The Frontstretch: Did You Notice? ... NASCAR's New TV Challenge, Record Droughts & Six Shooters by Thomas Bowles -- Wednesday March 6, 2013

Go to site navigation Go to article

Did You Notice?… The major undercurrent of FOX’s rebranding of SPEED as FOX Sports 1? The new network, set to debut August 17th is a reaction to NBC’s recent cash infusion into its own sports network. NBCSN, who happens to be looking for a chunk of NASCAR races in the next rights package, is being built as a “superstation” of sports with designs to challenge ESPN over the next decade. Add in CBS’ own dabbling in sports, albeit on a smaller scale with CBSSN and FOX felt like they needed to get with the program. (Note: ABC, the last member of TV’s network giants is owned by the same parent company, Disney, that controls ESPN.)

With that adjustment, though comes a reality check that some of the programming all have enjoyed on a racing-only network will simply go away. You’ve got to think, considering how they had cornered the racing market at one point FOX recognized a limit to how much money they could make through motorsports-related programming. Sports television, after all is a business just like all other fields and rebranding the network allows it to pursue other, more profitable sources of programming. Already, Dave Despain’s Wind Tunnel, popular amongst hardcore racing fans has been placed in the “under evaluation” category as to whether it will continue under the new network. What a nice way of saying its days are numbered, right? I think Despain, while one of the best racing reporters of our time doesn’t have an audience centered on that juicy 18-49 age group that makes advertisers start to spontaneously drool. There are other sports, like soccer that take less time, are easy to produce, have a well-rounded following and will bring in a newer, hipper audience. Again… if FOX felt racing would carry the majority of their new venture, maximizing the profit why wouldn’t they have found a way to keep a version on SPEED?

The bottom line is, while racing will form parts of the network (it won’t go away; FOX’s TV deal would be a waste without it) don’t expect it to be front and center all the time. Especially during the Fall, when Sprint Cup is televised elsewhere and NFL season takes center stage racing will be barely a blip on the radar screen. Expect major drops in the ratings, too if the big network chooses to move a handful of their Cup races to FS1 beginning in 2015. Yes, the network may be in 90 million homes but we saw the consequences for IndyCar when their races were relegated to Channel 12356 on the local cable channel. (The Nielsen ratings are so microscopic, these days it’s hard to get a reading on what they actually are for that series.)

In the short-term, there’s not much NASCAR can do about this adjustment. But as the four stick ‘n’ ball giants – hockey, baseball, football, and basketball – carry on with their own, branded networks you have to wonder what the sport is going to do to protect itself. Through NBATV, for example basketball can always rest assured its product is out there, along with 24-hour analysis and special programming for its hardcore fans. At one time, NASCAR was rumored to be starting its own TV network in Charlotte but those plans, at the moment appear to be on hold. In the meantime, its own website continues to struggle with interactive, in-race enhancements for fans to the point people have emailed me and said they can’t even navigate to the website because it’s crashing their browser. On Twitter, a once cutting-edge way for fans to stay connected to the sport now comes with a worry drivers can be fined for speaking their minds about series rules. We’re living in a technology and television generation, yet both seem to be slipping out of NASCAR’s grasp.

Getting a grip on that, beyond Danica Patrick and the Gen-6 car may be more of a key to growth than anything else. But I’ll tell you one thing that definitely isn’t a positive; a racing network specifically changing its name to get away from racing, with no replacement in sight. That doesn’t tell people to come sit in the stands on Sunday.

Did You Notice?… The panic over the new Generation-6 model? It’s two races in and already, after some below-average competition people are ready to take this car and throw it in the trash bin. We haven’t even been to an intermediate track yet! For those threatening to boycott the sport, already it’s like watching a baseball game after changing the rules and then leaving, stomping your feet in the third inning. Is it that bad you can’t bear to see how it turns out?

