The Frontstretch: Change For The Better: Helping The CoT From Becoming a PoS by Vito Pugliese -- Wednesday November 7, 2007

Go to site navigation Go to article

Change For The Better: Helping The CoT From Becoming a PoS

The Voice of Vito · Vito Pugliese · Wednesday November 7, 2007


It's no secret that I am not a fan of the Car of Tomorrow. Just saying the phrase elicits certain feelings: Anger. Spite. Loathing. Still … as much as I would love to sit here and rail against it for another 1500 words, I have made peace with the fact that it is here to stay, and you should, too. Call it what you will – a work in progress or mechanical cruelty – but there’s no denying this is the vehicle that will represent NASCAR for well into the next decade. With this weekend’s race at Phoenix being the last for the Car of Tomorrow's initial foray into competition, we thought it would be a good time to reflect on the car, how it has performed to date, and what can be done to help make racing better for both the fans and the drivers – before these things go full-time in 2008.

First off, we’ll start with competition. You'd be hard pressed to argue the new car started off with more than its fair share of good finishes. Kyle Busch and Jeff Burton battled down to the last lap in the CoT's debut at Bristol back in March; the margin of victory then? A microscopic .064 seconds. That would prove the norm rather than the exception; the next race at Martinsville saw both current title contenders locked in an epic duel, as Jimmie Johnson hold off Jeff Gordon to the tune of .065 seconds for the win. In that race, the new car had also proved itself to be quite resilient, even rebuffing Gordon's attempts to resurrect his Rusty Wallace bump & runs of years gone by in the closing laps. The next weekend at Phoenix, another late race battle ensued between Gordon and Tony Stewart. This one wasn’t as close, but the margin of victory still stood at a reasonable .697 seconds.

Maybe we're onto something here? From the outset, we saw increased competition, close finishes, and a host of safety improvements. From that perspective, you'd have to give the car an A+.

The next two races at Richmond and Darlington also produced endings that were decided with a margin of under one second; it wasn't until Martin Truex, Jr. put a hurtin' on ‘em at Dover that we had a really big blowout in a CoT Race. It was also the first time a non-Hendrick car would win; but as parity creeped in, we also began to see boring, follow the leader racing with little to no passing. Even the car’s debut at Talladega – save for the last lap – was little more than a three-hour nap for most fans and drivers; Jeff Gordon was even driven to yawning at one point during the event that he won.

That falloff puts the new equipment in position for a definite downgrade, in which the racing with the CoT has seemingly become worse. So, what gives? Many different factors are at play, as I’ll outline below; but the bottom line is what started out as an unqualified success has seemingly divulged into something less than enthusiastic, with the fan base, the crews, and the drivers that slip behind the wheel now bordering on indifference. Surely, something can be done to help the beleaguered CoT…right? Well, let’s just say when the idea for this article was first conceived, my initial reaction was, "it’s nothing that an 870 Remington and a flame thrower couldn't fix." But I still came up with some options below … and no, none of them involve a gigantic magnet and a car compactor.

Rock Your Body: Is it too much to ask NASCAR to let the army of fabricators in North Carolina actually have a crack at this thing, and play with the body a little bit? Sorry to break it to everyone, but even “Back In The Day," when stock cars were allegedly “stock cars,” the bodies were tweaked and massaged beyond what was originally a body in white from one of the Big Three. But even that spirit has now been eroded due to the implementation of common templates; any alteration to the body incurs a stiff penalty nowadays, often including the loss of your crew chief for up to a couple of months.

Yes, I understand that the idea behind the genericness is to control costs and cut down on wind tunnel time; but isn't that why teams have sponsors, and places like Lockheed-Martin have tunnel time available to race teams? It isn't like these bodies represent all new technology. And since the cars are now fitted with a bookshelf of an airdam by way of the splitter, some consideration should be given to using stock-looking front ends for each make of car, as opposed to cheesy headlight and grille stickers. It was cool when the old ASA series was doing that 15 years ago – it isn't today.

Monster Meats: "Tires, Cole…are what wins a race." We all remember Harry Hogge's nugget of wisdom to Cole Trickle in "Days of Thunder." However, that was back when tires were a little to the left of Topaz on Moh's Scale of Hardness. Nowadays, even Fred Flintstone thinks these things are a little firm. It has often been NASCAR's goal with the CoT to "put the driving back in the driver's hands." Well, that's fine. Most drivers are all alike on new tires. And when the tires don't wear out, that takes another element out of the competition equation. Not to mention that rock hard tires and a suspension with no travel do not make for a happy race car or race car driver.

