NASCAR Race Weekend Central

The Frontstretch 5: Hard NASCAR Questions

1. What happened to loyalty?

It seems like loyalty in NASCAR is becoming a thing of the past as a changing business model takes effect. At least to the naked eye, drivers seem to be the most loyal of the driver-team-sponsor triumvirate. You don’t see drivers walking out all that often in comparison to teams making some tough choices: to stick with the driver who got you to this point, or to take that one, who brings a sponsor or some other goodie to the table.

Sponsors seem the most fickle as they search out a return on investment, seemingly less likely to endure a driver’s growing pains if there’s someone else available. And some are leaving the sport altogether.

For the most part, the days of the handshake deal are long gone. Heck, contracts don’t mean much either if the right carrot is dangled.  It’s easier these days to swap drivers at somebody’s whim than it is to go to bat for a driver with backers.

Is that good for the sport? I don’t think so. It’s gotten so expensive that there’s been no choice but to get more and more of a corporate mentality within teams.

The problem is, that doesn’t resonate with the sport’s fan base. Art imitates life, and fans want to see hard work and loyalty rewarded, and when it’s not, there is disappointment.

It doesn’t feel any better to watch a driver lose a ride they helped shape, not because of skill but because of nepotism and cash on the barrel, than it does to see the same thing happen in a fan’s own life. There was a time when fans could admire the loyalty in the sport to the point that they actively participated by buying a sponsor’s product. It’s become a difficult cycle to break: fans are no longer loyal to sponsors, so those sponsors walk away because they don’t get the support from fans they once did, and the next sponsor in is even less relatable to fans.

Perhaps that’s the big question here is whether that cycle can be broken.

2. Can a driver earn a ride anymore?

This one goes hand in hand, to an extent, with the first question, because teams and sponsors aren’t going to bat for drivers as they once did. Look at Landon Cassill. He gave StarCom Racing its best-ever finish at Bristol, yet was “rewarded” with the team putting Joey Gase in the car for Talladega, a track where Cassill has shown strength and might have had a shot at improving on his Bristol race.

Why did it happen? Simple: Gase brings a sponsor.

It’s a double-edged sword, because teams need sponsors to race, but at what point does it become a revolving door of well-funded but not especially talented drivers in rides that can be bought by the highest bidder rather than earned by the most talented driver? And what happens when the driver can’t perform at the same level as his equipment?

The promise of better equipment bought Ty Dillon a seat, but if the equipment is better, why isn’t the No. 13 team’s performance?

Meanwhile, Aric Almirola is the perfect example of a driver who was underestimated because of the cars he was driving. He has lived up to his Stewart-Haas equipment so far, but would he have gotten that shot if longtime sponsor Smithfield hadn’t gone along for the ride? Almirola is currently 11th in points and has more top-10 finishes than Jimmie Johnson. He’s absolutely earned the ride, so why do people still wonder why he’s in it?

Does this trend hurt the sport as a whole? Maybe. The top rides still employ the top drivers, and they’re not for sale the way the small ones just trying to stay afloat might be. But it might not be as much fun for fans to watch a race and wonder if it would be better if those rides were filled with talent and loyalty.

3. Are all the rivalries gone?

Long-lasting and well-known rivalries were once a big part of the NASCAR landscape. Loyal fans passionately backed their drivers, and, usually, good-natured rivalries grew among the fans as well.

Now, though? Rivalries are a rarity, if they exist at all. A couple of drivers wrecking each other because they’re pissed off is not a rivalry. The main ingredient in a real rivalry is respect. It might be a grudging respect, but it’s there, for the most part. David Pearson and Richard Petty raced each others’ doors off; it wasn’t about wrecking, it was about racing. Until recently, the sport has had great rivalries based on great drivers trying to outdo each other. And, yes, sometimes it’s gotten out of hand.

Take a look at what’s possibly the greatest rivalry in all of sports: the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees. They’re bitter enemies on the field; there’s no team either wants to beat more than the other, and the fans are equally passionate. But, when a great Yankees player retires, other than at Yankee Stadium, he gets no better sendoff than at Fenway Park. The same goes for retiring Sox at Yankee Stadium. The Yankees made the Boston news this past week for sending flowers for a fallen Massachusetts police officer’s funeral. The rivalry is built on a foundation of respect.

In today’s NASCAR, rivalries seem to fizzle. There should be a huge rivalry between Kyle Busch and Jimmie Johnson, arguably the two best drivers in the garage.

But there just isn’t. The passion isn’t there from the drivers or the fans, and that’s a shame.

4. Is it the drivers?

There’s no way there’s just one factor to the falling ratings, and my guess is that the main one is stunningly simple: the huge swell in fans was due to a fad, and once it was over, they didn’t stick around. They probably weren’t going to from the start.

