The Frontstretch: Bristol : A Pleasant Surprise by Tommy Thompson -- Tuesday August 29, 2006

Go to site navigation Go to article

Bristol : A Pleasant Surprise

Thompson In Turn 5 · Tommy Thompson · Tuesday August 29, 2006


Saturday night’s Sharpie 500 from Bristol Motor Speedway has left me eating crow. Over the last several years, I have become more and more vocal in regard to my dislike of the Nextel Cup brand of short track racing that has been presented at both Bristol and Martinsville. My aversion to this form of racing stems from my inability to accept that it is OK to gain track position on a competitor by slamming into his rear bumper to move him up the track with little regard as to whether he is actually successful in avoiding the outside wall. As a longtime fan of short track racing, this “bump and run” maneuver just goes against everything I've always known in the world of clean, honorable and skillful driving at the local bullrings.

However, inexplicably this week’s race appears to have been raced in some type of “time warp” wherein drivers raced each other hard, respectfully, and executed clean passes. I enjoyed it, and have found that crow doesn't taste all that bad when I remember what Bristol has recently offered in the name of racing for me to digest.

In April of 2005, I wrote the following commentary for concerning NASCAR short track racing of late:

To describe the type of racing that NASCAR has subjected us to in the last two events can best be illustrated by a phrase I am borrowing from my five-year old Grandson, ‘it's yucky.’ Wreck after wreck, caution after caution, isn't what big league auto racing should be about. But it apparently is what a lot of NASCAR fans want to see. As a matter a fact, if Bristol could double the present approximate 160,000 seating capacity I would bet a week’s pay (as if that's a big deal) that they would still be confronted with a waiting list for season tickets. Considering the last race stats, which are typical of Bristol, there were fourteen (14) cautions for one hundred and fifteen (115) laps. No big surprise there. Bristol, along with Martinsville, is known for a lot of caution flag laps and dirty driving. Fans obviously like wrecks. They just don't like to admit to it.

Seriously, why else would fans attend these races? Certainly not for the speed, as these two tracks are the slowest on the schedule. Consider that between the recently completed races at these two half-mile venues there were a total of thirty (30) caution flags for two hundred and six (206) laps. Now, if it isn't the wrecking, it would have to be either that they really like parade laps or are holding on to the weak explanation that they like a lot of rubbing, because ‘rubbin' is racin'…

I had concluded once again, prior to the running of this year’s race, that NASCAR's Cup series was no longer capable of putting on a good short track show at either Bristol or Martinsville. This opinion was arrived at by surmising that the large influx of inexperienced drivers in the series, coupled with the ever-increasing pressures on drivers to perform, had resulted in a culture that would not allow for patience behind the wheel on a one groove, ½ mile track. In the last 3 years, Bristol has, on three different occasions had a race with 20 caution periods. They should have awarded the five bonus points for leading the most laps to the pace car driver.

Luckily, it is now apparent that I was wrong, as this year’s Bristol night race turned out to buck this trend. This week's race saw just ten (10) caution flags for sixty-four (64) laps. Of those caution periods, none were as a result of the “bump and run” maneuver that has accounted for so many commercial breaks in the past. This week’s race demonstrated that Cup drivers are still capable of racing hard and clean.

Perhaps the clean competition can be, as Dale Earnhardt, Jr. speculates, a result of drivers being congnizant of how much a “bone head” move could unfairly skew the Chase to the Nextel Cup Championship.

“With the Chase and everybody being so close, there was a lot more respect out there on the track – a lot more than you have seen in the past,’’ Junior explained after the race. “When I caught guys, they moved over, and I did the same for others. You don’t normally see that here…”

Junior may very well be correct. Maybe the racing was influenced by drivers, whether in the “Chase” or not, unwilling to be the instigator of a wreck that either eliminated or severely handicapped a driver and team from becoming a contender in the upcoming 10 race championship format. If that is the case, perhaps the clean racing will not repeat itself next spring when the series returns to Thunder Valley, and pride trumps points for most of the drivers on tour at that point in the season. That would be a shame, though, considering that it is now known that Cup drivers are capable of racing a short track how it should be raced, and that they understand the difference between the door-to-door, fender-to-fender rubbing style of racing, as opposed to the “wreck ‘em if you can” driving style that has gained undeserved acceptability.

Unfortunately, the majority of fans don't appear to agree with my viewpoint. During the TNT broadcast, 65% of viewers voting in a poll responded that the “bump and run” maneuver was acceptable anytime and anywhere. This did not come as a shock to me. I already knew that a large group of fans enjoy a good wreck, or at least the possibility of one. But I will continue to maintain that the object of racing, and more specifically passing, is to go around the competitor and not through them. I am constantly monitoring this situation and on the lookout for other race venues where such tactics are acceptable and won't result in a black flag and/or a penalty for rough driving or unsportsmanlike conduct. Most participants in lower forms of stock car racing, if asked about such tactics, will tell you that in addition to the sanctioning body’s penalties, a driver practicing such techniques will also run the risk of the victim of such shenanigans “putting a knot upside his head.”

