in their shops? All the years of knowledge and experience teams have stuck into the previous Cup series cars are now lost with car to become showcars, ARCA cars, and scrap? The majority of the safety innovations should have first been implemented with the existing chassis before radically changing to the new car. Had those changes been put in those cars first the COT may have never been needed in the first place. Look at all the teams that are struggling with the COT cars, particularly the Yates teams and Wood Brothers. Nascar may even end up forcing one of those out of the Cup series for good with the COT. The difference between the have’s and have not’s is much worse and not better with the COT and expect it to worsen more. Expect the racing to stink at almost all the tracks next year (Mostly due to poor handling!), not just the few we had to watch this year with the COT. Also expect only a handful of names in victory lane as well! And now they announce that the Busch series will have a COT of its own in 2009 because of the threatened reduction of Major Cup team participation in the series because of the lack of transferable data from the current Busch car to the Cup COT. Something needs to be done about this and the only answers that seem to make any sense to me suggest getting rid of the COT which will unfortunately never happen? And what’s the deal with Mike Helton? He’s little more than a thug and bully on race weekends when dealing with the teams and the comments he directs at the drivers!


Have a question for Matt's Fanning the Flames?>Just click here! and Matt may answer YOUR question right here on the Frontstretch.

Like what you see from Matt? Well you're going to love what you hear from Host Patrick Snow, Matt and Frontstretch's own Tom Bowles every week on the Athlon Inside Racing Powered by Pepsi podcast!

Contact Matt Taliaferro

Recent articles from Matt Taliaferro:

Fanning the Flames: Of Daytona, Danica, Dale, and Duels
2009 Season Review: Tony Stewart
2009 Season Review: Ryan Newman
Fanning the Flames: Closing the Inbox on the 2009 Season
Fanning the Flames: The Crew Chief Carousel and Other Assorted Oddities