The Frontstretch: Has Indy Lost Its Luster? Three Ways To Bring Drama Back To NASCAR's Crown Jewels by Thomas Bowles -- Monday July 20, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

Has Indy Lost Its Luster? Three Ways To Bring Drama Back To NASCAR's Crown Jewels

Bowles-Eye View · Thomas Bowles · Monday July 20, 2009

 

The year was 1994; I was only 13, but the whirlwind of the Brickyard 400 remains as vivid in my mind as if it happened yesterday. From the moment the cars first hit the track for practice, drama was in the air for fans and drivers alike, with everyone putting their best effort into becoming the first name on Indianapolis’ newest racing trophy. An eye-popping 86 cars made official qualifying attempts through two rounds, transforming even the drama of making the field into national news; for, unlike now, NASCAR’s qualifying rules of old gave just a handful of teams guaranteed entry into the race through their small but effective provisional system.

That put all drivers on an even playing field, opening the door for open-wheel legends like A.J. Foyt and Danny Sullivan to crack the starting lineup and hope to translate their skill behind a stock car on racing’s biggest stage. It was knockout qualifying at its best, nail-biting stuff that left a handful of the series’ full-time drivers sitting on the sidelines alongside Indy stars like Gary Bettenhausen who were unable to get up to speed quickly enough to make the field.

As Saturday approached, the anticipation became overwhelming as the enormity of the moment became clear. With the drop of the green, as run-of-the-mill driver turned surprise polesitter Rick Mast led the field into turn one, NASCAR threw away its regional roots and officially became a national powerhouse. While not a side-by-side thrill ride throughout all 400 miles (the racing at Indy was plagued by aerodynamic issues even back then), the moments that stand out for me are still compelling even now:

- Geoff Bodine taking the lead only to be spun out by his brother, Brett, the height of a family feud that wound up playing out on in an emotional interview on national television.

- The final 40 laps turning into a Who’s Who of NASCAR legends, with young Jeff Gordon and Ernie Irvan pursued by Dale Earnhardt Sr., Rusty Wallace, Bill Elliott, and Darrell Waltrip – four men with twelve Cup titles between them.

- An epic battle between Gordon and Irvan in the closing stages, with Irvan’s blown tire giving way with less than five laps left to hand the win to the hometown boy from Indiana. A changing of the guard was close at hand, witnessed in front of hundreds of thousands of cheering fans who refused to leave until long after the checkered flag fell.

Fast forward to 2008. Now 27, I’m in my third year of walking down Gasoline Alley and nothing – repeat, nothing – compares. The aura surrounding the race for those involved is still every bit the same as it was 15 years ago, the understanding you’re a part of something larger than your typical Sunday show at any other race. Yet when the green flag drops, it all deflates as quickly as the Goodyear tires when all 43 cars get up to speed. Technical terms get thrown fans’ way just as quickly as they’re changing the TV channel, with faulty rubber leading to a litany of competition cautions and statements from Goodyear that ring hollow. Excuses without a solution, they leave little consolation for drivers forced to race at 75, 80 percent of full speed in ten-lap intervals that reduced the 2.5-mile oval to little more than a series of single-file heat races. In the end, Jimmie Johnson took home the trophy, but as I watched him kiss the bricks from afar thousands were busy kissing stock car racing goodbye for good. Leaving the speedway, all anyone hitting the exits really cared about was screaming their displeasure and getting their thoughts in order for a nasty letter to the track requesting a refund for that farce.

Jimmie Johnson and his team kissed the bricks to celebrate their 2008 Brickyard win. But for the fans that had to endure watching the “race,” it left them with a feeling like they had just kissed their sister or brother.

What a contrast in momentum, a low point in a 12-month period that has come packaged with some of the sport’s darkest hours. Ever since, NASCAR’s majors have suffered from a troubling lack of drama, with the Daytona 500 packaged with just nine lead changes before the final result came courtesy of a downpour instead of a duel. Ditto with the Coca-Cola 600 just three months later, where fuel strategy and Mother Nature’s smile pulled an unlikely winner with a damaged car from a certain 15th place finish – or worse – to a Victory Lane where no one was watching.