I Don't Feel Right: Next to watching Tom Cruise trying to dance on BET, nothing looks more uncomfortable or out of place than the Car of Tomorrow flying into turn one at Martinsville, slamming the brakes on, and watching as the nose dives about an inch, then awkwardly wobbles its way through the corner as if the shocks were 42-ounce aluminum Easton softball bats. As the cars exit the turn, it was always a sight to see them rear up on the back tires, and – as they struggled to put all 800+ horsepower to the ground – pull the nose back up towards the horizon. Now, these cars just kind of … go forward. The cars are in a perpetual state of understeer (i.e., pushin'), and are so stiff-legged, they often pull the inside tire up off the ground in the middle of a turn, followed by impromptu puffs of smoke. The combination of a granite-like tire, little downforce, and no suspension travel make these about as fun to drive and watch as when an '83 Renault LeCar (French for, "The Car") is put through its paces.

Spilt Lip: And that brings us to the two main points of contention that I, and many observers, have with the CoT: the front and the back. The front splitter – suspended by flaccid, flimsy looking support braces – is what gives the car any semblance of front downforce now that the typical airdam has been removed. This presents a number of problems, though. If the splitter becomes damaged, your day is pretty much done; much like an open wheel race car that is dependent upon its front wings, the front splitter, once bent out of shape, can ruin a team's day. The same could be said of the fenders on the traditional car; however, at least those could be hammered out and pulled back with some degree of success. If the splitter falls off, well … good luck getting it reattached in less than fifteen minutes! The reduced frontal area also makes for wimpy and ineffective brake ducting on the CoT.
Since the car can still go fast in a straight line, it would seem to make sense that you'd want to be able to stop it repeatedly without boiling the brake fluid. But I digress …

Wings Clipped: Perhaps the biggest physical eyesore of this car is that abomination on the rear decklid. What at first glance looks to be someone's Erector-set endeavor gone horribly wrong is instead the main component on the CoT that makes it look decidedly un-NASCARy: the rear wing. It’s nothing compared to that tasteful decklid spoiler, one that has been used for the last 40 years which worked fine and to great benefit.

The thought behind adding the wing was that it would reduce downforce and by handing them out to teams, it would help keep them honest with the rear deck lid area. Huh? You can't do that with a pair of 3-foot wide metal plates? Unless they are going to festoon the car with dragon graphics and a bunch of indecipherable Japanese writing that seems to delight the NOPI-tuner types, NASCAR needs leave the wings at home. Not only are they offensive and silly, they tarnish the true heroic winged cars of the past: the 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona and the 1970 Plymouth Superbird.

While this is one man's opinion of what needs to be changed on NASCAR's newest ride, the sport has hopefully learned, as well, from this season's trial run with the new car. It will take some getting used to … but as we worked through the downsized cars of the early 1980's, they became the familiar, cock-eyed, contorted, downforce monsters that the soon-to-be-obsolete car became. This newest major change can wind up working out the same way; all that needs to happen is for the sanctioning body to be open to change. If NASCAR really wants to make the CoT a success, and right the wrongs of their current prototype, it would do them well to listen for to the engineers, fabricators, mechanics, and drivers, and implement their input.

And that, in itself, would be a welcome change – and a good head start – in fixing the CoT.

The Frontstretch Newsletter, back in 2014 gives you more of the daily news, commentary, and racing features from your favorite writers you know and love. Don’t waste another minute – click here to sign up now. We’re here to make sure you stay informed … so make sure you jump on for the ride!

Today on the Frontstretch:
Championship Caliber? What Does That Even Mean?
Mirror Driving: Winning Vs. Points, Needing a Boost, and The Lady’s Last Dance?
Nuts for Nationwide: The Curious Case of Elliott Sadler
Happiness Is…Arrogance, Less, Next, and the Outdoors
Frontstretch Foto Funnies: It’s Not Gonna Fit…


©2000 - 2008 Vito Pugliese and Thanks for visiting the Frontstretch!

Marty C
11/07/2007 08:59 AM

You’re wrong about just 1 thing, this isn’t just 1 man’s opinion!

