The Frontstretch: Side By Side: Who's To Blame For Daytona's Big Wreck -- Earnhardt, Jr. Or Brian Vickers? by Tom Bowles and Vito Pugliese -- Tuesday February 17, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

Side By Side: Who's To Blame For Daytona's Big Wreck -- Earnhardt, Jr. Or Brian Vickers?

Tom Bowles and Vito Pugliese · Tuesday February 17, 2009

 

Editor’s Note : The following is a special edition of Frontstretch’s Side By Side. Occasionally throughout the season, two of your favorite Frontstretch writers will duke it out in a debate concerning one of NASCAR’s biggest stories. Don’t let us be the only ones to speak our minds, though…be sure to read both sides and let us know what you think about the situation in the comment section below!

Today’s Question : Who’s to blame for the big wreck in this year’s Daytona 500 — Dale Earnhardt, Jr. or Brian Vickers?

Junior — Not Vickers — Didn’t Have His Head In The Game
Tom Bowles

Sunday marked Dale Earnhardt, Jr.‘s 19th Sprint Cup start at Daytona. It’s a town that’s housed some of the greatest moments of his career to date, including a 2004 victory in the Great American Race to go along with a July, 2001 victory in the Pepsi 400 — the first Cup event at the 2.5-mile facility since his father passed away six months earlier.

With six top 5 finishes on the high banks to go along with 383 laps led, it’s clear Earnhardt knows how to get around this place better than almost any other track on the circuit — with the exception of perhaps Talladega and Richmond. In my opinion, that’s what makes Sunday’s major incident tougher to take for NASCAR’s Most Popular Driver; a track that he expects to win at every time out is now forever linked with his most embarrassing moment behind the wheel instead. And deep down — underneath repeated denials of who caused what on Sunday — I’m fairly certain he might actually agree with that assessment.

There’s two main reasons Earnhardt is clearly to blame for this year’s version of the Big One. First off, if you look at the video of the incident, he hits Vickers not once, but twice before the No. 83 spins in front of traffic. As the cars come up to speed down the backstretch, you can see the No. 88 turn down below the yellow line after the first hit, allowing Vickers a chance to bring his car under control. It’s in those two seconds Junior needed to make a critical decision; he could have backed off, allowing Vickers to slide in front of him, or choose the more aggressive maneuver of continuing to try and make the pass. Of course, we all know already a frustrated Earnhardt chose option number two, gassing it to the right while tapping Vickers just enough to turn the front of the field into a tattered mess of broken sheet metal.

With two wins in 19 career starts at Daytona, you’d think Dale Earnhardt, Jr. would know better than to start the Big One in the sport’s biggest race …

Certainly, it’s OK to bump someone once down the straightaway — everyone makes mistakes, and after all, Vickers was pulling a blocking maneuver on the No. 88. But to push forward a second time — with two seconds in between hits — was clearly a choice Earnhardt didn’t have to make. Take a look at the drivers on the inside line surrounding him. In the worst case scenario, even if Earnhardt sucks it up and loses speed, he only falls behind three other cars, settling in right behind teammate and defending champion Jimmie Johnson. Considering the way teamwork is written into the Hendrick contract, do you really think Johnson would have left him out to dry? The two could have easily hooked up together, finding themselves in an even better position one or two laps later than the one Earnhardt was trying to force through a sudden banzai move down the backstretch.

Certainly, I can understand the frustration level of the man at the time. He’d already had two major pit road miscues that took a possible winning car out of contention; not only did Earnhardt drive the No. 88 past its pit under caution, but he stopped the car outside its pit box during a subsequent yellow flag, drawing a required one lap penalty by NASCAR that left him fuming in the cockpit.

But anger is never an adequate excuse for on-track aggression gone awry. And what bothers me the most about this incident is it occurred on the first lap of a restart, no less — before the cars were even fully up to speed. Yes, I know the rain was coming, and I understand the importance of getting a Lucky Dog position as quickly as possible. But was it really necessary to take an aggressive chance on grabbing that spot before the first lap back under green is even complete? Was a caution really going to come out that fast? There would have likely been plenty of time for Junior to put himself in position to get his lap back; I think we can all agree that of all the cars one lap down at the time, he appeared to have the best-handling car by a longshot.