In the aftermath of Tom Watson’s stirring near-victory at the British Open, a golfing major in which those who never even picked up a golf ball in their life were suddenly paying attention, that lack of interest worries me heading into the sport’s second-biggest race of the year. Despite Goodyear’s tire testing to make up for their debacle, the uncertainty is leaving most hoping that Indy is a race where all 43 cars can simply survive, negativity staying out of the headlines while teams continue focusing on their new “dramatic mission” of the season: a 10-race Chase for the Championship this Fall. Instead of 86 cars attempting to qualify, we’re lucky if 50 will make the trip, with not just a struggling economy but 35 guaranteed spots for full-timers making it ludicrous for anyone to come here with a startup team on a one-race deal.

Ladies and gentlemen, the drama we once had surrounding the sport’s biggest races has been taken from us. But not one to take defeat sitting down, I refuse to sit idly by and watch it happen without at least offering suggestions for change, offering hope in an era where pessimism has taken center stage. So, I present to you the following list to help bring back the 400-miler we saw in ’94 – not the one that’s been slowly but surely watered down to the level we experienced in 2008:

Bring Back A Newer, Better Version of the “Winston Million.” For those new to the sport, those two words are part of what brought the sport newfound fame and fortune in the mid-1980s. The brainchild of the former series title sponsor, the “Winston Million” program offered a $1 million bonus to any driver who could win three of the sport’s four “crown jewel” races: the Daytona 500, the Winston 500 at Talladega (Spring), the Coca-Cola 600 (Charlotte), and the Southern 500 (Darlington) on Labor Day weekend. Suddenly, the races all fans knew carried an extra level of importance were legitimized as such by the men who made it all possible.

As you might expect, that was a lot of money in those days, and it left several teams gunning to take home the prize. It didn’t take long; the first year of the program, a quiet redhead from Georgia named Bill Elliott happened to win two of those first three “jewels,” setting up a Darlington weekend in which the national media attention was unprecedented for the sport outside the Daytona 500. Making the national cover of Sports Illustrated, Elliott held off Cale Yabrorough in the closing laps to take the Southern 500, a $1 million bonus, and imprint himself as the sport’s next big superstar — while casual eyes became longtime fans in the process.

For years, others would try and fall just short, the drama making front-page headlines through summer and Fall even though the bonus was never collected. Then, in what was ironically the last year of the program in 1997, Jeff Gordon joined Elliott in the Million Dollar Club after a thrilling shootout with Jeff Burton that makes you wonder if we’d even see these days in a world where points are at the premium they are now.

Since then, the sport has never had a program as headline-grabbing as that. So, why doesn’t Sprint bring it back? How about making a snazzy name like the Sprint Super Slam, giving $5 million to a driver who could win three of the sport’s four “majors”: The Daytona 500, Coca-Cola 600, Southern 500 (now held on Mother’s Day Weekend), and now, replacing Talladega, the Brickyard 400 at Indianapolis. While they’re at it, let’s not be stingy with their wallet, either; how about $1 million for winning two of those four, guaranteeing up to three drivers hope of a solid payday heading to Indy. Along with the millions the program would likely generate in national exposure, the pursuit would certainly add some extra drama during the regular season, assuring some drivers would have more than points on their mind on a day where the goal should be to win – not to finish.

In looking at the list above, you might notice an interesting trend: none of those four events fall inside the Chase. So, why don’t we do a little program to go along with the playoffs, too? How about if the first driver to win two races within the ten-race playoff gets a million-dollar bonus as well? That goal gives teams, sponsors, and drivers who fell short of the championship a consolation prize to keep their interest, as well as keeping incentive alive for those Chase-eligible drivers who quickly fall out of the title hunt.

Yes, it’s true everyone is making more now than they did in 1985. But even in this day and age, money talks – especially when it comes to adding intrigue in a world where fans are all too quickly apt to go ADD on you.