I do have one concern, though and it surrounds dominance from a particular program. As I pointed out yesterday, the whole concept of “cookie-cutter” tracks filling the boredom quota in our lives comes from the fact Jimmie Johnson has absolutely dominated them. Here we are again, two races into a season and that pesky J.J. has an average finish of 1.5. His current shop, still led by crew chief Chad Knaus won 10 times and stomped the competition during the first year of the Gen-5 chassis. Add in the atypical early success of Earnhardt at Phoenix, a track where he’d skipped a beat at times in very recent history and you’re looking at the possibility for a runaway regular season, at least. The Gen-6 was designed, in part so the smaller teams could start on a level playing field, have a better chance to challenge the superstars above them. Instead, should HMS come out and take control it all but sets a Formula One style separation in stone. Someone needs to find a way to compete; there’s still time. But you have to think if J.J. contends and/or wins this Sunday he’s got to be the overwhelming favorite in the Chase once again.

Did You Notice?… This interesting twist, following Carl Edwards’ Las Vegas win put together by our own Kevin Rutherford? For a driver of his caliber (and for someone whose previous winless streaks weren’t as daunting), Edwards’ 70-race losing streak in Sprint Cup was unexpected and a bit troubling. Though he’s never been a driver to go on a tear, save for 2008’s nine-win campaign, seeing his familiar No. 99 out of victory lane took some getting used to.

But while the streak was sizable, it’s certainly not among the longest.

In fact, in terms of resolved streaks (i.e. winless streaks broken by a victory), it runs about mid-pack. As hard on one’s confidence 70 races without a win may be, Bill Elliott actually holds the distinction of the longest losing streak in Cup that ended up being broken with a victory (for drivers who have won at least once). Awesome Bill went an astounding 226 races, between 1994 and 2001 without one. A close second is Dale Earnhardt, Jr.‘s dry spell between 2008 and last year, 205 races in total.

That said, Edwards’ streak came at a time when he was still semi-competitive. In 2011, he finished tied for the championship despite winning only once that season, while Elliott and Junior downright struggled during the years of their streak.That’s partially what makes the lack of wins less affecting; one only really looks at 2012 as a year when he didn’t perform up to standards.

Edwards’ winless streak isn’t even that long put against other active drivers in the same boat. Of former winners who have competed in one of NASCAR’s top series since 2012, Ken Schrader holds the current record, with a 565-race dry spell dating back to 1991. Derrike Cope hasn’t won since 1990 — 327 races — and former champ Bobby Labonte just hit 326. In terms of drivers in (proven) winning equipment? Martin Truex, Jr.‘s 205 races without a victory comes to mind.

It all comes down to the team for which Edwards drives. Guys at Roush Fenway Racing are pretty much expected to win, not go on 70-race spells in between victories. Coupled with the fact that he actually hasn’t been half bad despite not winning, him taking so long to taste victory surprised a lot of people. Don’t count on it being this long again.

Longest Winless Droughts Snapped
(Between wins – Number of starts to get first career win does not count)
Bill Elliott – 226 (‘94 – ’01)
Dale Earnhardt, Jr. – 205 (‘08 – ’12)
Jeff Burton – 175 (‘01 – ’06)
Sterling Marlin – 170 (‘96 – ’01)
Dave Marcis – 167 (‘76 – ’82)

Did You Notice?… Quick hits before we take off…

- An underreported story from Phoenix is the way new Ford “front man” Brad Keselowski pushed the old, uncontested superstar a car length ahead during that green-white-checkered finish. Clearly, both men have matured since this 2010 flip that could have turned tragic after the two couldn’t get away from each other on-track; the mellowing of the bad blood between them is genuine. But I also think two of the smartest men in the garage are well aware of where their bread is now buttered. Penske Racing (Keselowski) is getting their engines from Roush Fenway, during year one with the Blue Oval program and needs all the support they can get. When you don’t build your own equipment, well, the last thing you want to do is bite the hand that feeds you.

As for Edwards? He’s never been afraid to seek out help and support. And who better to help rebuild your confidence, sharing information than a man that just won the 2012 Sprint Cup championship?