But Junior wasn’t thinking about all that. For a few critical seconds Sunday, he forgot about thinking ahead, his expert knowledge of the draft, and the reality that Vickers’ block is one of about 1,000 that occurs on the back straightaway during a 500-mile race at Daytona under these rules. No, instead Junior got a little ticked, lost common sense for about five seconds, and made a desperate maneuver that didn’t pay off and wrecked half the field. And then, the best part is he had the audacity to play the victim instead of apologize, issuing a litany of post-race press conference quotes that smelt like the stink of a man in denial.

“He shouldn’t have started that, it would have never happened,” he said of Vickers’ “untimely” block. “If he had held his ground, who knows? He would have probably got the back or got the position back eventually, but at that point in the race, that was pretty reckless.”

Sorry to say, Junior, but the only person reckless in that situation was you. And for a guy 10 years into the league claiming he’s in position to challenge for a championship this season, I can’t imagine getting off to a more difficult start.

Slow Traffic, Stay To The Right – Earnhardt Exonerated in Daytona Dust Up
Vito Pugliese

It was a rough Daytona 500 for Dale Earnhardt, Jr., to say the least. First, he drives past his pit stall under caution, and has to go all the way around again to make his stop. Later, when he did find his pit crew, he had what appeared to be the sidewall of his tire resting against the line of the pit box. His team must not have seen the NASCAR official frantically waving them off to stop working on the car (probably because they were too preoccupied with pushing him out of the way), which resulted in a one-lap penalty that took them right smack out of contention. This action would completely change the outcome of the race, and precipitated the multi-car incident that was to immediately follow on the restart.

But that wreck, as far as I’m concerned, was the work of Brian Vickers — not Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

Now, before I am labeled just another member of the media who kisses Junior’s butt, let me make one thing perfectly clear: I am an exceptional member of the media. And I have not… had… osculation with Junior’s butt. Not a single time. OK, that was my best Bill Clinton impression; I’m writing this on President’s Day, after all.

Or is it Brian Vickers who should be thinking over an apology? After all, his one restrictor plate victory came once he made “incidental” contact with teammate Jimmie Johnson to spin him out on the white flag lap at Talladega.

So, where’s my proof? If you review the tape from the backstretch and infield angles, you will witness Brian Vickers swerve across three lanes of traffic to block Dale Earnhardt, Jr.’s pass attempt. Was it a legal move by Vickers? Yes. Was it ill advised?

As former VP candidate and snowbound cutie Sarah Palin would say, “You betcha!”

The telemetry from both cars showed that Brian Vickers was traveling at 174 mph, while Dale Earnhardt, Jr. had achieved 179 mph at the time of his “run.” Now, even though I went to a public school, I do know that a 5 mph difference on the racetrack is not exactly insignificant when dealing with hundredths of a second at the restrictor plate races of Daytona or Talladega. Junior had closed a distance of five car lengths from the exit of Turn Two up to the initial point of contact halfway down the backstretch. The No. 88 was in the process of passing the No. 83 car, who was moving at a significantly slower rate of speed, when Vickers went to block and impeded Earnhardt’s progress.

Vickers had run so far down to the inside of the racetrack after making contact with the fender of the No. 88 car, in fact, the yellow out of bounds line was bisecting the two Red Bulls on the hood of his Toyota. Now, think back to the 2006 Daytona 500 when Tony Stewart did the same thing to Matt Kenseth at about the same point on the race track. Remember the result? That was about to replay itself again, except this time, the aggressor’s actions got the best of him. Dale Earnhardt, Jr. quickly turned back to the right in an effort – to his contention – get back in line to make the corner that was ahead.

At this point, everybody is entitled to his or her own opinion of what happened next. Was Earnhardt really trying to spin Vickers out of frustration and anger… or was he just trying to fall back in line so he could make the proper entry into Turn Three?

If you are of the opinion Earnhardt did it intentionally, well, then how was he able to do it so he barely caught Vickers with just the tip of his bumper, yet minutes earlier, could not find the blinding magenta “88” being waved at him by guys in uniforms that look exactly like his? How can he not have the depth perception to park a car in a garage stall, but can cross the “T” in Toyota with a hood pin at 179 mph?

