Race Weekend Central

Holding A Pretty Wheel: Don’t Call the Brickyard 400 a Racing Tradition

This weekend, NASCAR heads to Indianapolis Motor Speedway, arguably the most venerated racing venue in America, for a 400-mile race. The event features a high purse and is exciting for the drivers; it’s raced on the same track where the Indianapolis 500 takes place each May. The Indy 500 is the quintessential American race, 100 years strong in tradition and one so many young drivers aspire to win, no matter what form of racing they grow up to participate in.

But please don’t call the Brickyard 400 a racing tradition.

After 20 years, it’s a well-established NASCAR race. But a tradition in the same sense of the word as the Daytona 500 or the Southern 500 when run on its rightful weekend? No. Those races are the kind stock car racing has been built on, along with the twice-yearly trek to Martinsville Speedway and the formidable Coca-Cola 600. And a racing tradition? That’s Daytona and Monaco and Indy in May.

NASCAR at Indy is hardly a blip on that radar.

No, this particular race is no more traditional than any other that’s been on the schedule for 20 years or so. It’s firmly planted on the schedule, which is good for the drivers, but too bad for the fans, who would be treated to a better race somewhere like Iowa or a road course.

Which brings us to the elephant in the room: Sports, in general, thrive on tradition. Fans like it, and teams use it as a selling point. What fans almost universally despise is their sport selling out its tradition for gimmicks and glamor. For the most part, the major sports have kept their traditions firmly intact. Little has changed in, say, baseball in over a century. There’s been expansion, of course, and a lengthened season, but bigger adjustments have been few and far between. The designated hitter was adopted in the 1970s, then expansion added another round and a wild card to the playoffs in the 1990s. The most recent big change has been the introduction of instant replay in making some calls. And yeah, a lot of fans didn’t like some or all of those changes.

But the game itself is largely unaltered in the last 100 years or so. Fans from a different era would recognize it. In general, the governing body doesn’t just throw something at the game every time a group of fans complains about something. They understand that the game itself is the attraction. They understand that not every game will be won on a walk-off home run or a perfect game by a pitcher. Sometimes, a team is going to have a 12-0 lead after six innings and changing the rules isn’t going to do anything constructive. The league doesn’t force teams to move into new venues — a couple of the ballparks have hosted the game for over a century, and while they might lack modern amenities, just try to suggest pulling down Fenway Park or Wrigley Field in favor of a modern stadium. At the end of the day, it’s about the love of the game and its rich history that keeps fans coming back.

NASCAR isn’t a stick-and-ball sport (though it seems like they’re trying to be, more and more every year), but it does have something in common with them: its foundation is a rich and well-woven tapestry of history and tradition. So why doesn’t the sanctioning body want to recognize that?

Instead, the Daytona office seems bent on throwing much of the sport’s tradition out the window. Yes, they have made some effort to keep history relevant by moving the Southern 500 back to its Labor Day weekend date (though as a night race, which generally produces an inferior product on track). They’re also on dirt, running the Truck Series at Eldora (and it’s time to consider that for the XFINITY crowd as well; it’s been an excellent race, every time out). But those are token gestures as the actual game has changed to the point where many of the early fans and competitors would barely recognize it. The concept is still the same, but the racing has changed drastically, and so have the key players. It’s the trend these days to change as much as possible, throwing something at the wall and hoping it sticks.

But do fans need or even want all of that? In most cases, it seems like they do not. I’m not talking about bringing back the strictly stock specs; too many safety innovations would be lost. But 20 years ago, the cars were required to fit the same templates as the street versions. That would be a step in the right direction. Putting the emphasis on individual races instead of a poorly determined championship would be another one.

Stock car racing should be, at its core, simple: a bunch of drivers trying to go faster than everyone else. When they do that, when the drivers and teams really care about doing that, the racing will improve. Unfortunately, right now there’s too much money tied up in season-long points and not enough in individual races.

Fans need to play a role as well; saying you want traditional races and tracks on the schedule isn’t enough. If people truly want to keep places like Martinsville and Darlington going, they need to make them the best-attended and highest-rated races of the year. If there are more butts in the seats and more people watching the cookie-cutter races, those are the ones they will get.