- Front Row Motorsports is putting on a brave face this week. But after tearing up five cars, out of a possible six to start off 2013 you have to wonder how much they’re hurting for equipment. An underfunded team, who doesn’t have extra cash lying around to begin with the next month or so may be a case of “survival mode:” third driver Josh Wise starting-and-parking while the other two, David Ragan and David Gilliland, take out a restraining order on anyone within 50 feet. Such is the nature of NASCAR these days, another layer of possible conservatism that comes with running behind on building these new cars.

- Is it just me, or does Kurt Busch still think he’s driving Phoenix Racing equipment? Even last Fall, when experiencing success with Furniture Row Racing’s No. 78 he’d put himself in hot water unnecessarily with a self-imposed trip to the outside wall. You’d think a former Cup champion, once known for his consistency would learn to take a 15th-place car and finish 15th with it. Second place is the first loser; I understand that much-needed aggression within the sport. But sending yourself to the garage on a wrecker comes with a nasty bill that’s only going to dig your smaller team a deeper hole.

- NASCAR and the NRA. Really? Who knew both sides had a burning desire to shoot themselves in the foot? Anytime you try and put politics and sports together, well, mixing oil and water comes to mind. No one cared, for example about the six-shooters in Texas Victory Lane until everyone started sniffing post-NRA deal. I just don’t see this ending well for either side…

Connect with Tom!

Contact Tom Bowles

Connect with Kevin!

Contact Kevin Rutherford

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Beyond the Cockpit: Alexis DeJoria On The 300 mph Women of the NHRA
A Swan’s Broken Wings Equal NASCAR’s Next Concern?
Thinkin’ Out Loud – The Off Week Season Review
Pace Laps: Swan Racing’s Future, Fast Females and Dropping Out
Sprint Cup Series Facilities Can Build Upon Fan Experience by Looking to Their Roots


©2000 - 2008 Thomas Bowles and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Steve K
03/06/2013 01:36 AM

Does FOX not remember they have FOX Sports Networks all over the country? Do they remember how bad they failed at competing against ESPN? Anyone remember those smash hit shows staring Keith Olbermann? The regional sports reports? Anyone seen NBC Sports Network ratings? FOX Sports 1 is a terrible idea and SPEED fans sadly pay the price.

It is bad enough that Wind Tunnel is cut to 30 minutes this year, now it will be eliminated all together? I would like to say I am 31, love the show, and haven’t missed it since I discovered it a few years ago.

I love watching DTM races. I love watching the Aussie V8’s. My gut tells me they will not be on FS1. What about the newly unified Grand Am series? If NASCAR did start their own network I would hope they would buy the rights to air these events on a tape delayed basis. It would be a shame for race fans like myself to miss out on what the world has to offer to FOX can fail once again at besting ESPN.

Bad Wolf
03/06/2013 02:49 AM

I still miss the original “Speedvision” we had before they changed it to “Speed”.

Speed did have the best Nascar show ever back in 2004 with “Pit Bulls”, but they will never let a show like that happen again.

03/06/2013 08:37 AM

Anybody that can cut BSPN down to size is fine with me. I welcome it.

Nascar/Chevy/and Hendrick go hand in hand, so if you’re waiting for the fall of JJ and crew you might be waiting a while. It will be interesting to watch and see what happens if the Fords and Toyotas start winning a lot of races. That’s when the red flags go up with the Nascar overlords.

But if the Chevy’s and JJ (or DANICA! ) win a lot of races, Nascar will declare the Gen-6 car a complete success.

03/06/2013 09:19 AM

I feel badly for all of the loyal Speed employees who will probably suffer the most from this change. I like WT, but RaceHub is the show that I tune in to get the news about NASCAR and who knows how that will be affected?

I have never been into the lifestyle programming that Speed turned to for $ – don’t watch Pinks or whatever that wrecker show was. I stopped watching Trackside when Steve left and they turned this show into “how stupid can we make a driver look? for fun. Sorry, not interested. I used to watch more when they offered more racing.

I don’t really know if they can compete with ESPN – except for races, I don’t watch ESPN for any sports. I don’t care for the constant talking head approach.