My take on that incident is this: ever since the untimely death of Dale Earnhardt, Jr.’s father at this very track and the event that defined him eight years ago, what has NASCAR railed about on restrictor plate tracks? NO BLOCKING. If you were caught aggressively blocking, you were going to be black flagged. If you passed below the yellow line, you would be black flagged, except if you were forced below said out of bounds line (unless your name was Regan Smith).

The bottom line is, Dale Earnhardt, Jr. had the right of way, and Vickers made a bad choice to block him at an inopportune time. Like your typical mouth breather on the interstate who negligently drifts into the passing lane at 65 mph while texting on their Blackberry, Brian Vickers opted to obstruct the path of a car who was in the process of overtaking him at a much greater speed, halfway down the backstretch, going in a straight line… not turning. If Vickers was going to do something like that, I’m shocked he didn’t just slam on his brakes to top it all off — my other favorite highway maneuver.

But Vickers should be well aware that type of movement on this track can come with dangerous consequences. Even Elliott Sadler, overcome with emotion prior to being passed for the lead with rain on the way, didn’t throw a flying body-block on Matt Kenseth. Why? Because you aren’t supposed to. When you do stuff like that – i.e., swerving across the race track at nearly 200 mph – bad things happen.

Wrecks happen.

Now, was Earnhardt trying to hook him and spin him into the infield — not in front of the pack? Was it payback for Vickers’ similar move that took out he and Jimmie Johnson at Talladega in 2006? These things do have a habit of policing themselves, after all. But if you think it was intentional, or bemoan the loss of NASCAR’s past, it wasn’t anything his old man wouldn’t have done.

However, it is my contention that this contact would have been preventable had Vickers simply stayed in line and allowed Earnhardt’s faster traveling car to pass by. And what is unfortunate in the mess that ensured is that Kyle Busch was denied a shot at winning a race he dominated, while being turned into the wall teeth first — at a point where there is no SAFER Barrier. It is also regrettable that privateer Robby Gordon had a fast race car ruined, while Denny Hamlin suffered yet another inauspicious Daytona 500.

But with the resulting fallout from The Vickers / Earnhardt affair, I am reminded of Clint Eastwood’s trademark catch phrase in the second Dirty Harry installment, “Magnum Force.” – A man’s got to know his limitations.

Unfortunately for Kyle Busch, Denny Hamlin, Robby Gordon, and others, Brian Vickers found his by way of the bumper of the No. 88 Chevrolet.

Contact Tom Bowles
Contact Vito Pugliese

Do you want the chance to win a free Frontstretch T-Shirt, and are you really good at talking about NASCAR? Well, we have the perfect opportunity for you. Our staff will be giving away a free T-Shirt to the reader who makes the best post in our Frontstretch Forum between now and the end of the season. So, what makes a good post? It’s pretty hard to impress us, but here are some things we are looking for:

Does your post spark passionate reactions from other readers? Are you commenting on meaningful NASCAR-related events? Do your posts have substance? In other words, “Dale Jr. is the best driver ever” or “Danica Patrick is hot” will not cut it.

So go to the Frontstretch Forums, post early, post often, and post well! We’ll announce the winner following the final race of the season at Homestead.

 

©2000 - 2008 Tom Bowles and Vito Pugliese and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

 

Fred
02/17/2009 03:33 AM
permalink

Whether or not Vickers should have thrown such a major block is besides the point. Jr. could have avoiding wrecking him and didn’t… simple as that.

It appeared that Jr. wasn’t on his game all day. He threw a pretty hard block on Burton (even though they said it was Kenseth, who was behind Burton) 20 laps into the race. Then late in the race, and the coverage barely showed it, Burton took the lead (well, at least was side by side for the lead) but the coverage missed what happened. Two laps later, Burton is back in about 20th hitting the wall. If it wasn’t for the pit reporter that interviewed Jr. after the race (rain delay at that time), no one watching on TV would have known what happened to Burton. The reporter asked why Burton had gone to talk to Jr. Obvisously it must have been a heated enough conversation for the reporter to bring it up. Jr. responded that Burton was upset with the way he raced him 3 wide. I think Jr. forgot that he was a lap down at the time and Burton was going for the lead. But what I have to say about this is that Burton is one of the calmest guys on the track. If he yells at you for the way you drove, you more than likely were at fault.

