Aside from the race Saturday night, one of the biggest stories in NASCAR recently is Jimmie Johnson running the Boston Marathon. As we know now, he did it in three hours, nine minutes and seven seconds. Note that Boston’s course is considered to be one of the more difficult marathons.
However, Johnson is not the first Cup driver to do this. Michael Waltrip ran the Boston Marathon a number of years ago but at a much slower pace.
Since he’s the only person who’s done this before, Waltrip went to do a one-on-one interview with Johnson.
Jimmie Johnson completed the Boston Marathon with a time of 3 hours, 9 minutes and 7 seconds.
Watch as he talks with Michael Waltrip about his motivations behind entering one of the most prestigious marathons in the world. pic.twitter.com/n3SqplHPgh
— FOX: NASCAR (@NASCARONFOX) April 16, 2019
Here, Johnson talks his preparations for the event, the outpouring of support that he’s received and more. According to Monday’s edition of The Dale Jr. Download, Johnson has run 1000 miles this year in preparation for the race.
I liked the piece, but I would have liked Waltrip to give more input on his own experience with the race. Remember, he’s the one that had done it before (as of the time this feature aired). He could have given advice to Johnson on various parts of the course and maybe informed the viewers on his own training regimen. He was in a rare position of authority and failed to take advantage of it to educate viewers to the best of his ability.
At the track, the big story concerned the eight drivers that failed pre-race inspection. Early on, there was a heavy focus on these drivers. I’m not really opposed to such a move since the majority of the action at that point surrounded those drivers. The penalty didn’t really affect the race for someone like Joey Gase all that much, but it definitely affected drivers like Johnson, Erik Jones and Aric Almirola negatively.
The first half of the race was really not all that exciting. Kyle Busch effectively dominated the first half of the race until he got busted for speeding on pit road. To a certain degree, FOX can, with its coverage, make a race look better than it is, or worse than it really is. Typically, the latter is true.
FOX made an error in showing the pictures of Richmond through the years. It showed a picture of Richmond from what I guess is the early 1990s and labeled it as being from 1978. 1978 (as Mike Joy noted) is 10 years before the track was reconfigured into the current three-quarters of a mile it is today.
With that said, FOX let the pit reporters call stops during the one round of green flag pit stops Saturday night. That doesn’t sound like much, but it hasn’t been the case in recent weeks. The booth has effectively called rounds of green-flag pit stops as of late. That setup has sounded odd and unusually quiet, so it was a nice change of pace.
In the last 120 laps or so, things really started to heat up at the front of the field. Despite a 148-lap green-flag run to end the race, there wound up being some different action. Late in the race, FOX showed a lot of that action toward the front.
Even though the race seemed pretty quick to me (just a little over three hours), it was all but right up against the end of the time slot by the time the checkered flag flew. As a result, there was only really time for interviews with the top three finishers (Martin Truex Jr., Joey Logano and Clint Bowyer), along with a check of the points before FOX left Richmond.
Compared to recent races, I found FOX’s coverage Saturday night to be a little low-key. Coverage of on-track action varied. Early on, it was decent, but storyline-based. In that case, it was largely based around those who had to come from the rear. Then, there was a lull from about lap 75 to 280 before it picked up again. Tire wear was a big topic, yet we still never got to see what that wear looked like. It makes me wonder if that’s a conscious decision by FOX, something it overlooked or if the teams won’t let them put the tires on camera. These days, I’m willing to believe that it could be the third option, but I’m not sure.
My advice here would be to open up the coverage a little more. Be more descriptive of who’s moving up and who’s moving back, not just those that fit into a storyline chosen hours (or even days) before the race. Flexibility is key. Show the viewers as much on-track action as you can. Dover could be a place to try out this strategy.
Talladega in two weeks is probably the exception to the aforementioned rule since most everyone will be running together.
Easter weekend is the thinnest race weekend of the season. There is basically nothing happening this weekend. That said, I still have more content for you. Last fall, I interviewed Kelli Stavast as part of an inside piece on NBC Sports’ NASCAR coverage. We’ll have a feature based on that interview.
For the Critic’s Annex, we’ll take a look at Friday night’s ToyotaCare 250. I did see part of the repeat of the race Friday night (there was a midnight replay that I caught some of while eating dinner at my hotel). For you Ryan Sieg fans (and I know there are a number of you), you should be satisfied. Plus, you have Chad Knaus in the booth. That was very interesting.
If you have a gripe with me, or just want to say something about my critique, feel free to post in the comments below. Even though I can’t always respond, I do read your comments. Also, if you want to “like” me on Facebook or follow me on Twitter, please click on the appropriate icons. If you would like to contact either of NASCAR’s media partners, click on either of the links below.
As always, if you choose to contact a network by email, do so in a courteous manner. Network representatives are far more likely to respond to emails that ask questions politely rather than emails full of rants and vitriol.