The Frontstretch: Potential Loss Of GM And Dodge Will Force NASCAR To Make Difficult Decisions by Tommy Thompson -- Thursday April 2, 2009

Go to site navigation Go to article

Potential Loss Of GM And Dodge Will Force NASCAR To Make Difficult Decisions

Thompson In Turn 5 · Tommy Thompson · Thursday April 2, 2009


The drumbeat to the demise of American automakers General Motors and Chrysler is becoming increasingly louder in recent days, as both manufacturers appear certain to either cease to exist or file for bankruptcy to seek temporary protection through the courts as they attempt to reorganize their failing businesses. Curiously, NASCAR remains silent as to what their contingency plans are as the industry they have been intertwined with for decades continues to crumble around them.

At this point, let’s hope silence isn’t an indicator they have no such plan in place … because otherwise, the outcome for the sport could be disastrous. That two of the three U.S. automakers may soon be forced to withdraw their support from NASCAR is not an insignificant matter. In fact, those two manufacturers account for more than half the teams entered in this Sunday’s Samsung 500 to be held at Texas Motor Speedway. A quick count shows 17 of the 25 cars entered will be running Chevrolet powertrains, with another eight sporting the red emblem of Dodge. In the not-so-distant future, those 25 teams may very well be scrambling to find non-existent manufacturer support to stay afloat — or be forced to close their doors as a result.

How bad is it financially for these automakers? Really, really bad – particularly for Dodge’s parent company, Chrysler. Earlier this week, the Obama administration made the determination that the company Richard Petty brought to stock car racing prominence in the 1970’s was not worth attempting to save. With the U.S. taxpayer already committed to approximately $9 billion in loan guarantees for the No. 3 American car builder — and Chrysler back with their hands out for another public funding to the tune of $5 billion — the company was told no, that it would need to find outside help instead to stay afloat.

More accurately Chrysler, owned by the private equity company Cerberus, was given 30 days to reach a financial accord with the Spanish automaker Fiat Group SpA and undertake drastic cost-cutting measures. Talks between the CEO of Fiat, Sergio Marchionne, and Chrysler execs have gone on since the first of the week. Insiders are reporting that Fiat is showing only moderate interest in Chrysler and are not willing to absorb a significant interest in the beat-up car builder. Further, the cuts that are being required by the administration’s auto task force are, especially in Chrysler’s case, problematic at best given the short period of time afforded the company to turn around its business.

So Chrysler is, for all intents and purposes, down for the count… there simply is nowhere else to turn. Absent the support of an administration generally sympathetic to the plight of one of the few heavy industries left in the U.S. and the folks they employ, the government has concluded that any further financial assistance would be nothing more than throwing money down a rat hole. The company is destined to be sold off piecemeal under the guidance of a bankruptcy judge which, in the end, will leave any agreements or commitments to NASCAR, individual team owners, or drivers null and void.

Could Ford soon be the only American manufacturer supporting NASCAR teams? They’re currently the only one of the “Big Three” avoiding financial support from the U.S. Government to stay afloat.

If there is any good news for General Motors, it is that they may simply have 30 days more than Chrysler before filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Obama administration nixed $17 billion in immediate aid and gave GM — once the pride of American industry — until June 1st to cut billions of dollars in operating costs and improve its debt-ridden balance sheets.

That means the final chapter is likely playing out for the General Motors Corporation as we know it. Rick Wagoner, the long time Chief Executive Officer, was fired this week at the urging of government overseers, leaving a near impossible set of tasks put before new CEO Fritz Henderson. Henderson has since been given a government laundry list that he cannot possibly fulfill in the time allotted. Among the government prerequisites for continued public assistance is the selling or discontinuation of unprofitable divisions — such as Hummer and Saturn — which have bogged down the company’s profit margins in recent years. And as if those obstacles were not enough, GM must reach an agreement with the United Auto Workers on the funding of a trust to guarantee blue collar retirees their health care benefits — as well as make up some staggering deficiencies in pension funds.

The hurdles that the century-old General Motors must clear are just too many and too high. To satisfy the government at this point would require further renegotiating of wage cuts, plant closings, and reductions in health care and pensions for GM’s remaining employees. All in all, that’s a daunting task with no guarantee at the end that it would satisfy the government, particularly in respect to the significant public backlash that prevails towards further taxpayer funds being used to prop up the auto industry.

As a result GM has now, for the first time, acknowledged the possibility of entering bankruptcy court. A short bankruptcy would give the automaker the ability to wipe out debt, rewrite or cancel contracts, and reemerge as a significantly smaller but less debt-burdened operation. When asked this past Tuesday what the chances of bankruptcy are for GM, Henderson replied it is “certainly more probable.”