I’m a Jr. fan, but he was off his game all week. It almost appeared as if he was sick. DW was the same way, missed a few shows and was late for others. Then sounded sick during the 500. So who knows for sure?

The one thing I do know is that the coverage sucked!

Johnboy60
02/17/2009 07:19 AM
permalink

I do not care who gets the blame for that one. I am not a fan or hater of either. It belongs to nascrap for allowing blocking!
Vito, can you write anything without mentioning that punk kid Kyle?

Bobb
02/17/2009 08:31 AM
permalink

What either participant, Vickers or Earnhardt did was right. Their actions and maneuvers were appropriate for each; both were right to do what they did.
What both drivers did was not good. There is a difference between right and good. The end results obviously show that nothing good came from a couple of back markers.

Point the finger at NASCAR. Ever since plate racing came along, these big ugly wrecks have been typical.
Plate racing is an artificial competition that results in artificial results. Go back over the years and look at the final results of plate races and you’ll see results for those events do not parallel the rest of drivers’ careers.
NASCAR still hasn’t solved their problem and the more the discussion focuses upon the drivers rather than the conditions that lead to huge wrecks, the more they duck the responsibility.

NASCAR, nor any other series can write and enforce a blocking rule. F1, IRL, and every other series has tried and it fails; protecting the preferred line is part of racing. Go back in history to 1979 and recall the block Donnie Allison put on Cale Yarborough. NASCAR’s defining moment starts with the block.

Furthermore, NASCAR needs to put all lap down cars at the tail of the lead lap cars. With the modern scoring systems, when the caution comes out, the lap down leader WILL get his lap back no matter where he is on the track. Lap down cars have no business up by the leaders.
Lastly, for all those that are going to defend Dale Earnhardt Jr., please explain his race prior to the incident.
Jr. was “out to lunch” all day. His excuse that he couldn’t see his pit sign because so many other signs look alike doesn’t hold water; all the other drivers with ook alike signs saw theirs.
Pitting outside his box on the next stop wasn’t good either. The rule has been in effect forever; his excuse that the rule needs to be reviewed is insane considering most every driver pits in their box consistently.
Whatever we say here doesn’t matter anyhow. The conversation Rick Hendrick has with Jr. matters most and I doubt he’ll accept much after years of championship seasons from other drivers.

Douglas
02/17/2009 08:42 AM
permalink

Hey Vito, using Sarah Palin to “support” your thoughts on this incident is not a credible thing to do you know!

First and foremost, Vickers did excactly what is allowed!

Second, Jr. really never has had his head totally in racing!

Third, wimpy NA$CRAP gives Jr. yet another free pass when he should be “called into the hauler”.

Vickers = 100% correct

Jr. = 100% idiot

NA$CRAP = 110% at fault for random interpretation of the rules! Oh, gee, what rules? And who do they apply to?

M. B. Voelker
02/17/2009 09:12 AM
permalink

Nonsense, Vito.

Having a run on someone offers a driver the opportunity to pass. It does not give a driver the right to pass.

Blocking is legal. Period.

Once Jr. was blocked he should have eased off the throttle, stayed down until his spotter cleared him, then blended back in line.

If he lost positions by that then he lost positions — that’s what happens when you flub an opportunity to pass at a plate track.

Nothing, no amount of “frustration”, no move by another driver — not even a move that is actually illegal — gives one driver the right to turn another driver in front of the field at a plate track.

Jr., a 10-year veteran, has absolutely no excuse for pulling that stupid-rookie move and he deserves every word of condemnation for it.

He also deserved the penalty that Leffler got for a more equivocal and less generally destructive move on Saturday.

David L. Schmitz
02/17/2009 09:37 AM
permalink

Lets get one thing straight. If Vickers had been the car in back and Jr. had been the car in front,there would have been a penalty and a lynching.

nascrud1
02/17/2009 09:55 AM
permalink

fault and exoneration in this case is directly proportional to one “x” factor: inconsistentcy (supplied only by the buffoons at NASCAR.)

Linda
02/17/2009 10:33 AM
permalink

JR is even having trouble hiding behind all his fans on this one.