The best part of any sport is its history and tradition: the people and the places, the things fans did as kids that they’re now showing their kids and grandkids. Has NASCAR lost that? Not yet. But there’s no real enthusiasm in the front offices to truly preserve it, either.

About the author

Amy is an 20-year veteran NASCAR writer and a six-time National Motorsports Press Association (NMPA) writing award winner, including first place awards for both columns and race coverage. As well as serving as Photo Editor, Amy writes The Big 6 (Mondays) after every NASCAR Cup Series race. She can also be found working on her bi-weekly columns Holding A Pretty Wheel (Tuesdays) and Only Yesterday (Wednesdays). A New Hampshire native whose heart is in North Carolina, Amy’s work credits have extended everywhere from driver Kenny Wallace’s website to Athlon Sports. She can also be heard weekly as a panelist on the Hard Left Turn podcast that can be found on AccessWDUN.com's Around the Track page.

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kb

Me and mine cringe when this race comes around, the hype of “history” in the NASCAR world isn’t the same for other racing series, sorry it just isn’t. I find from my armchair it is a pretty boring racing, at least in recent memory. As with everything NASCAR..hype, hype, hype.

GinaV24

LOL at least in your armchair you can be comfortable or wander off to do something else when you are bored. Stuck at a track like Indy where you have limited sight lines, well, I’d rather be bored at home. Of course if Gordon wins, you will hear me yelling my head off with happiness. Hey, at least I’m consistent.

kb

I have a feeling he is going to have a very good week, he is due. I always thought that was a weird track due to the sight limitations, so it never appealed to me, but it does look good.

Bill B

Good article Amy.
I’ll make a deal with NASCAR. If they go back to the pre-Brian rules I’ll go to the Darlington, Martinsville and Daytona races next year.

DoninAjax

The Southern 500 isn’t a tradition anymore either.

GinaV24

Nope, NASCAR screwed that pooch, too. It should be a daytime race. I’ve been there during the day, yes, it’s hot but that is what made it so interesting as a race.

DoninAjax

I drove down to the 1980 Southern 500 and also went to the races at Hartsville-Darlington dirt track and got to see Jack Pennington.

Would someone please give Brian another toy to play with!

GinaV24

Yes, NASCAR has seemed to be into change for the sake of change, rather than for what’s actually an improvement.

We have tickets for Darlington this year. We’ve gone to Martinsville for years but I hate the dates that NASCAR has inflicted on that track so we stopped going to the spring race. Sorry but an early spring date in the mountains of Virginia is nearly always wet and cold. I’m no longer the “trouper” I used to be to be willing to put up with bad weather race dates. Martinsville, for years, was the weekend after Easter — the weather was usually beautiful and we always had a great time enjoying the weather that was nicer than where we had come from.

I understand your point about the fans supporting the tracks that are unique and it is a very valid one. However the racing would have to improve exponentially from what it is now to inspire me to continue to spend $ to travel to races after Gordon retires.

janice

i have a feeling this race on sunday will be a farce with the package they’re running. one week low down force, next week different type of downforce.

a few days ago i was confused cause i thought the brickyard 400 was ran the first sunday in august, as it was generally around gordon’s b/d.

oh well, i live confused. i do know that the race is on nbcsp and not nbc.

JohnQ

It is hard to even talk about tradition when NASCAR bears NO resemblance to stock car racing. Of course it will never happen but I love the idea of making the NASCAR vehicle fit the production street model templates. It would at least put an end to the pretense of a Camary race car. Really, when you pass Mr. Nobody on his way to nowhere in his light metallic nothing Camary you are more likely to yawn, if you notice at all, than think, now there is a race car.

DoninAjax

Gone are the days of the Earnhardt Chev in the dealerships. Steve McQueen’s son got an updated version of the Bullitt Mustang. Now all the “race” cars look the same and we’ll call that one a Chev, that one a Ford, and that one a “little toy,” which is what I believe Toyota means in Japanese.

Share via