Remove the Top 35 rule for the sport’s four biggest races. Remember when the open-wheel faithful got so up in arms over Tony George’s rule guaranteeing starting spots to 25 Indy 500 qualifiers, he was eventually forced to rescind it? In the meantime, NASCAR’s had a similar type of “locked in” rule in place for the sport’s biggest events, yet refused to bow to the critics despite mounting opposition against it. In reality, how dramatic and fair is qualifying when the bulk of the starting field is already decided going in? Nowhere is this illustrated more than at Indy and Dayton’s 150-mile qualifying races, now reduced to little more than exhibitions while a handful of cars at the back of the pack battle against near-impossible odds to crack what’s left of the starting lineup.

With that in mind, let’s roll back the top 35 rule and go back to an older, better provisional system for these “crown jewel” events. The rule that worked best – in place during the mid-1990s – is a system where the top 38 in speed make the field, leaving four provisionals (based on owner’s points) and an extra spot for a past Cup champion. That assured those on top of the point standings would have a place in the race, while allowing others to bring a little extra effort to a track where they should already be giving 110 percent. Yes, that change leaves a risk stars having a season like Dale Earnhardt, Jr.’s would be booted out of the starting lineup; but those chances are minute compared to the opportunities it would offer some of the part-time teams (and those looking to dip their feet into the sport) to crack the field with equal practice time, pursuing their dream of racing immortality alongside those who may have already gotten there.

Change the point system for this race… slightly. As we’ve said, with the advent of the Chase it’s points, points, points taking center stage during a weekend where kissing the bricks should be priority one. The problem is, it’s hard to change a season-long system based on both tradition and consistency and make four races “make or break” as opposed to the other 22.

But at the same time, you can’t deny these races do carry a higher degree of tradition and importance within the NASCAR world. There’s a reason we’re not like any other major sport; the even weight of games in stick-and-ball sports is balanced with the importance of these “major” events we immortalize just like golf, tennis, and others. But with every race given equal weight as of now according to playoff criteria, establishing a different system to make the Chase seems too complicated without a complete overhaul. So, here’s a fair and balanced way to add incentives for those too worried about the championship to try moving from third to first at the finish of these special races:

More bonus points once we get to the Chase itself.

It’s the perfect compromise: tinkering with a system that’s already messed with tradition enough we can’t change it back without getting rid of it altogether. But since that’s not an option going forward, why not keep fixing the program with just a few more tweaks? Now, instead of a 10-point bonus for winning one of the “crown jewel” races, why don’t we give 50 points instead? But let’s not stop there, either; how about 40 for 2nd, 30 for 3rd, 20 for 4th, and 10 for 5th?

That simple incentive, easy enough for fans to understand, will suddenly push those drivers away from playing it safe. Suddenly, a sixth-place finish isn’t good enough for a potential Chaser when they can gobble up bonus points that’ll separate them from the pack if they make it in September. And for those who are already in the field, every position carries added weight as they look towards getting a leg up in the postseason in any way possible.

Alright, there you have it: three small but critical ways in which we can get our “crown jewels” leaning back towards the drama that once accompanied their spot on the schedule. We may not be able to fix the cars quite yet (although changes may be coming), and as for the tires, well … all you can do is hope Goodyear did their homework. But at the very least, a little bit of outside promotion and excitement built around these races would do much to restore the spectacle that once was racing at Daytona, at Charlotte, at Indianapolis.

Because right now, they’re all too dangerously close to losing their luster.

Tom Bowles is now on Twitter! Click HERE to become a follower.

Don’t forget to listen to Race Talk Radio on Mondays, where Tom joins up with hosts Dennis Michelsen and Lori Munro for a segment as their “NASCAR Insider” on Doin’ Donuts! Click here to visit the website and listen to the show LIVE! Tom usually does his bit around 10:00 PM EST.

