NASCAR Race Weekend Central
(Photo: Nigel Kinrade Photography)

Holding a Pretty Wheel: Why the Number of Winners Matters

The end of Saturday night’s Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series race at Daytona International Speedway marks the halfway point in the 2018 season.  After 17 races of the 36-race schedule, we’ve seen just six different winners, the fewest in four decades.  Kevin Harvick and Kyle Busch have 10 of those wins between them, with five apiece. Martin Truex Jr. has three and Clint Bowyer a pair, leaving Joey Logano and Austin Dillon as the only other drivers to crack Victory Lane this year.

While it’s not the first time a driver has had a dominant season, it is unusual in that there are so few others to get a piece of the pie.  The question becomes whether the lack of diversity in the winner’s circle is good for NASCAR.

There are a couple different ways to look at it. On one side of the table, the drivers winning aren’t exactly unfamiliar to it, and they’re clearly the best in the game right now.  If fans want the best teams to win every week, they’re getting quite a display.

The last time there were so few winners through week 17 was 1978. Through the 17th race at Nashville Speedway, the winners fans saw were Cale Yarborough (five wins), Darrell Waltrip (four),  Benny Parsons (three), David Pearson (three) and Bobby Allison (two).

That list is even more stacked than this season’s in terms of accomplishment; every one of those drivers is in the Hall of Fame. Among this season’s winners, it’s safe to say Harvick and Busch are locks, and Truex has a shot as well.

There’s one notable name not on this season’s list: seven-time champion Jimmie Johnson. There was one in 1978 as well, then-six-time champion Richard Petty.  Petty went that entire season without a win, the first time that had happened since 1959.

The similarities between the two seasons are striking — and 1978 didn’t kill the sport.  In fact, many, if not most Americans had barely heard of NASCAR other than a clip here and there. At a time when the sport was growing, a handful of different winners was no hindrance.

But times have changed.  NASCAR has changed, and fans want instant gratification. Fans of anyone but the six winners this year aren’t getting any gratification at all.  Will they continue to watch if they feel their drivers don’t have a shot?

That’s a particularly tricky question for fans of Chevrolet drivers, because the manufacturer has just one Cup win this season, in the Daytona 500 with Dillon.  Since then, only Kyle Larson has been remotely competitive for the manufacturer, and there’s been little improvement.  Chevy flagship Hendrick Motorsports hasn’t won a race in nearly a. That’s not a good look, and while fans who root for manufacturers first are dwindling, will fans of Chevrolet or their teams keep watching if they have little hope of seeing a win?

The 1978 season saw just two more winners, Lennie Pond and Donnie Allison, who won just one race apiece on the 30-race schedule.

For the fans of the drivers with the lion’s share of wins, this season is pretty gratifying.  But for fans of others, it’s an exercise in frustration.  And let’s face it: NASCAR can’t afford to have fans turn away.

But the problem is, there’s really no way to fix it.  Gone are the days where NASCAR would tweak the rules for different car makes often.  Every time one model got a concession, another would be clamoring for one as well. This led to NASCAR tightening the rules, which hasn’t done what the sanctioning body hoped it would. In fact, it’s done the opposite in some cases. By giving teams few choices in their cars, it may actually take away from the competition.  If a driver isn’t comfortable with what’s mandated, there’s little chance for the team to make it better. Maybe next year, but fans don’t want to wait and see if next year will be better.

It may not be simply the number of winners that’s a problem; there have always been standouts, as that 1978 season shows loud and clear.  What might be a problem is the lack of ability for teams to work to find something better.  Teams can and do improve, and others fall off, but it seems there’s no ebb and flow in who’s on top. Some fans begin to see it as NASCAR playing favorites, and while there’s no reason for that to happen, perception is, to fans, reality.

The number of winners in NASCAR’s playoff era is an interesting conundrum; it’s possible that as many winless drivers will make the cut as those with wins, something NASCAR has wanted desperately to avoid.

The racing itself isn’t harmed by a few drivers winning every week, but the sport as a whole is in a precarious position overall these days.  It doesn’t necessarily need 15 winners to make an exciting season, but it needs the illusion that there could be.  And that’s decidedly missing.

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter
I agree to have my personal information transfered to AWeber ( more information )
A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

About Amy Henderson

Amy Henderson
Amy is a 15-year veteran writer and a five-time National Motorsports Press Association (NMPA) writing award winner, including first place awards for both columns and race coverage. Amy pens The Big 6 (Mondays) Frontstretch 5 (Wednesdays) and Holding A Pretty Wheel (monthly - Fridays). A New Hampshire native living in North Carolina, Amy’s work credits extend everywhere from driver Kenny Wallace’s website to Athlon Sports.

8 comments

  1. Avatar

    “Chevy flagship Hendrick Motorsports hasn’t won a race in nearly a. That’s”

    a what?

    • Avatar

      instead of “nearly a”, it should now read, “in over a” as in in over a year. last win was by jj at dover on 06/04/17.

  2. Avatar

    By tightening the rules, Nascar has made it impossible for any innovation or adaptability, coming dangerously close to an IROC situation. As you point out, it has made it nearly impossible for any but a few teams to gain any competitiveness. Having options is the only way to make room for more competitive teams.

    • Avatar

      Disagree. What “parity” has done is magnify the advantage that even a small change can make. Notice the rear window flex that SHR used this year. Thwy were dominant until other teams caught on, and obviously did a better job of it. And now we can wait for the next small breakthrough. Is it good for the sport? Probably doesn’t matter at this point.

  3. Avatar

    Fans of other sports may hate the winners, but they appreciate excellence. NASCAR fans live up to all their stereotypes of being toothless uneducated rednecks when they demand a new winner every week while failing to appreciate the great seasons Busch and Harvick are having. And Amy, who doesn’t attend or even watch the races is typical of that ignorant mindset.

    • Avatar

      Proof, Amy? You didn’t even see the action in Turns 1 and 2 on Sunday’s last lap. I guess you were too occupied watching for Matt DiBenedetto and your other beloved underdogs.

  4. Avatar

    I am against anything that dumbs down the sport and makes cars easier to drive. Amy is FOR anything that dumbs down the sport and makes cars easier to drive. Maybe she is a veteran of the short bus.

    Having said that, I do believe Chevy needs some help so that their good drivers have at least a chance to be competitive. When one car brand is as pitiful as the Camaro, it hurts the sport more than the fact that Busch and Harvick have dominated. And for once, I agree with salb, NASCAR should just throw out the IROC rulebook. I still think salb is a whiny crybaby, however.