Anthony thompson
02/17/2009 10:44 AM
permalink

This is clearly Nascars fault. The drivers, any driver should not be aloud to block. If you are slower than the guy behind you, he should be able to pass you. This is racing where the fastest guy wins not the one that can block the best.

Roseann
02/17/2009 10:56 AM
permalink

What would Dale sr. have done? Dud, the same thing.

Jeff G
02/17/2009 11:00 AM
permalink

First, I have to say “Bobb” has the best post here about the entire race Sunday.

I think Vickers and Earnhardt did what they both knew they would get away with.

Remember, this happened on and below the “YELLOW” line(s). Leffer did it in the middle of the track. That line(s) is a joke. How many yellow line wrecks and discussions occur after every plate race?

As “nascrud1” said. There is an X factor. We all know who that is.

This has happened before, and will happen again. Only the names will be changed.

NASCAR is the culprit. Not any driver out there.

Dick Lee
02/17/2009 11:12 AM
permalink

There is no excuse for what Jr did. He lost his cool and wrecked a lot of cars and endangered lives of other drivers. What added insult to injury was when NASCAR allowed Jr’s action to go unpunished. They must have had brain fade in the officials booth. I lost interest in the race after that. It sure would be interesting to watch both Jr and NASCAR go through a polygraph test after the race.

Mike C
02/17/2009 11:36 AM
permalink

It’s nascars fault for the dumbass yellow line rule. Blocking me past the yellow line is the same as running me into the outside wall. I would of wrecked Vickers too.

Bob
02/17/2009 12:47 PM
permalink

Vito,
You are as high as JR

rew
02/17/2009 12:51 PM
permalink

blocking is good when the person is BEHIND YOU, niot BESIDE YOU. JR spun him out, but Vickers is to blame too, as he came down on jr to start this..vickers got sideways because jr was under him, then junior turned back up into him trying to blend…get it right a-holes…and im not a jr fan.

Billie
02/17/2009 01:13 PM
permalink

Vito, good article, however I think the whole day started off on a sour note,#1 having the race on Fox with that silly rodent,if you have cable you have a cartoon channel if its what you like to see,#2 DW and his cohorts,#3, the threat of rain, making everyone nervous,#4, Vickers being in the race at all, #5, NASCAR and their dumb rules, I could go on and on but whats the point, Jr. bashers are having a field day and probably will the rest of the season. I am glad Jr. is becoming a bit more aggressive!

HankZ
02/17/2009 02:02 PM
permalink

Just like his freakin old man. And where did HE end up?

Alan
02/17/2009 02:05 PM
permalink

As has been mentioned by others, the wreck was caused not Earnhardt or Vickers. It was caused by NASCAR.

That stupid yellow line addresses a problem that didn’t exist. I’ve been to well over 50 cup races at Talladega and more than a couple at Daytona – cars hitting the apron and causing a crash was a very rare occurrence. ‘Line’ incidents in the last 5 years far exceeds apron incidents over the last 40 years!

Don’t want them racing down there? Don’t pave it or put Pocono-style rumple strips. Don’t paint a line and expect ANYTHING good to come from it.

Kevin in SoCal
02/17/2009 02:06 PM
permalink

As usual, MB Voelker is right on target, and David Schmitz below is correct as well. If the roles were reversed, Jr’s redneck posse would be calling for Vickers head again, as they did at Talladega. The opinion offered by Janet H. in the newletter is completely wrong as well. Its always hilarious to listen to Jr’s fans when he screws up and they try to defend him.

Vito Pugliese - FS Staff
02/17/2009 02:53 PM
permalink

“Nonsense, Vito.

Having a run on someone offers a driver the opportunity to pass. It does not give a driver the right to pass.

Blocking is legal. Period. “

Not so. NASCAR routinely maintains that when another car has gained inside position on another car, they have the right to that position.

Vickers move was legal, but that didn’t make it smart. Again, these things police themselves. I don’t think Vickers will try to block anyone who caught them from 50 yards behind like that anytime soon.