Contact Tom Bowles

NASCAR NEWS, RIGHT TO YOUR INBOXAND IT’S FREE.
The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Did You Notice? … A Return To Richmond, Post-Spingate And Quick Hits
NASCAR Mailbox: A ‘Normal’ Saturday And A Valuable Lesson
Beyond the Cockpit: Tony ‘The Sarge’ Schumacher
Open Wheel Wednesday: Controversial Moves, Long Beach Crowds, and Being a Fuddy Duddy
The Frontstretch Five: Pleasant Surprises of 2014 So Far
IndyCar Driver Profile: Takuma Sato
Beyond the Cockpit: Tommy Baldwin on Owning His Team, Hall of Fame and the Number Seven
FREE NEWSLETTER! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

 

©2000 - 2008 Thomas Bowles and Frontstetch.com. Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

RamblinWreck
07/20/2009 03:13 AM
permalink

Perhaps it’s time to stop running at the Brickyard. Sure, it’s great for the drivers to have the chance to race at Indy like I’m sure most of them have dreamed about since before they could walk; the speedway is nothing short of legendary. But it’s legendary for the Indy 500, for Andretti, Mears, Foyt, and Castroneves. NASCAR has no shortage of historic legendary tracks known for good stock car racing, and Indy isn’t among them.

You wrote just last week about the tracks that were built to host IndyCar races being less than spectacular for stock cars, and the Brickyard is the king of those. It’s telling that your column isn’t a look back at the many classic Winston Cup races at Indy but a look back at the first. Has there been a stock car race at Indy since 1994 that has had excitement to match the hype?

Ryan
07/20/2009 07:26 AM
permalink

Adding a huge payout and a “ snazzy “ name to a championship within a championship would mean more money for a few drivers . But thats all it would mean . You could also put up a million dollars to any team that wins three soccer matches in a row . That would certainly energize the existing fan base , but it would hardly make soccer a household word in the US . Same with the Nascar idea . It wouldn’t bring in new interest to the sport because the disinterest of fans isn’t based on a lack of gimmicks . Its based on a pretty poor show every week . If gimmicks worked , ticket sales would have gone through the roof when Double file restarts Shootout Style was announced .
The top 35 rule was taken directly from Indy car racing , Nascar doesn’t have very many original ideas . And there is no doubt that the top 35 nonsense has hurt the sport . But as we know , Nascar does not make mistakes , so the top 35 rule will stay . It might be tweaked from time to time , but it will stay .The Brickyard 400 still means a hell of a lot to cpmpetitors and fans alike , and hasn’t lost one bit of its luster . Its Nascar thats lost its luster .

Douglas
07/20/2009 07:40 AM
permalink

It is not a matter of:

HAS INDY LOST IT’S LUSTER”!

It is a simple matter of “NA$CRAP HAS LOST IT’S LUSTER & CREDIBILITY”!

It is a season long issue, not a single race issue.

AND!! !! !!

Can you imagine, for example, bringing back THE WINSTON MILLION concept, when last year you could not run 5 laps (at indy) before requiring new tires! And having two (2) restrictor plate races in the mix, how funny would that be!

How would you give away the million $$$$ ?????

To the SURVIVOR?????

The million should go to a REAL WINNER!

NOT! A “LUCKY” driver!

Overra88ted
07/20/2009 09:06 AM
permalink

Bringing back some form of the Winston million would be OK. But only if it paid $5 million to win. The closing lap duel between Tony Stewart and Kasey Kahne in 2005 was very exciting. It’s still the problem with the COT though.

mick
07/20/2009 09:28 AM
permalink

I’m tired of nascar running on tracks that aren’t built for nascar racing. It’s a major reason why the races at these tracks suck. And the Indy head honchos don’t give a real flip for nascar anyway.

And I don’t totally blame goodyear for the tire mess. I think a lot of it has to do with the diamond grinding that’s done on the corners which eat tires up. Nascar should not allow it.

Carl D.
07/20/2009 11:29 AM
permalink

While I think it would be great at some point for Nascar to bring back something similar to the “Winston Million”, but let’s be honest here… that does absolutely nothing to fix the racing itself. Had someone won a million dollars by winning the Brickyard travesty that was last year’s race, it would have only added insult to injury. Until the actual racing is improved, any kind of additional prestige rewarded for winning a “crown jewel” race is a joke.

Know what get when you put cologne on a turd? A turd with cologne on it.