What does such a pending financial collapse mean for our sport? Well, rest assured that the bankruptcy courts will do what managers at GM and Chrysler have been hesitant to do … cut off the channeling of funds to NASCAR and individual teams. Though the estimated $140 million dollars that each manufacturer contributes to the sport is, relatively speaking, a drop in the bucket to the billions of dollars the automakers (Ford Motor Company included) have been losing in recent years, it will be an easy expenditure for a court auditor to point out and order eliminated.

In good times, NASCAR racing may be as good as any other advertising venue for a company to get their brand before the public eye. However, given the fact that in spite of their past involvement in the sport, these companies have continued to see market shares decline, it will be hard to argue that a heavy investment in the sport has been necessary or beneficial.

In truth, the argument that “what wins on Sunday sells on Monday” is an antiquated and a difficult to prove philosophy. It may very well have had merit in the days when NASCAR’s stock cars at least vaguely resembled those found on showroom floors, but no longer — a nuance that is not likely to be missed by court-appointed auditors looking to cut costs any way they can.

The slow and steady demise of the once powerful American automobile industry is, and has been, a sad story for American capitalism. Of course, the damage that NASCAR and its effected teams would experience — should a bankruptcy court rule that one or both manufacturers are to renege on their financial and engineering support agreements — pales in comparison to the suffering and pain that thousands of pensioners and employees that are furloughed will endure. But nevertheless, the sport will be significantly impacted.

When the shoe drops for owners such as Rick Hendrick, Richard Childress, Chip Ganassi, Roger Penske, and the other Chevy and Dodge teams, it will be chaotic in the Cup Series to say the least. Of course, those mentioned will eventually, due to their great successes and resources, eventually land on their feet. However, how long it will take and who, ultimately, will suffer are big unknowns.

Unfortunately, there is no manufacturer for the GM and Dodge organizations to simply merge with. Of the two car builders that will remain, one, Ford Motor Company, has cut back significantly in its motorsports support to save capital as it continues to suffer heavy losses in its own right ($14.6 billion in 2008). Toyota, though certainly in better long-term financial health than the U.S. manufacturers, also posted its first annual loss ($1.6 billion) in 70 years last year. Perhaps as a direct result of that financial hit, they have made it clear there’s no intentions of further expanding their NASCAR program.

None of this is good news for NASCAR or the sport. But it certainly is a scenario that has been a possibility for some time. The sport has been ravaged by change in recent history and clearly more change, albeit unavoidable, is on the way.

That change, as always, brings questions about what the future of the sport will look like. Will NASCAR revert back to a goodly number of teams running as independents without the benefit of factory support? Or would a situation exist that we’d see a few teams supported by a deep-pocketed Japanese automaker and even fewer teams attempting to compete with what support a crippled American carmaker can provide? Or, is it possible the series might jettison the manufacturer support concept altogether, moving to a generic powertrain and “crate engine” to install in their generic chassis and bodies to offset the loss of viable manufacturers?

In the interim, NASCAR has little choice but to outwardly remain hopeful that GM, Chrysler, and, for that matter, Ford can somehow right their ships. But the chances that will happen are near impossible at this point. Now, by year’s end, they will be confronted with a difficult set of circumstances that they will have to deal with.

Decisions will have to be made. Tough decisions, to be sure.

And… that’s my view from Turn 5.

Contact Tommy Thompson

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Tommy Thompson and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

04/02/2009 07:58 AM

Car & Driver did their April Fool’s joke on Dodge and Chevy being forced out of NASCAR by the increasingly fascist Obama administration. The fact of the matter though is that it’s not a joke, it is not only possible, but I’d say probable. If this Congress would create unconstitutional laws to take away contractually guaranteed pay from executives after Congress specifically put in wording to allow them, does anyone believe that this administration is worried about angering a sport whose base leans towards conservative values?

I don’t think that GM or Chrysler factory support will last the season and as long as GM stands for Government Motors, you can bet that I’ll purchase Fords with their garish plastic interiors for my personal ride.

Annie Mack
04/02/2009 08:32 AM

Ren, there is an entire planet of countries you can move your whining butt to if you’re so unhappy with the USA.

04/02/2009 08:36 AM

What? Are Fords not American any more? I don’t really get where your going with that.

Steve Cloyd
04/02/2009 08:57 AM

Get ready for what I’ve predicted for years now – “The official car of NASCAR

Odds are, they’ll sell the rights to one manufacturer such as Honda, Toyota, or maybe even an upstart like Hyundai. They would then provide the teams cars under a lease agreement in much the same way Honda leases engines to Indy teams. The savings for the manufacturer and teams would be in that there would be no heavy development created by competition like there is now between brands. the cars would be the same and the series will truly become the spec series it is slowly becoming anyway. The “Car of Tomorrow” and the on-hold “engine of tomorrow” were just stepping stones to this the way I see it. Even without the economic woes, the greed and laziness (the car of tomorrow was originally just a lazy mans way to get out of actually having to mediate the bickering between manufacturers about rules) of the powers that be in NASCAR have plotted a course toward this anyway.