Because this maneuver was left unused this past weekend, Bristol became an enjoyable race to watch. Bristol Motor Speedway is a sight to behold, and truly a unique facility amongst the tracks that NASCAR visits throughout the year. The track’s downfall is simply that it only offers one real racing groove. This fact creates close, rough and tough racing. It also requires crews, during the 500 lap contest, to have superior pit stops and employ creative pit strategies to gain track position. For respectable racing, as was witnessed Saturday night, drivers must continue to respect their competitors and adhere to long understood protocol of conceding a position to a faster car once that car has shown to be unmistakably better. In that situation, a driver only needs to race his competitor as he would want to be raced if the two combatant’s situations were reversed.

Drivers know this routine, and by and large, they adhered to the short track etiquette that most all of them learned early in their careers. The event could only muster one little exchange of words between four time champion Jeff Gordon and upstart Scott Riggs over fairly benign contact between the two when Riggs overtook Gordon for a fourth place finishing position. A far cry from some of the controversies of the past… and that should be a good thing.

So good job, drivers, on a race well run! Oh…and for those 65% that were less than satisfied that there wasn't more twisted sheet metal left behind at the conclusion of the Sharpie 500, cheer up. Labor Day Weekend is almost upon us. Surely, there will be a Demolition Derby scheduled at a track or fairgrounds near you.

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Swan Racing Announces Restructuring, No. 26 & No. 30 ‘Sold’ Off
Tech Talk with Tony Gibson: Taking Stock Of Danica Patrick In Year Two
Vexing Vito: Three Drivers In Need of a Role Reversal
Going By the Numbers: Top-10 NASCAR Variety Hard To Come By In…
Truckin’ Thursdays: Lessons Learned Just Two Races In
Fantasy Insider: Team Revelations For NASCAR’s Short Tracks



©2000 - 2008 Tommy Thompson and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

08/30/2006 06:55 AM

I agree I thought that the bristol race was pretty good this week. I thought that everyone showed good patience,especially Riggs who I have gained a lot of respect for. But Bristol and Martinsville need to go back to full asphalt to create more than one groove. I understand that Bristol went to concrete because the track tore up more when it was asphalt, but its not like they dont make enough money off of the Bristol races to fix it every 5 or six years. I don’t know why Martinsville went to concrete in the corners, but they need to go back too. I go to all the cup races in Martinsville and think they do a good job driving there but being one of the 5 fans in attendance at the Busch series “Parade of Cars Under Caution” something needs to be fixed so that that debacle doesnt happen again in any series.

M. B. Voelker
08/30/2006 07:14 AM

You call that exhibition of how to move over a race?

I don’t like wrecks and the time spent watching them cut Tim Sauter out of his car Friday night reinforced that, but moving over isn’t racing.

Because the current points system fails to reward winning sufficiently to justify the risks a driver needs to take to win we were treated to 500 dreary laps of drivers trying desperately not to get in trouble. What we should have been seeing was 500 exciting laps of drivers trying desperately to either defend the position they had or gain another position. That’s what racing means.

There was more risk-taking and striving for position in Sunday’s F1 race. That is simply ridiculous.

08/30/2006 09:30 AM

WOW….Very refreshing to read an article that supports skillful hard racing! I find it much more exciting to see skill and respect being demonstrated for a win vs. selfish entitlement and disrespect of others safety, to win at any cost.

Unfortunately, many in the media and 65% of the fans have rationalized that going for the win at any cost is more exciting and therefore it’s okay and good for racing.

I respectfully disagree, however, and feel it sends the wrong message to our youth and represents our overall values in a negative light.

What happened to valuing Respect and Good Sportsmanship?

65% vs. 35%...This is one case where I’m grateful to be in the minority of fans that enjoy watching skillful hard racing from drivers who still value Respect and Good Sportsmanship!

08/30/2006 11:04 AM

This was indeed an interesting weekend in Thunder Valley. Minus Kevin Lepage in the Busch race Friday night, and a thumbs up from Reed as well, there was little “hot temper” action that the track is famous for. Even with many a driver watching their back and knowing their time could be cut short at any moment for things they have done in the past. Action of this nature wasn’t present. Some blame the Chase, some blame NASCAR for putting out a stern warning behind the scenes.

Watching from my vantage point in turn 3 both nights, the racing itself was good. No it wasn’t a hot tempered wreck-a-thon, but when was the last time you saw so many COMPETITIVE passes on the outside?

Many a lap went by with cars in both lanes running hard for a position. More times than not, the outer position picked it up. Oh, that’s right. Most of that wasn’t televised so that NBC/TNT could cash in as much as possible with commercials before they lose out in the TV schedule next season.

Sure there were some cars that moved over. They were laps down, and had the courtesy to let lead lap (and much more competitive) cars go by. Some didn’t budge, and got taken on the outside easily. These were not competitive outside passes though, to which I referred to a second ago.

In the end, it wasn’t the usual ticked off, flip off, push and shove wreck-fest, but it doesn’t mean that it still in its own right was any less of a race.

If you didn’t see it, blame TV. The racing was there.

08/30/2006 02:55 PM

Again, I have to agree with Mr. Thompson. The Bump and Run should NOT be a tool used to pass. I, too, disagree with the 65% that voted for that as an effective way to pass.

I think the problem with Bristol is the cars just go too fast. Because of the speeds they are running, the track has turned into a one-groove race track. The race this past Saturday was better in many regards only because there was a lot of give and take. If not for that, we would have seen the bumpfest that we normally see at Bristol.

Contact Tommy Thompson