Do you think that would have been tolerated in the days of Richard, Cale, David, and Bobby? The result would have been likely the same.

ginger
02/17/2009 03:22 PM
permalink

“However, it is my contention that this contact would have been preventable had Vickers simply stayed in line and allowed Earnhardt’s faster traveling car to pass by.” Vito, exactly. Vickers had two smart choices. Hold the bottom line or move up and let Jr pass. Instead, he let Jr move up beside his quarter panel and knocked him past the yellow line. Reminds me of his move at Dega a couple of years ago taking out Jr and JJ. Apparently his jealousy has overwhelmed him into making dumb choices.

Tom I’ve watched the video, paused, rewound, started, etc around 40 times now, and all I can say is you sure need glasses.

Jr, your fans love the fact that you took up for yourself. You owe noone an apology. It’s good to see the fire back in your eyes. We love you.

MïK
02/17/2009 03:33 PM
permalink

No blocking = no racing.

Racing is the act of driving a slalom course made of your fellow competitors. Without the pylons to go against, it would be time trials, or oval drag races. You block because your position is the reward.

I wouldn’t be interested in a race with no blocking.

Kevin in SoCal
02/17/2009 04:54 PM
permalink

Ginger, you cant tell me you would let a fellow racer go sailing on by, and let him have your position freely? Your love for Jr has YOU needing glasses.
Vickers moved to block, Jr went below the yellow line to keep from slamming into the back of Vickers. But, rather than backing off a tad and getting back in line, Jr chose to nudge Vickers’ car, which started the wreck.

Bill
02/17/2009 04:57 PM
permalink

Dale Jr could have avoided running into Vickers, plain and simple. The drivers had been blocking all day, including Jr. Why all of a sudden would it be Vickers fault for doing what NASCAR has allowed to be a legal move? Jr. had every opportunity to get back into line safely, even if it meant giving up positions. That is the price to be paid for going below the yellow line.

Doug Scholl
02/17/2009 07:21 PM
permalink

If Travis Kvapil did this to Jeremy Mayfield would there be this much outcry? With the exception of Kyle Busch who seems to cry whenever he doesn’t win..and sometimes he just walks away…..

Bobb
02/17/2009 07:24 PM
permalink

The yellow line had nothing to do with the incident.

The yellow line didn’t turn one car into the side of another.

If the yellow line was NOT there, the whole incident would have happened 10 feet further left with the grass in the place of the yellow line.

Rick Hendrick and all the other Cup drivers are going to believe that the yellow line made the 88 car turn right.

RJ
02/17/2009 09:16 PM
permalink

You have two polar opposite opinions and everyone will use any excuse to prove this person right or this person wrong. I would say line up all 43 drivers that were in this years Daytona 500 and point out the one that is “perfect”, also point out the one that in their racing career has not misjudged their position in relation to another driver that has caught one or more drivers up into the mess. Are you gonna line up JJ, no he is sometimes like a dart without feathers on a restrictor track, Jeff G, no that won’t work either, Concrete Carl, no think Talladega, Kyle the wild Thang Bush, oh heck no that won’t work either. Jr had a big run, Vickers put a chop block that would make the dirtiest lineman in football green with envy and and nearly punted Jr in the grass. I think Jr tried to move back up and misjudged the distance and slightly tapped Vickers rear qtr and the big one started. It happens every year, same ole same ole chop blocking moves until someone goes smashing into the wall and takes a bunch of other people with them, this time it was Jr that escaped, last year he was the victim. As I said line up the perfect driver so at least next week I can say, wow that driver never caused a wreck, that driver never misjudged his distance at 180+ mph. And all of you that somehow have incredible insight into peoples minds that you know their motives and intentions, pass whatever it is you drinking or smoking and so the rest of us can know so we know what they are going to do before they do it. Bush was just being his typical baby self, by the way I am positive that Kyle was not trying to wreck Tony in Nationwide race by cramming his car so far under Tony’s that Tony said it was hard to get away when your wheels are jacked off the ground.

PontiacGuy
02/17/2009 11:12 PM
permalink

*oyota doesn’t belong in NASCAR any way. Spin away!

John Wyckoff
02/18/2009 10:58 PM
permalink

The longer NASCAR allows blocking the more wrecks we will see at restrictor plate tracks. Although it was his racing style we know what happened on the last lap at Daytona on Feb 2001 because of that manuever. Need I say more?

More Side by Sides!