The manufacture will then probably design some ugly, too fast and too furious car that they can sell on the street with “Official car of NASCAR” decals plastered all over it.

Keep in mind, this is not what I want to happen at all. It’s just my prediction based on the direction they’ve taken the series, and NASCAR in general, over the last 10 years or so, sad as it may be.

04/02/2009 09:58 AM

Now that Obama is wearing the bowtie Chevrolet is history. Next question is which driver will get the first win in the new “Obamamobile”? Wouldn’t it be ironic if it’s the #88, which would mean the change needed to make him a winner was a new owner at GM!! Many didn’t like it when Toyota came to the party and now Fiat may be knocking on the door.
As Bob Dylan`s song goes “The Times They Are A-Changin`” Chevrolet fans will know have to decide whether to join bitter rival Ford, the foreign Toyota or jump on the Obama wagon. Hard choice huh??

Bill B
04/02/2009 10:14 AM

The COT has already killed any incentive a manufacturer should have for supporting several cars/teams. NASCAR is already positioned to say bye bye to the manufacturers. If they want to advertise in NASCAR it makes more sense for them to just pay to sponsor a car like other companies.
Win on Sunday buy on Monday has been a joke for at least 15 years (maybe longer as the Stock went out of NASCAR quite a while ago).

Lunar Tunes
04/02/2009 10:15 AM

Who cares?
there hasn’t been a ‘manufacturer’ in NASCAR for years, especially now with the COT.
Rooting for a car brand and not a driver is for ignorant people.

04/02/2009 10:34 AM

A bankruptcy by either GM or Chrysler would void the contracts many teams depend on and budget for. The support would be immediate and several teams would find themselves suddenly broke with upcoming obligations. That would force them into backruptcy to void the contracts they have with suppliers. It would keep trickling down to other suppliers and suppliers’ suppliers, etc.

Mike In NH
04/02/2009 01:43 PM

I’d need to see details of the financials of these teams before proclaiming doom on them and NASCAR.

I see problems on the technical side, though, as the manufacturers design the engines (at least in their basic configuration) and other parts. Ultimately there may be, like the IRL, one manufacturer supplying engines for the whole of NASCAR.

On the other hand, one of the themes of the year is “adversity breeds opportunity”, so if Honda or another foreign manufacturer wanted to get into NASCAR, this would be a prime opportunity to do so. That may be blasphemy to many folks, but look at your teen and 20’s kids and see what kind of cars are in their movies and in their driveways. My movies or TV shows had black Trans-Ams, black Mustangs, or orange Dodges in them, by way of comparison. Their fast and furious movies feature Hondas, Toyotas, and other foreign makes. Put them in NASCAR and you might attract some younger fans to the sport.

MJR in Springfield VA
04/02/2009 01:56 PM

The Past, the Present and the Future……..

National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing (NASCAR)

Now All we Seriously Care About is Revenue (NASCAR)

Now All Simply Created Alike Racecars (NASCAR)

Ah, it is such a sad state we fine ourselves in.

04/02/2009 03:15 PM

My brother worked for Chrysler and lost his job recently. He’s 55 years old. I’m far more concerned with the fate of thousands of people like him than whether Kasey Kahne will make a million less next year because the manufacturers pull out of NASCAR. Prediction: Racing will continue and may even be better without all the money being poured into wind tunnels and such.

04/02/2009 03:16 PM

Fiat is actually an Italian company

Paul F.
04/02/2009 08:17 PM

Someone’s gotta start a series where they race stock Mustangs, Camaros, and Challengers against each other on a short track tour. Since they can’t go 200 mph, the short tracks would make them still seem “racy”, and we would know we could go to the dealer and test drive the same car we saw win on the weekend. Oh, and if Toyota doesn’t build a stock car that can compete, that’s too bad.

Plus, if all the cars were “strictly stock”(as it once was…), we’d have that ideal sense of parity that NASCAR is trying to achieve through ludicrous means.

Yeah, teams would be rather unnecessary and they’d be rooted out of the sport since they wouldn’t actually have to “prepare” a car outside of knocking the glass out and installing a roll cage, but I think if someone started a NEW company and could get some kind of television coverage this could take off huge. Bruton Smith could make this work, I bet.

04/02/2009 10:32 PM

Wow, reading some of the comments shows me that the stereotype of NA$CAR fans. That some people have, isn’t all that far from the truth.

04/03/2009 01:46 AM

Let ‘em all run as independents; those COT boxes aren’t really manufacturers’ vehicles anyway. The game would then have a much more level playing surface than it does now.

While changing things, eliminate the mega teams and allow an owner to have only a two-car team, thus giving little guys a chance again.

Contact Tommy Thompson