As far as the Gen6 car, well, yes, it’s early in the season but maybe NASCAR should have used a smarter approach and instead of saying – its wonderful, it’s going it FIX everything, they could have said, it’s a work in progress. Not as impressive maybe but it would have helped manage expectations.

Nascar wanted parity, it’s why they went with the COT spec car. This Gen6 has a different look, but it’s the same chassis underneath so it’s still a spec car.

Show me some racing and I will stay interested.

Sue Rarick
03/06/2013 09:27 AM

Anyone that thought the new cars would give the small teams a chance has to qualify as toopid (stupid times 2). HMS probably has more computer simulation engineers than a team like BK racing has employees. Speaking of BK racing. How come nobody has mentioned this little company is not only building it’s own cars for the first time, but is actually building it’s own Toyota engines.

03/06/2013 10:30 AM

I just hope they will keep airing the ARCA and K&N Pro Series races. I love watching those. I watch a lot of race hub, but I get my news mostly from Jayski. Still, I watch the occasional F1 race and ARCA and K&N when they’re on. No doubt FS1 will have no time for those.

03/06/2013 12:32 PM

FOX has been trying to kill off SPEED since they took it over several years ago with some of the lame shows they were putting on, like Pimp My Ride, Wrecked, and Dumbest Stuff On Wheels, just to name some of the garbage that has been shown. Don’t get me wrong, I like My Classic Car, Gearz, Hot Rod TV, and even Pass Time (I like that one especially when ‘the house’ gets beat!). Those shows are at least performance oriented. With FOX’s rebranding of SPEED, it’s like they are trying to kill off the NASCAR broadcasts so they can dump the races down to this “new” channel. Why else would they continue to keep D.W. in the booth in spite of all the complaining we do about the goof! The real insult to all the fans who complained about D.W. was adding Micky to the booth for the truck races and putting him into the Hollyweird Hotel in place of Jeff Hammond. That proved that FOX has nothing but contempt for NASCAR fans. Now we are seeing the disappearance of SPEED and are going to see even more stick-and-ball sports. Yuck!!

Oh well, it was relatively good while it lasted.

03/06/2013 12:40 PM

My email to Fox will read:
Dear Fox,
You infected our sport with your gimicky programming and Waltrips. Don’t infect our channel with ball sports!

Alan Sorensen
03/06/2013 01:02 PM

Worried about the “bad karma” NRA might cause NASCAR? Seems you are the only one since so far, there are no other comments on it. Just wondering…

03/06/2013 01:12 PM

Dale Jr’s winless streak was 143 races.

03/06/2013 01:18 PM

Yvonne, you hit it on the head

03/06/2013 01:51 PM

Alan: Bad karma for sure. All these years the six shooter celebration occured and now all of a sudden the NRA wants to be part of it. Makes a person go hmmm. So it’s not hard to see what there up to.
Drivers, owners, and sponsors are now put in the middle thanks to the NRA.

03/06/2013 02:00 PM

Alan: Bad karma for sure. All these years the six shooter celebration occured without any issues and now all of a sudden the NRA wants to be part of it. Why not before? I think the only race they had anything to do with was a Nationwide or Truck series race previously. Makes a person go hmmm. So it’s not hard to see what they’re up to.
Drivers, owners, and sponsors are now put in the middle thanks to the NRA.

03/06/2013 02:37 PM

I don’t know where I read this yesterday, but Richard Childress is on the board of directors for the NRA. Wonder if we’ll be seeing more of their presence at races.


Contact Tom Bowles

Recent articles from Tom Bowles:

Did You Notice? ... Breaking Down A Sprint Cup Season Eight Races In
Did You Notice? ... Drivers Still Make A Difference... But Silly Cautions Don't
Did You Notice? ... NASCAR's Free Agent Lynchpin, Uncomfortable Reality And Gambling
Did You Notice? ... Toyota Trouble, Limping Into Action And Testing The Waters
Did You Notice? ... Keep On Asking, And You Will Receive A Qualifying Sigh Of Relief

If you want to know more about Tom Bowles or to view all of his articles here at the Frontstretch, check out his archive and bio page.

Want even more Tom Bowles? Check out Tom's archive at