But the ones who did have now seen the rise and fall of an entire generation of drivers. Some big names have ridden into the sunset in the last couple of years: Jeff Gordon, Tony Stewart, Carl Edwards, Dale Earnhardt Jr., Matt Kenseth. Their fans have been left reeling for a couple of reasons.

One, the older fans who rolled from Petty or Waltrip or Wallace or Earnhardt onto those drivers are finding the current crop either unrelatable or too old, maybe both. Kevin Harvick is an old-school racer that some of those fans might get behind, but then they’ll be faced with the same problem in a year or two.

Fans are very loyal and grow very attached.  They don’t want to go through all that again, especially not so soon.

Then again, the youngsters are harder to relate to. Many didn’t grow up working on cars or racing whatever they could to get by.  They’re talented, they have great personalities, but they aren’t old-school.

Surely it’s no fun for fans to watch a driver they’ve invested a piece of themselves into walk away; it is even harder to see that driver pushed unceremoniously out of his seat in exchange for a younger, sponsor-drawing driver.

Without the emotional investment of a passionate fandom, even the best racing might not be enough to keep fans in the fold.

5. Can you ever go back?

At the end of the day, as the shadows grow long, fans are fighting a losing battle against time. The search for what the sport once meant entangles with a search for their own lost youth, and nothing can ever live up to the golden memories of the best years of our lives. That leaves fans searching for the impossible and NASCAR with no way to respond.

For NASCAR, going back to the way something once was means admitting mistakes were made in the first place. It also means tipping a difficult balance between fans of generations and new-school, attention-challenged younger fans. Who’s really the future?

For teams, once a sponsorship or driver decision is made, even if it becomes clear it wasn’t the right one, it’s too late to change their minds.  Even if they could, there would be resentment and mistrust where once there was not.

What we’re all left with then, is a new reality to navigate.  Maybe the biggest question ends up being, how many will even try?

Share this article

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Echo

You nailed it, thank you.

DoninAjax

You’re forgetting Brian’s bumper cars. There are many tracks that hd no one complaints about the racing until it became Brian’s product.

And the drivers now have too many who don’t want to “race” and complain “Why is he racing me? Doesn’t he know who I am?”

And nobody watches a telecast of “the product” and says “That’s incredible! I’m going to see it live!”

Andy

NASCAR has until 2024 when the TV money runs out, then it will be on life support. The thing that will be interesting is who will fight to save it then….

Mike in Oro Valley

Bristol had lousy weather. Nothing can be done about that. It was a lousy race at a back in the day track. Which made for a lousy crowd. NASCAR won’t do anything about those.

Russ

Maybe the mystique, founded on our naivete is gone and isn’t coming back. Lots of people like to blame BZF and everything else, but maybe its really us.

SmarterThanYo

Amy, you are living in the past, not just NASCAR’s past, but society’s past. W-a-y back in the middle of the 20th century, a guy could expect to work for one company his whole career. There was a two-way street of loyalty. In the 1980’s, that all started to change. Companies looked to cut costs, rather than increase production, and the most expensive cost is always human labor. So jobs were cut without regard to “loyalty.” In fact, older employees were often let go BECAUSE they had higher salaries and benefits. Then the workforce responded with workers jumping ship at the first sign of a better offer. Now, it is expected that a resume will contain job changes every few years with no questions asked. So, why should NASCAR teams or sponsors be any different? They are looking to survive and cutting costs is the way to go. Drivers appear to be more “loyal,” but in a sport with so few good positions available, no driver dares to issue an ultimatum to the team owner, so they whine incessantly about NASCAR’s stupid rules and faulty pit guns instead, but stick with their team until they get the boot or that dream offer appears.

Furthermore, where is it written that one top 20 earns a driver the right to keep his ride? Matt Kenseth and Kasey Kahne were let go after winning last season, so why should Landon Cassill expect any more?

As for rivalries, they have to happen organically. Jimmie Johnson and Kyle Busch have never given each other trouble on the track, so there has been no reason for a rivalry. There have been few, if any, memorable battles on track between those two in all the years they have been racing each other. The media constantly hypes rivalries and then feels disappointed when nothing develops between the rival drivers. Again, they have too much to lose by egregious payback – just ask Logano and Kenseth or Busch and Hornaday.

If NASCAR is to survive, it needs a business model which reflects its status as a niche sport, with far fewer races and far fewer teams. That has actually worked out quite well for Indy car. So I would say it really is too late to go back and it would be foolish to try.

bob

“”There’s no way there’s just one factor to the falling ratings””

There really is.. The racing is BORING!!!! BORING!!!! BORING!!!!.

String it out single file and take a nap..

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com

Frontstretch