Mike C
11/07/2007 09:18 AM

One of the biggest reasons for the growth of stock car racing over the last 50 years , was the ability of the fans to pull for their favorite make of car . The Chevrolet , Ford , Dodge , Plymouth , Mercury , Pontiac , Oldsmobile . Hudson , or any other make they saw on the race track was exactly what they drove , or wished they drove . And the body modifications on the race cars looked great on their street cars .
Then the rules makers took over and reduced the cars to common or almost common templates , and the cars no longer looked like anything that any fan drove . You either cheered for one of the few remaining nameplates ( it quickly became apparent to the manufacturers that there was very little brand identity left , so why spend the money to race )or cheer for your favorite driver as NASCAR began to push the drivers as being far more important than the cars . NASCAR rulesmakers took it one step further , probably just because they could , and made the cars identical except for decals . The COT design isn’t grounded in engineering or aero theory . It is simply Brian France remaking NASCAR for his own legacy . You are correct about the tires being a possible saviour for the COT . The tires could be softer and certainly wider . All other pro racing in the world uses much wider tires than NASCAR . And with the constant blowouts at every track , the tires could use a redesign .
What will save NASCAR is reverting back to the type of rules and the manufacturer involvement of the pre “ Modern Era “ so we can get excited about the cars and engineering again .

Brian France Sucks
11/07/2007 12:29 PM

The CoT (Crap of Today) is worthless. The wing is stupid, and the car is always tight. The only reson that the first few finishes were close were some timely, ahem, phantom cautions thrown by NA$CAR to liven up a mediocre show. This is a failed experiment, and one that has cost a lot of guys a lot of money; the only one’s that have profited are the France morons that lease the wings to the teams. The guys that designed this thing must have had grandfathers that designed the Edsel and fathers that designed the Corvair and Futura.

11/07/2007 12:38 PM

Nascar has tried the COT and it isn’t working on many levels . So lets change again , but this time lets take racing back to where it should be . The cars should be showroom stock appearing . Front chin spoilers and rear spoilers . Flaired fenders if needed . Production roof height . No special low numbers production cars . In other words , race what the manufacturers build , not what nascar designs for you The COT was supposed to decrease costs . It didn’t, it increased costs and pretty much screwed up racing .

11/07/2007 01:59 PM

What is depressing about the whole COT program is that its signaling the demise of manufacturers involvement to what is becoming a basic IROC program. We know that NASCAR is working on the Engine-of-tomorrow..(this will be followed by the “rear-view-mirror-of-tomorrow” as well as the “cup-holder-of-tomorrow”). So what the final “product” will be is cars that are all the same that can’t be adjusted in anyway save for air-pressure/track bar adjustments. Weeeee, won’t that be a blast for the fans. I’ll be the first to say that stock car’s were never truely “stock”..we all know that_but from a fans perspective you at least felt perhaps some alligence to a paticular make. From a teams perspective you were able to actually work on your car looking for any legal,(and not so legal), advantage that would hopefully end up in a good finish. With the COT program all that is taken away and you are left with a really watered down version of racing. Sadly NASCAR doesn’t see this as an issue which is a bummer for this fan because like many of you I grew up going to local short tracks where the cars that were run were literally cars that were pulled from junkyards..(62’ Chevy II anyone? )…Now_those were race cars. I had hopes that the rumors were true that the Busch series was going to go to Pony cars on ’09 but now I’m hearing that they too will run COT’s..really sad state of affairs.

True Fan
11/07/2007 02:10 PM

I agree with Pj whole heartedly !

11/07/2007 07:11 PM

Go back to stock bodies, no spoilers or air dams! You young guys had better learn to drive!

11/07/2007 07:35 PM

And just think, we haven’t even suffered through a whole season of the COT. Everyone talks of the COT in terms of cost, yet let us not forget that NA$CAR’s selling point on this “thing” has been safety. But NA$CAR allows non chase drivers to sit sideways in the face of oncoming traffic, without the benefit of a caution, so that the “playoffs” might have a proper finish. Dale has got to be livid. I can’t believe as a sidebar to his legacy, would he have ever wanted this path NA$CAR has taken in the name of his death. Think back and you’ll remember NA$CAR’s change of “focus”. We lost Adam and Kenny in one year and nothing was done. But when NA$CAR lost “The Late Great” suddenly everything changed. Most are great. Softer walls, HANS device.But NA$CAR has taken their grief to a ridiculous extreme.

11/07/2007 08:11 PM

I agree, the COT was sold on the premise of safety which I’m sure everyone is for. I’m not exactly sure why NASCAR felt the need to go the route of making an entire car..with all the safety features added after Sr’s death I’m not sure the COT was really needed. As you point out Dale Sr. would be majorly jerked by what has transpired in NASCAR since his death.

11/07/2007 08:46 PM

Like everything in the modern NA$CAR, it has to be done to the extreme. But it is still predicated by money. They realized that losing a rookie or two would be “understandable” to the racing public. But start losing long time major stars in the sport, and you’ll never sell the sport to major sponsors and possibly Wall Street.

Contact Vito Pugliese