Keith
07/20/2009 11:43 AM
permalink

There was no other race in racing history that had the same energy as the first race at the Brickyard. The one thing everyone should realize is that the Brickyard 400 saved the race track it was in bad shape in 1994 the paint was peeling in the grandstands I sat in for practice in the paddock penthouse I sat on folding chairs for the race the bathrooms were falling apart and with the money that the 400 brought in they really cleaned up the place.This allowed them to install new garages and build the road course and bring in F-1. This of course had it’s downside for open wheel fans it gave Tony George the money to start the IRL. No matter whether you like the racing there or not it does bring in the largest crowd Na$car gets all year and the TV ratings aren’t bad either so I think it will be around for a while. It’s not my favorite track Darlington is and I have been to every 400 since 94 but I think I have more fun this race weekend than most of the others I go to it has a different feel they let you go almost anywhere you want and there is no hasseles unlike all the I$C tracks I go to.

john
07/20/2009 11:50 AM
permalink

Congrats on your website being chosen as one of the “Citizen Journalist” media members — The question is do you have the “kahoonies” to send Matt McLaughlin to cover a race?

Douglas
07/20/2009 01:00 PM
permalink

Hey Mick! RE: Not GOODYEARS fault! (on the tire issue).

I look at it like this: GOODYEAR has ALWAYS had tire issues. But the WMD car, or the CoT as it is commonly called, makes the tire situation much worse.

I place 100% of the blame on GOODYEAR! If they, GOODYEAR, cannot produce a real racing tire for this tank, THEN THEIR RESPONIBILITY IS TO TELL NA$CRAP THEY WILL NO LONGER SUPPLY TIRES!

PERIOD!

As long as GOODYEAR agrees to supply race tires, then they should have the ability to do so!

AND THEY DO NOT HAVE THAT ABILITY!

The Old Guy
07/20/2009 03:26 PM
permalink

That was going pretty good until I got to “As Sunday Approached. Are you sure? If I’m not mistaken, the first “Brickyard 400” was run on Saturday and was for several years thereafter. Up until it became the “Allstate 400”.

One poster says NASCAR shouldn’t allow the diamond grinding. Uh, NASCAR doesn’t own the track. It works fine for the Indy cars with a lot of downforce and it worked jut fine for the pre “COT” race cars.

I think the original allure of the Brickyard has passed into history as far as NASCAR is concerned. It’s become more of “Been there, done that” than anything else. Maybe Indy should be replaced by, say, Rockingham? Or, N. Wilkesboro. Or, even the Old Nashville Fairgrounds Speedway which was the “Original” High Banked half mile.

Managing Editor
07/20/2009 04:11 PM
permalink

Hey guys,

I wish I had more time to talk today but two quick things … first off, thanks for pointing out the error about Sunday vs Saturday. Nothing more than my own idiot goof; one of those mind playing tricks on you kind of moments where you should have fact-checked but didn’t because it’s a memory in your own head.

Second, as for the Citizens Journalist Corps … we will have a response about our inclusion coming out later in the week, so watch out for that. It’ll likely be couched in a column of some kind. And for the record, Matt has covered plenty of NASCAR races in over 20 years of writing. He’s stepped foot in the garage in three different decades for a variety of publications; so going to the track for him is nothing new :O)

Thanks as always for the insightful comments, plenty of them on this particular thread.

Mike
07/20/2009 06:52 PM
permalink

NA$CAR sucks.

 

Contact Tom Bowles

Recent articles from Tom Bowles:

Did You Notice? ... A Return To Richmond, Post-Spingate And Quick Hits
Did You Notice? ... Breaking Down A Sprint Cup Season Eight Races In
Did You Notice? ... Drivers Still Make A Difference... But Silly Cautions Don't
Did You Notice? ... NASCAR's Free Agent Lynchpin, Uncomfortable Reality And Gambling
Did You Notice? ... Toyota Trouble, Limping Into Action And Testing The Waters

If you want to know more about Tom Bowles or to view all of his articles here at the Frontstretch, check out his archive and bio page.

Want even more Tom Bowles? Check out Tom's archive at SI.com.